Science-related populism referring to Europe: narratives of dominance and sovereignty

References

• Anderson, B. R. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (Revised and extended. ed.). Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, J. M., & Shaw, D. (2015). Does partisanship shape attitudes toward science and public policy? The case for ideology and religion. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214554756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. (2017). Why populism? Theory and Society, 46(5), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. (2021). Paradoxes of populism during the pandemic. Thesis Eleven, 164(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513620970804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cleen, B., Glynos, J., & Mondon, A. (2018). Critical research on populism: Nine rules of engagement. Organization, 25(5), 649–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418768053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019). A Europe fit for the digital age. Empowering people with a new generation of technologies. Retrieved September 30, 2023, from https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age_en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020). Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology. Shaping Europe’s digital future, Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759091014
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, European Council, European Commission. (2021). Joint declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission on the conference on the future of Europe engaging with citizens for democracy – building a more resilient Europe. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32021C0318(01)
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, J. D., Bell, R. A., & Ruiz, J. B. (2019). Relationship of people’s sources of health information and political ideology with acceptance of conspiratorial beliefs about vaccines. Vaccine, 37(23), 2993–2997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.04.063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossum, J. E. (2019). Europe’s triangular challenge: Differentiation, dominance and democracy. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1, 1–45. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3505864
   Google Scholar
• Fossum, J. E. (2023). The context of fake news, disinformation, and manipulation. In M. Conrad, G. Hálfdanarson, A. Michailidou, C. Galpin, & N. Pyrhönen (Eds.), Europe in the age of post-truth politics (pp. 31–52). Palgrave Macmillan Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13694-8_3.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. C., Hartter, J., & Saito, K. (2015). Trust in scientists on climate change and vaccines. SAGE Open, 5(3), 215824401560275. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015602752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Harley, B. (2004). Discourse analysis and content analysis: Two solitudes? Qualitative & Multi-Method Research, 2(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.998649
   Google Scholar
• Kyle, Jordan, & Gultchin, Limor. (2018). Populism in Power Around the World. SSRN Electronic Journal, 46, 417. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3283962
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Cook, J., Van Der Linden, S., Roozenbeek, J., Oreskes, N., Pennycook, G., & Fazio, L. K. (2023). Misinformation and the epistemic integrity of democracy. Current Opinion in Psychology, 54, 101711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCammon, C. (2018). Domination. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2018 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/domination/
   Google Scholar
• Mede, N. G., & Schäfer, M. S. (2020). Science-related populism: Conceptualizing populist demands toward science. Public Understanding of Science, 29(5), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520924259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkley, E. (2020). Anti-intellectualism, populism, and motivated resistance to expert consensus. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(1), 24–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkley, E., & Loewen, P. J. (2021). Anti-intellectualism and the mass public’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(6), 706–715. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01112-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Motta, M. (2018). The dynamics and political implications of anti-intellectualism in the United States. American Politics Research, 46(3), 465–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X17719507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2021). Populism in Europe: An illiberal democratic response to undemocratic liberalism (The government and opposition/leonard schapiro lecture 2019). Government and Opposition, 56(4), 577–597. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ACTRADE/9780190234874.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (1996). Freedom as antipower. Ethics, 106(3), 576–604. https://doi.org/10.1086/233648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regulation 2021/522. Regulation (EU) 2021/522 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 March 2021 establishing a Programme for the Union’s action in the field of health (‘EU4Health Programme’) for the period 2021-2027, and repealing Regulation (EU) No 282/2014 (Text with EEA relevance). http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/522/oj.
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, W., Esser, F., Wettstein, M., Engesser, S., Wirz, D., Schulz, A., Ernst, N., Büchel, F., Caramani, D., Manucci, L., Steenbergen, M. R., Bernhard, L., Weber, E., Hänggli, R., Dalmus, C., Schemer, C., & Müller, P. (2016). The appeal of populist ideas, strategies and styles: A theoretical model and research design for analyzing populist political communication. NCCR democracy Working Paper series 88, University of Zurich. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-127461
   Google Scholar