Exploring how learning by ‘talking and doing’ supports flourishing in S.T.E.M for elementary students

References

• Anderman, E. M., & Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64(2), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064002287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baines, E., Blatchford, P., & Chowne, A. (2007). Improving the effectiveness of collaborative group work in primary schools: Effects on science attainment. British Educational Research Journal, 33(5), 663–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701582231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, D. (2017). Do not use averages with Likert scale data. Retrieved June 3, 2023, from https://bookdown.org/Rmadillo/likert/
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. (2006). How a detracked mathematics approach promoted respect, responsibility, and high achievement. Theory into Practice, 45(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4501_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets. Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages, and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass/Wile.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside School. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 110(3), 608–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810811000302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighouse, H. (2006). On Education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education challenges and opportunities. National STEM Teachers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Capar, G., & Tarim, K. (2015). Efficacy of the cooperative learning method on mathematics achievement and attitude: A meta-analysis research. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 553–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1996). Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1086/461846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherkowski, S., & Walker, K. (2016). Purpose, passion and play. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(4), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10-2014-0124
   Google Scholar
• Cherkowski, S., Kutsyuruba, B., & Walker, K. (2020). Positive leadership: Animating purpose, presence, passion and play for flourishing in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(4), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-04-2019-0076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherkowski, S., & Walker, K. (2014). Flourishing communities: Re-storying educational leadership using a positive research lens. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 17(2), 200–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2013.827240
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. E., Kirschner, P. A., & Sweller, J. (2012). Putting students on the path to learning: The case for fully guided instruction. American Educator, 36(1), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Czíkszentmihályi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper- Perennial. “Definitions,” trans. D. S. Hutchinson, in Plato, Complete Works, ed. John M. Cooper (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997), 1680.
   Google Scholar
• Denman, D. C., Baldwin, A. S., Betts, A. C., McQueen, A., & Tiro, J. A. (2018). Reducing “I don’t know” responses and missing survey data: Implications for measurement. Medical Decision Making, 38(6), 673–682. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X18785159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, R. G., & King, C. (1998). Missing data in Likert ratings: A comparison of replacement methods. The Journal of General Psychology, 125(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309809595542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M. (2020). Inquiry-based science education. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, J., & Matell, M. S. (1971). Three-point Likert scales are good enough. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(4), 495–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377100800414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Roseth, C. (2010). Cooperative learning in middle schools: Interrelationship of relationships and achievement. Middle Grades Research Journal, 5(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin, G. A., Epstein, Y. M., Schorr, R. Y., & Warner, L. B. (2011). Beliefs and engagement structures: Behind the affective dimension of mathematical learning. ZDM, 43(4), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0348-z
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, C., & Bokhorst-Heng, W. (forthcoming). Diversity and multiculturalism in Canadian schools: Fostering human flourishing. Canadian Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 141–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9012-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S. K. (2020). After the M in STEM: Towards multispecies’ flourishing. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(2), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00089-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S. K., & Bowen, M. (2022). Why multispecies flourishing? Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.515
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S. K., Karrow, D., & Bowen, M. (2021). Abeng for multispecies’ flourishing. In D. Kollosche (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eleventh International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (Vol. 1, pp.184–188). Tredition.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S., LaFrance, S., & Tran, H. T. T. (2022). After plantations’ precarities: curating math-thematic curriculum plots in initial teacher education for multispecies’ flourishing and a freedom-yet-to-come. Research in Mathematics Education, 24(2), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2022.2090421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmons, R. (2022). Mixed methods. Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, J. (2013). Science stories: Science methods for elementary and middle school teachers. Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Konting, M., Norfaryanti, K., & Man, N. (2009). Quality assurance in higher education institutions: exist survey among Universiti Putra Malaysia graduating students. International Education Studies, 2(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v2n1p25
   Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. (2006). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–334). Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, K. (2017). Recent work on flourishing as the aim of education: A critical review. British Journal of Educational Studies, 65(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2016.1182115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linneberg, M. S., & Korsgaard, S. (2019). Coding qualitative data: A synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-12-2018-0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín‐Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales‐Palacios, F. J., & Vílchez‐González, J. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education, 103(4), 799–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellor, D., & Moore, K. A. (2014). The use of Likert scales with children. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(3), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, J., Jansen, A., & Goldin, G. A. (2017). The complexities of mathematical engagement: Motivation, affect, and social interactions. Compendium for research in mathematics education, 667–699.
   Google Scholar
• Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Pauw, J. B., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525
   Google Scholar
• Sanda, M.-A. (2022). Impact of digitised ‘teaching-learning’ virtual platforms on tertiary students’ learning objectives and teaching outcomes. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2022.2161114
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and wellbeing. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Struyf, A., De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Students’ engagement in different STEM learning environments: Integrated STEM education as promising practice? International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 1387–1407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1607983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, F. (2020). Mathematics for human flourishing. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, T. T., Khan, S. K., & LaFrance, S. (2020). Mathematics for multispecies’ flourishing: Make kin with Vietnamese Bánh Chưng. Journal of the Philosophy of Mathematics Education, 36, 49pp.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022, September 8). Employment in STEM occupations. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/stem-employment.htm
   Google Scholar
• Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2014). Realistic mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin, M. J., & Roseth, C. J. (2019). Effects of cooperative learning on peer relations, empathy, and bullying in middle school. Aggressive Behavior, 45(6), 643–651. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, E. A., Hay, J. L., Orom, H., Kiviniemi, M. T., & Drake, B. F. (2013). “Don’t know” responses to risk perception measures: implications for underserved populations. Medical Decision Making, 33(2), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X12464435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, E., Wang, W., & Wang, Q. (2023). The effectiveness of collaborative problem solving in promoting students’ critical thinking: A meta-analysis based on empirical literature. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01508-1
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., Cao, Y., Chan, M. C. E., & Wan, M. E. V. (2022). A comparison of meaning negotiation during collaborative problem solving in mathematics between students in China and Australia. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 54(2), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01335-9
   Google Scholar