Satisfaction and academic performance of undergraduate economics students

References

• Agresti, A. (2018). An introduction to categorical data analysis (Vol. 656). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, M. I. S., Idrus, M. I., & Rijal, S. (2023). The role of education in fostering entrepreneurial spirit in the young generation. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management, 1(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v1i2.28
   Google Scholar
• An, B. P. (2015). The role of academic motivation and engagement on the relationship between dual enrollment and academic performance. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(1), 98–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2015.11777358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artigue, M., Bosch, M., Doorman, M., Juhász, P., Kvasz, L., & Maass, K. (2020). Inquiry based mathematics education and the development of learning trajectories. Teaching Mathematics and Computer Science, 18(3), 63–89. https://doi.org/10.5485/TMCS.2020.0505
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518–529.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2014a). Exercise of personal agency through the self-efficacy mechanism. In Self-efficacy (pp. 3–38). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2014b). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In Handbook of moral behavior and development (pp. 69–128). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benos, N., & Zotou, S. (2014). Education and economic growth: A meta-regression analysis. World Development, 64, 669–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.06.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björklund, C., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Kullberg, A. (2020). Research on early childhood mathematics teaching and learning. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(4), 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01177-3
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn (Vol. 11). National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, R., Karlson, K. B., & Holm, A. (2018). Interpreting and understanding logits, probits, and other nonlinear probability models. Annual Review of Sociology, 44(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (2013). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Adolescents and Their Families, 2013, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (2018). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 393–451). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buchmann, C., & Park, H. (2009). Stratification and the formation of expectations in highly differentiated educational systems. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 27(4), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2009.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Camacho-Morles, J., Slemp, G. R., Pekrun, R., Loderer, K., Hou, H., & Oades, L. G. (2021). Activity achievement emotions and academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 1051–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09585-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. M. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(3), 75–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100614541236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong, K. C., & Ong, B. (2016). An evaluation of the relationship between student engagement, academic achievement, and satisfaction. In Assessment for Learning Within and Beyond the Classroom: Taylor’s 8th Teaching and Learning Conference 2015 Proceedings (pp. 409–416). Springer Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Chigbu, B. I., & Nekhwevha, F. H. (2021). High school training outcome and academic performance of first-year tertiary institution learners-taking’ input-environment-outcomes model’ into account. Heliyon, 7(7), e07700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalhi, M. (2020). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. Hachette UK.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, J. E., Hillman, C. H., Castelli, D., Etnier, J. L., Lee, S., Tomporowski, P., Lambourne, K., & Szabo-Reed, A. N. (2016). Physical activity, fitness, cognitive function, and academic achievement in children: A systematic review. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 48(6), 1197–1222. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, C. S., & Merrill, G. B. (2012). Predicting student achievement in university-level business and economics classes: Peer observation of classroom instruction and student ratings of teaching effectiveness. College Teaching, 60(2), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2011.627896
   Google Scholar
• Government of Rwanda (2017). National Strategy for Transformation (NST1) 2017–2024. Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R., & Brookhart, S. M. (2019). What we know about grading: What works, what doesn’t, and what’s next. ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2012). Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes, and causation. Journal of Economic Growth, 17(4), 267–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-012-9081-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heutte, J., Fenouillet, F., Martin-Krumm, C., Gute, G., Raes, A., Gute, D., Bachelet, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2021). Optimal experience in adult learning: conception and validation of the flow in education scale (EduFlow-2). Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 828027. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.828027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopland, A. O., & Nyhus, O. H. (2015). Does student satisfaction with school facilities affect exam results? An empirical investigation. Facilities, 33(13/14), 760–774. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-09-2014-0076
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Y. L., Hung, C. H., & Ching, G. S. (2014). Student-faculty interaction: Mediating between student engagement factors and educational outcome gains. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 4(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2014.800
   Google Scholar
• Hulleman, C. S., Barron, K. E., Kosovich, J. J., & Lazowski, R. A. (2016). Student motivation: Current theories, constructs, and interventions within an expectancy-value framework. In A. A. Lipnevich, F. Preckel, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 241–278). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Iliyasu, R., & Etikan, I. (2021). Comparison of quota sampling and stratified random sampling. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 10(1), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2021.10.00326
   Google Scholar
• Karch, J. (2021). Choosing between the two-sample t-test and its alternatives: A practical guideline.
   Google Scholar
• Khadka, J. (2019). Sampling error in survey research. International Journal of Scientific Research, 8, 2214–2220.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, J., & Iqbal, M. J. (2016). Relationship between student satisfaction and academic achievement in distance education: A case study of AIOU Islamabad. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J., & Swafford, J. (2002). Helping children learn mathematics. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirmizi, Ö. (2015). The influence of learner readiness on student satisfaction and academic achievement in an online program at higher education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 133–142. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1057353.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J. L., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature (Vol. 8). National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (2010). Student success in college (includes new preface and epilogue): Creating conditions that matter. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (2018). Goal setting theory: Controversies and resolutions. In The SAGE handbook of industrial, work & organizational psychology: Organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 145–166). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, F., Li, L., Zhang, Y., Ngo, Q. T., & Iqbal, W. (2021). Role of education in poverty reduction: Macroeconomic and social determinants form developing economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(44), 63163–63177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19563-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. The American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A. N. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May-Varas, S., Margolis, J., & Mead, T. (2023). Bioecological model of human development. In J. Margolis, S. May-Varas, & T. Mead (Eds.), Educational learning theories. Education Open Textbooks.
   Google Scholar
• Mihanović, Z., Batinić, A. B., & Pavičić, J. (2016). The link between students’ satisfaction with faculty, overall students’ satisfaction with student life and student performances. Review of Innovation and Competitiveness, 2(1), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.32728/ric.2016.21/3
   Google Scholar
• MINEDUC (2023). 2021/22 Education statistical yearbook – School year ended in July 2023. Ministry of Education (Rwanda).
   Google Scholar
• Okolie, U. C., Mlanga, S., Oyerinde, D. O., Olaniyi, N. O., & Chucks, M. E. (2022). Collaborative learning and student engagement in practical skills acquisition. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(6), 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1929395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okoye, K., Nganji, J. T., Escamilla, J., Fung, J. M., & Hosseini, S. (2022). Impact of global government investment on education and research development: A comparative analysis and demystifying the science, technology, innovation, and education conundrum. Global Transitions, 4, 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2022.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ritzhaupt, A. D., Cheng, L., Luo, W., & Hohlfeld, T. N. (2020). The digital divide in formal educational settings: The past, present, and future relevance. In M.J. Bishop, E. Boling, J. Elen & V. Svihla. (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology: Learning design (pp. 483–504). Cham: Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36119-8_23
   Google Scholar
• Roach, T. (2014). Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 17, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2014.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (12th ed.). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37–76). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szulewski, A., van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2023). Cognitive load theory: Researching and planning teaching to maximise learning. In J. Cleland & S. J. Durning (Eds.), Researching medical education (2nd ed., pp. 303–314). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (2012). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tudor, T. R. (2018). Fully integrating academic advising with career coaching to increase student retention, graduation rates and future job satisfaction: An industry approach. Industry and Higher Education, 32(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422218759928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Werfhorst, H. G., Kessenich, E., & Geven, S. (2022). The digital divide in online education: Inequality in digital readiness of students and schools. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100100
   Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society, 21(2), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Elst, H. (2019). Foundations of descriptive and inferential statistics. Lecture notes for a quantitative-methodological module at the bachelor degree (B.Sc) level. Köln: parcIT GmbH. E-Print: arXiv:1302.2525v4 [stat.AP].
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M., & Tate, T. (2017). Digital divides and social inclusion. In K. A. Mills, A. Stornaiuolo, A. Smith, & J. Z. Pandya (Eds.), Handbook of writing, literacies, and education in digital cultures (pp. 63–75). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Whitt, E. J., Schuh, J. H., Kinzie, J., & Kuh, G. D. (2013). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar