The digital technology literacy profiles of students as prospective elementary school teachers

References

• Ali, A. (2021). Quantitative data analysis. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23322.36807
   Google Scholar
• Ata, R., & Yildirim, K. (2019). Exploring Turkish pre-service teachers’ perceptions and views of digital literacy. Education Sciences, 9(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbie, E. R. (2021). The practice of social research (15th Ed.). Cengage.
   Google Scholar
• Bali̇kesi̇, R., U., Yünkül, E., Bali̇kesi̇r, U., & Güneş, A. (2022). The relationship between prospective teachers’ digital literacy skills, attitude towards the teaching profession and academic motivations. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 17(3), 140–163. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2022.461.7
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, J., Sonderegger, A., & Sauer, J. (2023). Questionnaire experience of the pictorial usability inventory (PUI) – A comparison of pictorial and hybrid usability scales. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 179, 103116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, I., Shamir-Inbal, T., & Avdiel, O. (2020). How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students? The Internet and Higher Education, 45, 100722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brent, E., & Leedy, P. D. (1990). Practical research: Planning and design. Teaching Sociology, 18(2), 248. https://doi.org/10.2307/1318509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buntins, K., Kerres, M., & Heinemann, A. (2021). A scoping review of research instruments for measuring student engagement: In need for convergence. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100099
   Google Scholar
• Çam, E., & Kiyici, M. (2017). Perceptions of prospective teachers on digital literacy. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2017(4), 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Cardona, M. A., & Rodríguez, R. J. (2022). Advancing digital equity for all: Community-based recommendations for developing effective digital equity plans to close the digital divide and enable technology-empowered learning. Office of Educational Technology. US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cerero, J. F., Fernández Batanero, J. M., & Almenara, J. C. (2023). Digital teaching competencies and disability. Validation of a questionnaire design using the K coefficient to select experts. Heliyon, 9(6), e16467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, A. (Ed.). (2005). Teaching and learning strategies for the thinking classroom. International Debate Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (Fourth Indian edition). PHI Learning Private Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, E., Sousa, E., Brito, R., & Costa, F. A. (2023). Understanding the meaning of a digital school from the perspective of primary school teachers. Digital Education Review, 2023(43), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2023.43.172-184
   Google Scholar
• Cueva, A., & Inga, E. (2022). Information and communication technologies for education considering the flipped learning model. Education Sciences, 12(3), 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazilla, S., Bukit, N., & Sriadhi, S. (2023). Professional competence of prospective elementary school teachers in designing lesson plans integrating project-based learning models and TPACK. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 10(1), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v10i1.54875
   Google Scholar
• Filiz, O., & Kurt, A. A. (2022). The effect of preservice teachers’ experiences in a flipped course on digital competencies related to educational technology and innovativeness. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5(3), 655–675. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1118674
   Google Scholar
• Focacci, C. N., & Perez, C. (2022). The importance of education and training policies in supporting technological revolutions: A comparative and historical analysis of UK, US, Germany, and Sweden (1830–1970). Technology in Society, 70, 102000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedik, O., & Delican, B. (2022). Relationship between professionalism levels and pedagogical digital competences of pre-service elementary school teachers. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 10(S1), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v10iS1-Aug.4314
   Google Scholar
• Gilster, P., & Glister, P. (1997). Digital literacy (p. 1). Wiley Computer Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Gremse, F., & Schulz, V. (2011). Qualitative and quantitative data analysis. Small animal imaging: Basics and practical guide (pp. 363–378). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12945-2_25
   Google Scholar
• Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(3), 66–67. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoi, N. H. (2020). Developing Vietnam’s high-quality human resources in conditions of industrial revolution 4.0. Some Theoretical Aspects, 2020, 601. https://doi.org/10.24411/2312-8089-2020-10601
   Google Scholar
• Isrokatun, I., Pradita, A. A., Ummah, S. A., Amalia, D. Y., & Salsabila, N. S. (2022). Digital literacy competency of primary school teacher education department student as the demands of 21st Century learning. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 9(3), 466–483. https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v9i3.44057
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N., Baird, S., & Lunin, L. (2018). GAGE research design, sample and methodology. Gender and Adolescence: Global Evidence.
   Google Scholar
• Karsli, M. B., Küçük, S., Kılıç, R., & Ünal, Ö. A. (2023). Assessment of digital competencies of teacher educators with the DigCompEdu Framework. Nternational Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 13(1), 67–94. http://www.ijocis.com/index.php/ijocis/index
   Google Scholar
• Kindei, L., Olena, N., Iryna, B., Yulia, K., & Natalka, K. (2022). The problem of methodological training of future teachers in the digital environment. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11(5), 146. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n5p146
   Google Scholar
• Kotronoulas, G., Miguel, S., Dowling, M., Fernández-Ortega, P., Colomer-Lahiguera, S., Bağçivan, G., Pape, E., Drury, A., Semple, C., Dieperink, K. B., & Papadopoulou, C. (2023). An overview of the fundamentals of data management, analysis, and interpretation in quantitative research. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 39(2), 151398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law of the Republic of Indonesia number. 14. (2005). Teachers and Lecturers.
   Google Scholar
• Lilian, A. (2022). Motivational beliefs, an important contrivance in elevating digital literacy among university students. Heliyon, 8(12), e11913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A., Brante, E. W., & Klee, H. L. (2020). A framework of pre-service teachers’ conceptions about digital literacy: Comparing the United States and Sweden. Computers & Education, 148, 103788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loglo, F. S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2023). Learning with digital media: A systematic review of students’ use in African Higher Education. Journal of Learning for Development, 10(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.56059/2311/1550
   Google Scholar
• Marczyk, G. R., DeMatteo, D., & Festinger, D. (2005). Essentials of research design and methodology. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mariscal, L. L., Albarracin, M. R., Mobo, F. D., & Cutillas, A. L. (2023). Pedagogical competence towards technology-driven instruction on basic education. International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 4(5), 1567–1580. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.05.18
   Google Scholar
• Melash, V. D., Molodychenko, V. V., Huz, V. V., Varenychenko, A. B., & Kirsanova, S. S. (2020). Modernization of education programs and formation of digital competences of future primary school teachers. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(7), 377. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n7p377
   Google Scholar
• Mohamad, M. M., Sulaiman, N. L., Sern, L. C., & Salleh, K. M. (2015). Measuring the Validity and Reliability of Research Instruments. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129
   Google Scholar
• Newman, I., & Benz, C. R. (1998). Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum. Southern Illinois University Press (pp. 235–236).
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. H. (2020). Developing Vietnam’s High-quality Human Resources in Conditions of Industrial Revolution 4.0: Some Theoretical Aspects. Bulletin of Science and Education, 6-1(84), 48–51. https://doi.org/10.24411/2312-8089-2020-10601
   Google Scholar
• Nordell, S. E. (2009). Learning how to learn: A model for teaching students learning strategies. Bioscene, 35(1), 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Oke, A., & Fernandes, F. A. P. (2020). Innovations in teaching and learning: Exploring the perceptions of the education sector on the 4th Industrial Revolution (4IR). Journal of Open Innovation, 6(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6020031
   Google Scholar
• Ong, M. H. A., & Puteh, F. (2017). Quantitative data analysis: Choosing between SPSS, PLS and AMOS in social science research. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Scientific Research, 3(1), 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Purnama, S., Ulfah, M., Machali, I., Wibowo, A., & Narmaditya, B. S. (2021). Does digital literacy influence students’ online risk? Evidence from Covid-19. Heliyon, 7(6), e07406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambousek, V., Štípek, J., & Vaňková, P. (2016). Contents of digital literacy from the perspective of teachers and pupils. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.101
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, P., Chaudhary, K., Sharma, B., & Chand, R. (2022). Talismans of digital literacy: A statistical overview. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 20(5), 570–587. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.5.2599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redfern, A. (2015). The essential guide to classroom practice: 200+ strategies for outstanding teaching and learning. Routledge Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140410512
   Google Scholar
• Sajidan, S., Atmojo, I. R. W., Ardiansyah, R., Chumdari, C., Adi, F. P., & Wulandari, W. (2023). The level of classroom teacher digital literacy in the technology dimension of the Instant Digital Competence Assessment (IDCA). Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 10(1), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v10i1.55680
   Google Scholar
• Seaman, D. J., & Seaman, D. J. (2023). Digital learning pulse survey: The Digital Transformation of the Community College. Bay View Analytics 6924 Thornhill Drive, Oakland, CA 94611.
   Google Scholar
• Secolsky, C. (2017). Handbook on measurement, assessment, and evaluation in higher education. (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709307
   Google Scholar
• Shi, H. (2017). Learning strategies and classification in education. Institute for Learning Styles Journal, 1(1), 24–36.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, C. M., & Chaw, L. Y. (2016). Digital literacy: A prerequisite for effective learning in a blended. Learning Environment? 14(1), 54–65.
   Google Scholar
• Thuy Hang, L., & Hong Van, V. (2020). Building strong teaching and learning strategies through teaching innovations and learners’ creativity: A study of Vietnam Universities. International Journal of Education and Practice, 8(3), 498–510. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2020.83.498.510
   Google Scholar
• Tomczyk, Ł. (2020). Digital literacy and e-learning experiences among the pre-service teachers data. Data in Brief, 32, 106052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, M. (2007). Research methods. Journal of Business, 5(3), 312–315.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, C. E. (1988). Assessment and training of student learning strategies. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 291–316). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2118-5_11
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1983). The teaching of learning strategies. In Innovation Abstracts, 5(32), 32.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J. (2022). An empirical survey of statistical research methods in applied science. Journal of King Saud University – Science, 34(4), 102008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, T. K., Lin, M. L., & Liao, Y. K. (2017). Understanding factors influencing information communication technology adoption behavior: The moderators of information literacy and digital skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar