The difficult process of autonomous choice: using I-poems to understand experiences of abortion-seekers in The Netherlands

References

• Goeij Ed, Kleiverda G, van de Koppel Z. Ava Inventarisatie Cliënttevredenheid Medicamenteuze Zwangerschapsafbreking, Abortus: van gebeurtenis naar proces Hoe tevreden zijn we in Nederland over de abortuszorg? – Ava (avahelpt.nl); 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Hessini L, Mitchell EM. Conceptualising abortion stigma. Cult Health Sex. 2009;11(6):625–639. doi:10.1080/13691050902842741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell AT, O’Carroll T, Toole N. Internalized stigma and stigma-related isolation predict women’s psychological distress and physical health symptoms post-abortion. Psychol Women Q. 2018;42(2):220–234. doi:10.1177/0361684317748937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauer M, van Ditzhuijzen J, Boeije H, et al. Understanding decision-making and decision difficulty in women with an unintended pregnancy in The Netherlands. Qual Health Res. 2019;29(8):1084–1095. doi:10.1177/104973231881043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Rosenfeld EA, Nikolajski C, et al. Abortion stigma among low-income women obtaining abortions in western Pennsylvania: a qualitative assessment. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017;49(1):29–36. doi:10.1363/psrh.12014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomperts R, Schellekens M, Leusink P, et al. Abortushulp kent te veel barrières. Medisch Contact (medischcontact.nl). 2019;6.
   Google Scholar
• Holten L, de Goeij E, Kleiverda G. Permeability of abortion care in The Netherlands: a qualitative analysis of women’s experiences, health professional perspectives, and the internet resource of Women on Web. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021;29(1). doi:10.1080/26410397.2021.1917042.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards R, Weller S. Shifting analytic ontology: using I-poems in qualitative longitudinal research. Qual Res. 2012;12(2):202–217. doi:10.1177/1468794111422040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross LJ, Solinger R. Reproductive justice: an introduction. Oakland California: University of California Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Brown LM, Gilligan C. Meeting at the crossroads: the landmark book about the turning points in girls’ and women’s lives. New York: Ballantine; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan C, Spencer R, Weinberg MK, et al. On the listening guide: A voice-centered relational method. In: PM Camic, JE Rhodes, L Yardley, editors. Qualitative research in psychology: expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2003. p. 157–172. doi:10.1037/10595-009.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie G. Freebirthing in the United Kingdom: the voice centered relational method and the (de)construction of the I-Poem. Int J Qual Methods. 2021;20. doi:10.1177/1609406921993285.
   Google Scholar
• Fontein-Kuipers Y, Koster D, Romijn C, … van Willigen I. I-POEMS: listening to the voices of women with a traumatic birth experience. J Psychol Cognit. 2018;3(2):29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Balan BN. Multiple voices and methods: listening to women who are in workplace transition. Int J Qual Methods. 2005;4(4):63–86. doi:10.1177/160940690500400405.
   Google Scholar
• Miller E, Donohue G, Holland-Batt S. “You could scream the place down”: five poems on the experience of aged care. Qual Inq. 2015;21(5):410–417. doi:10.1177/1077800415572396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6(35). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Altshuler AL, Nguyen BT, Riley HE, et al. Male partners’ involvement in abortion care: a mixed-methods systematic review. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016;48(4):209–219. doi:10.1363/psrh.12000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen BT, Hebert LE, Newton SL, et al. Supporting women at the time of abortion: a mixed-methods study of male partner experiences and perspectives. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018;50(2):75–83. doi:10.1363/psrh.12059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chibber KS, Biggs MA, Roberts SC, et al. The role of intimate partners in women’s reasons for seeking abortion. Womens Health Issues. 2014;24(1):e131–e138. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2013.10.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman JG, Decker MR, McCauley HL, et al. Male perpetration of intimate partner violence and involvement in abortions and abortion-related conflict. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(8):1415–1417. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.173393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• (NGvA) Nederlandse Genootschap van Abortusartsen. Richtlijn begeleiding van vrouwen die een zwangerschapsafbreking overwegen [Guideline guidance for women considering termination of pregnancy]. Richtlijnen - NGvA; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Kimport K, Preskill F, Cockrill K, et al. Women’s perspectives on ultrasound viewing in the abortion care context. Womens Health Issues. 2012;22(6):e513–e517. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2012.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hukku S, LaRoche K, Foster AM. “This was the worst part of the whole experience”: the underexplored burden of ultrasound on Canadian women seeking abortion care. Contraception. 2022;109:84–88. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2022.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebe ER, Adams L. Women’s perceptions about seeing the ultrasound picture before an abortion. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2009;14(2):97–102. doi:10.1080/13625180902745130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjelsvik M, Sekse RJ, Aasen EM, et al. Viewing the image? Ultrasound examination during abortion preparations, ethical challenges. Nurs Ethics. 2022;29(2):511–522. doi:10.1177/09697330211051009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beynon-Jones SM. Re-visioning ultrasound through women’s accounts of pre-abortion care in England. Gend Soc. 2015;29(5):694–715. doi:10.1177/0891243215590101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patev AJ, Hood KB. Towards a better understanding of abortion misinformation in the USA: a review of the literature. Cult Health Sex. 2020: 285–300. doi:10.1080/13691058.2019.1706001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris A, Bessett D, Steinberg JR, et al. Abortion stigma: a reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21(3):S49–S54. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2011.02.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebe E, Chalmers A, Yager H. Delayed motherhood: understanding the experiences of women older than age 33 who are having abortions but plan to become mothers later. Canad Fam Phys. 2012;58(10):e588–e595. Delayed motherhood | The College of Family Physicians of Canada (cfp.ca).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta N, Baum SE, Cartwright AF, et al. The association between reproductive autonomy and abortion stigma among women who have had abortions in the United States. Stigma Health. 2019;4(4):377. doi:10.1037/sah0000151.
   Google Scholar
• Lebold M. Canadian Women’s Contemporary Experiences Accessing Abortion. Master thesis School of Nursing, York University, Toronto, Ontario; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Inspectie Gezondheidszorg en Jeugd. Jaarrapportage 2021 van de Wet afbreking zwangerschap. Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport. Rapportage Wet afbreking zwangerschap (Wafz) | Over ons | Inspectie Gezondheidszorg en Jeugd (igj.nl); 2022.
   Google Scholar