834
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Information & Communications Technology in Education

Artificial intelligence pedagogical chatbots as L2 conversational agents

ORCID Icon
Article: 2327789 | Received 05 Jan 2024, Accepted 01 Mar 2024, Published online: 18 Mar 2024

References

  • Alm, A., & Nkomo, L. M. (2020). Chatbot experiences of informal language learners: A sentiment analysis. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching), 10(4), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2020100104
  • Alrajhi, A. S. (2020a). EFL learners’ beliefs concerning the effects of accumulative gaming experiences on the development of their linguistic competence. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 17(2), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.56040/asla1731.
  • Alrajhi, A. S. (2020b). English learners’ perceptions of video games as a medium for learning and integration into the English curriculum. MEXTESOL Journal, 44(4), 1–17.
  • Alrajhi, A. S. (2020c). Static infographics effects on the receptive knowledge of idiomatic expressions. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i2.28596
  • Alrajhi, A. S. (2023). EFL learners' perceptions and attitudinal fluctuations toward digital multimodal composition: A longitudinal approach. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.317748
  • Bailey, D. (2019 , August 27–29). Chatbots as conversational agents in the context of language learning [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and Education., South Korea. https://t.ly/vwp0
  • Bibauw, S., Van den Noortgate, W., François, F., & Desmet, P. (2022). Dialogue systems for language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 26(1), 1–24. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73488
  • Bonett, D. G., & Wright, T. A. (2015). Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1960
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Chapelle, C. (2005). Interactionist SLA theory in CALL research. In J. L. Egbert & G. M. Petrie (Eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 53–64). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Coniam, D. (2014). The linguistic accuracy of chatbots: Usability from an ESL perspective. Text & Talk, 34(5), 545–567. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0018
  • Copulsky, J. (2019). Do conversational platforms represent the next big digital marketing opportunity? Applied Marketing Analytics, 4(4), 311–316.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Dale, R. (2016). The return of the chatbots. Natural Language Engineering, 22(5), 811–817. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324916000243
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
  • Fryer, L. K., Ainley, M., Thompson, A., Gibson, A., & Sherlock, Z. (2017). Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: An experimental comparison of chatbot and human task partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.045
  • Fryer, L., & Carpenter, R. (2006). Bots as language learning tools. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 8–14. 10125/44068
  • Fryer, L. K., Coniam, D., Carpenter, R., & Lăpușneanu, D. (2020). Bots for language learning now: Current and future directions. Language Learning & Technology, 24(2), 8–22. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44719
  • Fryer, L. K., Nakao, K., & Thompson, A. (2019). Chatbot learning partners: Connecting learning experiences, interest and competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.023
  • Gallacher, A., Thompson, A., & Howarth, M. (2018). “My robot is an idiot!” – Students’ perceptions of AI in the L2 classroom. In P. Taalas, J. Jalkanen, L. Bradley & S. Thouësny (Eds), Future-proof CALL: language learning as exploration and encounters – short papers from EUROCALL 2018 (pp. 70–76). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.26.815
  • Golossenko, A., Pillai, K. G., & Aroean, L. (2020). Seeing brands as humans: Development and validation of a brand anthropomorphism scale. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 37(4), 737–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.02.007
  • Grudin, J., & Jacques, R. (2019). (Eds). Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300439
  • Kwon, S. K., Shin, D., & Lee, Y. (2023). The application of chatbot as an L2 writing practice tool. Language Learning & Technology, 27(1), 1–19. 10125/73541
  • Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.
  • Luo, X., Tong, S., Fang, Z., & Qu, Z. (2019). Frontiers: Machines vs. humans: The impact of artificial intelligence chatbot disclosure on customer purchases. Marketing Science, 38(6), 937–947. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2019.1192
  • Melián-González, S., Gutiérrez-Taño, D., & Bulchand-Gidumal, J. (2021). Predicting the intentions to use chatbots for travel and tourism. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(2), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2019.1706457
  • Pelau, C., Dabija, D. C., & Ene, I. (2021). What makes an AI device human-like? The role of interaction quality, empathy and perceived psychological anthropomorphic characteristics in the acceptance of artificial intelligence in the service industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106855
  • Shah, H., Warwick, K., Vallverdú, J., & Wu, D. (2016). Can machines talk? Comparison of Eliza with modern dialogue systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.004
  • Shin, D., Kim, H., Lee, J. H., & Yang, H. (2021). Exploring the use of an artificial intelligence chatbot as second language conversation partners. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 21, 375–391. https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.21.202104.375
  • Smutny, P., & Schreiberova, P. (2020). Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the Facebook messenger. Computers & Education, 151, 103862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103862
  • Thompson, A., Gallacher, A., & Howarth, M. (2018). Stimulating task interest: Human partners or chatbots?. In P. Taalas, J. Jalkanen, L. Bradley & S. Thouësny (Eds), Future-proof CALL: Language learning as exploration and encounters – Short papers from EUROCALL 2018 (pp. 302–306). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.26.854
  • Winkler, R., & Söllner, M. (2018). Unleashing the potential of chatbots in education: A state-of-the-art analysis. In Academy of Management Annual Meeting (AOM) . Chicago, USA.
  • Yang, H., Kim, H., Lee, J., & Shin, D. (2022). Implementation of an AI chatbot as an English conversation partner in EFL speaking classes. ReCALL, 34(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344022000039
  • Yang, H., Kim, H., Shin, D., & Lee, J. H. (2019). A study on adopting AI-based chatbot in elementary English-speaking classes. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 22(4), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.15702/mall.2019.22.4.184
  • Yin, Q., & Satar, M. (2020). English as a foreign language learner interaction with chatbots: Negotiation for meaning. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 7(2), 390–410. http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/707