Quantifying the ideational context: political frames, meaning trajectories and punctuated equilibria in Spanish mainstream press during the Catalan nationalist challenge

References

• Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Growth and Spread of Nationalism. New York and London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Balbi, S., and V. Esposito. 1998. “Comparing Advertising Campaigns by Means of Textual Data Analysis with External Information.” Actes des 4es Journées Internationales D’Analyse Statistique des Données Textuelles, UPRESA, Nice, 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Baldoli, R., and E. Mocca. 2021. “Rescuing National Unity with Imagination: The Case of Tabarnia.” Nations and Nationalism 27 (4): 1063–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrio, A., O. Barberà, and J. Rodríguez-Teruel. 2018. “Spain Steals from us! The ‘Populist Drift’ of Catalan Regionalism.” Comparative European Politics 16 (6): 993–1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartley, L., and E. Hidalgo-Tenorio. 2015. “Constructing Perceptions of Sexual Orientation: A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis of Transitivity in the Irish Press.” Estudios Irlandeses 10 (10): 14–34.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., and B. D. Jones. 2010. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. M. 1997. “"Any More Bright Ideas?" The Ideational Turn of Comparative Political Economy.” Comparative Politics 29 (2): 229–250.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. 2003. “Structures do not Come with an Instruction Sheet: Interests, Ideas, and Progress in Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 1 (4): 695–706.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, Z., A. C. Graesser, L. Windsor, Q. Cheng, D. W. Shaffer, and X. Hu. 2018. “Impact of corpus size and dimensionality of LSA spaces from Wikipedia articles on AutoTutor answer evaluation.” Journal of Educational Data Mining.
   Google Scholar
• Castelló, E., and A. Capdevila. 2015. “Of war and Water: Metaphors and Citizenship Agency in the Newspapers Reporting the 9/11 Catalan Protest in 2012.” International Journal of Communication 9: 18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkel, J. T. 1998. “The Constructive Turn in International Relations Theory.” World Politics 50 (2): 324–348.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, D., and J. N. Druckman. 2007. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, R. B., and D. Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coppock, A., E. Ekins, and D. Kirby. 2018. “The Long-Lasting Effects of Newspaper Op-Eds on Public Opinion.” Quarterly Journal of Politics 13 (1): 59–87.
   Google Scholar
• David, P. A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” The American Economic Review 75 (2): 332–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vreese, C. H. 2005. “News Framing: Theory and Typology.” Information Design Journal & Document Design 13 (1).
   Google Scholar
• De Vreese, C. H., J. Peter, and H. A. Semetko. 2001. “Framing Politics at the Launch of the Euro: A Cross-National Comparative Study of Frames in the News.” Political Communication 18 (2): 107–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díez Medrano, J. 2021. Framing Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, R. M. W. 1997. The Rise and Fall of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Domènech, X., J. Moreno Luzón, M. L. Latorre, and J.-P. Rubiés. 2020. “El Procés de Cataluña en Perspectiva Histórica (Debate).” Ayer 120 (2): 327–355.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1972. “Up and Down with Ecology the ‘Issue-Attention Cycle’.” The Public Interest 28: 38–50.
   Google Scholar
• Dumais, S. T. 2004. “Latent Semantic Analysis.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 38: 188–230.
   Google Scholar
• Eldredge, N., and S. J. Gould. 1972. “Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism.” In Models in Paleobiology, edited by T. J. M. Schopf, 82–115. San Francisco: Freeman Cooper.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. 1993. “Framing: Towards Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” In McQuail’s Reader in Mass Communication Theory, edited by D. McQuail, 390–397.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 2010. “Media Framing Biases and Political Power: Explaining Slant in News of Campaign.” Journalism 11 (4): 389–408.
   Google Scholar
• Ethayarajh, K. 2019. “How contextual are contextualized word representations? Comparing the geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddings.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.00512.
   Google Scholar
• Fillmore, C. J. 1976. “Frame Semantics and the Nature of Language.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech 280 (1): 20–32.
   Google Scholar
• Fillmore, C. J. 1977. “Topics in Lexical Semantics.” In Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, edited by R. Cole, 76–138. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. 1996. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. 2013. The Political Theory of Political Thinking: The Anatomy of a Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furnas, G. W., S. Deerwester, S. T. Durnais, T. K. Landauer, R. A. Harshman, L. A. Streeter, and K. E. Lochbaum. 1988. “Information Retrieval Using a Singular Value Decomposition Model of Latent Semantic Structure.” ACM SIGIR Forum 51 (2): 90–105.
   Google Scholar
• García, C. 2021. “When an Efficient Use of Strategic Communication (Public Diplomacy and Public Relations) to Internationalize a Domestic Conflict Is Not Enough to Gain International Political Support: The Catalan Case (2012-2017).” International Journal of Strategic Communication 15 (4): 293–309.
   Google Scholar
• Gellner, E. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J., and R. O. Keohane. 1993. “1. Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework.” In Ideas and Foreign Policy, 3–30. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, A., Z. Zada, E. Buchnik, M. Schain, A. Price, B. Aubrey, S. A. Nastase, et al. 2022. “Shared Computational Principles for Language Processing in Humans and Deep Language Models.” Nature Neuroscience 25 (3): 369–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greif, A., and D. D. Laitin. 2004. “A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change.” American Political Science Review 98 (4): 633–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., and R. C. Taylor. 1996. “Political Science and the Three new Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44 (5): 936–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. 1967. “Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English: Part 2.” Journal of Linguistics 3 (2): 199–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. 1973. Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A., and C. M. Matthiessen. 2014. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2004. “Ideas, Interests and Institutions in the Comparative Political Economy of Great Transformations.” Review of International Political Economy 11 (1): 204–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2011. “Ideas and the Construction of Interests.” In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, edited by D. Beland and R. H. Cox, 65–82.
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo-Tenorio, E., M.-Á. Benítez-Castro, and F. D. Cesare, eds. 2019. Populist Discourse: Critical Approaches to Contemporary Politics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, P., M. A. Lambon Ralph, and T. T. Rogers. 2013. “Semantic Diversity: A Measure of Semantic Ambiguity Based on Variability in the Contextual Usage of Words.” Behavior Research Methods 45: 718–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, P., T. T. Rogers, and M. A. Lambon Ralph. 2011. “Semantic Diversity Accounts for the “Missing” Word Frequency Effect in Stroke Aphasia: Insights Using a Novel Method to Quantify Contextual Variability in Meaning.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23 (9): 2432–2446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollis, G., and C. Westbury. 2016. “The Principals of Meaning: Extracting Semantic Dimensions from co-Occurrence Models of Semantics.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23: 1744–1756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, D., and R. Barkemeyer. 2012. “Media Coverage of Sustainable Development Issues–Attention Cycles or Punctuated Equilibrium?” Sustainable Development 20 (1): 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humlebæk, C., and M. F. Hau. 2020. “From National Holiday to Independence Day: Changing Perceptions of the “Diada”.” Genealogy 4 (1): 31.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. 1987. “Television News and Citizens’ Explanations of National Affairs.” American Political Science Review 81 (3): 815–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorge-Botana, G., R. Olmos, and J. M. Luzón. 2018. “Word Maturity Indices with Latent Semantic Analysis: Why, When, and Where is Procrustes Rotation Applied?” WIRES Cognitive Science 9 (1): e1457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorge-Botana, G., R. Olmos, and J. M. Luzón. 2019. “Could LSA Become a “Bifactor” Model? Towards a Model with General and Group Factors.” Expert Systems with Applications 131: 71–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorge-Botana, G., R. Olmos, and V. Sanjosé. 2017. “Predicting Word Maturity from Frequency and Semantic Diversity: A Computational Study.” Discourse Processes 54 (8): 682–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorge-Botana, G., R. Ricardo Olmos, and J. M. Luzón. 2020. “Bridging the Theoretical Gap Between Semantic Representation Models Without the Pressure of a Ranking: Some Lessons Learnt from LSA.” Cognitive Processing 21: 1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1984. “Choices, Values, and Frames.” American Psychologist 39: 341–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. D. 1984. “Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics.” Comparative Politics 16 (2): 223–246.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. 2nd ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. 1988. “Cognitive Semantics.” In Meaning and Mental Representations, edited by U. Eco, M. Santambrogio, and P. Violi, 119–154. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., P. W. Foltz, and D. Laham. 1998. “An Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis.” Discourse Processes 25 (2-3): 259–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laycock, D. 2005. “Visions of Popular Sovereignty: Mapping the Contested Terrain of Contemporary Western Populisms.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (2): 125–144.
   Google Scholar
• Laycock, D. 2014. “Conceptual Foundations of Continuity and Change in NDP Ideology.” Reviving Social Democracy: The Near Death and Surprising Rise of the Federal NDP, 109–139.
   Google Scholar
• Lebret, R., and R. Collobert. 2015. “Rehabilitation of Count-Based Models for Word Vector Representations.” Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing: 16th International Conference, CICLing 2015, Cairo, Egypt, April 14–20, 2015, Proceedings, Part I 16. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, O., and Y. Goldberg. 2014. “Neural Word Embedding as Implicit Matrix Factorization.” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol 27, edited by Z. Ghahramani, M. Welling, C. Cortes, N. D. Lawrence, and K. Q. Weinberger, 2177–2185. New York: Curran Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M., and S. Rokkan. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. Toronto: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., and J. P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Mingo, A., G. Jorge-Botana, JÁ Martinez-Huertas, and R. Olmos. 2023. “Quantum Projections on Conceptual Subspaces.” Cognitive Systems Research 82: 101154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikolov, T., K. Chen, G. Corrado, and J. Dean. 2013. “Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Almendral, R. 2018. “Reconstructing the History of Nationalist Cognition and Everyday Nationhood from Paccounts.” Nations and Nationalism 24 (3): 648–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., and D. R. Kinder. 1996. “Issue Frames and Group-Centrism in American Public Opinion.” The Journal of Politics 58 (4): 1055–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., Z. M. Oxley, and R. A. Clawson. 1997. “Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects.” Political Behavior 19 (3): 221–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newth, G. 2021. “Populism and Nativism in Contemporary Regionalist and Nationalist Politics: A Minimalist Framework for Ideologically Opposed Parties.” Politics, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivas Osuna, J.J. 2014. Iberian Military Politics: Controlling the Armed Forces During Dictatorship and Democratisation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Olivas Osuna, J.J. 2022. “Populism and Borders: Tools for Constructing ‘The People’ and Legitimizing Exclusion.” Journal of Borderlands Studies, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. E. 1993. Out of Order. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, J., R. Socher, and C. D. Manning. 2014. “GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation.” Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1532–1543.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. B., J. Pierre, and D. S. King. 2005. “The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism.” The Journal of Politics 67 (4): 1275–1300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pla de Nacionalizació. Internal document drafted by Jordi Pujol’s Government in 1990, Excerpts published by El Triangle between 13 September and 5 October 2019, https://www.eltriangle.eu/es/2019/09/11/noticia-es-103554/.
   Google Scholar
• Ranciere, J. 1995. On the Shores of Politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Rico, G., and R. Liñeira. 2014. “Bringing Secessionism Into the Mainstream: The 2012 Regional Election in Catalonia.” South European Society and Politics 19 (2): 257–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, D., Q. Skinner, and J. Tully. 1989. Political innovation and conceptual change, 11. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2010. “Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change Through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘new Institutionalism’.” European Political Science Review 2 (1): 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 2000. “Bounded Rationality in Social Science: Today and Tomorrow.” Mind & Society 1 (1): 25–39.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberger, J., and K. Jezek. 2004. “Using Latent Semantic Analysis in Text Summarization and Summary Evaluation.” Proc. ISIM 4, no. 93-100. https://www.kiv.zcu.cz/~jstein/publikace/isim2004.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe, A. L. 1968. Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, C. 2005. “Nation-building Through Discourse Theory.” Nations and Nationalism 11 (2): 185–202.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. 2003. “How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis’, Authoritarianism.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valdez, D., A. C. Pickett, and P. Goodson. 2018. “Topic Modeling: Latent Semantic Analysis for the Social Sciences.” Social Science Quarterly 99 (5): 1665–1679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, P., and S. Walgrave. 2016. “Information and Arena: The Dual Function of the News Media for Political Elites.” Journal of Communication 66 (3): 496–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. 2008. “Bounded Rationality in Latin-American Pension Reform.” In Lessons from Pension Reform in the Americas, edited by S. Kay and T. Sinha. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkerson, J., and A. Casas. 2017. “Large-scale Computerized Text Analysis in Political Science: Opportunities and Challenges.” Annual Review of Political Science 20: 529–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar