308
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Information & Communications Technology in Education

At-risk and online: parent perceptions of at-risk learner’s supports in a fully online school

Article: 2317110 | Received 25 Aug 2023, Accepted 31 Jan 2024, Published online: 27 Feb 2024

References

  • Adler-Greene, L. (2019). Every student succeeds act: Are schools making sure every student succeeds? Touro Law Review, 35(1), 11–23. https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview/vol35/iss1/4/
  • Adams, S. (2020). A Study of At-Risk High School Students Enrolled in a Full-Time Online Learning Environment [Doctoral dissertation]. City University of Seattle.
  • Ahn, J., & McEachin, A. (2017). Student enrollment patterns and achievement in Ohio’s online charter schools. Educational Researcher, 46(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17692999
  • Anderson, S., & Leventhal, T. (2017). Residential mobility and adolescent achievement and behavior: Understanding timing and extent of mobility. Journal of Research on Adolescence: The Official Journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 27(2), 328–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12288
  • Archambault, L., Diamond, D., Brown, R., Cavanaugh, C., Coffey, M., Foures-Aalbu, D., Richardson, J., & Zygouris, V. (2010). Research committee issues brief: An exploration of at-risk learners and online education. International Association for K–12 Online Learning.
  • Aud, S., Fox, M., & KewalRamani, A. (2010). Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups. (NCES 2010-015). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Barbour, M. K., & MulCahy, D. (2009). Student performance in virtual schooling: Looking beyond the numbers. ERS Spectrum, 27(1), 23–30.
  • Barbour, M. K., Hasler Waters, L., & Hunt, J. (2011). Online and blended learning: Case studies from K-12 schools around the world. International Association for K-12 On-line Learning.
  • Barnett, K. K. (2016). The at-risk student’s journey with online course credit: Looking at perceptions of care. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(4), 367–398. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1148596.pdf
  • Barrat, V., & Berliner, B. (2013). The invisible achievement gap: Education outcomes of students in foster care in California’s public schools. WestEd. https://www.wested.org/resources/theinvisible-achievement-gap-education-outcomes-of-students-infoster-care-in-californias-public-schools-part-1/
  • Barrows, S., Cheng, A., Peterson, P. E., & West, M. R. (2019). Do charters pose a threat to private schools? Evidence from nationally representative surveys of US parents. Journal of School Choice, 13(1), 10–32.
  • Beasley, J. G., & Beck, D. E. (2017). Defining differentiation in cyber schools: What online teachers say. TechTrends, 61(6), 550–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0189-x
  • Beck, D. (2022). Online teaching and COVID. Submitted to TechTrends.
  • Beck, D., & Beasley, J. (2021). Identifying the differentiation practices of virtual school teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 2191–2205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10332-y
  • Beck, D. E., Maranto, R., & Lo, W.-J. (2013). Determinants of student and parent satisfaction at a cyber charter school. The Journal of Educational Research, 107(3), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.807494
  • Beck, D., Egalite, A., & Maranto, R. (2014). Why they choose and how it goes: Comparing special education and general education cyber student perceptions. Computers & Education, 76, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.011
  • Borup, J., & Stimson, R. (2019). Online teachers’ and on-site facilitators’ shared responsibilities at a supplemental virtual secondary school. American Journal of Distance Education, 33(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1554984
  • Borup, J., Stevens, M. A., & Hasler-Waters, L. (2015). Parent and student perceptions of parent engagement at a cyber charter high school. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 19(5), 69–91.
  • Beken, J. A., Williams, J., Combs, J. P., & Slate, J. R. (2009). At-risk students at traditional and academic alternative school settings: Differences in math and English performance indicators. Florida Journal of Educational Administration & Policy, 3(1), 49–61. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ903005.pdf
  • Borup, J., Graham, C. R., West, R. E., Archambault, L., & Spring, K. J. (2020). Academic communities of engagement: An expansive lens for examining support structures in blended and online learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 807–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09744-x
  • Borup, J., Chambers, C., & Stimson, R. (2019). Online teacher and on-site facilitator perceptions of parental engagement at supplemental virtual high school. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.4237
  • Borup, J., & Kennedy, K. (2017). The case for K–12 online learning. In R. A. Fox & N. K. Buchanan (Eds.), School choice: An international sourcebook for practitioners, researchers, policy-makers and journalists (pp. 403–420). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119082361.ch28
  • Borup, J. (2016). Teacher perceptions of parental engagement at a cyber high school. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(2), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.114656
  • Brown, M. H., Lenares-Solomon, D., & Deaner, R. G. (2019). Every student succeeds act: A call to action for school counselors. Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy, 6(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/2326716X.2018.1557574
  • Buckley, J., & Schneider, M. (2009). Charter schools: Hope or hype?. Princeton University Press.
  • Cavanaugh, C., Repetto, J., Wayer, N., & Spitler, C. (2013). Online learning for students with disabilities: A framework for success. Journal of Special Education Technology, 28(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341302800101
  • Cho, V., & Littenberg-Tobias, J. (2016). Digital devices and teaching the whole student: Developing and validating an instrument to measure educators’ attitudes and beliefs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 643–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9441-x
  • Courtney, M. E., Roderick, M., Smithgall, C., Gladden, R. M., & Nagaoka, J. (2004). The educational status of foster children. Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.
  • Cowen, J. M. (2017). Who are the homeless? Student mobility and achievement in Michigan 2010–2013. Educational Researcher, 46(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17694165
  • Cutuli, J. J., Desjardins, C. D., Herbers, J. E., Long, J. D., Heistad, D., Chan, C.-K., Hinz, E., & Masten, A. S. (2013). Academic achievement trajectories of homeless and highly mobile students: Resilience in the context of chronic and acute risk. Child Development, 84(3), 841–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12013
  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Hyler, M. E. (2020). Preparing educators for the time of COVID… and beyond. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1816961
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Zielezinski, M. B., & Goldman, S. (2014). Using technology to support at-risk students’ learning. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/scope-pub-usingtechnology-report.pdf
  • Darling-Aduana, J. (2019). Students enrolled in online courses. AERA Open, 5(4), 233285841988773.https://doi.org/10.1177/2F2332858419887736
  • de la Varre, C., Irvin, M. J., Jordan, A. W., Hannum, W. H., & Farmer, T. W. (2014). Reasons for student dropout in an online course in a rural K-12 setting. Distance Education, 35(3), 324–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.955259
  • Doubet, K. J. (2007). Teacher fidelity and student response to a model of differentiation as implemented in one high school (Order No. 3283287). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (304806872). Retrieved from http://0-search.proquest.com.library.uark.edu/docview/304806872?accountid=8361
  • Drysdale, J. S., Graham, C. R., & Borup, J. (2014). An online high school “shepherding” program: Teacher roles and experiences mentoring online students. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 22(1), 9–32.
  • Duffield, S. K. (2018). Alternative middle school models: An exploratory study. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 62(2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2017.1376306
  • Dunn, C., Chambers, D., & Rabren, K. (2006). Variables afecting students’ decision to drop out of school. Remedial and Special Education, 25(5), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250050501
  • Freidhoff, J. R. (2015). Michigan’s K–12 virtual learning effectiveness report 2013-2014. Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute.
  • Frymier, J., & Gansneder, B. (1989). The Phi Delta Kappa study of students at risk. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 142–146.
  • Gardner, D. P., Larsen, Y. W., Baker, W., Campbell, A., Crosby, E. A., Foster, C. A., Francis, N. C., Giamatti, A. B., Gordon, S., Haderlein, A. V., Holton, G., Kirk, A. Y., Marston, M. S., Quie, A. H., Sanchez, F. D., Seaborg, G. T., Sommer, J., & Wallace, R. (1983). A Nation at Risk: The imperative for education reform. National Commission on Excellence in Education, https://edreform.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/A_Nation_At_Risk_1983.pdf
  • Garrison, R. (2009). Implications of online learning for the conceptual development and practice of distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 93–104.
  • Gill, B., Walsh, L., Wulsin, C. S., Matulewicz, H., Severn, V., Grau, E., … Kerwin, T. (2015). Inside online charter schools. Walton Family Foundation and Mathematica Policy Research. Retrieved February 10, 2020, from http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/∼/media/publications/pdfs/education/inside_online_charter_schools.pdf.
  • Greene, J. P., & Paul, J. D. (2022a). Using parental satisfaction to evaluate virtual charter schools. https://www.efinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/EFI-WP_Satisfaction_GreenePaul2.pdf
  • Greene, J. P., & Paul, J. D. (2022b). Investigating the relationship between negative selection into online schooling and achievement growth. https://www.efinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/EFI-WP_Paul_Greene_OnlineEnrollment.pdf
  • Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework. Online Learning, 23(2), 145–178. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481
  • Harms, C. M., Niederhauser, D. S., Davis, N. E., Roblyer, M. D., & Gilbert, S. B. (2006). Educating educators for virtual schooling: Communicating roles and responsibilities. The Electronic Journal of Communication, 16(1 & 2), 17–24.
  • Hart, C. M. D., Berger, D., Jacob, B., Loeb, S., & Hill, M. (2019). Online learning, offline outcomes: Online course taking and high school student performance. AERA Open, 5(1), 233285841983285. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419832852
  • Hasler Waters, L., & Leong, P. (2014). Who is teaching? New roles for teachers and parents in cyber charter schools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(1), 33–56.
  • Heinrich, C. J., Darling-Aduana, J., Good, A., & Cheng, H. (2019). A look inside online educational settings in high school: Promise and pitfalls for improving educational opportunities and outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2147–2188. https://doi.org/10.3102/2F0002831219838776
  • Heissel, J. (2016). The relative benefits of live versus online delivery: Evidence from virtual algebra 1 in North Carolina. Economics of Education Review, 53, 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.05.001
  • Hendrix, N., & Degner, K. (2016). Supporting online AP students: The rural facilitator and considerations for training. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1198194
  • Hillman, D. C., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649409526853
  • Hockett, J. A. (2010). The influence of lesson study on how teachers plan for, implement, and understand differentiated instruction (Order No. 3446406). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (858070962). Retrieved from http://0-search.proquest.com.library.uark.edu/docview/858070962?accountid=836.
  • Hollis, R. B., & Was, C. A. (2016). Mind wandering, control failures, and social media distractions in online learning. Learning and Instruction, 42, 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.007
  • Hoover‐Dempsey, K. V., Walker, J. M. T., Sandler, H. M., Whetsel, D., Green, C. L., Wilkins, A. S., & Closson, K. (2005). Why do parents become involved? Research fndings and implications. The Elementary School Journal, 106(2), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1086/499194
  • Hope, S. (2017). ESSA research brief. Metropolitan Educational Research Consortium.
  • Huh, Y., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2018). Online K–12 teachers’ perceptions and practices of supporting self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(8), 1129–1153. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0735633117699231
  • Ingersoll, G. M., Scamman, J. P., & Eckerling, W. D. (1989). Geographic mobility and student achievement in an urban setting. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011002143
  • International Association for K-12 Online Learning (iNACOL). (2011). National standards for quality online courses. Vienna, VA. Retrieved http://www.inacol.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/iNACOL_TeachingStandardsv2.pdf
  • Jacob, B., Berger, D., Hart, C., & Loeb, S. (2016). Can technology help promote equality of educational opportunities? RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(5), 242–271. https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2016.2.5.12
  • Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Choosing between online and face-to-face courses: Community college student voices. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(1), 27–38.https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2014.867697
  • Kingsbury, I. (2021). Online learning: How do brick and mortar schools stack up to virtual schools? Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6567–6588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10450-1
  • Kingsbury, I., Beck, D., & Bradley-Dorsey, M. (2022). What kind of students attend Cyber schools? Pandemic enrollment as evidence of negative selection. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.901319
  • Klein, C. (2006). Virtual charter schools and home schooling. Cambria Press.
  • Kumi-Yeboah, A., Dogbey, J., & Yuan, G. (2017). Exploring factors that promote online learning experiences and academic self-concept of minority high school students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1365669
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986(30), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427
  • Lueken, M., Ritter, G., & Beck, D. (2015). Value-added in a virtual learning environment: An evaluation of a virtual charter school. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(3), 305–335.
  • Martin, F., & Borup, J. (2022). Online learner engagement: Conceptual definitions, research themes, and supportive practices. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2089147
  • McClendon, C., Massey Neugebauer, R., & King, A, Grand Canyon University. (2017). Grit, growth mindset, and deliberate practice in online learning. Journal of Instructional Research, 6(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.9743/JIR.2017.2
  • McFarland, J., Stark, P., & Cui, J. (2016). Trends in High School Dropout and Completion Rates in the United States: 2013. (NCES 2016-117). U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved May 8, 2017 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.
  • Mehana, M., & Reynolds, A. J. (2004). School mobility and achievement: A meta-analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 26(1), 93–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2003.11.004
  • Michinov, N., Brunot, S., Bohec, O. L., Juhel, J., & Delaval, M. (2011). Procrastination, participation, and performance in online learning environments. Computers & Education, 56(1), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.025
  • Molnar, A., Miron, G., Elgeberi, N., Barbour, M. K., Huerta, L., Shafer, S. R., & Rice, J. K. (2019). Virtual Schools in the US 2019. National Education Policy Center.
  • Miron, G., & Gulosino, C. (2016). Virtual schools report 2016: Directory and performance review. National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/virtual-schools-annual-2013
  • Miron, G., Huerta, L., Cuban, L., Horvitz, B., Gulosino, C., Rice, J. K., & Shafer, S. R. (2013). Virtual Schools in the U.S. 2013: Politics, performance, policy, and research evidence (A. Molnar, Ed.). National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/virtual-schools-annual-2013
  • Rice, J. K., Huerta, L., Shafer, S. R., Barbour, M. K., Miron, G., Gulosino, C., & Horvitz, B. (2014). Virtual schools in the U.S. 2014: Politics, performance, policy, and research evidence (A. Molnar, Ed.). National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/virtual-schools-annual-2014
  • Huerta, L., Shafer, S. R., Barbour, M. K., Miron, G., & Gulosino, C. (2015). Virtual schools in the U.S. 2015: Politics, performance, policy, and research evidence(A. Molnar, Ed.). National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/virtual-schools-annual-2015
  • Molnar, A., Miron, G., Gulosino, C., Shank, C., Davidson, C., Barbour, M. K., Huerta, L., Shafter, S. R., Rice, J. K., & Nitkin, D. (2017). Virtual schools in the U.S. 2017. National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/virtual-schools-annual-2017
  • Morgan, H. (2015). Online instruction and virtual schools for middle and high school students: Twenty-first-century fads or progressive teaching methods for today’s pupils. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 88(2), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2015.1007909
  • National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, 50-State Campaign for Achievement Now, & National Association of Charter School Authorizers. (2016). A call to action to improve the quality of full-time virtual charter public schools. Authors. http://www.publiccharters.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/06/Virtuals-FINAL-06202016-1.pdf
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). The Condition of Education 2016 (NCES 2016-144), Annual Earnings of Young Adults. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cba.asp
  • National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. (2005). Facts from NLTS2: High school completion by students with disabilities. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved February 21, 2014, from www.nlts2.org/fact_sheet_2005_11.pdf
  • Oliver, K., & Kellogg, S. (2015). Credit recovery in a virtual school: Affordances of online learning for the at-risk student. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(2), 191–218. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1148607.pdf
  • Oreopoulos, P., Brown, R. S., & Lavecchia, A. M. (2017). Pathways to education: An integrated approach to helping at-risk high school students. Journal of Political Economy, 125(4), 947–984. https://doi.org/10.3386/w20430
  • Oviatt, D. R., Graham, C. R., Davies, R. S., & Borup, J. (2018). Online student use of a proximate community of engagement in an independent study program. Online Learning, 22(1), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1153
  • Paudel, P. (2020). Online education: Benefits, challenges and strategies during and after COVID-19 in higher education. International Journal on Studies in Education, 3(2), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.32
  • Paul, J. D., & Wolf, P. J. (2020). Moving on Up? A Virtual School, Student Mobility, and Achievement. EdWorkingPaper No. 20-309. Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Powell, A., Roberts, V., & Patrick, S. (2015). Using online learning for credit recovery: Getting back on track to graduation. Promising practices in blended and online learning series. International Association for K–12 Online Learning.
  • Rapp, K. E., Eckes, S. E., & Plurker, J. A. (2006). Cyber charter schools in Indiana: Policy implications of the current statutory language. Education Policy Brief, 4(3), 1–4. http://ceep.indiana.edu/projects/PDF/PB_V4N3_Winter_2006_CyberCharter.pdf
  • Repetto, J. B., Spitler, C. J., & Cox, P. R. (2018). Research on at-risk learners in K-12 online learning. In Handbook of research on K-12 online and blending learning (pp. 107–134). ETC Press.
  • Repetto, J., Cavanaugh, C., Wayer, N., & Liu, F. (2010). Virtual high schools: Improving outcomes for students with disabilities. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 11(2), 91–104.
  • Ripamonti, E. (2017). Risk factors for dropping out of high school: A review of contemporary, international empirical research. Adolescent Research Review, 3(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-017-0075-y
  • Rhim, L., & Kowal, J. (2008). Demystifying Special Education in Virtual Charter Schools. Special Education Technical Assistance for Charter Schools Project.
  • Roksa, J., & Kinsley, P. (2018). The role of family support in facilitating academic success of lowincome students. Research in Higher Education, 60(4), 415–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9517-z
  • Rose, R. M., & Blomeyer, R. L. (2007). Access and equity in online classes and virtual schools. North American Council for Online Learning. International Association for K–12 Online (iNACOL). Available online at http://www.nacol.org/docs/NACOL_EquityAccess.pdf
  • Rumberger, R. W., & Larson, K. A. (1998). Student mobility and the increased risk of high school dropout. American Journal of Education, 107(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1086/444201
  • Shore, R., & Shore, B. (2009). Reducing the high school dropout rate. Annie E. Casey Foundation.
  • Statistic Brain. (2017). High School Dropout Statistics. http://www.statisticbrain.com/highschool-dropout-statistics/
  • Stewart, T., & Wolf, P. J. (2014). What major challenges did families experience using private school vouchers?. In The school choice journey (pp. 67–88). School Vouchers and the Empowerment of Urban Families.
  • Sublett, C., & Chang, Y. (2019). Logging in to press on: An examination of high school dropout and completion among students with disabilities in online courses. Journal of Special Education Technology, 34(2), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643418795841
  • Symeonides, R., & Childs, C. (2015). The personal experience of online learning: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 539–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.015
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2005). An educator’s guide to differentiating instruction. Houghton Mifflin.
  • U.S. Census Bureau Current Population Survey. (2022). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cps.html
  • Viano, S. L. (2018). At-risk high school students recovering course credits online: What we know and need to know. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2018.1412554
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, Ed.). Harvard University Press.
  • Watson, J., & Germin, B. (2008). Promising practices in online learning: Using online learning for at-risk students and credit recovery. International Association for K–12 Online Learning.
  • Watson, J. F., Gemin, B., & Ryan, J. (2008). Keeping pace with k–12 online learning: A review of state-level policy and practice. Evergreen Consulting Associates. http://www.kpk12.com/
  • Webber, K. C. (2018). A qualitative study of school social workers’ roles and challenges in dropout prevention. Children & Schools, 40(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdy003
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
  • Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2007). Predictors for student success in an online course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 71–83.
  • Zinskie, C. D., & Rea, D. (2016). The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): What it means for educators of students at risk. National Youth-At-Risk Journal, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.20429/nyarj.2016.020101
  • Zvoch, K. (2006). Freshmen year dropouts: Interactions between student and school characteristics and student dropout status. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 11(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327671espr1101_6