Reproductive empowerment and contraceptive self-care: a systematic review

References

• World Health Organization. WHO guideline on self-care interventions for health and well-being. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Report of the International conference on population and development. New York: United Nations; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer N. Resources, agency, achievements: reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Dev Change. 1999;30(3):435–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra A, Schuler SR, Boender C, editors. Measuring women’s empowerment as a variable in international development. Background paper prepared for the World Bank Workshop on Poverty and Gender: New Perspectives; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls New York, NY: United Nations; 2021 [cited 2021 February 2]. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal5.
   Google Scholar
• United States Agency of International Development. Gender equality and women’s empowerment: 2020 policy. Washington (DC): United States Agency of International Development, 2020 2020. Report No.
   Google Scholar
• Edmeades J, Hinson L, Sebany M, et al. A conceptual framework for reproductive empowerment: empowering individuals and couples to improve their health. Washington DC: International Center for Research on Women; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Karp C, Wood SN, Galadanci H, et al. “I am the master key that opens and locks”: presentation and application of a conceptual framework for women’s and girls’ empowerment in reproductive health. Soc Sci Med. 2020;258:113086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau C, Karp C, Wood SN, et al. Reconceptualizing women’s and girls’ empowerment: a cross-cultural index for measuring progress toward improved sexual and reproductive health. Int Perspect Sexual Reproductive Health. 2020;46:187–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul M, Mejia CM, Muyunda B, et al. Developing measures of reproductive empowerment: a qualitative study in Zambia. Chapel Hill (NC): MEASURE Evaluation; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wood SN, Karp C, Tsui A, et al. A sexual and reproductive empowerment framework to explore volitional sex in sub-Saharan Africa. Cult Health Sex. 2020;23:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, et al. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007;7:16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyay UD, Dworkin SL, Weitz TA, et al. Development and validation of a reproductive autonomy scale. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45(1):19–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy CE, Fonner VA, Armstrong KA, et al. The evidence project risk of bias tool: assessing study rigor for both randomized and non-randomized intervention studies. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP Qualitative Research Checklist 2017 [cited 2021 February 1]. Available from: http://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/dded87_25658615020e427da194a325e7773d42.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Adolescence: a period needing special attention. Health for the World’s Adolescents: A second chance in the second decade. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Catalogue of Bias Collaboration, Thomas ET, Heneghan C. Outcome reporting bias. In: Catalogue of Biases 2017 2017 [cited 2021 February 1]. Available from: https://catalogofbias.org/biases/outcome-reporting-bias/.
   Google Scholar
• Escribano S, Espada J, Morales A, et al. Mediation analysis of an effective sexual health promotion intervention for Spanish adolescents. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(10):1850–1859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espada JP, Morales A, Guillén-Riquelme A, et al. Predicting condom use in adolescents: a test of three socio-cognitive models using a structural equation modeling approach. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghobadzadeh M, Sieving RE, Gloppen K. Positive youth development and contraceptive use consistency. J pediatr health care : Off publ Natl Assoc Pediatr Nurse Assoc Pract. 2016;30(4):308–316.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton NS. Critical ethnographic respect: womens’ narratives, material conditions, and emergency contraception in India. Anthropol Med. 2020;29:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehlendorf C, Fitzpatrick J, Fox E, et al. Cluster randomized trial of a patient-centered contraceptive decision support tool, My Birth Control. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(6):565.e1–56.e12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson J, Bailey JV, Gubijev A, et al. An interactive website for informed contraception choice: randomised evaluation of contraception choices. Digital Health. 2020;6:2055207620936435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundstrom B, Smith E, Vyge K, et al. Moving oral contraceptives over the counter: theory-based formative research to design communication strategy. J Health Commun. 2020;25(4):313–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO consolidated guideline on self-care interventions for health: sexual and reproductive health and rights web supplement: global values and preferences survey report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Asante KO, Doku PN. Cultural adaptation of the Condom Use Self Efficacy Scale (CUSES) in Ghana. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):227–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buston K, Parkes A, Wight D. High and low contraceptive use amongst young male offenders: a qualitative interview study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2014;40(4):248–253.
   Google Scholar
• Chirinda W, Peltzer K. Correlates of inconsistent condom use among youth aged 18–24 years in South Africa. J Child Adolesc Mental Health. 2014;26(1):75–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Do M, Fu H. Is women’s self-efficacy in negotiating sexual decisionmaking associated with condom use in marital relationships in Vietnam? Stud Fam Plann. 2011;42(4):273–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folayan MO, Odetoyinbo M, Harrison A. Differences in use of contraception by age, sex and HIV status of 10-19-year-old adolescents in Nigeria. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2015;29(4):20150059.
   Google Scholar
• Gesselman AN, Ryan R, Yarber WL, et al. An exploratory test of a couples-based condom-use intervention designed to promote pleasurable and safer penile–vaginal sex among university students. J Am Coll Health. 2020:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugu JK, Mevissen FE, Prinsen A, et al. Who’s that girl? A qualitative analysis of adolescent girls’ views on factors associated with teenage pregnancies in Bolgatanga, Ghana. Reprod Health. 2016;13:39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long L, Han Y, Tong L, et al. Association between condom use and perspectives on contraceptive responsibility in different sexual relationships among sexually active college students in China: a cross-sectional study. Medicine. 2019;98(1):e13879–e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchwood TD, Penn DC, DiClemente RJ, et al. Influence of sexual sensation-seeking on factors associated with risky sexual behaviour among African-American female adolescents. Sex Health. 2014;11(6):540–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos MJO, Ferreira EMS, Ferreira M. Contraceptive behavior of Portuguese higher education students. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018;71(suppl 4):1706–1713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih SL, Kebodeaux CA, Secura GM, et al. Baseline correlates of inconsistent and incorrect condom use among sexually active women in the contraceptive CHOICE project. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38(11):1012–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smylie L, Clarke B, Doherty M, et al. The development and validation of sexual health indicators of Canadians aged 16-24 years. Public Health Rep (Washington, DC: 1974). 2013;128 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):53–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa CSP, Castro R, Pinheiro AKB, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the condom self-efficacy scale: application to Brazilian adolescents and young adults. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018;25:e2991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafuri S, Martinelli D, Germinario C, et al. Determining factors for condom use: a survey of young Italian adults. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care : Off J Eur Soc Contracept. 2010;15(1):24–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Shiels C, Gabbay MB. Modelling condom use: does the theory of planned behaviour explain condom use in a low risk, community sample? Psychol Health Med. 2014;19(4):463–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tingey L, Chambers R, Rosenstock S, et al. The impact of a sexual and reproductive health intervention for American Indian adolescents on predictors of condom use intention. JAdolesc Health: Off Publ Soc Adolesc Med. 2017;60(3):284–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsay S, Childs G, Cook-Heard D, et al. Correlates of condom self-efficacy in an incarcerated juvenile population. J Correct Health Care: Off J Natl Comm Correct Health Care. 2013;19(1):27–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Z. Correlates of condom use among Chinese college students in Hunan province. AIDS Educ Prev: Off Publ Int Soc AIDS Educ. 2012;24(5):469–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agha S. Intentions to use contraceptives in Pakistan: implications for behavior change campaigns. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui TC, Markham CM, Ross MW, et al. Perceived gender inequality, sexual communication self-efficacy, and sexual behaviour among female undergraduate students in the Mekong delta of Vietnam. Sex Health. 2012;9(4):314–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do M, Kurimoto N. Women’s empowerment and choice of contraceptive methods in selected African countries. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012;38(1):23–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson HN, Borrero S, Lehman E, et al. Measuring oral contraceptive adherence using self-report versus pharmacy claims data. Contraception. 2017;96(6):453–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiodo D, Crooks CV, Wolfe DA, et al. Longitudinal prediction and concurrent functioning of adolescent girls demonstrating various profiles of dating violence and victimization. Prev Sci : Off J Soc Prev Res. 2012;13(4):350–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis KC. “Stealthing”: factors associated with young men’s nonconsensual condom removal. Health Psychol: Off J Div Health Psychol, Am Psychol Assoc. 2019;38(11):997–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell E, Bennett LR. Pressure and persuasion: young Fijian women’s experiences of sexual and reproductive coercion in romantic relationships. Violence Against Women. 2020;26(12–13):1555–1573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma V, Sarna A, Tun W, et al. Women and substance use: a qualitative study on sexual and reproductive health of women who use drugs in Delhi, India. BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e018530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto Y, Matsumoto K. Choice of contraceptive methods by women’s status: evidence from large-scale microdata in Nepal. Sex Reprod Healthc: Off J Swed Assoc Midwives. 2017;14:48–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss K, Andersen K, Pearson E, et al. Unintended consequences of mHealth interactive voice messages promoting contraceptive use after menstrual regulation in Bangladesh: intimate partner violence results from a randomized controlled trial. Glob Health: Sci Pract. 2019;7(3):386–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel de Bocanegra H, Rostovtseva DP, Khera S, et al. Birth control sabotage and forced sex: experiences reported by women in domestic violence shelters. Violence Against Women. 2010;16(5):601–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO consolidated guideline on self-care interventions for health: sexual and reproductive health and rights web supplement: global values and preferences survey report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15(1):25–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brafford LJ, Beck KH. Development and validation of a condom self-efficacy scale for college students. J Am Coll Health. 1991;39(5):219–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanna KM. An adolescent and young adult condom self-efficacy scale. J Pediatr Nurs. 1999;14(1):59–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pulerwitz J, Gortmaker SL, DeJong W. Measuring sexual relationship power in HIV/STD research. Sex Roles. 2000;42(7):637–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espada JP, Ballester R, Huedo-Medina T, et al. Development of a new instrument to assess AIDS-related attitudes among Spanish Youngsters. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology. 2013;29(1):83–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ. Partner influences and gender-related factors associated with noncondom use among young adult African American women. Am J Community Psychol. 1998;26(1):29–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espada JP, Gonzálvez MT, Orgilés M, et al. Validación de la Escala de Autoeficacia General con adolescentes españoles. Electron J Res Educ Psychol. 2017;10(26):355–370.
   Google Scholar
• Fedding CA, Rossi JS. Testing a model of situational self-efficacy for safer sex among college students: stage of change and gender-based diffewnces. Psychol Health. 1999;14(3):467–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longmore MA, Manning WD, Giordano PC, et al. Contraceptive self-efficacy: does it influence adolescents’ contraceptive use? J Health Soc Behav. 2003;44:45–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne L, Fischer S. Malawi’s self-care success story: rapid introduction of self-injectable contraception. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs; 2020; [cited 2021 February 2]. Available from: https://knowledgesuccess.org/2020/07/22/malawis-self-care-success-story-rapid-introduction-of-self-injectable-contraception/.
   Google Scholar
• Ministere de la Sante et de l’Action Sociale, JSI, PATH. Second DMPA-SC Evidence to Practice Meeting. Seattle, WA: PATH, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Association for Reproductive and Family Health. Empowering women for a healthier future in Lagos State. Ibadan: Association for Reproductive and Family Health; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Remme M, Narasimhan M, Wilson D, et al. Self care interventions for sexual and reproductive health and rights: costs, benefits, and financing. Br Med J. 2019;365.
   Google Scholar
• Upadhyay UD, Danza PY, Neilands TB, et al. Development and validation of the sexual and reproductive empowerment scale for adolescents and young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2021;68(1):86–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanc AK. The effect of power in sexual relationships on sexual and reproductive health: an examination of the evidence. Stud Fam Plann. 2001;32(3):189–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy KJ, Mehta R, Haberland NA. Gender, power, and violence: a systematic review of measures and their association with male perpetration of IPV. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0207091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sully E, Biddlecom A, Darroch JE, et al. Adding it up: investing in sexual and reproductive health 2019. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• UNFPA. Facing the facts: adolescent girls and contraception. New York: United Nations Population Fund, 2015 2016. Report No.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan R, George A, Ssali S, et al. How to do (or not to do) … gender analysis in health systems research. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31(8):1069–1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyay UD, Gipson JD, Withers M, et al. Women’s empowerment and fertility: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 2014;115:111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar