Multi-objective topology optimization of porous microstructure in die-bonding layer of a semiconductor

References

• Zhang H, Wang W, Bai H, et al. Microstructural and mechanical evolution of silver sintering die attach for SiC power devices during high temperature applications. J Alloys Compd. 2019;774:487–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Nagao S, Zhang H, et al. Mechanical deformation of sintered porous ag die attach at high temperature and its size effect for wide-bandgap power device design. J Electron Mater. 2017;46(3):1576–1586. doi: 10.1007/s11664-016-5200-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barui S, Chatterjee S, Mandal S, et al. Microstructure and compression properties of 3D powder printed Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds with designed porosity: experimental and computational analysis. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;70:812–823. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.09.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Kang J, Sun C, et al. Mapping porous microstructures to yield desired mechanical properties for application in 3D printed bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants. Mater Des. 2017;133:62–68. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidhar S, Kuwazuru O, Shiihara Y, et al. Empirical formulation of stress concentration factor around an arbitrary-sized spherical dual-cavity system and its application to aluminum die castings. Appl Math Modell. 2015;39:5707–5723. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.01.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigmund O. On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization. J Struct Mech. 1997;25(4):493–524. doi: 10.1080/08905459708945415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu B, Zhang X, Zhang H, et al. Design of compliant mechanisms using continuum topology optimization: a review. Mech Mach Theory. 2020;143:103622. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.103622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira A, Talischi C, Paulino GH, et al. Fluid flow topology optimization in PolyTop: stability and computational implementation. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2016;54:1345–1364. doi: 10.1007/s00158-014-1182-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaji K, Yamada T, Yoshino M, et al. Topology optimization in thermal-fluid flow using the lattice Boltzmann method. J Comput Phys. 2016;307:355–377. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia Q, Xia L, Shi T. Topology optimization of thermal actuator and its support using the level set based multiple–type boundary method and sensitivity analysis based on constrained variational principle. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2018;57(3):1317–1327. doi: 10.1007/s00158-017-1814-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langelaar M, Yoon GH, Kim YY, et al. Topology optimization of planar shape memory alloy thermal actuators using element connectivity parameterization. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2011;88(9):817–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendsøe MP. Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optim. 1989;1(4):193–202. doi: 10.1007/BF01650949
   Google Scholar
• Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader AM. Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method. J Comput Phys. 2004;194(1):363–393. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2003.09.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang MY, Wang X, Guo D. A level set method for structural topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2003;192(1–2):227–246. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(02)00559-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sethian JA, Wiegmann A. Structural boundary design via level set and immersed interface methods. J Comput Phys. 2000;163(2):489–528. doi: 10.1006/jcph.2000.6581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk NP, Maute K, Langelaar M, et al. Level-set methods for structural topology optimization: a review. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2013;48(3):437–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada T, Yamasaki S, Nishiwaki S, et al. Design of compliant thermal actuators using structural optimization based on the level set method. J Comput Inf Sci Eng. 2011;11(1):011005. doi: 10.1115/1.3563049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Kondoh T, Jolivet P, et al. Three-dimensional topology optimization of a fluid–structure system using body-fitted mesh adaption based on the level-set method. Appl Math Model. 2022;101:276–308. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2021.08.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Watanabe I, Yamada T. Computational morphology design of duplex structure considering interface debonding. Compos Struct. 2022;302:116200. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguchi Y, Yamada T, Izui K, et al. Topology optimization for hyperbolic acoustic meta-materials using a high-frequency homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2018;335:419–471. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2018.02.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allaire G, Yamada T. Optimization of dispersive coefficients in the homogenization of the wave equation in periodic structures. Numer Math. 2018;140(2):265–326. doi: 10.1007/s00211-018-0972-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang X, Radman A, Xie YM. Topological design of microstructures of cellular materials for maximum bulk or shear modulus. Comput Mater Sci. 2011;50(6):1861–1870. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.01.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang XY, Huang X, Rong JH, et al. Design of 3D orthotropic materials with prescribed ratios for effective Young’s moduli. Comput Mater Sci. 2013;67:229–237. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.08.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassen E, Lazarov BS, Sigmund O. Design of manufacturable 3D extremal elastic microstructure. Mech Mater. 2014;69(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang X, Zhou SW, Xie YM, et al. Topology optimization of microstructures of cellular materials and composites for macrostructures. Comput Mater Sci. 2013;67:397–407. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe I, Nakamura G, Yuge K, et al. Maximization of strengthening effect of microscopic morphology in duplex steels. In : advanced structured materials: from creep damage mechanics to homogenization methods. Cham: Springer; 2015. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-19440-024
   Google Scholar
• Chen W, Liu S. Topology optimization of microstructures of viscoelastic damping materials for a prescribed shear modulus. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2014;50(2):287–296. doi: 10.1007/s00158-014-1049-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruggi M, Corigliano A. Optimal 2D auxetic micro-structures with band gap. Meccanica. 2019;54(13):2001–2027. doi: 10.1007/s11012-019-00981-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogiatzis P, Chen S, Wang X, et al. Topology optimization of multi-material negative Poisson’s ratio metamaterials using a reconciled level set method. Comput Aided Des. 2017;83:15–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2016.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou S, Li Q. Computational design of multi-phase microstructural materials for extremal conductivity. Comput Mater Sci. 2008;43(3):549–564. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Chen TT, Jiang X, et al. Deep learning-based inverse design of three-dimensional architected cellular materials with the target porosity and stiffness using voxelized voronoi lattices. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2023;24(1):2157682. doi: 10.1080/14686996.2022.2157682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabst W, Uhlířová T, Gregorová E. Shear and bulk moduli of isotropic porous and cellular alumina ceramics predicted from thermal conductivity via cross-property relations. Ceram Int. 2018;444(7):8100–8108. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.01.254
   Google Scholar
• Sigmund O. Design of multiphysics actuators using topology optimization–part I: one- material structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2001;190(49–50):6577–6604. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00251-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigmund O. Design of multiphysics actuators using topology optimization–part II: two-material structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2001;190(49–50):6605–6627. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00252-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato Y, Izui K, Yamada T, et al. Data mining based on clustering and association rule analysis for knowledge discovery in multi-objective topology optimization. Expert Syst Appl. 2019;119:247–261. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.10.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Zhou S, Li Q. Multiobjective topology optimization for finite periodic structures. Comput Struct. 2010;88(11–12):806–811. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadman JE, Zhou S, Chen Y, et al. On design of multi-functional microstructural materials. J Mater Sci. 2013;48:51–66. doi: 10.1007/s10853-012-6643-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francisco P, Faria L, Simões R. Multi-objective and multi-load topology optimization and experimental validation of homogenized coupled fluid flow and heat transfer and structural stiffness. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2020;62(5):2571–2598. doi: 10.1007/s00158-020-02625-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe I, Yamanaka A. Voxel coarsening approach on image-based finite element modeling of representative volume element. Int J Mech Sci. 2019;150:314–321. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.10.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargmann S, Klusemann B, Markmann J, et al. Generation of 3D representative volume elements for heterogeneous materials: a review. Prog Mater Sci. 2018;96:322–384. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Guo X, Watanabe I. A mathematically defined 3D auxetic metamaterial with tunable mechanical and conduction properties. Mater Des. 2021;198:109313. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassani B, Hinton E. A review of homogenization and topology optimization III—topology optimization using optimality criteria. Comput Struct. 1998;69(6):739–756. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00133-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassen E, Andreasen CS. How to determine composite material properties using numerical homogenization. Comput Mater Sci. 2014;83:488–495. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Peng J, Liu T, et al. Multi-objective periodic topology optimization of thermo- mechanical coupling structure with anisotropic materials by using the element-free Galerkin method. Int J Mech Mater Des. 2022;18(4):939–960. doi: 10.1007/s10999-022-09600-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Ye H, Wei N, et al. Design optimization of multifunctional metamaterials with tunable thermal expansion and phononic bandgap. Mater Des. 2021;209:109990. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alacoque L, Watkins RT, Tamijani AY. Stress-based and robust topology optimization for thermoelastic multi-material periodic microstructures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2021;379:113749. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2021.113749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allaire G. Homogenization and two-scale convergence. SIAM J Math Anal. 1992;23(6):1482–1518. doi: 10.1137/0523084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allaire G. Mathematical approaches and methods. Homogenization and porous media. New York (NY): Springer; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe I, Terada K. A method of predicting macroscopic yield strength of polycrystalline metals subjected to plastic forming by micro–macro de-coupling scheme. Int J Mech Sci. 2010;52(2):343–355. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe I, Setoyama D, Nagasako N, et al. Multiscale prediction of mechanical behavior of ferrite–pearlite steel with numerical material testing. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2012;89(7):829–845. doi: 10.1002/nme.3264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Yang Q, Chang T, et al. Multi-load cases topological optimization by weighted sum method based on load case severity degree and ideality. Adv Mech Eng. 2020;12(8):1687814020947510. doi: 10.1177/1687814020947510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler RT, Arora JS. The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization: new insights. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2010;41(6):853–862. doi: 10.1007/s00158-009-0460-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu N, Seo M, Min S. Multi-objective topology optimization incorporating an adaptive weighed-sum method and a configuration-based clustering scheme. CMAME. 2021;385:114015. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2021.114015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleury C. Structural weight optimization by dual methods of convex programming. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 1979;14(12):1761–1783. doi: 10.1002/nme.1620141203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleury C. CONLIN: an efficient dual optimizer based on convex approximation concepts. Struct Optim. 1989;1(2):81–89. doi: 10.1007/BF01637664
   Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Chen T, Guo X, et al. Controllable inverse design of auxetic metamaterials using deep learning. Mater Des. 2021;211:110178. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar