Actors, concepts, controversies: the conceptual politics of European integration

References

• Adler-Nissen, R. 2016. “Towards a Practice Turn in EU Studies: The Everyday of European Integration.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (1): 87–103. doi:10.1111/jcms.12329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspinwall, M. D., and G. Schneider. 2000. “Same Menu, Seperate Tables: The Institutionalist Turn in Political Science and the Study of European Integration.” European Journal of Political Research 38 (1): 1–36. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bächtiger, A. 2014. “Debate and Deliberation in Legislatures.” In Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies, edited by K. Strøm, T. Saalfeld, and S. Martin, 145–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berenskoetter, F. 2016. Concepts in World Politics. Melbourne: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Besson, S., and A. Utzinger. 2008. “Toward European Citizenship.” Journal of Social Philosophy 39(2): 185–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büger, C., and F. Gadinger. 2018. International Practice Theory. Second ed. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T., G. Falkner, and K. Erik JØrgensen. 2002. “Theorizing EU Treaty Reform: Beyond Diplomacy and Bargaining.” Journal of European Public Policy 9 (1): 12–32. doi:10.1080/13501760110104154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T., K. E. Jorgensen, and A. Wiener, eds. 2001. The Social Construction of Europe. London [u.a.]: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Doty, R. L. 1993. “Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines.” International Studies Quarterly 37 (3): 297. doi:10.2307/2600810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2005. “P6_TA(2005)0194 Framework Agreement on EP-Commission Relations and European Parliament Decision on the Revision of the Framework Agreement on Relations Between the European Parliament and the Commission (2005/2076(ACI)).” Accessed May 08, 2012. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+TA+P6-TA-2005-0194+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2009. “BUILDING PARLIAMENT: 50 YEARS of EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY 1958–2008.” Accessed May 08, 2012. http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/ardb/evt/1_avrupa_birligi/1_1_tarihce/50_years_of_european_parliament_history.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2001. “European Parliament/Commission Framework Agreement C5-0349/2000.” Accessed May 08, 2012. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:121:0122:0126:EN:PDF.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2010. “Framework Agreement on Relations Between the European Parliament and the European Commission.” Accessed June 23, 2016. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:304:0047:0062:EN:PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Europäische Politische Gemeinschaft. 1953. “Entwurf Zu Einem Vertrag Über Die Satzung Der Europäischen (Politischen) Gemeinschaft (EPG).” Accessed February 05, 2013. http://www.politische-union.de/epg1.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., and A. Héritier. 2007. “Codecision and Institutional Change.” West European Politics 30 (2): 285–300. doi:10.1080/01402380701239723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez Sebastian, J., ed. 2011. Political Concepts and Time: New Approaches to Conceptual History. Santander: Cantabria University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., and K. Sikkink. 2001. “TAKING STOCK: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 4(1): 391–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallie, W. B. 1955. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–198.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, M., and R. A. W. Rhodes. 2018. “Towards an Interpretive Parliamentary Studies.” In Soziologie Der Parlamente: Neue Wege Der Politischen Institutionenforschung, edited by J. Brichzin, D. Krichewsky, L. Ringel, and J. Schank, 87–107. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., and R. R. Taylor. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies XLIV(5): 936–957.
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., C. Moury, and M. G. Schoeller. 2017. “The European Parliament as a Driving Force of Constitutionalisation.” Accessed December 19, 2017. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/536467/IPOL_STU(2015)536467_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S., and C. Lord. 1996. “The Making of a President: The European Parliament and the Confirmation of Jacques Santer as President of the Commission.” Government & Opposition 31 (1): 62–76. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.1996.tb00149.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihalainen, P., C. Ilie, and K. Palonen, eds. 2016. Parliament and Parliamentarism. A Comparative History of Disputes on a European Concept. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ish-Shalom, P. 2021. Concepts at Work. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jachtenfuchs, M. 2002. Die Konstruktion Europas: Verfassungsideen Und Institutionelle Entwicklung. 1. Aufl. Weltpolitik im 21. Jahrhundert Bd. 9. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verl.-Ges.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E., R. Daniel Kelemen, and S. Meunier. 2016. “Failing Forward? The Euro Crisis and the Incomplete Nature of European Integration.” Comparative Political Studies 49 (7): 1010–1034. doi:10.1177/0010414015617966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppi, N. 2010. “The Political Ontology of European Integration.” Comparative European Politics 8 (1): 19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppi, N. 2018. Toward a Reflexive Political Sociology of the European Union: Fields, Intellectuals and Politicians. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kauppi, N., K. Palonen, and C. Wiesner. 2016. “The Politification and Politicisation of the EU.” Redescriptions 19 (1): 72–90.
