PAtENT: a student-centered entrepreneurial pathway to the engineering doctorate

References

• Aithal, P. S., & Aithal, S. (2023). Introducing systematic patent analysis as an innovative pedagogy tool/experiential learning project in HE Institutes and universities to boost awareness of patent-based IPR. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences, 8(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.47992/IJMTS.2581.6012.0308
   Google Scholar
• Alhojailan, M. I., & Ibrahim, M. (2012). Thematic analysis: A critical review of its process and evaluation. West East Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Barak, M., Ginzburg, T., & Erduran, S. (2022). Nature of Engineering: A Cognitive and Epistemic Account with Implications for Engineering Education. Science & Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00402-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbini, F. M., Corsino, M., & Giuri, P. (2021). How do universities shape founding teams? Social proximity and informal mechanisms of knowledge transfer in student entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(4), 1046–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09799-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, A., Bates, M., & Bates, L. (2007). Preparing students for the professional workplace: who has responsibility for what? Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 8(2), 121–129.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. E., Cashin, J., Nguyen, T. T., & Zambrano, P. (2022). Expanding integrated competency-focused health worker curricula for maternal infant and young child nutrition. Education Sciences, 12(8), 518. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkers, R., & Bombaerts, G. (2017). Introducing broad skills in higher engineering education: the patents and standards courses at Eindhoven University of Technology. Technology & Innovation, 19(2), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.21300/19.2.2017.493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belinski, R., Peixe, A. M., Frederico, G. F., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2020). Organizational learning and Industry 4.0: findings from a systematic literature review and research agenda. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(8), 2435–2457. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2020-0158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, J. R. (2008). Utilization of problem-based learning in an entrepreneurship business planning course. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/NEJE-11-01-2008-B004
   Google Scholar
• Boehm, W. W. (1956). Curriculum study. Social Casework, 37(7), 348–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/104438945603700705
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Davey, L., & Jenkinson, E. (2023). Doing Reflexive Thematic Analysis. In Supporting Research in Counselling and Psychotherapy: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Research (pp. 19–38). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Choe, N. H., & Borrego, M. (2020). Master’s and doctoral engineering students’ interest in industry, academia, and government careers. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(2), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., & Dede, C. D. (2009). Design for scalability: A case study of the River City curriculum. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9156-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Sage publication.
   Google Scholar
• Daspit, J. J., Fox, C. J., & Findley, S. K. (2023). Entrepreneurial mindset: An integrated definition, a review of current insights, and directions for future research. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(1), 12–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1907583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Río Fernández, J., Gomáriz Castro, S., Olivé I Duran, J., & Mànuel Làzaro, A. (2022). Knowledge Transfer in Higher Education Institutions Focused on Entrepreneurial Activities of Electronic Instrumentation. Knowledge, 2(4), 587–617. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge2040035
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, C., & Bellara, A. (2013). The current state of assessment education: Aligning policy, standards, and teacher education curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(4), 356–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113488144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deveci, İ., & Seikkula-Leino, J. (2023). The link between entrepreneurship and STEM education. In Kaya-Capocci, S., Peters-Burton, E. (Eds.), Enhancing Entrepreneurial Mindsets Through STEM Education. Integrated Science (Vol. 15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17816-0_1
   Google Scholar
• DiPietro, C., Dyjur, P., Fitzpatrick, K., Grant, K., Hoessler, C., Kalu, F., Richards, J., Skene, A., & Wolf, P. (2022). Educational development guide series: No. 4. A comprehensive guide to working with higher education curriculum development, review & renewal projects (P. Dyjur & A. Skene, Eds). Educational Developers Caucus. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/115104
   Google Scholar
• Drane, D., Micari, M., & Light, G. (2014). Students as teachers: Effectiveness of a peer-led STEM learning programme over 10 years. Educational Research and Evaluation, 20(3), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2014.895388
   Google Scholar
• Duval-Couetil, N., Ladisch, M., & Yi, S. (2021). Addressing academic researcher priorities through science and technology entrepreneurship education. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(2), 288–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09787-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekundayo, M. S. (2022). The Influence of Knowledge Management on Organizational Innovation Mediated by Organizational Learning: A Quantitative Study [Doctoral dissertation]. Capella University.
   Google Scholar
• Fasi, M. A. (2022). An Overview on patenting trends and technology commercialization practices in the university Technology Transfer Offices in USA and China. World Patent Information, 68, 102097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2022.102097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, C., Lightfoot, E., Nachbaur, M., & Sucher, K. (2022). A study of PhD courses and curricula across schools of social work. Research on Social Work Practice, 32(1), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315211039187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. K., & Doore, S. A. (2020). Doctoral Student Socialization and Professional Pathways. In J. C. Weidman, L. DeAngelo (Eds.), Socialization in Higher Education and the Early Career. Knowledge Studies in Higher Education (Vol. 7). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33350-8_7
   Google Scholar
• Gathercoal, P., Love, D. O., & McKean, G. (2017). Webfolios in Teacher Education. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Glazer, J. L., & Peurach, D. J. (2012). School improvement networks as a strategy for large-scale education reform: The role of educational environments. Educational Policy, 27(4), 676–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904811429283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynes, B., Costin, Y., & Richardson, I. (2023). Educating for STEM: Developing Entrepreneurial Thinking in STEM (Entre-STEM). In S. Kaya-Capocci, E. Peters-Burton (Eds.), Enhancing Entrepreneurial Mindsets Through STEM Education. Integrated Science (Vol. 15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17816-0_8
   Google Scholar
• Jaiswal, P., & Al-Hattami, A. (2020). Enhancing learners’ academic performances using student centered approaches. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(16), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i16.14875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, M. V., & Shaw, J. M. (2020). Teaching engineering innovation, design, and leadership through a community of practice. Education for Chemical Engineers, 31, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2020.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsson, C., Loeffler, R., Sidhu, I., & Nilsson, C. H. (2016). A student-centered approach and mindset-focused pedagogical approach for entrepreneurship and leadership. Applied Innovation Review, 2, 57–63.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya-Capocci, S., & Ucar, S. (2023). Entrepreneurial STEM for Global Epidemics. In N. Rezaei (Eds.), Integrated Education and Learning. Integrated Science (Vol. 13). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15963-3_25
   Google Scholar
• Kent, R. (2020). Data construction and data analysis for survey research. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Latif, N., & Zahraee, M. (2022). Augmenting undergraduate Engineering Technology education through applied research [Paper presentation]. 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2
   Google Scholar
• Levander, L. M., & Mikkola, M. (2009). Core curriculum analysis: A tool for educational design. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 15(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13892240903069785
   Google Scholar
• Mamaril, N. A., Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Economy, D. R., & Kennedy, M. S. (2016). Measuring undergraduate students’ engineering self‐efficacy: A validation study. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 366–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, L., Chang, R., Chandrasekaran, S., Coddington, A., Daniel, S., Cook, E., Crossin, E., Cosson, B., Turner, J., Mazzurco, A., Dohaney, J., O’Hanlon, T., Pickering, J., Walker, S., Maclean, F., & Smith, T. D. (2021). From problem-based learning to practice-based education: A framework for shaping future engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1708867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. (2019). The concept of reflection: a systematic review and thematic synthesis across professional contexts. Reflective Practice, 20(3), 396–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2019.1622520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, H., Direito, I., Freitas, A., & Salgado, A. (2022). Roses In, Roses Out - How the Framework of Management by Competencies in HRM Can Help Address the Issue of Doctoral Candidates and Graduates Soft Skills in Engineering [paper presentation]. INTED2022 Proceedings (pp. 9657–9664).
   Google Scholar
• Matriano, E. A. (2020). Ensuring student-centered, constructivist and project-based experiential learning applying the Exploration, Research, Interaction and Creation (ERIC) learning model. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 7(1), 214–227.
   Google Scholar
• Manyukhina, Y., & Wyse, D. (2019). Learner agency and the curriculum: A critical realist perspective. The Curriculum Journal, 30(3), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1599973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejtoft, T., & Vesterberg, J. (2017 Integration of generic skills in engineering education: Increased student engagement using a CDIO approach [paper presentation]. The 13th International CDIO Conference, Calgary, Canada (pp. 386–395). University of Calgary.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R., Flynn, L., Couch, S., Detchprohm, N., Eagle, W. E., Garner, J., … Talamantes, A. (2022). Infusing Entrepreneurship into Engineering Design Curricula to Promote Inventiveness: A Student-Centered Approach to Inclusive Innovation [Paper presentation]. 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2
   Google Scholar
• Muscio, A., & Ramaciotti, L. (2019). How does academia influence Ph. D. entrepreneurship? New insights on the entrepreneurial university. Technovation, 82-83, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, C. S., Adams, P., & Mertova, P. (2008). Student engagement: The key to improving survey response rates. Quality in Higher Education, 14(3), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320802507505
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018a). Graduate STEM education for the 21st century. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018b). Revitalizing Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century: Overview of Student and Faculty Focus Group Findings. National Academic Press. pga_186164.pdf (nationalacademies.org).
   Google Scholar
• Naumann, C. (2017). Entrepreneurial mindset: A synthetic literature review. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(3), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppermann, M. (1995). E-mail surveys-potentials and pitfalls. Marketing Research, 7(3), 28.
   Google Scholar
• Opsomer, J., Chen, A., Chang, W. Y., & Foley, D, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). (2021). US employment higher in the private sector than in the education sector for US-trained doctoral scientists and engineers: Findings from the 2019 survey of doctorate recipients. National Science Foundation | National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Pihie, Z. A. L., & Sani, A. S. A. (2009). Exploring the entrepreneurial mindset of students: implication for improvement of entrepreneurial learning at university. The Journal of International Social Research, 2(8), 340–345.
   Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., Meyer, M. S., Karami, S., & Ghahremani, M. (2023). Room to Run: Using Technology to Move Creativity into the Classroom. In Creative Provocations: Speculations on the Future of Creativity, Technology & Learning (pp. 65–80). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Preskill, H., & Torres, R. T. (1999). Evaluative inquiry for learning in organizations. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rahi, S., Alnaser, F. M., & Abd Ghani, M. (2019). Designing survey research: recommendation for questionnaire development, calculating sample size and selecting research paradigms [Paper presentation]. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings (pp. 1157–1169).
   Google Scholar
• Riley, D. R., Shuster, H. M., LeMasney, C. A., Silvestri, C. E., & Mallouk, K. E. (2023). First-year engineering students’ conceptualization of entrepreneurial mindset. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 6(1), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/25151274211029207
   Google Scholar
• Rippa, P., Landi, G., Cosimato, S., Turriziani, L., & Gheith, M. (2022). Embedding entrepreneurship in doctoral students: the impact of a T-shaped educational approach. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(1), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2020-0289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorrer, A., Pugalee, D. K., Ramaprabhu, P., Uddin, M., Cherukuri, H. P., Xu, T., & Prajapati, D. (2021). Pathways to entrepreneurship (PAtENT) program: Reimagining STEM doctoral programs [Paper presentation]. 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2
   Google Scholar
• Ruslin, R., Mashuri, S., Rasak, M. S. A., Alhabsyi, F., & Syam, H. (2022). Semi-structured Interview: A methodological reflection on the development of a qualitative research instrument in educational studies. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 12(1), 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2016). Why pursue the postdoc path? Science (New York, N.Y.), 352(6286), 663–664. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sioukas, A. (2022). Constructivism and the student-centered entrepreneurship classroom: Learning avenues and challenges for US college students. Industry and Higher Education, 37(4), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222221135311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela-Valdés, J. F., & Aragón-Romero, M. (2012). Patented! problem based learning [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Education and e-Learning Innovations(pp. 1–3). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., Van Baalen, S., Klaassen, R., & Boon, M. (2020). Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 508–555. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, G. B. (2011). Student-centered learning in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 92–97.
   Google Scholar
• Villarroel, V., Benavente, M., Chuecas, M. J., & Bruna, D. (2020). Experiential learning in higher education. A student-centered teaching method that improves perceived learning. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(5), 8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, E. L., & Kleppe, J. A. (2001). Teaching invention, innovation, and entrepreneurship in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(4), 565–570. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00640.x
   Google Scholar
• West, H. M. (2021). Using Growth Patterns to Simultaneously Promote Elementary Students’ Multiplicative Reasoning and Early Algebraic Thinking: an Examination of Children’s Thinking, Teachers’ Perspectives, and Curriculum. North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Zappe, S. E., Cutler, S. L., & Gase, L. (2023). A systematic review of the impacts of entrepreneurial support programs in science, technology, engineering, and math fields. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 6(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/25151274211040422
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M. J., Croiset, E., & Ioannidis, M. (2022). Constructivist-based experiential learning: A case study of student-centered and design-centric unit operation distillation laboratory. Education for Chemical Engineers, 41, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2022.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar