Filmmaking with biology undergraduates: combining digital technology with authentic assessment to develop students’ skillset and capabilities for life after graduation

References

• Alamri, H. A., Watson, S., & Watson, W. (2021). Learning technology models that support personalization within blended learning environments in higher education. TechTrends, 65(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00530-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.819566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman, M., Nieminen, J. H., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Designing assessment in a digital world: An organising framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(3), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2069674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/713695728
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., Clarke, V., Cooper, H., Camic, P. M., Long, D. L., & Panter, A. T. (2012). Thematic analysis. In. Rindskopf D. & Sher K. J. (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Reuben Shipway, J. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, A. M., Vasconcelos, A. C., & Holdridge, P. (2010). Diversifying assessment through multimedia creation in a non‐technical module: Reflections on the MAIK project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(7), 831–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903125249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deeley, S. J. (2018). Using technology to facilitate effective assessment for learning and feedback in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1356906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downie, S., Gao, X., Bedford, S., Bell, K., & Kuit, T. (2021). Technology enhanced learning environments in higher education: A cross-discipline study on teacher and student perceptions. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.4.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feilzer, M. Y. (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809349691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, H., & Crespi, C. (2012). The value of student created videos in the college classroom – An exploratory study in marketing and accounting. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 5(1), 273–283.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60(5), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0091-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackman, J. A., Gentile, D. A., Cho, N. J., & Park, Y. (2021). Addressing the digital skills gap for future education. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(5), 542–545. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01074-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. (2016). Re-conceptualising graduate employability: The importance of pre-professional identity. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(5), 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1139551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jopp, R. (2020). A case study of a technology enhanced learning initiative that supports authentic assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(8), 942–958. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1613637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, H. Y., & Kim, H. R. (2021). Impact of blended learning on learning outcomes in the public healthcare education course: A review of flipped classroom with team-based learning. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02508-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornelakis, A., & Petrakaki, D. (2020). Embedding employability skills in UK higher education: Between digitalization and marketization. Industry and Higher Education, 34(5), 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422220902978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancastle, S. A. (2012). Vicarious experiential learning of challenging technical topics mediated by the process of video production: A case study of second year undergraduate engineering students. International Conference on Information Communication Technologies in Education, Proceedings of the 12th ICICTE, Readings in Technology in Education (pp. 248–257). http://www.icicte.org/Proceedings2012/Papers/06-4-Lancastle.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mavroudi, E., & Jöns, H. (2011). Video documentaries in the assessment of human geography field courses. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(4), 579–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2011.559578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur, J. (2023). Rethinking authentic assessment: work, well-being, and society. Higher Education, 85(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00822-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, B., Lewin‐Jones, J., Barrett, H., & Williamson, S. (2010). The use of video to enable deep learning. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 15(4), 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2010.526802
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, A., Sibson, R., & Jackson, D. (2022). Digital demand and digital deficit: Conceptualising digital literacy and gauging proficiency among higher education students. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 44(3), 258–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2022.2030275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, R., Bell, E., & Wakefield, A. (2023). A model for implementing learner-generated filmmaking into undergraduate teaching and assessment. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 23(1), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v23i1.33190
   Google Scholar
• Nieminen, J. H., Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Designing the digital in authentic assessment: Is it fit for purpose? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(4), 529–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2089627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691773384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono, A., & Ichii, R. (2019). Business students’ reflection on reflective writing assessments. Journal of International Education in Business, 12(2), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-08-2018-0036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirhonen, J., & Rasi, P. (2017). Student-generated instructional videos facilitate learning through positive emotions. Journal of Biological Education, 51(3), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1200647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porcaro, P. A., Jackson, D. E., McLaughlin, P. M., & O’Malley, C. J. (2016). Curriculum design of a flipped classroom to enhance haematology learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9599-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puentedura, R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education. http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Reyna, J., Hanham, J., & Meier, P. (2017). A taxonomy of digital media types for learner-generated digital media assignments. E-Learning and Digital Media, 14(6), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753017752973
   Google Scholar
• Reyna, J., Hanham, J., Vlachopoulos, P., & Meier, P. (2021). A systematic approach to designing, implementing, and evaluating learner-generated digital media (LGDM) assignments and its effect on self-regulation in tertiary science education. Research in Science Education, 51(6), 1501–1527. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11165-019-09885-X/TABLES/10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, J., & Meier, P, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia. (2018a). Learner-generated digital media (LGDM) as an assessment tool in tertiary science education: A review of literature. IAFOR Journal of Education, 6(3), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.6.3.06
   Google Scholar
• Reyna, J., & Meier, P. (2018b). Using the learner-generated digital media (LGDM) framework in tertiary science education: A pilot study. Education Sciences, 8(3), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Montgomery, C. (2013). Assessment for learning in higher education. In Assessment for learning in higher education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203818268
   Google Scholar
• Sander, P., & Sanders, L. (2006). Understanding academic confidence. Psychology Teaching Review, 12(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsptr.2006.12.1.29
   Google Scholar
• Schuck, S., & Kearney, M. (2006). Capturing learning through student-generated digital video. Australian Educational Computing, 21(1), 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Secomb, J. (2008). A systematic review of peer teaching and learning in clinical education. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(6), 703–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01954.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickerman, P. (2009). Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: An attempt to deepen learning? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801955986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victory Brodman, M., Zaidi, A., & Qureshi, S. (2023). Confidence-building in a collaborative, multidisciplinary mock page activity for fourth-year medical students. Medical Education Online, 28(1), 2173995. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2173995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: Creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield, A., Pike, R., & Amici-Dargan, S. (2022). Learner-generated podcasts: An authentic and enjoyable assessment for students working in pairs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(7), 1025–1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2152426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmott, C. J. R. (2015). Teaching bioethics via the production of student-generated videos. Journal of Biological Education, 49(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2014.897640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubizarreta, J. (2009). The learning portfolio: Reflective practice for improving student learning (2nd ed.). Wiley.
   Google Scholar