   Google Scholar
• Kietz, D., and A. Maurer. 2007. “The European Parliament in Treaty Reform: Predefining IGCs Through Interinstitutional Agreements.” European Law Journal 13 (1): 20–46. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00350.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. 1967. “Richtlinien Für Das Lexikon Politisch-Sozialer Begriffe Der Neuzeit.” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 11: 81–99.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. 1996. “A Response to a Comment on Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe.” In The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts. New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte, edited by H. Lehmann and M. Richter, 59–70. Washington: German Historical Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. 1997. “The Temporalisation of Concepts.” Redescriptions (Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought) 1 (1): 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. 2000. Zeitschichten: Studien Zur Historik. 1st ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. 2006a. “Begriffsgeschichte Und Sozialgeschichte.” In Vergangene Zukunft: Zur Semantik Geschichtlicher Zeiten. 107–129. 6th ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. 2006b. “Begriffsgeschichtliche Probleme Der Verfassungsgeschichtsschreibung.” In Begriffsgeschichten: Studien Zur Semantik Und Pragmatik Der Politischen Und Sozialen Sprache. 1st ed. 365–401. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. 2006c. “Die Geschichte Der Begriffe Und Begriffe Der Geschichte.” In Begriffsgeschichten: Studien Zur Semantik Und Pragmatik Der Politischen Und Sozialen Sprache. 1st ed. 56–76. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Kostakopoulou, D. 2007. “European Union Citizenship: Writing the Future.” European Law Journal 13 (5): 623–646. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00387.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A. 2010. “Looking ‘Up’, ‘Down’ and ‘Sideways’: Understanding EU Institutions in Context.” West European Politics 34 (1): 167–179. doi:10.1080/01402382.2011.523551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krotz, U., and J. Schild. 2015. Shaping Europe: France, Germany, and Embedded Bilateralism from the Elysée Treaty to Twenty-First Century Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lacroix, J., and K. Nicolaïdis. 2010. European Stories: Intellectual Debates on Europe in National Contexts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leifeld, P. 2016. “Discourse Network Analysis: Policy Debates as Dynamic Networks.” edited by Jennifer N. Victor, Alexander H. Montgomery, Mark Lubell, and Philip Leifeld, 301–26 1: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leifeld, P., ed. 2020. “Policy Debates and Discourse Network Analysis.” Special issue, Politics and Governance 8, no. 2. Accessed August 25, 2023. https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/issue/viewIssue/171/PDF171.
   Google Scholar
• Manin, B. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Themes in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, E., and S. Laurence. 2005. “Concepts: In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.” Accessed November 07, 2017. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/concepts/.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. H. 1950. “Citizenship and Social Class.” In Citizenship and Social Class: And Other Essays, 1–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J., and S. M. Walt. 2013. “Leaving Theory Behind: Why Simplistic Hypothesis Testing Is Bad for International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 427–457. doi:10.1177/1354066113494320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, K. L., and M. G. Schoeller. 2019. “Rising Despite the Polycrisis? The European Parliament’s Strategies of Self-Empowerment After Lisbon.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (7): 1075–1093. doi:10.1080/13501763.2019.1619187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moury, C. 2007. “Explaining the European Parliament’s Right to Appoint and Invest the Commission.” West European Politics 30 (2): 367–391. doi:10.1080/01402380701239889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palonen, K. 1997. “An Application of Conceptual History to Itself: From Method to Theory in Reinhart Koselleck’s Begriffsgeschichte.” Redescriptions (Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought) 1: 39–69.
   Google Scholar
• Palonen, K. 1998. “Judging Politics – a Temporal Perspective.” Redescriptions (Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought) 2: 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Palonen, K. 2002. “Begriffsgeschichte Und/als Politikwissenschaft.” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte (44): 221–234.
   Google Scholar
• Palonen, K. 2003a. “Four Times of Politics: Polics, Politics, Politicking and Politicization.” Alternatives 28 (2): 171–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palonen, K. 2003b. Quentin Skinner: History, Politics, Rhetoric. Oxford [u.a.]: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Palonen, K. 2004. Die Entzauberung Der Begriffe. Das Umschreiben Der Politischen Begriffe Bei Quentin Skinner Und Reinhart Koselleck. Münster: Lit.
   Google Scholar
• Palonen, K. 2005. “The Politics of Conceptual History.” Contributions to the History of Concepts 1 (1): 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Palonen, K. 2010. “Begriffsdebatten und Debattenbegriffe. Das parlamentarische Paradigma des Begriffsstreits und -wandels.” ZPTh – Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie 1 (2). doi:10.3224/zpth.v1i2.5113.
   Google Scholar
• Palonen, K. 2012. “Reinhart Koselleck on Translation, Anachronism and Conceptual Change.” In Why Concept Matter? Translating Social and Political Thought, edited by M. Burke and M. Richter, 73–92. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Palonen, K. 2016a. “Political Theory of Parliament: Introduction.” In Ihalainen, Ilie, and Palonen 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Palonen, K. 2016b. The Politics of Parliamentary Procedure: The Formation of the Westminster Procedure as a Parliamentary Ideal Type. 2nd ed. Leverkusen-Opladen: Budrich, Barbara.
   Google Scholar
• Palonen, K. 2018. Thinking Parliamentarily. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Y. 2010. “Accountability and Multi-Level Governance: More Accountability, Less Democracy?” West European Politics 33 (5): 1030–1049. doi:10.1080/01402382.2010.486126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, C. 2003. A Certain Idea of Europe. Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. 1997. “The European Union: Pooled Sovereignty, Divided Accountability.” Political Studies 45 (3): 559–578. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piattoni, S. 2010. The Theory of Multi-Level Governance: Conceptual, Empirical, and Normative Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. 2009. The Concept of Representation. [Nachdr.]. Berkeley, CA [u.a.]: Univ. of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pocock, J. 1998. “The Ideal of Citizenship Since Classical Times.” In the Citizenship Debates: A Reader, edited by G. Shafir, 31–41. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poptcheva, E.-M. 2014. “Briefing: Parliamentary Hearings of the Commissioners-Designate.” . Accessed October 06, 2016. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/EPRS/Commissioner_hearings/538919-Parliamentary-hearings-FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, M. 1995. The History of Political and Social Concepts: A Critical Introduction. New York [u.a.]: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B. 2005. Building Europes Parliament. Democratic Representation Beyond the Nation-State. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/oso/public/content/politicalscience/0199273421/toc.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” AJPS 64 (4): 1033–1053. Accessed November 28, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, P. 2019. Europe’s New Fiscal Union. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2006. Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11(1): 303–326. http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342. Accessed October 29, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2010. “Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change Through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘New Institutionalism’.” European Political Science Review 2(01): 1. doi:10.1017/S175577390999021X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. C. 1969. “Three Neo-Functional Hypotheses about International Integration.” International Organization 23(1): 161. doi:10.1017/S0020818300025601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servent, A. R. 2011. “Co-Decision in the European Parliament: Comparing Rationalist and Constructivist Explanations of the Returns Directive.” Journal of Contemporary European Research 7 (1): 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q. 1999. “Rhetoric and Conceptual Change.” Redescriptions (Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought), 60–73. Accessed October 05, 2012. http://www.jyu.fi/yhtfil/redescriptions/Yearbook%201999/Skinner%20Q%201999.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q. 2002a. “Introduction: Seeing Things Their Way.” In Visions of Policics Vol. 1. Regarding Method, edited by Quentin Skinner, 1–7. Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q. 2002b. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” In Visions of Policics Vol. 1. Regarding Method, 57–89. Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q. 2002c. “Moral Principles and Social Change.” In Visions of Policics Vol. 1. Regarding Method, 145–157. Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q. 2002d. “Retrospect: Studying Rhetoric and Conceptual Change.” In Visions of Policics Vol. 1. Regarding Method, 175–187. Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q. 2002e. “The Idea of a Cultural Lexicon.” In Visions of Policics Vol. 1. Regarding Method, 158–174. Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q. 2009. “A Genealogy of the Modern State: British Academy Lectures.” Proceedings of the British Academy 162: 325–370.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, C. S. 2013. The Struggle for EU Legitimacy: Public Contestation, 1950-2005. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tiilikainen, T., and C. Wiesner. 2016. “Towards a European Parliamentarism?” In Ihalainen, Ilie, and Palonen 2016, 292–310.
   Google Scholar
• Tömmel, I. 2014. The European Union: What It Is and How It Works. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Triandafyllidou, A., and R. Gropas. 2015. What Is Europe? 21st Century Europe. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N. 2006. Representative Democracy. Principles and Genealogy. Chicago, IL. [u.a.]: Univ. of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, N. 2007. “After Finalité? The Future of the European Constitutional Idea.” SSRN Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1022586.
   Google Scholar
• Wendler, F. 2019. “The European Parliament as an Arena and Agent in the Politics of Climate Change: Comparing the External and Internal Dimension.” Politics and Governance 7 (3): 327–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendler, F., and A. Hurrelmann. 2022. “Discursive Postfunctionalism: Theorizing the Interface Between EU Politicization and Policy-Making.” Journal of European Integration 44(7): 941–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. 1998. European Citizenship Practice. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesner, C. 2007. Bürgerschaft Und Demokratie in Der EU. Münster: Lit.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesner, C. 2014a. Demokratisierung Der EU Durch Nationale Europadiskurse? Strukturen Und Prozesse Europäischer Identitätsbildung Im Deutsch-Französischen Vergleich. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesner, C. 2014b. “From Safeguarding Peace in Europe to Financial Crisis: Old Questions and New Challenges of EU Integration.” In the Meanings of Europe, edited by C. Wiesner and M. Schmidt-Gleim, 91–106. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesner, C. 2018a. “Shaping Citizenship Practice Through Laws: Rights and Conceptual Innovations in the EU.” In Shaping Citizenship: A Political Concept in Theory Debate, and Practice, edited by C. Wiesner, A. Björk, H.-M. Kivistö, and K. Mäkinen, 159–174. [S.l.]: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesner, C. 2018b. “The Micro-Politics of Parliamentary Powers: European Parliament Strategies for Expanding Its Influence in the EU Institutional System.” Journal of European Integration 40 (4): 375–391. doi:10.1080/07036337.2018.1462351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesner, C. 2019. Inventing the EU as a Democratic Polity: Concepts, Actors and Controversies. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Science and Business Media; Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesner, C. 2021. “Politicisation, Politics, and Democracy.” In Rethinking Politicsation in Politics, Sociology and International Relations, edited by C. Wiesner. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesner, C. 2022a. “Between Conceptual Innovation and ‘There Is No Alternative’: Conceptual Politics and the Building of the EU as a Polity.” In Rhetoric and Bricolage in European Politics and Beyond: The Political Mind in Action, edited by N. Kauppi and K. Palonen, 89–116. Rhetoric, Politics and Society. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesner, C. 2022b. “Doing Qualitative and Interpretative Research: Reflecting Principles and Principled Challenges.” Political Research Exchange 4 (1): 277. doi:10.1080/2474736X.2022.2127372.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesner, C. 2023. Politicisation, Democratisation and Identity Formation in the EU: Constitutional Discourses in Germany and France. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesner, C., T. Haapala, and K. Palonen. 2017. Debates, Rhetoric and Political Action: Practices of Textual Interpretation and Analysis. Rhetoric, Politics and Society. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesner, C., and P. Harfst. 2019. “Legitimität Als Essentially Contested Concept.” In Legitimität Und Legitimation, edited by C. Wiesner and P. Harfst, 373–383. Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesner, C., and P. Harfst. 2022. “Conceptualizing Legitimacy: What to Learn from the Controversies Related to an Essentially Contested Concept.” Front. Polit. Sci 4:5. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2022.867756/full.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesner, C., and M. Schmidt-Gleim, eds. 2014. The Meanings of Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wintle, M., and M. Spiering, eds. 2003. Ideas of Europe Since 1914: The Legacy of the First World War. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zvereva, G. 2014. “Shaping New Russion Identity: Discourses of “Inclusion/Exclusion in Europe.” In The Meanings of Europe, edited by C. Wiesner and M. Schmidt-Gleim, 221–235. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar