Mechanical property characterizations of woven natural fiber-reinforced polymers 3D printed through a laminated object manufacturing process

References

• Ngo, T. D.; Kashani, A.; Imbalzano, G.; Nguyen, K. T.; Hui, D. Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing): A Review of Materials, Methods, Applications and Challenges. Compos. B Eng. 2018, 143(15), 172–196.
   Google Scholar
• Jarosinski, W.; Zhang, J. Additive Manufacturing Processes and Equipment. In Additive Manufacturing - Materials, Processes, Quantifications and Applications; Jing, Z., Yeon-Gil J., Eds.; Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2018; pp. 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Groover, M. Rapid Prototyping and Additive Manufacturing. In Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing - Materials, Processes, and Systems; Mikell P. G., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Danvers, MA, 2016; pp. 716–733.
   Google Scholar
• Klosterman, D.; Chartoff, R.; Osborne, N.; Graves, G.; Lightman, A.; Han, G.; Bezeredi, A.; Rodrigues, S. Development of a Curved Layer LOM Process for Monolithic Ceramics and Ceramic Matrix Composites. Rapid. Prototyping. J. 1999, 5(2), 61–71. DOI: 10.1108/13552549910267362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windsheimer, H.; Travitzky, N.; Hofenauer, A.; Greil, P. Laminated Object Manufacturing of Preceramic-Paper-Derived Si-SiC Composites. Adv. Mat. 2007, 19(24), 4515–4519. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200700789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, S.; Liu, F.; Zhang, J.; Xiong, S. Study of the Key Technologies of LOM for Functional Metal Parts. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2004, 150(1–2), 175–181. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.01.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilipovic, A.; Raos, P.; Sercer, M. Experimental Testing of Quality of Polymer Parts Produced by Laminated Object Manufacturing - LOM. Tech. Gaz. 2011, 18(2), 253–260.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S.; Singh, I.; Koloor, S. S.; Kumar, D.; Yahya, M. Y. On Laminated Object Manufactured FDM-Printed ABS/TPU Multimaterial Specimens: An Insight into Mechanical and Morphological Characteristics. Polymers. 2022, 14(4066), 14194066. DOI: 10.3390/polym14194066.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, B.; Parandoush, P.; Li, X.; Ruan, S.; Shen, C.; Behnagh, R. A.; Liu, Y.; Lin, D. Ultrafast Printing of Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites with Ultrahigh Mechanical Performance by Ultrasonic-Assisted Laminated Object Manufacturing. Polymer. Compos. 2020, 41(11), 4706–4715. DOI: 10.1002/pc.25744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzi, A.; Sepe, R., “Mechanical Properties of Woven Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites,” in ECCM15 15th European Conference on Composite Materials, Venice, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Salman, S. D. Effects of Jute Fibre Content on the Mechanical and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of the Composites in Structural Applications. Defence. Technol. 2020, 16(6), 1098–1105. DOI: 10.1016/j.dt.2019.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalbehera, S.; Acharya, S. Study on Mechanical Properties of Natural Fiber Reinforced Woven Jute-Glass Hybrid Epoxy Composites. Adv. Polymer. Sci. Tech. 2014, 4(1), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, L.; Peng, X.; Walczyk, D. F. 3D Printing of Biofiber-Reinforced Composites: A Review. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2020, 26(6), 1113–1129. DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-08-2019-0214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L.; Walczyk, D.; Li, B. Modeling of Glue Penetration into Natural Fiber Reinforcements by Roller Infusion. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2018, 140(4), 041006–1–11. DOI: 10.1115/1.4038514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L.; Walczyk, D.; McIntyre, G. A New Approach to Manufacturing Biocomposite Sandwich Structures: Investigation of Preform Shell Behavior. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2017, 139(2), 021014–1–11. DOI: 10.1115/1.4034278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L.; Walczyk, D.; McIntyre, G.; Bucinell, R.; Li, B. Bioresin Infused Then Cured Mycelium-Based Sandwich-Structure Biocomposites: Resin Transfer Molding (RTM) Process, Flexural Properties, and Simulation. J. Cleaner Prod. 2019, 207, 123–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L.; Walczyk, D.; McIntyre, G.; Chan, W. K. Cost Modeling and Optimization of a Manufacturing System for Mycelium-Based Biocomposite Parts. J. Manufactur. Syst. 2016, 41, 8–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L.; Walczyk, D.; McIntyre, G.; Bucinell, R.; Tudryn, G. Manufacturing of Biocomposite Sandwich Structures Using Mycelium-Bound Cores and Preforms. J. Manuf. Processes. 2017, 28, 50–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.04.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkema. brochure-elium-2017. Arkema, [Online]. 2017. Available: https://www.arkema.co.jp/export/shared/.content/media/downloads/products-documentations/incubator/brochure-elium-2017.pdf. [Accessed Jun 25, 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Arkema. Elium 150 Technical datasheet. Arkema, [Online]. Available: https://cstjmateriauxcomposites.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/elium_150_tech_data_sheet_grp_160908.pdf. [Accessed Jun 25, 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, X.; Luo, Y.; Tian, X.; Huang, D.; Reddy, N.; Yang, Y. Chemical Structure of Poly(Lactic Acid). In Poly(Lactic Acid): Synthesis, Structures, Properties, Processing, and Applications; Rafael A., Loong-Tak L., Susan E. M. S., Hideto T., Eds.; Hoboken, New Jersey, US: John Wiley and Sons, 2010; pp. 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Casalini, T.; Rossi, F.; Castrovinci, A.; Perale, G. A Perspective on Polylactic Acid-Based Polymers Use for Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 259. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagarajan, V.; Mohanty, A. K.; Misra, M. Perspective on Polylactic Acid (PLA) Based Sustainable Materials for Durable Applications: Focus on Toughness and Heat Resistance. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4(6), 2899–2916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczmare, H.; Nowicki, M.; Vuković-Kwiatkowska, I. Crosslinked Blends of Poly(lactic Acid) and Polyacrylates: AFM, DSC and XRD Studies. J. Polym. Res. 2013, 20(3), 91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar