373
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Information & Communications Technology in Education

Perspectives on the use of virtual tools among university teachers in the context of an emerging economy

, , ORCID Icon, &
Article: 2317249 | Received 26 Jul 2023, Accepted 06 Feb 2024, Published online: 03 Mar 2024

References

  • Addimando, L. (2022). Distance learning in pandemic age: Lessons from a (no longer) emergency. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 16302. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316302
  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Springer.
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076477
  • Al-Karaki, J. N., Ababneh, N., Hamid, Y., & Gawanmeh, A. (2021). Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education during COVID-19 global crisis: UAE educators’ perspectives. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3), ep311. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10945
  • Arif, F. K. M., Affendi, F. R., Noah, J. B., & Yunus, M. M. (2020). Innovative trends and practices in ESL for education 4.0 among higher learning institutions. International Journal of Science and Technology Research, 9, 4027–4030.
  • Arroba, M. (2023). Educación continua [Continuing education]. https://arrobamedellin.edu.co/
  • Aslan, A., & Zhu, C. (2017). Investigating variables predicting Turkish pre‐service teachers’ integration of ICT into teaching practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 552–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12437
  • Bait-Suwailam, M., Jervase, J., Al-Lawati, H., & Nadir, Z. (2022). An active learning computer-based teaching tool for enhancing students’ learning and visualization skills in electromagnetics. International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, 69 (1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.24425/ijet.2023.144331
  • Baltaci-Goktalay, S., & Ozdilek, Z. (2010). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions about web 2.0 technologies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4737–4741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.760
  • Bansa, Y. A., & Asrini. (2020). The use of ICT in teaching: Lecturers’ perceptions, obstacles, and expectations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1464(1), 012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1464/1/012037
  • Basak, S. K., Wotto, M., & Bélanger, P. (2018). M-learning and D-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(4), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018785180
  • Bedolla, J. S., D’Antonio, G., & Chiabert, P. (2017). A novel approach for teaching IT tools within learning factories. Procedia Manufacturing, 9, 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.049
  • Blau, I., Shamir-Inbal, T., & Avdiel, O. (2020). How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students? The Internet and Higher Education, 45, 100722.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722
  • Cadena-Vela, S., Ortiz, J., Torres, G., & Mejía-Madrid, G. (2018). Innovation in the university: Virtual educational platform. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, Association for Computing Machinery (pp. 799–805).
  • Chavoshi, A., & Hamidi, H. (2019). Social, individual, technological and pedagogical factors influencing mobile learning acceptance in higher education: A case from Iran. Telematics and Informatics, 38, 133–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.09.007
  • Chiu, J. L., DeJaegher, C. J., & Chao, J. (2015). The effects of augmented virtual science laboratories on middle school students’ understanding of gas properties. Computers & Education, 85, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.007
  • Cliffe, A. D. (2017). A review of the benefits and drawbacks to virtual field guides in today’s Geoscience higher education environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–14.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Diez, L. F., Valencia, A., & Bermudez, J. (2017). Agent-based model for the analysis of technological acceptance of mobile learning. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 15(6), 1121–1127. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2017.7932700
  • Dudaitė, J., & Prakapas, R. (2017). The experience of teachers in the application of activInspire interactive evaluation system in classroom: A case of teachers in Lithuania. Informatics in Education, 16(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2017.10
  • Escobar, M., Sanhueza, S., & Friz, M. (2018). Uso de estrategias tecnológicas en educación: Una comparación entre biología y educación física [Use of technological strategies in education: A comparison between biology and physical education]. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 23, 483–504.
  • Fairén, M., Moyés, J., & Insa, E. (2020). VR4Health: Personalized teaching and learning anatomy using VR. Journal of Medical Systems, 44(5), 94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-01550-5
  • González-Bravo, L., & Valdivia-Peralta, M. (2015). Posibilidades para el uso del modelo de aceptación de la tecnología (TAM) y de la teoría de los marcos tecnológicos para evaluar la aceptación de nuevas tecnologías para el aseguramiento de la calidad en la educación superior chilena [Possibilities for the use of the technology acceptance model (TAM) and the theory of technological frameworks to evaluate the acceptance of new technologies for quality assurance in Chilean higher education]. Revista Electrónica Educare, 19(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.19-2.11
  • Jaramillo, C. (2020). Cerrar la brecha digital para combatir la pobreza en América Latina y el Caribe. https://bit.ly/2Ifjssd
  • Karim, R. A., Abu, A. G., Adnan, A. H. M., & Suhandoko, A. D. J. (2018). The use of mobile technology in promoting education 4.0 for higher education. Advanced Journal of Technical and Vocational Education, 2, 34–39.
  • Latorre-Cosculluela, C., Sierra-Sánchez, V., Rivera-Torres, P., & Liesa-Orús, M. (2023). ICT efficacy and response to different needs in university classrooms: Effects on attitudes and active behaviour towards technology. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09357-2
  • Li, L., Zhu, M. L., Shi, Y. Q., & Yang, L. L. (2023). Influencing factors of self-regulated learning of medical-related students in a traditional Chinese medical university: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04051-4
  • Li, Q., Liu, Q., & Chen, Y. (2023). Prospective teachers’ acceptance of virtual reality technology: A mixed study in Rural China. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 3217–3248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11219-w
  • Li, S., Li, G., Liu, Y., Xu, W., Yang, N., Chen, H., Li, N., Luo, K., & Jin, S. (2020). Development and assessment of a gastroscopy electronic learning system for primary learners: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(3), e16233. https://doi.org/10.2196/16233
  • Loureiro, A. (2019). Pedagogical use of ICT - Strengthening teacher skills in a B-learning master’s program. In 2019 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE) (pp. 1–5), IEEE.
  • Lucas, M. (2020). External barriers affecting the successful implementation of mobile educational interventions. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, 105509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.001
  • Martín-García, A., Del Dujo, A. G., & Muñoz-Rodríguez, J. (2014). Factores determinantes de adopción de blended learning en educación superior. Adaptación Del Modelo UTAUT [Determinants of adoption of blended learning in higher education. Adaptation of the UTAUT Model]. Educación XX1, 17. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.17.2.11489
  • Metropolitano, I. T. (2019a). Rendición de cuentas 2018 [Accountability 2018]. Rendición de Cuentas.
  • Metropolitano, I. T. (2019b). Rendición de cuentas 2019 [Accountability 2019]. https://bit.ly/2FU9DQ0.
  • Moundridou M., & Papanikolaou K. A. (2017). Educating engineer educators on technology enhanced learning based on TPACK. In 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1243–1250). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7943007
  • Napal, M., Mendióroz-Lacambra, A. M., & Peñalva, A. (2020). Sustainability teaching tools in the digital age. Sustainability, 12(8), 3366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083366
  • Ozdilek, Z., & Baltaci-Goktalay, S. (2013). Pre-service science teachers’ perceptions about effective design of blended university chemistry courses. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14, 165–180.
  • Palacios-Saltos, E., Moreira-Zambrano, Y. M., & Vargas-Rodríguez, F. A. (2021). Sostenibilidad educativa y desarrollo social latinoamericano: Artículo de revisión bibliográfica [Educational sustainability and Latin American social development: Literature review article]. Revista Científica Multidisciplinaria Arbitrada "Yachasun", 5(8 Edicion especial junio), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.46296/yc.v5i8edespjun.0095
  • Peñuelas, S. A. P., Pierra, L. I. C., González, Ó. U. R., & Nogales, O. I. G. (2020). Enseñanza remota de emergencia ante la pandemia Covid-19 en educación media superior y educación superior [Emergency remote teaching in the face of the Covid-19 pandemic in upper secondary education and higher education]. Propós. Represent, 8, 589. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2020.v8nSPE3.589
  • Porlán, R. (2020). El cambio de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje en tiempos de pandemia [The change in teaching and learning in times of pandemic]. Revista de Educación Ambiental y Sostenibilidad, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_educ_ambient_sostenibilidad.2020.v2.i1.1502
  • Prada, M. A., Fuertes, J. J., Alonso, S., García, S., & Domínguez, M. (2015). Challenges and solutions in remote laboratories. Application to a remote laboratory of an electro-pneumatic classification cell. Computers & Education, 85, 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.004
  • Quintana, G. J., & Osuna-Acedo, S. (2020). Transmedia practices and collaborative strategies in informal learning of adolescents. Social Sciences, 9(6), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9060092
  • Raju, S. V., Raju, M. S. V. S. B., Abbaiah, G., & Gudavalli, M. (2016). Role of ICT in outcome based education. In 2016 IEEE 6th International Conference on Advanced Computing (IACC) (pp. 815–819).
  • Ramirez-Anormaliza, R., Sabaté, F., Llinàs-Audet, X., & Lordan, O. (2017). Aceptación y uso de los sistemas E-learning por estudiantes de grado de ecuador: El caso de una universidad estatal [Acceptance and use of E-learning systems by undergraduate students from Ecuador: The case of a state university]. Intangible Capital, 13(3), 548–581. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.820
  • Reid, P. (2014). Categories for barriers to adoption of instructional technologies. Education and Information Technologies, 19(2), 383–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9222-z
  • Reyes, O., Espinoza, R., & Olvera, R. (2013). Criterios para determinar el tamaño de muestra en estudios descriptivos [Criteria to determine the sample size in descriptive studies]. International Research Congress of Celaya, 5, 2919–2924.
  • Sánchez, R. B., Mallado, C. M., & González-Piñal, R. P. (2013). Cambios pedagógicos y sociales en el uso de las TIC: U-learning y u-Portafolio [Pedagogical and social changes in the use of ICT: U-learning and u-Portfolio]. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Docencia (REID), 10, 7–20.
  • Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Hernández-García, Á., García-Peñalvo, F. J., Chaparro-Peláez, J., & Olmos-Migueláñez, S. (2019). Break the walls!
  • Second-order barriers and the acceptance of mLearning by first-year pre-service teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.019
  • Saraí, A.-B. (2005). Fórmulas para el cálculo de la muestra en investigaciones de salud [Formulas for calculating the sample in health research]. Salud En Tabasco, 11(1–2), 333–338. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=48711206
  • Tîrziu, A. M., & Vrabie, C. (2015). Education 2.0: E-learning methods. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 376–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.213
  • Toma, F., Ardelean, A., Grădinaru, C., Nedelea, A., & Diaconu, D. C. (2023). Effects of ICT integration in teaching using learning activities. Sustainability, 15(8), 6885. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086885
  • Valencia-Arias, A., Chalela-Naffah, S., & Bermúdez-Hernández, J. (2019). A proposed model of E-learning tools acceptance among university students in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1057–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9815-2
  • Wang, K., Zhang, L., & Ye, L. (2021). A nationwide survey of online teaching strategies in dental education in China. Journal of Dental Education, 85(2), 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12413
  • Zalavra, E., & Papanikolaou, K. (2018). Supporting the learning design process: Insights into pre-service teachers’ perceptions. In European Conference on E-Learning, Academic Conferences International Limited (pp. 620–629).