351
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Messy, entangled, and shapeshifting: Feral Mapping

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Received 26 May 2023, Accepted 17 Dec 2023, Published online: 27 Mar 2024

References

  • Bell, G. (2010). CHI 2010 opening plenary: Genevieve bell – Messy futures: Culture, technology and research. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-a2gj2clzTk.
  • Botero, A., Dolejšová, M., Choi, J. H.-J., & Ampatzidou, C. (2022). Open forest: Walking with forests, stories, data, and other creatures. Interactions, 29(1), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3501766
  • Caquard, S., & Cartwright, W. (2014). Narrative cartography: From mapping stories to the narrative of maps and mapping. The Cartographic Journal, 51(2), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1179/0008704114Z.000000000130
  • Choi, J. H., & Botero, A. (2021). What does it mean to do things together?: Design’s conflicting relationships with democracy. Interactions, 28(6), 28–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3489440
  • Choi, J. H. J., Braybrooke, K., & Forlano, L. (2023). Care-full co-curation: Critical urban placemaking for more-than-human futures. City, 27(1-2), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2022.2149945
  • Cosgrove, D. (2005). Maps, mapping, modernity: Art and cartography in the twentieth century. Imago Mundi, 57(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308569042000289824
  • de Castro, E. B. V., & Wagner, R. (2015). The relative native: Essays on indigenous conceptual worlds. Hau Books/University of Chicago Press.
  • de la Cadena, M. (2014, January 13). The politics of modern politics meets ethnographies of excess through ontological openings. Theorizing the contemporary. Fieldsights. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/the-politics-of-modern-politics-meets-ethnographies-of-excess-through-ontological-openings
  • Debord, G. (1958, June). “Definitions”. Internationale Situationniste. Paris (1) Translated by Ken Knabb. https://www.cddc.vt.edu/sionline/si/definitions.html.
  • Dolejšová, M., Botero, A., & Choi, J. H. (2023). Open forest: Walking-with feral stories, creatures, data. Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: The International Venue on Practice-centered Computing on the Design of Cooperation Technologies – Exploratory Papers, Reports of the European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (ISSN 2510-2591). https://doi.org/10.48340/ecscw2023_ep11
  • Elwood, S. A. (2001). GIS and collaborative urban governance: Understanding their implications for community action and power. Urban Geography, 22(8), 737–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2001.11501633
  • Escobar, A. (2007). Worlds and knowledges otherwise. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 179–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162506
  • Goffe, T. L. (2020). Unmapping the Caribbean: Toward a digital praxis of archipelagic sounding. archipelagos, (5). https://doi.org/10.7916/archipelagos-72th-0z19
  • Greenfield, A. (2010, April 15). Ultramapping. http://speedbird.wordpress.com/2010/04/15/ultramapping/
  • Griffin, A., & McQuoid, J. (2012). At the intersection of maps and emotion: The challenge of spatially representing experience. Kartographische Nachrichten, 62(6), 291–299.
  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
  • Kearney, A. T. (2022). Readiness for the storm the 2022 global cities report.
  • Keith, M., & Pile, S. (Eds.). (1993). Place and the politics of identity (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203016695
  • Knight, L. (2021). Inefficient mapping: A protocol for attuning to phenomena. Punctum Books.
  • Latour, B. (1993). The pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, B. (2016). Foreword: The scientific fables of an empirical La Fontaine. In V. Despret (Ed.), What would animals say if we asked the right questions? (pp. vii–xiv). University of Minnesota Press.
  • McKittrick, K. (2021). Dear science and other stories. Duke Univesrity Press.
  • Mitro, M. (2023). Open urban forest. In M. Dolejšová (Ed.), Creatures co-laboratory catalogue (pp. 88–95). CreaTures. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7525506
  • Rancière, J. (2009). Afterword/method of equality: An answer to some questions. In G. Rockhill & P. Watts (Eds.), Jacques Rancière: History, politics, aesthetics (pp. 273–289). Duke University Press.
  • Sassen, S. (2005). The global city: Introducing a concept. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 11(2), 27–43. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24590544
  • Schuurman, N. (2000). Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990s. Progress in Human Geography, 24(4), 569–590. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200100189111
  • Schuurman, N., & Pratt, G. (2002). Care of the subject: Feminism and critiques of GIS. Gender, Place & Culture, 9(3), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369022000003905
  • Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
  • Steyerl, H. (2016). A sea of data: Apophenia and pattern (mis-)recognition. E-Flux Journal, (72). https://www.e-flux.com/journal/72/60480/a-sea-of-data-apophenia-and-pattern-mis-recognition/.
  • Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press.
  • Tsing, A. L., Mathews, A. S., & Bubandt, N. (2019). Patchy anthropocene: Landscape structure, multispecies history, and the retooling of anthropology: An introduction to supplement 20. Current Anthropology, 60(S20), S186–S197. https://doi.org/10.1086/703391
  • Yeah Yeah Yeahs. (2003). Maps [Song]. On Fever to Tell. Interscope Records.