The NGEU comes to Visegrád: implementation process and throughput legitimacy

References

• Anckar, C. (2008). On the applicability of the most similar systems design and the most different systems design in comparative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(5), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BankWatch. (2021). Assessment of Hungary's recovery and resilience plan. Briefing April 2021. https://bankwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/2021-04-29_Hungary-RRF-assessment_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Benz, A., & Papadopoulos, Y. (2006). Governance and democracy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bokhorst, D. (2022). The influence of the European semester: Case study analysis and lessons for its post-pandemic transformation. Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(1), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caby, V., & Frehen, L. (2021). How to produce and measure throughput legitimacy? Lessons from a systematic literature review. Politics and Governance, 9(1), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.4011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, F., Natalini, A., & Wegemann, C. (2015). Clustered Europeanization and national reform programmes: A qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(8), 1186–1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1011197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatzopoulou, S. (2015). Unpacking the mechanisms of the EU’ throughput’ governance legitimacy: The case of EFSA. European Politics and Society, 16(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2014.974312
   Google Scholar
• Corti, F., & Vesan, P. (2023). From austerity-conditionality towards a new investment-led growth strategy: Social Europe after the Recovery and Resilience Facility. Social Policy & Administration, 57(4), 513–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespy, A. (2013). Deliberative democracy and the legitimacy of the European Union: A reappraisal of conflict. Political Studies, 62(S1), 81–98.
   Google Scholar
• Crum, B., & Merlo, S. (2020). Democratic legitimacy in the post-crisis EMU. Journal of European Integration, 42(3), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1730347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csehi, R., & Schulz, D. (2021). The EU's new economic governance framework and budgetary decision-making in the member states: Boon or bane for throughput legitimacy? JCMS, 60(1), 118–135.
   Google Scholar
• De la Porte, C., & Jensen, D. M. (2021). The next generation EU: An analysis of the dimensions of conflict behind the deal. Social Policy & Administration, 55(2), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Mascio, F., Natalini, A., Ongaro, E., & Stolfi, F. (2020). Influence of the European Semester on national public sector reforms under conditions of fiscal consolidation: The policy of conditionality in Italy 2011–2015. Public Policy and Administration, 35(2), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076718814892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudzinska, A., & Ilonszki, G. (2023). Opposition discourse about national recovery and resilience plans. Poland and Hungary compared. Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs, 27(1), 37–62. https://doi.org/10.33067/SE.1.2023.2
   Google Scholar
• Efstathiou, K., & Wolff, G. (2019). What drives national implementation of EU policy eecommendations'? Bruegel Working Paper, 4, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• EurActiv. (2020). Župani predstavili svoje priority pre plán obnovy, niektoré do Hegerových reforiem nezapadajú. https://euractiv.sk/section/ekonomika-a-euro/news/zupani-predstavili-svoje-priority-pre-plan-obnovy-niektore-do-hegerovych-reforiem-nezapadaju/
   Google Scholar
• Euractiv. (2021). Příprava národních plánů obnovy nejde v zemích V4 úplně hladce. https://euractiv.cz/section/politika/linksdossier/priprava-narodnich-planu-obnovy-nejde-v-zemich-v4-uplne-hladce/
   Google Scholar
• EurActiv. (2021b). Pripomienkové konanie ukázalo nespokojnosť verejnosti s prípravou plánu obnovy. https://euractiv.sk/section/ekonomika-a-euro/news/pripomienkove-konanie-ukazalo-nespokojnost-verejnosti-s-pripravou-planu-obnovy/
   Google Scholar
• Euractiv (2021d) NGO’sy i biznes apelują do premiera Morawieckiego: Współpracujmy, aby lepiej wykorzystać unijne miliardy z Funduszu Odbudowy. https://www.euractiv.pl/section/polityka-regionalna/news/polska-unia-europejska-pandemia-koronawirus-fundusz-odbudowy-kpo-fundusze-unijne-morawiecki-wwfpolska-klimat-srodowisko/
   Google Scholar
• Fabbrini, S. (2023). Going beyond the pandemic: ‘next generation eu’ and the politics of sub-regional coalitions. Comparative European Politics, 21(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-022-00302-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer, J. N. (2021). Avoiding the main risks in the recovery plans of the member states. CEPS Recovery and Resilience Papers. https://www.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Recovery-and-Resilience-Reflection-Paper-No1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fromage, D., & van den Brink, T. (2018). Democratic legitimation of EU economic governance: Challenges and opportunities for European legislatures. Journal of European Integration, 40(3), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1450407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fumagalli, C. (2019). When Do They Speak? Deliberation and Democratic Decision-Making in the European Union. Political Studies, 67(4), 1053–1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719828276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fundacja Batorego. (2021). Apel o współpracę przy tworzeniu Krajowego Planu Odbudowy. https://www.batory.org.pl/oswiadczenie/apel-o-wspolprace-przy-tworzeniu-krajowego-planu-odbudowy/.
   Google Scholar
• Heinkelmann-Wild, T., & Zangl, B. (2018). Multilevel blame games: Blame-shifting in the European Union. Governance, 33(4), 953–969. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klika, C. (2015). Implementing the REACH authorization procedure on chemical substances of concern: What kind of legitimacy? Politics and Governance, 3(1), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i1.85
   Google Scholar
• Mariotto, C. (2022). The implementation of economic rules: From the stability and growth pact to the European semester. Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miró, J. (2022). Debating fiscal solidarity in the EU: Interests, values and identities in the legitimation of the Next Generation EU plan. Journal of European Integration, 44(3), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.1977292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (2002). In Defence of the ‘democratic deficit’: Reassessing legitimacy in the European union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 603–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosley, J. E., & Wong, J. (2021). Decision-making in collaborative governance networks: Pathways to input and throughput legitimacy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(2), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MÖSZ. (2021a). MÖSZ online sajtótájékoztató. https://moszlap.hu/hu/cikk/mosz-online-sajtotajekoztato
   Google Scholar
• MÖSZ. (2021b). Konzultációt sürget dr. Gémesi György. https://moszlap.hu/hu/cikk/konzultaciot-surget-dr-gemesi-gyorgy
   Google Scholar
• NRSR. (2020a). Návrh skupiny poslancov Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky č. 247. https://www.nrsr.sk/web/Dynamic/DocumentPreview.aspx?DocID=483201
   Google Scholar
• NRSR. (2020b). Návrh skupiny poslancov Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky č. 348. https://www.nrsr.sk/web/Dynamic/DocumentPreview.aspx?DocID=488297
   Google Scholar
• NRSR. (2021). Návrh skupiny poslancov Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky č. 474. https://www.nrsr.sk/web/Dynamic/DocumentPreview.aspx?DocID=492381
   Google Scholar
• Peksa, M. (2020). Otevřený dopis vládě: Peníze z Evropy nejsou „něco navíc“, ale šance změnit budoucnost. https://mikulas-peksa.eu/otevreny-dopis-vlade-investice/
   Google Scholar
• Petmesidou, M., Branco, R., Pavolini, E., Begega, S. G., & Guillén, A. M. (2023). The EPSR and the Next Generation EU: Heralding a reconfiguration of social protection in South Europe? Social Policy and Administration, 57(4), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pravda. (2021). Kritici plán obnovy nešetrili. Prišlo 2 444 pripomienok, vyše 1 300 zásadných a 50 hromadných. https://ekonomika.pravda.sk/ludia/clanok/583067-kritici-plan-obnovy-nesetrili-prislo-2-444-pripomienok-vyse-1-300-zasadnych-a-50-hromadnych/
   Google Scholar
• Respekt. (2020). Jak to všechno utratit. https://www.respekt.cz/tydenik/2020/44/jak-to-vsechno-utratit
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., & Kleine, M. (2007). Assessing the Legitimacy of the EU's Treaty Revision Methods. JCMS, 45(1), 69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2013). Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput’. Political Studies, 62(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Reinterpreting the rules’ by stealth’ in times of crisis: The European Central Bank and the European Commission. West European Politics, 39(5), 1032–1052. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1186389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A., & Wood, M. (2019). Conceptualizing throughput legitimacy: Procedural mechanisms of accountability, transparency, inclusiveness and openness in EU governance. Public Administration, 97(4), 727–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schramm, L., Krotz, U., & De Witte, B. (2022). Building ‘Next Generation’after the pandemic: The implementation and implications of the EU Covid Recovery Plan. JCMS, 60(S1), 114–124.
   Google Scholar
• Sejm. (2020a). Sprawozdanie Stenograficzne z 15. posiedzenia Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w dniu 22 lipca 2020 r. (pierwszy dzień obrad). http://orka2.sejm.gov.pl/StenoInter9.nsf/0/61C79198514935EDC12585B20047D675/%24File/15_a_ksiazka_bis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sejm. (2020b). Sprawozdanie Stenograficzne z 21. posiedzenia Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w dniu 19 listopada 2020 r. (drugi dzień obrad). http://orka2.sejm.gov.pl/StenoInter9.nsf/0/6F98061F55434901C1258626000D3C96/%24File/21_b_ksiazka_bis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sejm. (2021a). Sprawozdanie Stenograficzne z 27. posiedzenia Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w dniu 16 marca 2021 r. (pierwszy dzień obrad)
   Google Scholar
• Sejm. (2021b). Sprawozdanie Stenograficzne z 27. posiedzenia Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w dniu 17 marca 2021 r. (drugi dzień obrad)
   Google Scholar
• Sejm. (2021c). Sprawozdanie Stenograficzne z 28. posiedzenia Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w dniu 14 kwietnia 2021 r. (pierwszy dzień obrad)
   Google Scholar
• Senate, C. Z. (2021a). Resolution of the Senate on Information from the government on the drafting of the National Renovation Plan (recovery and resilience plan). https://www.senat.cz/xqw/xervlet/pssenat/htmlhled?action=doc&value=99532
   Google Scholar
• Senate, C. Z. (2021b). Zápis ze 6. Schůze VEU. https://www.senat.cz/xqw/xervlet/pssenat/htmlhled?action=doc&value=99034
   Google Scholar
• Slov-Lex. (2021). LP/2021/112 Plán obnovy a odolnosti Slovenskej republiky. https://www.slov-lex.sk/legislativne-procesy?p_p_id=processDetail_WAR_portletsel&p_p_lifecycle=0&p_p_col_id=column-2&p_p_col_count=1&_processDetail_WAR_portletsel_cisloLP=LP%2F2021%2F112&_processDetail_WAR_portletsel_action=pplpZobrazPripomienky
   Google Scholar
• SPPK. (2021a). Minister Mičovský ponížil seba aj celý agrosektor. https://www.sppk.sk/clanok/3864.
   Google Scholar
• SPPK. (2021b). Čo ostane z plánovaných plánov? https://www.sppk.sk/clanok/3700
   Google Scholar
• Steffek, J. (2019). The limits of proceduralism: Critical remarks on the rise of ‘throughput legitimacy. Public Administration, 97(4), 784–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svaz průmyslu a dopravy. (2020). Připomínky Svazu průmyslu a dopravy České republiky k Východiska Národního plánu obnovy v kontextu Hospodářské strategie. https://www.spcr.cz/images/Stanovisko_SP_CR_k_V%C3%BDchodisk%C5%AFm_N%C3%A1rodn%C3%ADho_pl%C3%A1nu_obnovy_v_kontextu_Hospod%C3%A1%C5%99sk%C3%A9_strategie_final08102020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The parliament. (2021). Hungarian MEP raises questions over his country's National Recovery and Resilience Plan (Hungarian MEP raises questions over his country's National Recovery and Resilience Plan (theparliamentmagazine.eu)
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, J. (Ed.). (2009). The legitimacy of the European union after enlargement. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhercke, B., & Verdun, A. (2022). The European Semester as Goldilocks: Macroeconomic Policy Coordination and the Recovery and Resilience Facility. Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(1), 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vláda. (2020a). Vláda ČR (2020): Usnesení vlády České republiky z 27. července 2020 č. 815. https://apps.odok.cz/attachment/-/down/RCIABS2B64LW
   Google Scholar
• Vláda. (2020b). Východiska Národního plánu obnovy. https://www.vlada.cz/assets/urad-vlady/poskytovani-informaci/poskytnute-informace-na-zadost/Vychodiska-NP-obnovy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vláda. (2021). Vláda schválila návrh Národního plánu obnovy za téměř 200 miliard, odsouhlasila i záměr dalšího rozvolnění protiepidemických opatření. https://www.vlada.cz/cz/media-centrum/aktualne/vlada-schvalila-navrh-narodniho-planu-obnovy-za-temer-200-miliard–odsouhlasila-i-zamer-dalsiho-rozvolneni-protiepidemickych-opatreni-188456/
   Google Scholar
• Změna k lepšímu. (2020). Změna k lepšímu (2020): Připomínky podnikatelské iniciativy Změna k lepšímu k materiálu „Východiska Národního plánu obnovy v kontextu Hospodářské strategie“. https://ekonomickydenik.cz/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/pripominkyzkl_narodni-plan-obnovy.pdf
   Google Scholar