Analysis of conceptual understanding of solutions and titration among Rwandan secondary school students

References

• Adadan, E. (2013). Using multiple representations to promote grade 11 students’ scientific understanding of the particle theory of matter. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1079–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9299-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajayi, V. O., & Ogbeba, J. (2017). Effects of hands-on activity-based and demonstration methods on senior secondary students’ achievement in physical chemistry. Journal of Educational Studies, 17(1).
   Google Scholar
• Barke, H. D., Hazari, A., & Yitbarek, S. (2009). Misconceptions in chemistry: Addressing perceptions in chemical education. In Misconceptions in Chemistry: Addressing Perceptions in Chemical Education. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70989-3
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, J., & Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Education, 85(4), 426–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, W. G. (1924). The advantages of laboratory work in the study of elementary chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 1(11), 205. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed001p205
   Google Scholar
• Brandriet, A. R., & Bretz, S. L. (2014). The development of the redox concept inventory as a measure of students’ symbolic and particulate redox understandings and confidence. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(8), 1132–1144. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500051n
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretz, S. L. (2019). Evidence for the importance of laboratory courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(2), 193–195. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bwalya, A., Rutegwa, M., Tukahabwa, D., & Mapulanga, T. (2023). Enhancing pre-service biology teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge through a TPACK-based technology integration course. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(6), 956–973. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetin-Dindar, A., & Geban, O. (2017). Conceptual understanding of acids and bases concepts and motivation to learn chemistry. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1039422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S.-Y., & Liu, S.-Y. (2020). Using augmented reality to experiment with elements in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 111(May), 106418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106418
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1986). Experience and education. The Educational Forum, 50(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131728609335764
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688.. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000076652
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw Hill LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel, D. (2015). Enhancing the conceptual understanding of science. Educational Horizons, 81(2), 70–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hensiek, S., Dekorver, B. K., Harwood, C. J., Fish, J., O’Shea, K., & Towns, M. (2016). Improving and Assessing Student Hands-On Laboratory Skills through Digital Badging. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(11), 1847–1854. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A. (2004). The laboratory in chemistry education: Thirty years of experience with developments, implementation, and research. Chemistry Education, Research and Practice, 5(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1039/B4RP90027H
   Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indriastuti, L. H., & Priyantini, W. (2013). Kesiapan laboratorium biologi dalam menunjang kegiatan praktikum SMA Negeri di kabupaten Brebes. Journal of Biology Education, 2(2), 109–115. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujbe/article/view/3096
   Google Scholar
• Jaber, L. Z., & BouJaoude, S. (2012). A macro–micro–symbolic teaching to promote relational understanding of chemical reactions. International Journal of Science Education, 34(7), 973–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.569959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, A. (1991). Why is chemistry difficult to learn? things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x
   Google Scholar
• Kala, N., Yaman, F., & Ayas, A. (2013). The effectiveness of predict-observe-explain technique in probing students’understanding about acid-base chemistry: A case for the concepts of pH, pOH, and strength. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 555–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9354-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapici, H. O., Akcay, H., & de Jong, T. (2019). Using hands-on and virtual laboratories alone or together―which works better for acquiring knowledge and skills? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(3), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9762-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennepohl, D. (2021). Laboratory activities to support online chemistry courses: A literature review. Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 99(11), 851–859. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjc-2020-0506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili, F. (2001). Chemistry laboratory innovations using universal lab interface (ULI). Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, 3, 10–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2001.964021
   Google Scholar
• Logar, A., & Savec, V. F. (2011). Students’ hands-on experimental work vs lecture demonstration in teaching elementary school chemistry. Acta Chimica Slovenica, 58(4), 866–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, S., Bi, H., & Liu, X. (2018). The effects of explanation-driven inquiry on students’ conceptual understanding of redox. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1857–1873. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1513670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mc Donnell, C., O’Connor, C., & Seery, M. K. (2007). Developing practical chemistry skills by means of student-driven problem based learning mini-projects. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90026G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClary, L. M., & Bretz, S. L. (2012). Development and assessment of a diagnostic tool to identify organic chemistry students’ alternative conceptions related to acid strength. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2317–2341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.684433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarvey, D. J. (2003). Experimenting with undergraduate practicals. New Directions in the Teaching of Natural Sciences, 3(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.11120/ndir.2003.00010003
   Google Scholar
• McKee, E., Williamson, V. M., & Ruebush, L. E. (2007). Effects of a demonstration laboratory on student learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(5), 395–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9064-4
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, L. S., Schmidt, S., Nozawa, F., Panee, D., & Kisler, M. (2003). Using demonstrations to promote student comprehension in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(4), 431–435. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed080p431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musengimana, J., Kampire, E., & Ntawiha, P. (2022). Effect of task-based learning on students’ understanding of chemical reactions among selected Rwandan lower secondary school students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(1), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutwarasibo, F. (2013). Promoting university students’ collaborative learning through instructor-guided writing groups. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v2n3p1
   Google Scholar
• Ndihokubwayo, K., Uwamahoro, J., & Ndayambaje, I. (2020). Effectiveness of PhET simulations and YouTube videos to improve the learning of optics in Rwandan secondary schools. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 24(2), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2020.1818042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Österlund, L. L., Berg, A., & Ekborg, M. (2010). Redox models in chemistry textbooks for the upper secondary school: Friend or foe? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(3), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1039/C005467B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özmen, H., DemİrcİoĞlu, G., & Coll, R. K. (2009). A comparative study of the effects of a concept mapping enhanced laboratory experience on Turkish high school students’ understanding of acid-base chemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9087-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadhani, M. H., & Titisari, P. W. (2019). Laboratory hands-on activity: A case study in senior high school of Pekanbaru-Indonesia. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(2), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i2.8457
   Google Scholar
• Ratmini, W. S. (2017). The implementation of chemistry practicum at SMA laboratorium undiksha singaraja in the school year 2016/2017. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(2), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v6i2.11881
   Google Scholar
• Reese, H. W. (2011). The learning-by-doing principle. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 17(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100597
   Google Scholar
• Sansom, R., & Walker, J. P. (2020). Investing in laboratory courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(1), 308–309. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibomana, A., Karegeya, C., & Sentongo, J. (2021). Effect of cooperative learning on chemistry students’ achievement in Rwandan day-upper secondary schools. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 2079–2088. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.4.2079
   Google Scholar
• Stull, A. T., Gainer, M. J., & Hegarty, M. (2017). Learning by enacting : The role of embodiment in chemistry education. Learning and Instruction, 55, 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supatmi, S., Setiawan, A., Rahmawati, Y., Education, C., Program, S., & Jakarta, U. N. (2019). Students’ misconceptions of acid-base titration assessments using a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic test. African Journal of Chemical Education, 9(January), 18–37.
   Google Scholar
• Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “triplet. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903386435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towns, M., Harwood, C. J., Robertshaw, M. B., Fish, J., & O’Shea, K. (2015). The Digital Pipetting Badge: A Method to Improve Student Hands-On Laboratory Skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(12), 2038–2044. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US NRC. (2005). America’s lab report: Investigations in high school science. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Hodges, G., & Lee, J. (2022). Connecting macroscopic, molecular, and symbolic representations with immersive technologies in high school chemistry: The case of redox reactions. Education Sciences, 12(7), 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar