Pre-service language teachers’ grading literacy: perceptions of grading in three university programs in Finland and Sweden

References

• Anderson, L. W. (2018). A critique of grading: Policies, practices, and technical matters. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(49). Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Educational Evaluation: Dialogues with the International Academy of Education, 49. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.3814
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, L. F., & Damböck, B. (2017). Language assessment for classroom teachers. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1996). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapelle, C. A. (2020). Argument-based validation in testing and assessment. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jamieson, J. (2010). Does an argument-based approach to validity make a difference? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 29(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00165.x
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, L., DeLuca, C., Braund, H., Yan, W., & Rasooli, A. (2020). Teachers’ grading decisions and practices across cultures: Exploring the value, consistency, and construction of grades across Canadian and Chinese secondary schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, 100928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, L., & Sun, Y. (2015). Interpreting the impact of the Ontario secondary school literacy test on second language students within an argument-based validation framework. Language Assessment Quarterly, 12(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2014.981334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBoer, B. V., Anderson, D. M., & Elfessi, A. M. (2007). Grading styles and instructor attitudes. College Teaching, 55(2), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.55.2.57-64
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, C., Chavez, T., Bellara, A., & Cao, C. (2013). Pedagogies for preservice assessment education: Supporting teacher candidates’ assessment literacy development. The Teacher Educator, 48(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2012.760024
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, C., & Klinger, D. A. (2010). Assessment literacy development: Identifying gaps in teacher candidates’ learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(4), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.516643
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, C. (2017). Examining variability in teachers’ approaches to classroom assessment: A latent class analysis study. AERA Online Paper Repository
   Google Scholar
• Dragemark Oscarson, A., Fröjdendahl, B., & Hildén, R. (2023). Att läsa bedömningsuppdraget: Ett textanalytiskt exempel från tidigare svenska och finländska läroplaner. Educare, (2), 210–242. https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2023.2.819
   Google Scholar
• Education Act. (2010). (800). https://www.skolverket.se/download/18.47fb451e167211613ef398/1542791697007/swedishgrades_b).
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, F. (2017). A rubric to track the development of secondary pre-service and novice teachers’ summative assessment literacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(2), 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1245651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish National Agency of Education. (2015). National core curricula for general upper secondary education. Finnish National Board of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Agency of Education. (2020). Oppilaan oppimisen ja osaamisen arviointi perusopetuksessa. Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteiden 2014 muutokset. [Evaluation of pupils’ learning and learning outcomes in basic education. Amendments to the core curricula for basic education 2014]. 10.2.2020.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board of Education. (2014). National core curricula for basic education. Finnish National Board of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fulcher, G. (2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.642041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulmer, G. W., Lee, I. C. H., & Tan, K. H. K. (2015). Multi-level model of contextual factors and teachers’ assessment practices: A1n integrative review of research. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1017445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R., & Bailey, J. M. (2010). Developing standards-based report cards. Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R., & Link, L. J. (2019). Exploring the factors teachers consider in determining students’ grades. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1555515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herppich, S., Praetorius, A.-K., Förster, N., Glogger-Frey, I., Karst, K., Leutner, D., Behrmann, L., Böhmer, M., Ufer, S., Klug, J., Hetmanek, A., Ohle, A., Böhmer, I., Karing, C., Kaiser, J., & Südkamp, A. (2018). Teachers’ assessment competence: Integrating knowledge-, process-, and product-oriented approaches into a competence-oriented conceptual model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildén, R., & Fröjdendahl, B. (2018). The dawn of assessment literacy – exploring the conceptions of Finnish student teachers in foreign languages. Apples - Journal of Applied Language Studies, 12(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.17011/apples/urn.201802201542
   Google Scholar
• Hilden, R., Oscarson, A. D., Yildirim, A., & Fröjdendahl, B. (2022). Swedish and Finnish pre-service teachers’ perceptions of summative assessment practices. Languages (Basel), 7(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7010010
   Google Scholar
• Hilden, R., & Takala, S. (2007). Relating descriptors of the Finnish school scale to the CEF overall scales for communicative activities. In Koskensalo, A., Smeds, J.,Kaikkonen, P. & Kohonen, V. (Eds.), Foreign languages and multicultural perspectives in the European context. Fremdsprachen und multikulturelle Perspektiven im europäischen Kontext. Dichtung, Wahrheit und Sprache. (pp. 291–300). LIT-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kremmel, B., & Harding, L. (2020). Towards a comprehensive, empirical model of language assessment literacy across stakeholder groups: Developing the language assessment literacy survey. Language Assessment Quarterly, 17(1), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2019.1674855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunnath, J. P. (2017). Teacher grading decisions: Influences, rationale, and practices. American Secondary Education, 45(3), 68–88.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, C., Hultén, M., & Tveit, S. (2017). The power of teacher-assigned grades in outcome-based education. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 3(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2017.1317229
   Google Scholar
• Meissel, K., Meyer, F., Yao, E. S., & Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2017). Subjectivity of teacher judgments: Exploring student characteristics that influence teacher judgments of student ability. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertler, C. A. (2005). ERRATUM: Secondary teachers’ assessment literacy: Does classroom experience make a difference? American Secondary Education, 33(2), 76–73.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher, 18(2), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175249
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, M. A., & Guskey, T. R. (2015). Standards-based grading and reporting will improve education. Phi Delta Kappan, 96(7), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721715579043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oscarson, M. (2015). Bedömning på systemnivå-En komparativ studie av stegsystemet i språk i den svenska skolan och språknivåer i Europarådets Common European Framework of Reference. Educare, 2(2), 128–153. https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2015.2.1135
   Google Scholar
• Pastore, S., & Andrade, H. L. (2019). Teacher assessment literacy: A three-dimensional model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 84, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall, J., & Engelhard, G. (2010). Examining the grading practices of teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(7), 1372–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, T., & Ungerleider, C. (2019). Imputed meaning: An exploration of how teachers interpret grades. Action in Teacher Education, 41(3), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2019.1574246
   Google Scholar
• Seden, K., & Svaricek, R. (2018). Teacher subjectivity regarding assessment: exploring English as a foreign language teachers’ conceptions of assessment theories that influence student learning. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 8(3), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.500
   Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E. (2001a). Democratic assessment as an alternative. Language Testing, 18(4), 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800404
   Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E. (2001b). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, P., & Sylvén, L. K. (2016). Extramural English in teaching and learning: From theory and research to practice. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Svennberg, L., Meckbach, J., & Redelius, K. (2014). Exploring PE teachers’ ‘gut feelings’ An attempt to verbalise and discuss teachers’ internalised grading criteria. European Physical Education Review, 20(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X13517437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. (2013). Communicating the theory, practice and principles of language testing to test stakeholders: Some reflections. Language Testing, 30(3), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. Chapter 2. in Ed. Willig, C & Stainton Rogers, W. The sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555
   Google Scholar
• Thorsen, C. (2014). Dimensions of norm-referenced compulsory school grades and their relative importance for the prediction of upper secondary school grades. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.705322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, R. D., Simon, M., & Charland, J. (2011). Being fair: Teachers’ interpretations of principles for standards-based grading. The Educational Forum, 75(3), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2011.577669
   Google Scholar
• Vogt, K., & Tsagari, D. (2014). Assessment literacy of foreign language teachers: Findings of a European study. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(4), 374–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2014.960046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., Li, Z., Panadero, E., Yang, M., Yang, L., & Lao, H. (2021). A systematic review on factors influencing teachers’ intentions and implementations regarding formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(3), 228–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1884042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar