Colombian politicians and Twitter usage: on the path to gender parity

References

• Abele, A. E., and B. Wojciszke. 2007. “Agency and Communion from the Perspective of Self Versus Others.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93 (5): 751–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alotaibi, N., and J. Mulderrig. 2021. “Debating Saudi Womanhood: A Corpus-Aided Critical Discourse Analysis of the Representation of Saudi Women in the Twitter Campaign Against the ‘Male Guardianship’ System.” In Exploring Discourse and Ideology Through Corpora. Linguistic Insights: Studies in Language and Communication, 276, edited by M. Fuster-Marquez, J. Santaemilia, C. Gregori-Signes, and P. Rodriquez-Aburneiras, 233–262. Bern: Peter Lang. doi:10.3726/b17868
   Google Scholar
• Arifiyanti, A. A., E. D. Wahyuni, and A. Kurniawan. 2020. “Emotion Mining of Indonesia Presidential Political Campaign 2019 Using Twitter Data.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1569 (2): 022035. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1569/2/022035.
   Google Scholar
• Beltran, J., A. Gallego, A. Huidobro, E. Romero, and L. Padró. 2021. “Male and Female Politicians on Twitter: A Machine Learning Approach.” European Journal of Political Research 60 (1): 239–251. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, L., and V. M. Hennings. 2012. “Mixed Signals? Gender and the Media’s Coverage of the 2008 Vice Presidential Candidates.” Politics and Policy 40 (2): 221–257. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1346.2012.00350.x.
   Google Scholar
• Boynton, G. R. 2014. “The Political Domain Goes to Twitter: Hashtags, Retweets and URLs.” Open Journal of Political Science 04 (1): 8–15. doi:10.4236/ojps.2014.41002.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgewater, J., and R. U. Nagel. 2020. “Is There Cross-National Evidence That Voters Prefer Men as Party Leaders?” Electoral Studies 67), doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N. E., C. J. Clark, and A. Mahoney. 2022. “The Black Women of the US Congress: Learning from Descriptive Data.” Journal of Women, Politics and Policy 43 (3): 328–346. doi:10.1080/1554477X.2022.2074757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynstrom, D. G., M. C. Banwart, L. L. Kayd, and T. A. Robertson. 2004. Gender and Candidate Communication: Videostyle, Webstyle, Newsstyle. London, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Calzado, M. 2020. “Election Campaign Audiences and Urban Security: Citizens and Elections Promises During a Mediatized Political Campaign (Argentina 2015).” Communication and Society 33 (2): 155–169. doi:10.15581/003.33.2.155-169.
   Google Scholar
• Cardo, V. 2021. “Gender Politics Online? Political Women and Social Media at Election Time in the United Kingdom, the United States and New Zealand.” European Journal of Communication 36 (1): 38–52. doi:10.1177/0267323120968962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carty, E. B., M. Alcántara, M. García Montero, and C. Rivas Pérez, eds. 2021. “Politics and Political Elites in Latin America: Challenges and Trends.” Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública 10 (1): 181–184.
   Google Scholar
• Correa, J. C., and J. E. Camargo. 2017. “Ideological Consumerism in Colombian Elections, 2015: Links Between Political Ideology, Twitter Activity, and Electoral Results.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 20 (1): 37–43. doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin, R. L., and N. Haryanto. 2021. “Women Candidates and Islamic Personalization in Social Media Campaigns for Local Parliament Elections in Indonesia.” South East Asia Research 29 (1): 72–91. doi:10.1080/0967828X.2021.1878928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denemark, D., I. Ward, and C. Bean. 2012. “Gender and Leader Effects in the 2010 Australian Election.” Australian Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 563–578. doi:10.1080/10361146.2012.731485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Paula Trindade, L. 2020. “My Hair, My Crown”. Examining Black Brazilian Women’s Anti-Racist Discursive Strategies on Social Media.” Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue Canadienne des Études Latino-Américaines et Caraïbes 45 (3): 277–296. doi:10.1080/08263663.2020.1769448.
   Google Scholar
• Duval, D., and J. Bouchard. 2021. “Gender, the Media and Parity: The Case of the 2018 Québec Election.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 54 (3): 637–654. doi:10.1017/S000842392100038X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., and S. J. Karau. 2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice Toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review 109 (3): 573–598. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder, L. 2020. “The Growing Partisan Gap Among Women in Congress.” Society 57 (5): 520–526. doi:10.1007/s12115-020-00524-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enli, G. S., and E. Skogerbø. 2013. “Personalized Campaigns in Party-Centred Politics: Twitter and Facebook as Arenas for Political Communication.” Information, Communication and Society 16 (5): 757–774. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erjavec, K. E., and M. P. Kovačič. 2012. “You Don’t Understand, This Is a New War! Analysis of Hate Speech in News Web Sites’ Comments.” Mass Communication and Society 15 (6): 899–920. doi:10.1080/15205436.2011.619679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito, E., and R. Breeze. 2022. “Gender and Politics in a Digitalized World: Investigating Online Hostility Against UK Female MPs.” Discourse and Society 33 (3): 303–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, H. K., and J. H. Clark. 2016. “You Tweet Like a Girl!”: How Female Candidates Campaign on Twitter.” American Politics Research 44 (2): 326–352. doi:10.1177/1532673X15597747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, H. K., V. Cordova, and S. S. Sipole. 2014. “Twitter Style: An Analysis of How House Candidates Used Twitter in Their 2012 Campaigns.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (2): 454–462. doi:10.1017/S1049096514000389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferré-Pavia, C., K. Abrego, and C. Gayà Morlà. 2023. Communicative Empowerment for Female Politicians: Moving Towards a Safe Space That Makes Them Visible in Social Media.” Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Fosch-Villaronga, E., A. Poulsen, R. A. Søraa, and B. H. M. Custers. 2021. “A Little Bird Told Me Your Gender: Gender Inferences in Social Media.” Information Processing and Management 58 (3): 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraile, M., and J. Fortin-Rittberger. 2020. “Unpacking Gender, Age, and Education Knowledge Inequalities: A Systematic Comparison.” Social Science Quarterly 101 (4): 1653–1669. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridkin, K. L., and P. J. Kenney. 2009. “The Role of Gender Stereotypes in U.S. Senate Campaigns.” Politics and Gender 5 (3): 301–324. doi:10.1017/S1743923X09990158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, T., and F. Schäfer. 2021. “Normalizing Misogyny: Hate Speech and Verbal Abuse of Female Politicians on Japanese Twitter.” Japan Forum 33 (4): 553–579. doi:10.1080/09555803.2019.1687564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton, S. A., C. D. Maestas, L. S. Maisel, and W. J. Stone. 2006. “The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (2): 235–248. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4148091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainous, J., and K. M. Wagner. 2014. Tweeting to Power: The Social Media Revolution in American Politics. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• García Beaudoux, V., O. D’Adamo, and M. Gavensky. 2017. “Una Tipología de los Sesgos y Estereotipos de Género en la Cobertura Periodística de las Mujeres Candidatas.” Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública 24: 113–129. doi:10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2018.24.61614.
   Google Scholar
• García-Beaudoux, V., O. D’Adamo, S. Berrocal, and M. Gavensky. 2020. “Stereotypes and Biases in the Treatment of Female and Male Candidates on Television Shows in the 2017 Legislative Elections in Argentina.” RLCS. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social 77: 275–293. doi:10.4185/RLCS-2020-1458.
   Google Scholar
• Geertsema-Sligh, M. 2018. “Gender Issues in News Coverage.” In The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies, edited by T. P. Hanusch, F. Vos, D. Dimitrakopoulou, M. Geertsema-Sligh, and A. Sehl, 1–8. Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0162.
   Google Scholar
• González, A., and E. Richard. 2020. “Hashtags y Discusión Política: Lo Que Twittearon los Candidatos a la Alcaldía de Bogotá.” In Elecciones subnacionales 2019: Una redefinición de los partidos y de sus campañas electorales, edited by F. Barrero and E. Richard, 643–668. Berlin, Konrad Adenauer Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear-Grant, E. 2013. Media Coverage and Electoral Politics in Canada. Vancouver, UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T., and J. Schwanholz. 2020. “Politicians and Political Parties Use of Social Media in-Between Elections.” Journal of Applied Journalism and Media Studies 9 (2): 91–103. doi:10.1386/ajms_00017_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero-Solé, F., and C. Perales-García. 2021. “Bridging the Gap: How Gender Influences Spanish Politicians’ Activity on Twitter.” Journalism and Media 2 (3): 469–483. doi:10.3390/journalmedia2030028.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. L., and T. K. Trolier. 1986. “Stereotypes and Stereotyping: An Overview of the Cognitive Approach.” In Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism, edited by J. F. Dovidio and S. L. Gaertner, 127–163. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraldsson, A., and L. Wängnerud. 2019. “The Effect of Media Sexism on Women’s Political Ambition: Evidence from a Worldwide Study.” Feminist Media Studies 19 (4): 525–541. doi:10.1080/14680777.2018.1468797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsley, J. 2019. “Followers Retweet! The Influence of Middle-Level Gatekeepers on the Spread of Political Information on Twitter.” Policy and Internet 11 (3): 280–304. doi:10.1002/poi3.202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, B. 2019. “Women’s Survival Through Social Media: A Narrative Analysis.” Asian Journal of Women’s Studies 25 (2): 180–197. doi:10.1080/12259276.2019.1610612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrbková, L., and A. Macková. 2021. “Campaign Like a Girl? Gender and Communication on Social Networking Sites in the Czech Parliamentary Election.” Information, Communication and Society 24 (11): 1622–1639. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2020.1716040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., and M. W. Kearney. 2021. “Gendered Tweets: Computational Text Analysis of Gender Differences in Political Discussion on Twitter.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 40 (4): 482–503. doi:10.1177/0261927X209697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalalzai, F. 2006. “Women Candidates and the Media: 1992–2000 Elections.” Politics and Policy 34 (3): 606–633. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1346.2006.00030.x.
   Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., M. R. Banaji, and B. A. Nosek. 2004. “A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo.” Political Psychology 25 (6): 881–919. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A. 2014. “Twitter in Politics: A Comprehensive Literature Review.” SSRN Electronic Journal, doi:10.2139/ssrn.2402443.
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A., H. Schoen, and P. Jürgens. 2016. “The Mediation of Politics Through Twitter: An Analysis of Messages Posted During the Campaign for the German Federal Election 2013.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 21 (1): 50–68. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, J. W. 2000. “Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates’ Ideological Orientations?” The Journal of Politics 62 (2): 414–429. doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krook, M. L. 2022. “Semiotic Violence Against Women: Theorizing Harms Against Female Politicians.” Signs 47 (2): 371–397. doi:10.1086/716642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O. 2020. “Right-Wingers on the Rise Online: Insights from the 2018 Swedish Elections.” New Media and Society 22 (12): 2108–2127. doi:10.1177/1461444819887700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavery, L. 2013. “Gender Bias in the Media? An Examination of Local Television News Coverage of Male and Female House Candidates.” Politics and Policy 41 (6): 877–910. doi:10.1111/polp.12051.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., and R. K. Merton. 1948. Mass Communication, Popular Taste and Organized Social Action. Indiana, Bobbs-Merrill, College Division, pp. 95–118.
   Google Scholar
• Llanos, B. 2013. “OJOS QUE (Aún) NO VEN, Nuevo Reporte de Ocho Países: Género, Campañas Electorales y Medios en América Latina.” ONU mujeres. https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/ojos-que-a%C3%BAn-no-ven.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M., R. Dawe, and E. Suhay. 2021. “Gender Attitudes and Candidate Preferences in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary and General Elections.” Politics and Gender 18 (3): 830–857. doi:10.1017/S1743923X21000155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, B., R. Balasubramanyan, B. Routledge, and N. Smith. 2010. “From Tweets to Polls: Linking Text Sentiment to Public Opinion Time Series. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.” International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media 4 (1): 122–129. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/From-Tweets-to-Polls%3A-Linking-Text-Sentiment-to-O%27Connor-Balasubramanyan/3fee8e69b8e2df25030cf331b28b37f4dd13086c.
   Google Scholar
• Okimoto, T. G., and V. L. Brescoll. 2010. “The Price of Power: Power Seeking and Backlash Against Female Politicians.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36 (7): 923–936. doi:10.1177/0146167210371949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paatelainen, L., E. Kannasto, and P. Isotalus. 2022. “Functions of Hybrid Media: How Parties and Their Leaders Use Traditional Media in Their Social Media Campaign Communication.” Frontiers in Communication 6: 817285. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2021.817285.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. 2007. “Gender as a Group Process: Implications for the Persistence of Inequality.” In The Social Psychology of Gender, edited by S. Correll, 311–333. Amsterdam, Elsevier/North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, H. 2008. “Strategy Versus Understanding: How Orientations Toward Political Conversation Influence Political Engagement.” Communication Research 35 (4): 452–480. doi:10.1177/0093650208315977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., and L. Jacobson. 1968. “Pygmalion in the Classroom.” Urban Review 3 (1): 16–20. doi:10.1007/BF02322211.
   Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., and K. Fairchild. 2004. “Reactions to Counterstereotypic Behavior: The Role of Backlash in Cultural Stereotype Maintenance.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (2): 157–176. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., and P. Glick. 2008. The Social Psychology of Gender: How Power and Intimacy Shape Gender Relations. New York, Guilford Press. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003.
   Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., A. G. Greenwald, and D. E. McGhee. 2001. “Implicit Self-Concept and Evaluative Implicit Gender Stereotypes: Self and Ingroup Share Desirable Traits.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27 (9): 1164–1178. doi:10.1177/0146167201279009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoog, L., and D. Karlsson. 2022. “Perceptions of Polarization Among Political Representatives.” Political Research Exchange 4(1)), doi:10.1080/2474736X.2022.2124923.
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J. 2002. “New Voices in the Public Sphere: A Comparative Analysis of Interpersonal and Online Political Talk.” Javnost – The Public 9 (2): 23–41. doi:10.1080/13183222.2002.11008798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, K. V. R. 2021. “The Gendered Digital Turn: Canadian Mayors on Social Media.” Information Polity 26 (2): 157–171. doi:10.3233/IP-200301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M., A. Harell, S. Rijkhoff, and T. Gosselin. 2020. “Gendered News Coverage and Women Heads of Government.” Political Communication 38 (4): 388–406. doi:10.1080/10584609.2020.1784326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Women. 2021. Mujeres en la política. Digital library. United Nations entity for gender equality and the empowerment of women & inter-parliamentary union. https://www.unwomen.org/es/news/stories/2021/3/press-release-women-in-politics-new-data-shows-growth-but-also-setbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Vann, P. 2014. “Changing the Game: The Role of Social Media in Overcoming Old Media’s Attention Deficit Toward Women’s Sport.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 58 (3): 438–455. doi:10.1080/08838151.2014.935850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, K. M., J. Gainous, and M. R. Holman. 2017. “I Am Woman, Hear Me Tweet! Gender Differences in Twitter Use Among Congressional Candidates.” Journal of Women, Politics and Policy 38 (4): 430–455. doi:10.1080/1554477X.2016.1268871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar