Enhancing trust, safety and quality: exploring the role of dialogue in peer feedback on professional competencies

References

• Belbin, R. M. (2010). Management teams: Why they succeed or fail (3rd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braadbaart, I., Vuuregge, A., Beekman, F., Scheijen, S., Muijlwijk-Koezen, J., & Scholten, D. (2023). Leveraging the ALACT reflection model to improve academic skills development in bachelor students: A case study. The Asian Conference on Education 2022: Official Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2186-5892.2023.76. ISSN: 2186–5892.
   Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2012). Trust and its role in facilitating dialogic feedback. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well (pp. 90–103). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203074336
   Google Scholar
• Chartered Management Institute. (2018). 21st century leaders. Building employability through higher education. https://www.managers.org.uk/knowledge-and-insights/research/building-employability-through-higher-education/
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). Students’ interpersonal perspectives on, conceptions of and approaches to learning in online peer assessment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 599–618. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottrell, S. (2001). Teaching study skills and supporting learning. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, M. L., Saunders-Smits, G. N., & Groen, P. (2020). Evaluation of competency methods in engineering education: A systematic review. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(5), 729–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1671810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannefer, E. F., Henson, L. C., Bierer, S. B., Grady-Weliky, T. A., Meldrum, S., Nofziger, A. C., Barclay, C., & Epstein, R. M. (2005). Peer assessment of professional competence. Medical Education, 39(7), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02193.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolce, V., Emanuel, F., Cisi, M., & Ghislieri, C. (2020). The soft skills of accounting graduates: Perceptions versus expectations. Accounting Education, 29(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2019.1697937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley, L. M., & Bamford, N. J. (2018). Peer feedback on collaborative learning activities in veterinary education. Veterinary Sciences, 5(4), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5040090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Er, E., Dimitriadis, Y., & Gašević, D. (2020). A collaborative learning approach to dialogic peer feedback: A theoretical framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(4), 586–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1786497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). EntreComp: The European entrepreneurship competence framework. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2767/88978
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. (2003). Involving students in assessment. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 3(2), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2003.3.2.102
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287–322. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FeedbackFruits (2021). FeedbackFruits Tool Suite (version 2.59) [Computer Software]. https://feedbackfruits.com/
   Google Scholar
• Glazzard, J., & Stones, S. (2019). Student perceptions of feedback in higher education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(11), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.11.3
   Google Scholar
• Guardado, M., & Shi, L. (2007). ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback. Computers and Composition, 24(4), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2007.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Hove, D. t., Jorgensen, T. D., & van der Ark, L. A. (2022). Updated guidelines on selecting an intraclass correlation coefficient for interrater reliability, with applications to incomplete observational designs. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, C., Barrett, A., & Frick, T. (2010). Anonymity to promote peer feedback: Pre-service teachers’ comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(1), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.43.1.f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J. (2019). The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 863–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman, B., Saab, N., Van Driel, J., & Van Den Broek, P. (2020). A questionnaire to assess students’ beliefs about peer-feedback. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(3), 328–338. (https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1630294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongsma, M. V., Scholten, D. J., van Muijlwijk-Koezen, J. E., & Meeter, M. (2022). Online versus offline peer feedback in higher education: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(2), 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221114181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenworthy, L., & Kielstra, P. (2015). Driving the skills agenda: Preparing students for the future. Economist Intelligence Unit. https://www.eiuperspectives.economist.com/sites/default/files/Drivingtheskillsagenda.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lejk, M., & Wyvill, M. (2002). Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: Student attitudes to holistic and category-based approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(6), 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000020327
   Google Scholar
• Li, L. (2017). The role of anonymity in peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 645–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1174766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, R., & Bol, L. (2007). A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(2), 100–115.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. E., Minshew, L. M., Gonzalez, D., Lamb, K., Klus, N. J., Aubé, J., Cox, W., & Brouwer, K. L. R. (2019). Can they imagine the future? A qualitative study exploring the skills employers seek in pharmaceutical sciences doctoral graduates. PLoS One, 14(9), e0222422. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, H., Hoekstra, R., Brouwer, J., & Strijbos, J. W. (2020). Unfolding collaborative learning assessment literacy: A reflection on current assessment methods in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(8), 1222–1240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1729696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelwati, Abdullah, K. L., Chong, M. C., & McKenna, L. (2020). The effect of peer learning on professional competence development among Indonesian undergraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Professional Nursing: Official Journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 36(6), 477–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., & Alqassab, M. (2019). An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1253–1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt, E., & Winstone, N. (2018). The impact of anonymous marking on students’ perceptions of fairness, feedback and relationships with lecturers. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1183–1193. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1437594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O'Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raes, A., Vanderhoven, E., & Schellens, T. (2015). Increasing anonymity in peer assessment by using classroom response technology within face-to-face higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(1), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.823930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., & Schellens, T. (2018). Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: Its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students’ perceptions about peer assessment skills. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(1), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-017-0339-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillings, M., Roebertsen, H., Savelberg, H., van Dijk, A., & Dolmans, D. (2021). Improving the understanding of written peer feedback through face-to-face peer dialogue: Students’ perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(5), 1100–1116. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1798889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. (2017). Peer assessment: Learning by judging and discussing the work of other learners. Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology, 1(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.31532/interdiscipeducpsychol.1.1.007
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2006). Peer assessment in university teaching: Evaluating seven course designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500262346
   Google Scholar
• van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2010). Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Heerden, M., & Bharuthram, S. (2021). Knowing me, knowing you: The effects of peer familiarity on receiving peer feedback for undergraduate student writers. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(8), 1191–1201. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1863910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollstedt, M., & Rezat, S. (2019). An introduction to grounded theory with a special focus on axial coding and the coding paradigm. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15636-7_4
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Management Review, 15(1), 45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J. (2022). Making peer feedback work: The contribution of technology-mediated dialogic peer feedback to feedback uptake and literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1914544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.719154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Q., & Carless, D. (2018). Dialogue within peer feedback processes: Clarification and negotiation of meaning. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(4), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1446417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar