Gender-age effects in assessing attitudes toward statistics among undergraduate students: structural equation approach

References

• Ajzen I, Fishbein M. 1988. Theory of reasoned action-Theory of planned behavior. University of South Florida, 2007, 67–98.
   Google Scholar
• Arbuckle JL. 2015. IBM SPSS Amos user’s guide [Computer software and manual].
   Google Scholar
• Baker C. 1992. Attitudes and language. Vol. 83. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Bond ME, Perkins SN, Ramirez C. 2012. Students’ perceptions of statistics: an exploration of attitudes, conceptualizations, and content knowledge of statistics. Stat Educ Res J. 11:6–25.
   Google Scholar
• Brown TA. 2015. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• Brown TS, Brown JT. 1995. Prerequisite course grades and attitude toward statistics. Coll Stud J. 29:502–507.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne BM. 2010. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming (multivariate applications series). Vol. 396. New York: Taylor & Francis Group. p. 7384.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne B. 2011. Structural equation modeling with Mplus: basic concepts, applications, and programming (multivariate applications). London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona J, Martínez RJ, Sánchez M. 2005. Mathematical background and attitudes toward statistics in a sample of Spanish college students. Psychol Rep. 97:53–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashin SE, Elmore PB. 2005. The Survey of Attitudes Toward Statistics Scale: a construct validity study. Educ Psychol Meas. 65:509–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caterina P, Maria DA, Francesca C. 2017. Are there gender differences in cognitive reflection? Invariance and differences related to mathematics. Think Reason. 24:258–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catsambis S. 1994. The path to math: Gender and racial-ethnic differences in mathematics participation from middle school to high school. Sociol Educ. 67:199–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiesi F, Primi C. 2015. Gender differences in attitudes toward statistics: Is there a case for a confidence gap?
   Google Scholar
• Chiesi F, Primi C. 2009. Assessing statistics attitudes among college students: pychometric properties of the Italian version of the Survey of Attitudes toward Statistics (SATS). Learn Individ Differ. 19:309–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dani BZ, Joan G. 2004. Statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking: goals, definitions, and challenges. In: Ben-Zvi D, Garfield J, editors. The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking. Dordrecht: Springer. p. 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Dauphinee TL, Schau C, Stevens JJ. 1997. Survey of attitudes toward statistics: factor structure and factorial invariance for females and males. Struct Equ Model. 4:129–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiser JR. 1986. Social psychology: Attitudes, cognition and social behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Else-Quest NM, Hyde JS, Linn MC. 2010. Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 136:103–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Else-Quest NM, Mineo CC, Higgins A. 2013. Math and science attitudes and achievement at the intersection of gender and ethnicity. Psychol Women Q. 37:293–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmioğlu E. 2011. A structural equation model examining the relationships among mathematics achievement, attitudes toward statistics, and statistics outcomes. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ. 10:23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Evans BR. 2007. Student attitudes, conceptions, and achievement in introductory undergraduate college statistics [Doctoral dissertation]. Temple University.
   Google Scholar
• Field A. 2009. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Finney S, Schraw G. 2003. Self-efficacy beliefs in college statistics courses. Contemp Educ Psychol. 28:161–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res. 18:39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman JV, Collier S, Staniforth D, Smith KJ. 2008. Innovations in curriculum design: a multi-disciplinary approach to teaching statistics to undergraduate medical students. BMC Med Educ. 8:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal I, Ginsburg L, Schau C. 1997. Monitoring attitudes and beliefs in statistics education. Assess Chall Stat Educ. 12:37–51.
   Google Scholar
• Gal I. 2004. Statistical literacy: meanings, components, responsibilities. In Ben-Zvi D, Garfield J, editors. The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 47–78.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskin J, Lim J. 2016. Model Fit Measures. AMOS Plugin. Gaskination’s StatWiki.
   Google Scholar
• George D, Mallery P. 2010. SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference 17.0 update. 10th ed. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Goodenow C. 1993. The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychol Schs. 30:79–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravetter FJ, Wallnau LB. 2012. Forzano LAB. Research methods for the behavioral sciences. 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. p. 78.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black B, Babin B, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. 2010. Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hannigan A, Hegarty AC, McGrath D. 2014. Attitudes towards statistics of graduate entry medical students: the role of prior learning experiences. BMC Med Educ. 14:70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. 2015. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci. 43:115–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidayati NA, Waluya SB. 2020. Statistics literacy: what, why and how? J Phys Conf Ser. 1613:012080.
   Google Scholar
• Hilton SC, Schau C, Olsen JA. 2004. Survey of attitudes toward statistics: factor structure invariance by gender and by administration time. Struct Equ Model. 11:92–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ifinedo P. 2006. Acceptance and continuance intention of web-based learning technologies (WLT) use among university students in a Baltic country. E J Info Sys Dev Count. 23:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Khavenson T, Orel E, Tryakshina M. 2012. Adaptation of survey of attitudes towards statistics (SATS 36) for Russian sample. Procedia-Social Behav Sci. 46:2126–2129.
   Google Scholar
• Kline RB. 2013. Beyond significance testing: statistics reform in the behavioral sciences. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kline RB. 2015. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis CM, Anderson RE, Yasuhara K. 2016. “I Don’t Code All Day” fitting in computer science when the stereotypes don’t fit. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. p. 23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lipič N, Ovsenik M. 2020. The effect of statistical literacy on response to environmental change. Organizacija. 53:147–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills JD. 2004. Students’ attitudes toward statistics: Implications for the future. Coll Stud J. 38:349–362.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG. 2021. Introduction to linear regression analysis. Newark: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy K, Williamson H, Sargeant E, McCarthy M. 2020. Why people comply with COVID-19 social distancing restrictions: Self-interest or duty? Aust NZ J Criminol. 53:477–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylnikov L. 2016. Particularities of solving the problems of support for managerial decision making in production and economic systems using the statistical data. Int J Econ Financial Issues. 6:321–331. https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/3759/pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nieswandt M. 2007. Student affect and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry. J Res Sci Teach. 44:908–937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie AJ, Da Ros D, Ryan JM. 1997. The components of statistics anxiety: a phenomenological study. Focus Learning Probl Math. 19:11–35.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie AJ. 2000. Academic procrastinators and perfectionistic tendencies among graduate students. J Soc Behav Personal. 15:103.
   Google Scholar
• Opstad L. 2020. Attitudes towards statistics among business students: do gender, mathematical skills and personal traits matter? Sustainability. 12:6104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakpour AH, Zeidi IM, Yekaninejad MS, Burri A. 2014. Validation of a translated and culturally adapted Iranian version of the International Index of Erectile Function. J Sex Marital Ther. 40:541–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repedro Jr RE, Diego CV. 2021. Attitudes toward statistics and statistical literacy of public senior high school students. Philipp Soc Sci J. 4:48–56.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts DM, Bilderback EW. 1980. Reliability and validity of a statistics attitude survey. Educ Psychol Meas. 40:235–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin A, Rosebery A, Bruce B. 1988. ELASTIC and reasoning under uncertainty. Research report no. 6851. Boston: BBN Systems and Technologies Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan EB, Giles H. 1982. Attitudes towards language variation: Social and applied contexts. London: E. Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer JL, Graham JW. 2002. Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods. 7:147–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schau C, Dauphinee T, Del Vecchio A, Stevens J. 1995. The development and validation of the survey of attitudes toward statistics. Educ Psychol Meas. 55:868–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schau C. 2003. Students’ attitudes: The “other” important outcome in statistics education. In: Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings. p. 3673–3681.
   Google Scholar
• Songsore E, White BJ. 2018. Students’ perceptions of the future relevance of statistics after completing an online introductory statistics course. Stat Educ Res. 17:120–140.
   Google Scholar
• Stanisavljevic D, Trajkovic G, Marinkovic J, Bukumiric Z, Cirkovic A, Milic N. 2014. Assessing attitudes towards statistics among medical students: psychometric properties of the Serbian version of the Survey of Attitudes Towards Statistics (SATS). PLoS One. 9:e112567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens T, Wang K, Olivárez A, Hamman D. 2007. Use of self-perspectives and their sources to predict the mathematics enrollment intentions of girls and boys. Sex Roles, 56:351–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suki NM. 2011. A structural model of customer satisfaction and trust in vendors involved in mobile commerce. Int J Bus Sci Appl Manag (IJBSAM). 6:18–30.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. 2007. Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. 2019. Using multivariate statistics. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Tempelaar DT, Gijselaers WH, van der Loeff SS, Nijhuis JF. 2007. A structural equation model analyzing the relationship of student achievement motivations and personality factors in a range of academic subject-matter areas. Contemp Educ Psychol. 32:105–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiedemann J. 2000. Gender-related beliefs of teachers in elementary school mathematics. Educ Stud Math 41:191–207.
   Google Scholar
• Trochim WM, Donnelly JP. 2006. The research methods knowledge base. 3rd ed. Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhoof S, Kuppens S, Castro Sotos AE, Verschaffel L, Onghena P. 2011. Measuring statistics attitudes: structure of the survey of attitudes toward statistics. Stat Educ Res J. 10:35–51.
   Google Scholar
• Wainberg J. 2018. Stories vs statistics: the impact of anecdotal data on managerial decision making. Adv Account Behav Res. 21:127–141.
   Google Scholar
• Watters JJ, Ginns IS. 2000. Developing motivation to teach elementary science: effect of collaborative and authentic learning practices in preservice education. J Sci Teach Educ. 11:301–321.
   Google Scholar
• Weissglass J, Curnmings D. 1991. Dynamic visual experiments with random phenomena. In: Zimmermann W, Cunningham S, editor. Visualization in mathematics. Washington (DC): Mathematical Association of America. p. 215–223.
   Google Scholar
• Wise SL. 1985. The development and validation of a scale measuring attitudes toward statistics. Educ Psychol Meas. 45:401–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Shang L, Wang R, Zhao Q, Li C, Xu Y, Su H. 2012. Attitudes toward statistics in medical postgraduates: measuring, evaluating and monitoring. BMC Med Educ. 12:117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žmuk B. 2015. Business sample survey measurement on statistical thinking and methods adoption: the case of croatian small enterprises. Interdiscip Descr Complex Syst INDECS. 13:154–166.
   Google Scholar