Perception of vulnerability in young females’ experiences of oral sex: Findings from the focus group discussions

References

• Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York, NY: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Bay-Cheng, L. Y., & Fava, N. M. (2011). Young women’s experiences and perceptions of cunnilingus during adolescence. Journal of Sex Research, 48(6), 531–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Robinson, A. D., & Zucker, A. N. (2009). Behavioral and relational contexts of adolescent desire, wanting, and pleasure: Undergraduate women’s retrospective accounts. Journal of Sex Research, 46(6), 511–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bersamin, M. M., Walker, S., Waiters, E. D., Fisher, D. A., & Grube, J. W. (2005). Promising to wait: Virginity pledges and adolescent sexual behavior. Journal of Adolescent Health, 36(5), 428–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, W., Doherty-Poirier, M., MacKinnon, D., Fortin, C., Saab, H., King, M., & Gallupe, O. (2006). Sexual health of Canadian youth: Findings from the Canadian youth, sexual health and HIV/AIDS study. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 15(2), 59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, S., & Halpern-Felsher, B. L. (2007). versusAdolescents’ reported consequences of having oral sex vs. vaginal sex. Pediatrics, 119, 229–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, A., Futch, V. A., & Tolman, D. L. (2011). “It is like doing homework”: Academic achievement discourse in adolescent girls’ fellation narratives. Sexuaity Research and Social Policy, 8, 139–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, T. F., & Pruzinsky, T. (Eds.). (2002). Body images: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, W. (2007). Oral sex: Varied Behaviors and perceptions in a college population. Journal of Sex Research, 44(1), 28–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dittmar, H. (2005). Introduction to the special issue: Body image - vulnerability factors and processes linking sociocultural pressures and body dissatisfaction. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(6), 768–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010). Predictors and consequences of sexual ‘hook-ups’ among college students: a short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1105–1119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Towards understanding woman’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, H. (2000). Focusing on sex: Using focus groups in sex research. Sexualities, 3(3), 275–297.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern-Felsher, B. L., Cornell, J. L., Kropp, R. Y., & Tschann, J. M. (2005). Oral versus vaginal sex among adolescents: Perceptions, attitudes, and behaviour. Pediatrics, 115, 845–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L., & Armstrong, E. A. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: Double binds and flawed options. Gender & Society, 23(5), 589–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, E. (2009). The ethics and implications of paying participants in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research and Methodology, 12(4), 335–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free associations, narrativa and the interview method. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 87–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Impett, E. A., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D. L. (2006). To be seen and not heard: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ sexual health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35(2), 129–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaestle, C. E., & Halpern, C. T. (2007). What’s love got to do with it? Sexual behaviors of opposite-sex couples through emerging adulthood. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39(3), 134–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltiala-Heino, R., Kosunen, E., & Rimpelä, M. (2003). Pubertal timing, sexual behaviour and self-reported depression in middle adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 26(5), 531–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A. (1998). Analyzing & reporting focus group results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, L. D., Jones, R., & Santelli, J. S. (2008). Noncoital sexual activities among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43, 231–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malacad, B. L., & Hess, G. C. (2010). Oral sex: Behaviours and feelings of Canadian young women and implications for sex education. The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 15(3), 177–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, S. I., & Fine, M. (2008). Writing on cellophane: Studying teen women’s sexual desires; inventing methodological release points. In K. Gallagher (Ed.), The methodological dilemma: Creative, critical and collaborative approaches to qualitative research (pp. 232–260). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, A. (2004). Oral sex among teenagers: Research, discourse, and education. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 13, 201–203.
   Google Scholar
• McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, S., Erens, B., Field, J., Johnson, A. M., Mercer, C.H., Wellings, K., … Fenton, K. A. (2004) The National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles: Summary of key findings. AIDS & Hepatitis Digest, 99.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, A. M. (2007). Adolescent first sex and subsequent mental health. American Journal of Sociology, 112(6), 1811–1847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, C. H., Copas, A. J., Sonnenberg, P., Johnson, A. M., McManus, S., Erens, B., & Cassell, J. A. (2009). Who has sex with whom? Characteristics of heterosexual partnerships reported in the second National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles. International Journal of Epidemiology, 38, 206–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L., & Spanish, M. T. (1984). Focus groups: A new tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 7, 253–270.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, M. A., Millstein, S. G., Ofner, S., & Halpern-Felsher, B. L. (2006). Greater expectations: Adolescents’ positive motivations for sex. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38(2), 84–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 321–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, M. E., & Lee, C. M. (2010). Sexual motivations and engagement in sexual behavior during the transition to college. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(3), 674–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). ‘Hook-ups’: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinstein, M. J., Meade, C. S., & Cohen, G. L. (2003). Adolescent oral sex, peer popularity, and perceptions of best friends’ sexual behaviour. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 28, 243–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L. (2009). Framed before we know it: How gender shapes social relations. Gender & Society, 23, 145–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18, 510–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risman, B., & Schwartz, P. (2002). After the Sexual revolution: Gender politics in teen dating. Contexts, 1, 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, M. J. (2007). The age of independence: Interracial unions, same sex unions and the changing American family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, D. T., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Crocker, J. (2011). Relationship contingency and sexual motivation in women: Implications for sexual satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(1), 99–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzel-Murphy, E. A., Harris, D. A., Knight, R. A., & Milburn, M. A. (2009). Sexual coercion in men and women: similar behaviors, different predictors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(6), 974–986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, Agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiggemann, M. (2005). Body dissatisfaction and adolescent self-esteem: Prospecive findings. Body Image: An International Journal of Research, 2, 129–135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tolman, D. L. (2012). Female adolescents, sexual empowerment and desire: A missing discourse of gender inequity. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), 746–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolman, D. L., Futch, V., & Burns, A. (2009). Narrating fellatio: Coercion, competence and contradictions. Toronto: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Tolman, D. L., Impett, E. A., Tracy, A. J., & Michael, A. (2006). Looking good, sounding good: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ metal health. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(1), 85–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolman, D. L., Striepe, M. I., & Harmon, T. (2003). Gender matters: Constructing a model of adolescent sexual health. Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 4–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uecker, J. E., Angotti, N., & Regnerus, M. D. (2008). Going most of the way: “Technical virginity” among American adolescents. Social Science Research, 37(4), 1200–1215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellings, K., Nanchahal, K., Macdowall, W., McManus, S., Erens, B., Mercer, C. H., … Field, J. (2001). Sexual behaviour in Britain: Early heterosexual experience. The Lancet, 358(9296), 1843–1850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (2000). Womens’ body image self-consciousness during physical intimacy with a partner. Journal of Sex Research, 37(1), 60–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W., & Hurst, S. R. (1998). Body size, physical attractiveness, and body image among young adult women: Relationship to sexual experience and sexual esteem. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 272–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. (1998). Focus groups in feminist research: Power, interaction and the co-construction of meaning. Women’s Studies International Forum, 21(1), 111–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeller, R. A. (1993). Focus group research on sensitive topics: Setting the Agenda without setting the Agenda. In D. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups (pp. 167–183). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar