Students’ perspective on feedback in mathematics in high school

References

• Andersson, C., & Palm, T. (2017). Characteristics of improved formative assessment practice. Education Inquiry, 8(2), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2016.1275185
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302408382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/713695728
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadfoot, P., Daugherty, R., Gardner, J., Harlen, W., James, M., & Stobart, G. (2002). Assessment for Learning: 10 Principles. Assessment Reform Group. Nuffield Foundation and University of Cambridge. https://assessmentreformgroup.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/10principles_english.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bueie, A. A. (2015). Summativ vurdering i formativ drakt – elevperspektiv på tilbakemelding fra heldagsprøver i norsk. [Summative assessment in a formative frame – student perspective of feedback on all-day test in Norwegian languages]. Acta Didactica Norge, 9(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.1300
   Google Scholar
• Bueie, A. A. (2016). Nyttige og mindre nyttige Lærerkommentarer-slik elevene ser det. [Useful and less useful teacher comments: Students’ perceptions]. Nordic Journal of Literacy Research, 2, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.17585/njlr.v2.188
   Google Scholar
• Butler-Kisber, L., & Poldma, T. (2010). The power of visual approaches in qualitative inquiry: The use of collage making and concept mapping in experiential research. Journal of Research Practice, 6(2), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2019). Feedback loops and the longer-term: Towards feedback spirals. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 705–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1531108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Mahoney, P., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2019). What makes for effective feedback: Staff and student perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O. (2013). Dialog, samspill og læring: flerstemmige læringsfellesskap i teori og praksis. [Dialogue, interaction and learning: the polyphonic learning communities in theory and practice]. In R. Krumsvik & R. Säljö (Eds.) Praktisk-pedagogisk utdanning. En antologi. Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Engelsen, K., & Smith, K. (2010). Is “Excellent” good enough? Education Inquiry, 1(4), 415–431. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v1i4.21954
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, H. (2017). Elevers oppfatning av lærers tilbakemeldingspraksis: om sammenheng mellom graden av VfL-praksis og elevenes opplevde nytte av lærers skriftlige tilbakemeldinger i skriftlig norsk. [Students’ perceptions of feedback practice: The interrelationship between the degree of assessment for learning and students’ perceived usefulness of written feedback from teachers in Norwegian written languages]. Nordic Journal of Literacy Research, 3(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.23865/njlr.v3.683
   Google Scholar
• Esterhazy, R., & Damşa, C. (2019). Unpacking the feedback process: An analysis of undergraduate students’ interactional meaning-making of feedback comments. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1359249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiskerstrand, P., & Gamlem, S. M. (2023). Instructional feedback to support self-regulated writing in primary school. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1232529. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1232529
   Google Scholar
• Fjørtoft, H. (2013). Vurderingspraksiser i norskfaget. [Assessment practices in Norwegian languages]. In L.V. Sandvik, & T. Buland (Eds.). Vurdering i skolen. Operasjonaliseringer og praksiser. [Assessment in school. Interpretation and practices]. Report 2 from the project Forskning på individuell vurdering i skolen (FIVIS),. 99–118. NTNU Skole- og læringsforskning og SINTEF.
   Google Scholar
• Gamlem, S. M. (2019). Mapping teaching through interactions and pupils’ learning in mathematics. SAGE Open, 9(3), 215824401986148. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019861485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamlem, S. M., & Munthe, E. (2014). Mapping the quality of feedback to support students’ learning in lower secondary classrooms. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.855171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K. (2013). Student perceptions of classroom feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(2), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.749212
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Does your assessment support your students’ learning. Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grevholm, B. (2021). Recent Nordic research in mathematics education illustrated by examples from NORMA17. Mathematics, 9(8), 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9080803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grønkjær, M., Curtis, T., de Crespigny, C., & Delmar, C. (1970). Analysing group interaction in focus group research: Impact on content and the role of the moderator. Qualitative Studies, 2(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.7146/qs.v2i1.4273
   Google Scholar
• Halkier, B. (2010). Fokusgrupper. [Focus groups]. Gyldendal forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Gan, M. (2011). Instruction based on feedback. In R.E. Myer, & P.A. Alexander (Eds.) Handbook of research on learning and instruction (2nd ed., pp. 234–290). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., Crivelli, J., Van Gompel, K., West-Smith, P., & Wike, K. (2021). Feedback that leads to improvement in student essays: Testing the hypothesis that “Where to Next” feedback is most powerful. Frontiers in Education, 6, 645758. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.645758
   Google Scholar
• Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (Eds.). (2019). Identifying feedback that has impact. The impact of feedback in higher education (pp. 15–34).
   Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck, T. H. (2011). Fra teoretiske modeller til klasseromspraksis: Hvordan fremme selvregulert læring? [From theoretical models to classroom practices: How to promote self-regulated learning?] Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift, 95(5), 360–373. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-2987-2011-05-04
   Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck, T., Throndsen, I., Lie, S., & Dale, E. L. (2012). Assessment with distinctly defined criteria: A research study of a national project. Policy Futures in Education, 10(4), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2012.10.4.421
   Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck, T., Tolo, A., Florez, T., & El Masri, Y. (2013). Balancing trust and accountability? The assessment for learning programme in Norway. A governing complex educational systems case study. OECD Education Working Papers No. 97. Report for OECD Paris part of the Governing Complex Education Systems. EDU/WKP (2013)12.
   Google Scholar
• Jónsson, I. R., Smith, K., & Geirsdóttir, G. (2018). Shared language of feedback and assessment. Perception of teachers and students in three Icelandic secondary schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56, 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungert, T., & Andersson, U. (2013). Self-efficacy beliefs in mathematics, native language literacy and foreign language amongst boys and girls with and without mathematic difficulties. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.621140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 311(7000), 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Det kvalitative forskningsintervju. [Qualitative interviews] (3rd ed.). Gyldendal forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Research. (2020). Regulations to the Education Act, Chapter 3: Individual assessment in primary school and in upper secondary education.
   Google Scholar
• National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (NESH). (2022). Guidelines for research ethics in the social sciences and the humanities (5th ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Nieminen, J. H., & Atjonen, P. (2023). The assessment culture of mathematics in Finland: A student perspective. Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2022.2045626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen, J. H., Tai, J., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2021). Student agency in feedback: Beyond the individual. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1887080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normann, D.-A., Sandvik, L. V., & Fjørtoft, H. (2023). Reduced grading in assessment: A scoping review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 135, 104336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nortvedt, G. A., & Pettersen, A. (2015). Matematikk. [Mathematics]. In M. Kjærnsli & F. Jensen (Eds.) Stø Kurs. Norske elevers kompetanse i naturfag, matematikk og lesing i PISA. [Steady course. Norwegian students’ competency in nature study, mathematics and reading in PISA]. Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nortvedt, G. A., Santos, L., & Pinto, J. (2016). Assessment for learning in Norway and Portugal: The case of primary school mathematics teaching. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(3), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1108900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2017). Vurdering for læring - om satsingen. [Assessment for learning – a strategy]. https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/vurdering/nasjonal-satsing/om-satsingen/
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. (2018). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: A roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0258-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S.L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365–386). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452–502). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pippitt, K. A., Moore, K. B., Lindsley, J. E., Cariello, P. F., Smith, A. G., Formosa, T., Moser, K., Morton, D. A., Colbert-Getz, J. M., & Chow, C. J. (2022). Assessment for learning with ungraded and graded assessment. Medical Science Educator, 32(5), 1045–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01612-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pitt, E., Bearman, M., & Esterhazy, R. (2020). The conundrum of low achievement and feedback for learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1630363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakoczy, K., Pinger, P., Hochweber, J., Klieme, E., Schütze, B., & Besser, M. (2019). Formative assessment in mathematics: Mediated by feedback’s perceived usefulness and students’ self-efficacy. Learning and Instruction, 60, 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830280103
   Google Scholar
• Rambøll Management Consulting. (2020). Vurdering i skolen [Assessment in school]. Report.
   Google Scholar
• Rønsen, A. K. (2013). What teachers say and what students perceive: Interpretations of feedback in teacher-student assessment dialogues. Education Inquiry, 4(3), 22625. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v4i3.22625
   Google Scholar
• Rosas, S. R., & Kane, M. (2012). Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: A pooled study analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35(2), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2011). Informal formative assessment: The role of instructional dialogues in assessing students’ learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2011). Interpreting qualitative data. a guide to the principles of qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K., Gamlem, S. M., Sandal, A. K., & Engelsen, S. (2016). Education for the future: A conceptual framework of responsive pedagogy. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1227021. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1227021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spooner, M., & Pawlikowska, T. (2023). Feedback literacy as a model to explore how learners respond to feedback. British Journal of Hospital Medicine (London, England: 2005), 84(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2022.0446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stovner, R. B., Klette, K., & Nortvedt, G. A. (2021). The instructional situations in which mathematics teachers provide substantive feedback. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108(3), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10065-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stovner. (2021). The Feedback Teachers Provide in Mathematics Lessons and How They Provide It Feedback Practices in Norwegian Lower Secondary Mathematics Classrooms [Thesis Philosophiae Doctor] [Department of Teacher Education and School Research Faculty of Educational Sciences]. University of Oslo. RB
   Google Scholar
• Straub, R. (1997). Students’ reactions to teacher comments: An exploratory study. Research in the Teaching of English, 31(1), 91–119. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte19973873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tveit, S. (2014). Educational assessment in Norway. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2013.830079
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Human Rights. (2002). Convention on the Rights of the Child. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CRC.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Utdanning.no. (2024). Choice of mathematics at upper secondary school. https://utdanning.no/tema/utdanning_hjelp_og_veiledning/valg_av_matematikk_pa_videregaende
   Google Scholar
• Vattøy, K.-D., & Gamlem, S. M. (2023). Students’ experiences of peer feedback practices as related to awareness raising of learning goals, self-monitoring, self-efficacy, anxiety, and enjoyment in teaching EFL and mathematics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2192772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendelborg, C., & Hygen, B. W. (2022). Elevundersøkelsen 2022. Analyse av Elevundersøkelsen skoleåret 2022/23. [The Annual Pupil Survey 2022.]. NTNU Samfunnsforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2008). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work? In C.A. Dwyer (Ed.) The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., & Boud, B. (2020). The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 656–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2019). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylie, E. C., & Lyon, C. L. (2015). The fidelity of formative assessment implementation: Issues of breadth and quality. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 22(1), 140–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.990416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-regulatory cycles of learning. In G.A. Straka (Ed.), Conceptions of self-directed learning: Theoretical and conceptual considerations (pp. 221–234). Waxmann.
   Google Scholar