321
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
International & Comparative Education

Factors influencing college students’ willingness to continue learning in internationalization at home

, , &
Article: 2331290 | Received 06 Sep 2023, Accepted 07 Mar 2024, Published online: 22 Mar 2024

References

  • Agnew, M., & Kahn, H. E. (2014). Internationalization at Home: Grounded practices to promote intercultural, international, and global learning. Metropolitan Universities, 25(3), 31–46.
  • Al-Emran, M., Arpaci, I., & Salloum, S. A. (2020). An empirical examination of continuous intention to use m-learning: An integrated model. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2899–2918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10094-2
  • Almeida, J., Robson, S., Morosini, M., & Baranzeli, C. (2019). Understanding Internationalization at Home: Perspectives from the global north and south. European Educational Research Journal, 18(2), 200–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118807537
  • Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315307303542
  • Ayele, A. A., & Birhanie, W. K. (2018). Acceptance and use of e-learning systems: The case of teachers in technology institutes of Ethiopian Universities. Applied Informatics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40535-018-0048-7
  • Beelen, J., & Jones, E. (2015a). Redefining internationalisation at home. In Curaj A., Matei L., Pricopie R., Salmi J., & Scott P. (Eds.), The European higher education area: Between critical reflections and future policies (pp. 59–72). Springer.
  • Beelen, J., & Jones, E. (2015b). Looking back at 15 years of internationalisation at home. EAIE forum member magazine, 6–8.
  • Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
  • Challob, A. I. (2021). The effect of flipped learning on EFL students’ writing performance, autonomy, and motivation. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 3743–3769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10434-1
  • Chen, H. (2006). Flow on the net: Exploring online web users’ positive affects and their flow state. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.07.001
  • Cheng, M., Wang, S., Wang, Y., Zhang, R., & Qin, L. (2023). Physical activity reduces internet addiction among “post-00” college students: The mediating role of coping styles. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1052510. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1052510
  • Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., Lai, H., & Chang, C.-M. (2012). Re-examining the influence of trust on online repeat purchase intention: The moderating role of habit and its antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 53(4), 835–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.021
  • Crowther, P. (2003). Internationalization at home: A position paper.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Davis, D., Chen, G., Hauff, C., & Houben, G.-J. (2018). Activating learning at scale: A review of innovations in online learning strategies. Computers & Education, 125, 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.019
  • Gelderblom, H., Matthee, M., Hattingh, M., & Weilbach, L. (2019). High school learners’ continuance intention to use electronic textbooks: A usability study. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1753–1776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9850-z
  • Gemmell, I., Harrison, R., Clegg, J., & Reed, K. (2014). Internationalisation in on-line distance learning postgraduate education: A case study on student views on learning alongside students from other countries. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.881264
  • Goh, T. T., & Yang, B. (2021). The role of e-engagement and flow on the continuance with a learning management system in a blended learning environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00285-8
  • Gröber, S., Vetter, M., Eckert, B., & Jodl, H.-J. (2007). Experimenting from a distance—Remotely controlled laboratory (RCL). European Journal of Physics, 28(3), S127–S141. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/28/3/S12
  • Gu, X., & Mao, E. Z. (2023). The impacts of academic stress on college students’ problematic smartphone use and Internet gaming disorder under the background of Neijuan: Hierarchical regressions with mediational analysis on escape and coping motives. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 1032700. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1032700
  • Hai, M. D., Timothy, T., Natasha, A. R., et al. (2020). Explaining Chinese university students’ continuance learning intention in the MOOC setting: A modified expectation confirmation model perspective. Computers & Education, 150(6), 1–16.
  • Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045
  • Ho, L. A., & Kuo, T. H. (2010). How can one amplify the effect of E-learning? An examination of high-tech employees’ computer attitude and flow experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.007
  • Hudzik, J. K. (2011). Comprehensive internationalization: From concept to action. NAFSA.
  • Hutchinson, T., & Water, A. (1987). English for specific purpose: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge University Press.
  • Islam, A. T., Flint, J., Jaecks, P., & Cap, C. H. (2017). A proficient and versatile online student-teacher collaboration platform for large classroom lectures. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0067-9
  • Johnston, L. (2022). China’s rise in the global south: The Middle East, Africa, and Beijing’s alternative world order Dawn C. Murphy Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. The China Quarterly, 252, 1307–1308. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030574102200145X
  • Jon, J.-E. (2013). Realizing Internationalization at Home in Korean higher education: Promoting domestic students’ interaction with international students and intercultural competence. Journal of Studies in International Education, 17(4), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315312468329
  • Khalid, J., & Janee Ali, A. (2018). Promoting Internationalization at Home in ASEAN higher education institutions: A proposed project. ASEAN Journal of Community Engagement, 2(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.7454/ajce.v2i1.106
  • Klein, B. D., Rossin, D., Guo, Y. M., & Ro, Y. K. (2010). An examination of the effects of flow on learning in a graduate-level introductory operations management course. Journal of Education for Business, 85(5), 292–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320903449600
  • Koufaris, M. (2002). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83
  • Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
  • Laufer, M., Leiser, A., Deacon, B., Perrin de Brichambaut, P., Fecher, B., Kobsda, C., & Hesse, F. (2021). Digital higher education: A divider or bridge builder? Leadership perspectives on edtech in a COVID-19 reality. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00287-6
  • Leask, B. (2009). Using formal and informal curricula to improve interactions between home and international students. Journal of Studies in International Education, 13(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315308329786
  • Leask, B. (2015). Internationalizing the curriculum. Routledge.
  • Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2013). A structural equation model of predictors of online learning retention. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.01.005
  • Lin, W. S., & Wang, C. H. (2012). Antecedences to continued intentions of adopting e-learning system in blended learning instruction: A contingency framework based on models of information system success and task-technology fit. Computers & Education, 58(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.008
  • Liu, S. H., Liao, H. L., & Pratt, J. A. (2009). Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Computers & Education, 52(3), 599–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.002
  • Nilsson, B. (1999). Internationalization at Home—Theory and praxis. EAIE Forum.
  • Pan, S.-Y. (2013). China’s approach to the international market for higher education students: Strategies and implications. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2013.786860
  • Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it?: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.
  • Qi, D., Zhang, M., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Resource integration, value co-creation and continuance intention in MOOCs learning process. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 701–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1802299
  • Rauer, J. N., Kroiss, M., Kryvinska, N., Corinna, E., & Mohamed, A. (2021). Cross-university virtual teamwork as a means of internationalization at home. International Journal of Management Education, 19(3), 100512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100512
  • Robson, S., Almeida, J., & Schartner, A. (2018). Internationalization at Home: Time for review and development? European Journal of Higher Education, 8(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2017.1376697
  • Soffer, T., & Nachmias, R. (2018). Effectiveness of learning in online academic courses compared with face to face courses in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 534–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12258
  • Soria, K. M., & Troisi, J. (2014). Internationalization at Home natives to study abroad: Implications for students’ development of global, international, and intercultural competencies. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18(3), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315313496572
  • Sum, M., & Oancea, A. (2022). The use of technology in higher education teaching by academics during the COVID-19 emergency remote teaching period: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00364-4
  • Wang, W., Duan, Y., Wang, Q., & Liu, H. (2021). An ECM-ISC based on college students’ continued learning intention toward e-learning space post COVID-19. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 09(12), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.912026
  • Wang, C., & Wang, D. (2023). Managing the integration of teaching resources for college physical education using intelligent edge-cloud computing. Journal of Cloud Computing, 12(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-023-00455-1
  • Yi-Shun, W. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information & Management, 41(1), 75–86.
  • Yudkevich, M., Altbach, P. G., & Rumbley, L. (2016). International faculty in higher education, comparative perspectives on recruitment, integration and impact. Routledge.