References
- Ágh, Attila. 2022. “The Third Wave of Autocratization in East-Central Europe.” Journal of Comparative Politics 15 (2): 72–87.
- Baker, Thomas E. 1991. “The Impropriety of Expert Witness Testimony on the Law.” University of Kansas Law Review 40: 325–364.
- Banakar, Reza, and Max Travers. 2005. “Law, Sociology and Method.” In Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research, edited by Reza Banakar and Max Travers, 1–25. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
- Belavusau, Uladzislau. 2013. Freedom of Speech: Importing European and US Constitutional Models in Transitional Democracies. London: Routledge.
- Benčík, Ján. 2017. “Vyhrážali sa mi obesením aj dobodaním, ochranku som odmietol [They Threatened Me with Hanging and Stabbing, I Declined Security].” Interview by Miroslav Kern. https://dennikn.sk/685272/bloger-jan-bencik-vyhrazali-sa-mi-obesenim-aj-dobodanim-ochranku-som-odmietol/.
- Berman, Paul Schiff. 2020. “Understanding Global Legal Pluralism: From Local to Global, from Descriptive to Normative.” In The Oxford Handbook of Global Legal Pluralism, edited by Paul Schiff Berman, 1–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Bihariová, Irena. 2016. “Dag Daniš sa mýli. Protiextrémistická novela nás posúva vpred [Dag Daniš Is Wrong. The Anti-Extremist Amendment Is a Step Forward].” Denník N (blog). https://dennikn.sk/blog/593165/dag-danis-sa-myli-protiextremisticka-novela-nas-posuva-vpred/.
- Burns, Stacy Lee. 2008. “Demonstrating ‘Reasonable Fear’ at Trial: Is It Science or Junk Science?” Human Studies 31 (2): 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-008-9081-1
- Cammaerts, Bart. 2009. “Radical Pluralism and Free Speech in Online Public Spaces: The Case of North Belgian Extreme Right Discourses.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 12 (6): 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877909342479
- Campbell, John R. 2020. “Interrogating the Role and Value of Cultural Expertise in Law.” Laws 9 (4): 29–52. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws9040029
- Criminal Code of the Slovak Republic No. 300/2005 Coll. [English Translation]. 2005. https://legislationline.org/legislation?q=lang%3Aen%2Csort%3Amost_read_first%2Clegislation_category%3A48%2Cpage%3A1%2Ctype_main%3A43.
- ČTK. 2016. “Soud zrušil trest pro advokáta, který upozorňoval na židovský původ znalce [Court Abolished Penalty for Lawyer Who Argued with the Jewish Origin of the Expert Witness].” iDNES.cz. https://www.idnes.cz/zpravy/domaci/advokat-petr-koci-znalec-namitka-zid-komora.A161207_061959_domaci_ane.
- Czech Bar Association. nd. “Advokáti vystoupili proti kolegovi, který označil znalce za podjatého Žida | Česká advokátní komora [Lawyers Spoke Up Against Colleague Who Labelled Expert Witness as a Biased Jew | Czech Bar Association].” https://www.cak.cz/scripts/detail.php?id=7834.
- Darian-Smith, Eve. 2022. “Legal Pluralism in Postcolonial, Postnational, and Postdemocratic Times.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Anthropology, edited by Marie-Claire Foblets, Mark Goodale, Maria Sapignoli, and Olaf Zenker, 899–916. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Donert, Celia. 2017. The Rights of the Roma: The Struggle for Citizenship in Postwar Czechoslovakia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Drábik, Jakub. 2022. “‘With Courage against the System.’ The Ideology of the People’s Party Our Slovakia.” Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe 30 (3): 417–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/25739638.2022.2164119
- Dugovič, Matej. 2016. “Kotlebovho poslanca nebudú stíhať za výrok, že holokaust sú lži a rozprávky [Kotleba’s MP Will Not Be Prosecuted for the Claim that Holocaust Is Lies and Fairy Tales].” Denník N. https://dennikn.sk/553396/vyrok-kotlebovho-poslanca-mazureka-k-holokaustu-po-policii-neprekaza-ani-prokurature/.
- Dupret, Baudouin, Michael Lynch, and Tim Berard, eds. 2015. “Introduction: Law at Work.” In Law at Work: Studies in Legal Ethnomethods, edited by Baudouin Dupret, Michael Lynch, and Tim Berard, 1–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Dupret, Baudouin. 2016. Adjudication in Action: An Ethnomethodology of Law, Morality and Justice. London: Routledge.
- ECRI – European Commission against Racism and Intolerance. 2020. “Sixth Report on Slovakia.” https://rm.coe.int/ecri-6th-report-on-the-slovak-republic/1680a0a088.
- Evans, Richard J. 2002. “History, Memory, and the Law: The Historian as Expert Witness.” History and Theory 41 (3): 326–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2303.00209
- Farrell, Michelle, Eleanor Drywood, and Edel Hughes, eds. 2019. Human Rights in the Media: Fear and Fetish. London: Routledge.
- Friedman, Lawrence M. 2016. Impact: How Law Affects Behavior. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
- Garfinkel, Harold. 2003. “Ethnomethodology.” In Key Ideas in Sociology, edited by Martin Slattery, 104–108. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
- German Sirotnikova, Miroslava. 2020. “Slovak Election Dilemma: To Talk or Not to Talk to Fascists?” Balkan Insight (blog). https://balkaninsight.com/2020/02/05/slovak-election-dilemma-to-talk-or-not-to-talk-to-fascists/.
- Griffiths, John. 1986. “What is Legal Pluralism?” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 18 (24): 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387
- Haughton, Tim., Marek Rybář, and Kevin Deegan-Krause. 2019. “5 Big Lessons from Slovakia’s Presidential Elections.” Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/03/18/big-lessons-slovakias-presidential-elections/.
- Heinze, Eric. 2016. Hate Speech and Democratic Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Heper, Metin, and Şule Toktaş. 2003. “Islam, Modernity, and Democracy in Contemporary Turkey: The Case of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.” The Muslim World 93 (2): 157–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-1913.00019
- Holden, Livia. 2019. “Beyond Anthropological Expert Witnessing: Toward an Integrated Definition of Cultural Expertise.” In Cultural Expertise and Socio-Legal Studies, edited by Livia Holden, 181–204. Bingley: Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-433720190000078010
- Holden, Livia. 2022. “Anthropologists as Experts: Cultural Expertise, Colonialism, and Positionality.” Law & Social Inquiry 47 (2): 669–690. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2021.58
- Holden, Livia, and Giovanni Tortora. 2017. “Corrupted Files: Cross-Fading Defense Strategies of a Vesuvian Lawyer.” In Corruption and the Secret of Law: A Legal Anthropological Perspective, edited by Monique Nuijten and Gerhard Anders, 99–122. London: Routledge.
- Holt, Ed. 2020. “COVID-19 Lockdown of Roma Settlements in Slovakia.” The Lancet Infectious Diseases 20 (6): 659. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30381-9
- Horák, Jan. 2016. “Je to Žid, zaútočil advokát členky DSSS na znalce. Soud mu zrušil pokutu [It Is a Jew, the Lawyer of the Member of DSSS Attacked the Expert Witness. The Court Abolished His Penalty].” Lidovky.cz. https://www.lidovky.cz/domov/soud-zrusil-pokutu-advokatu-kocimu.A161206_130423_ln_domov_jho.
- Jasanoff, Sheila. 1997. Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America. Reprint edition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
- Kniffka, Hannes. 2007. Working in Languag and Law: A German Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9780230590045.
- Kováč, Peter. 2022. “Prokurátor Honz: Po Kotlebovi preverujeme aj ľudí z Republiky [Prosecutor Honz: After Kotleba We Also Investigate People from Republika].” domov.sme.sk. https://domov.sme.sk/c/22895524/tomas-honz-prokurator-rozhovor.html.
- Krekó, Péter, and Zsolt Enyedi. 2018. “Explaining Eastern Europe: Orbán’s Laboratory of Illiberalism.” Journal of Democracy 29 (3): 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0043
- Kühn, Zdeněk. 2011. The Judiciary in Central and Eastern Europe: Mechanical Jurisprudence in Transformation? Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
- Kusý, Miroslav. 1994. “Human Rights Education, Constitutionalism and Their Interrelations in Slovakia.” European Journal of Education 29 (4): 377–389. https://doi.org/10.2307/1503847
- Kyseľ, Tomáš. 2017. “Poslancovi ĽSNS prekážajú vyznamenania pre „Židov “aj ženu, ktorá prežila holokaust [ĽSNS MP Bothered by Recognition for ‘Jews’ and for a Woman Who Survived the Holocaust].” Aktuality.sk. https://www.aktuality.sk/clanok/406140/poslancovi-lsns-prekazaju-vyznamenania-pre-zidov-aj-zenu-ktora-prezila-holokaust/.
- Kyseľ, Tomáš. 2020a. “Mazurek má ďalší problém. Polícia začala trestné stíhanie pre status, v ktorom útočníka z Vrútok označil za Róma [Mazurek Has Another Problem. Police Initiated Prosecution for Status, in Which He Labelled the Attacker from Vrútky a Roma].” Aktuality.sk. https://www.aktuality.sk/clanok/828610/mazurek-ma-dalsi-problem-policia-zacala-trestne-stihanie-pre-status-v-ktorom-utocnika-z-vrutok-oznacil-za-roma/.
- Kyseľ, Tomáš. 2020b. “Kotleba je vinný v kauze šekov vo výške 1488 eur, dostal 4 roky a 4 mesiace [Kotleba Guilty in the 1488 Euro Cheques Case, Was Sentenced to 4 Years and 4 Months].” Aktuality.sk. https://www.aktuality.sk/clanok/829669/online-na-sude-s-kotlebom-je-napata-atmosfera-sudkyna-stopla-jeho-advokata/.
- Land, Molly K. 2020. “The Problem of Platform Law: Pluralistic Legal Ordering on Social Media.” In The Oxford Handbook of Global Legal Pluralism, edited by Paul Schiff Berman, 975–994. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lipstadt, Deborah E. 1994. Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory. New York: Plume.
- Lobba, Paolo. 2015. “Holocaust Denial before the European Court of Human Rights: Evolution of an Exceptional Regime.” European Journal of International Law 26 (1): 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chv003
- Ľudová strana Naše Slovensko. 2019a. “Najvyšší súd odmietol zrušenie ĽS Naše Slovensko. Reakcia vedenia strany po vynesení rozsudku [The Supreme Court Declined the Ban of PPOS. Reaction of the Party Leadership after the Verdict].” https://web.archive.org/web/20190502053225/http://www.naseslovensko.net/cinnost/najvyssi-sud-odmietol-zrusenie-ls-nase-slovensko-reakcia-vedenia-strany-po-vyneseni-rozsudku/.
- Ľudová strana Naše Slovensko. 2019b. “Milan Mazurek sa stal prvým poslancom NR SR, ktorému odobrali mandát [Milan Mazurek Became the First MP Whose Mandate Was Revoked].” https://web.archive.org/web/20191023020820/http://www.naseslovensko.net/cinnost/milan-mazurek-sa-stal-prvym-poslancom-ktoremu-odobrali-mandat-poslanca-nr-sr/.
- Lynch, Michael. 1994. Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625473
- Lynch, Michael. 2015. “Turning a Witness: The Textual and Interactional Production of a Statement in Adversarial Testimony.” In Law at Work: Studies in Legal Ethnomethods, edited by Baudouin Dupret, Michael Lynch, and Tim Berard, 163–189. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Maková, Denisa. 2019. “Slovakia: Chair of Neo-Nazi Party Indicted for Using Nazi Symbols on Checks.” Romea.Cz. http://www.romea.cz/en/news/world/slovakia-chair-of-neo-nazi-party-indicted-for-using-nazi-symbols-on-checks-2.
- Malová, Darina, and Branislav Dolný. 2016. “Economy and Democracy in Slovakia during the Crisis: From a Laggard to the EU Core.” Problems of Post-Communism 63 (5–6): 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2016.1200952
- Manzo, John F. 2016. “Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis, and the Sociology of Law.” In Law in Action: Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law, edited by Max Travers and John F. Manzo, 1–15. London: Routledge.
- Mareš, Miroslav. 2015. “„Znalci na extremismus“: sociální vědy ve službách vnitřní bezpečnosti? [‘Experts on Extremism’: Social Sciences in the Service of Homeland Security?].” Sociální Studia / Social Studies 12 (2): 69–82. https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2015-2-69
- Mesežnikov, Grigorij, and Oľga Gyárfášová. 2018. “Slovakia’s Conflicting Camps.” Journal of Democracy 29 (3): 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0046
- Milo, Daniel. 2016. “Daniel Milo: Keď policajt v službe povie, že extrémistami sú prezident a premiér, niekde je chyba [Daniel Milo: When a Policeperson in Service Says that the Extremists are the President and the PM, Something Went Wrong].” Interview by Dušan Mikušovič. Denník N. https://dennikn.sk/534256/daniel-milo-ked-policajt-v-sluzbe-povie-ze-extremistami-su-prezident-a-premier-niekde-je-chyba/.
- Ministry of Interior of the Slovak Republic. 2018. “Národná protiteroristická jednotka [National Anti-Terrorism Unit].” https://www.minv.sk/?narodna-protiteroristicka-jednotka.
- Ministry of Interior of the Slovak Republic. 2023. “Štatistika kriminality v Slovenskej republike [Statistics of Criminality in the Slovak Republic].” https://www.minv.sk/?statistika-kriminality-v-slovenskej-republike-csv.
- Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic. 2021. “Evidence znalců a tlumočníků [Database of Expert Witnesses and Translators].” http://datalot.justice.cz/justice/repznatl.nsf/$$SearchForm?OpenForm.
- Ministry of Justice of the Slovak Republic. 2018. “Skúšky a zápis [Exams and Registration].” https://www.justice.gov.sk/Stranky/Nase-sluzby/Civilne-pravo/Znalci/Skusky-Zapis-a-Vyciarknutie.aspx.
- Molnár, Péter. 2012. “Responding to ‘Hate Speech’ with Art, Education and the Imminent Danger Test.” In The Content and Context of Hate Speech: Rethinking Regulation and Responses, edited by Michael Herz and Péter Molnár, 183–197. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- National Criminal Agency of Slovakia. 2017a. “Case PPZ–36/NKA–PZ-ST–2017, Defendant’s Written Complaint.”
- National Criminal Agency of Slovakia. 2017b. “Case PPZ–36/NKA–PZ-ST–2017, Expert Statement.”
- Noorloos, Marloes van. 2014. “The Politicisation of Hate Speech Bans in the Twenty-First-Century Netherlands: Law in a Changing Context.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40 (2): 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.851474
- Pacherová, Soňa, and Vanda Vavrová. 2017. “Nenávisť na webe policajti odhaľujú novou aplikáciou [Police Discovers Hatred on the Web with a New App].” Pravda. https://spravy.pravda.sk/domace/clanok/417818-nenavist-na-webe-policajti-odhaluju-novou-aplikaciou/.
- Pech, Laurent, and Kim Lane Scheppele. 2017. “Illiberalism within: Rule of Law Backsliding in the EU.” Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 19 (December): 3–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2017.9
- Pejchal, Viera. 2020. Hate Speech and Human Rights in Eastern Europe: Legislating for Divergent Values. London: Routledge.
- Pešek, Jan. 2013. “The Establishment of Totalitarianism in Slovakia after the February Coup of 1948 and the Culmination of Mass Persecution, 1948–1953.” In Slovakia in History, edited by Mikuláš Teich, Dušan Kováč, and Martin D. Brown, 284–298. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Petersen, Niels. 2013. “Avoiding the Common-Wisdom Fallacy: The Role of Social Sciences in Constitutional Adjudication.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 11 (2): 294–318. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mot008
- Přibáň, Jiří, and Wojciech Sadurski. 2007. “The Role of Political Rights in the Democratization of Central and Eastern Europe.” In Political Rights under Stress in 21st Century Europe, edited by Wojciech Sadurski, 196–238. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Rekker, Roderik, and Joost van Spanje. 2022. “Hate Speech Prosecution of Politicians and Its Effect on Support for the Legal System and Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science 52 (2): 886–907. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712342000068X
- Renteln, Alison Dundes. 2004. The Cultural Defense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Republika. 2023. “Náš tím [Our Team].” https://www.hnutie-republika.sk/nas-tim/.
- Rose, Arnold M. 1955. “The Social Scientist as an Expert Witness.” Minnesota Law Review 40: 205–218.
- Rupnik, Jacques. 2016. “Surging Illiberalism in the East.” Journal of Democracy 27 (4): 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0064
- Ryšavý, Zdeněk. 2017. “Slovak MP Charged with Insulting Romani People and Inciting Hatred on the Radio.” Romea.Cz. http://www.romea.cz/en/news/world/slovak-mp-charged-wtih-insulting-romani-people-and-inciting-hatred-on-the-radio.
- SITA. 2018. “Mazurek na súde namietal znalca. Tvrdí, že je Žid [Mazurek at Court Objected Towards the Expert Witness, Claims He Is a Jew].” Sme. https://domov.sme.sk/c/20769954/mazurek-na-sude-namietal-znalca-tvrdi-ze-je-zid.html.
- Šnídl, Vladimír. 2018. “Rostas a Mizík citujú Štúrove výroky o Židoch, ale nechápu ich, hovorí historik [Rostas and Mizík Quote Štúr’s Statements About the Jews, but They Do Not Understand Them, Says Historian].” Denník N. https://dennikn.sk/1143939/rostas-a-mizik-cituju-sturove-vyroky-o-zidoch-ale-nechapu-ich-hovori-historik/.
- Steuer, Max. 2016. “The International Helping Hand? The Impact of the Council of Europe on Policies towards ‘Hate Speech’ in Slovakia.” Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. http://fesbp.hu/common/pdf/Hate_Speech_Steuer_20160519.pdf.
- Steuer, Max. 2017. “Extrémy slobody prejavu a úloha právnej regulácie [the Extremes of Freedom of Speech and the Role of Legal Regulation].” Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi 25 (3): 475–491. https://doi.org/10.5817/CPVP2017-3-7
- Steuer, Max. 2019. “Militant Democracy on the Rise: Consequences of Legal Restrictions on Extreme Speech in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary.” Review of Central and East European Law 44 (2): 162–201. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-04402003
- Steuer, Max. 2022. “The Role of Judicial Craft in Improving Democracy’s Resilience: The Case of Party Bans in Czechia, Hungary and Slovakia.” European Constitutional Law Review 18 (3): 440–465. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019622000256
- Steuer, Max. 2023. “Cultural Expertise and Extreme Speech.” In Cultural Expertise, Law, and Rights: A Comprehensive Guide, edited by Livia Holden, 158–165. London: Routledge.
- Stremlau, Nicole, and Iginio Gagliardone. 2019. “Socio-Legal Approaches to Online Hate Speech.” In Routledge Handbook of Socio-Legal Theory and Methods, edited by Naomi Creutzfeldt, Marc Mason, Kirsten McConnachie, 385–398. London: Routledge.
- Surmánek, Štefan. 2014. Pravdivý obraz o živote a postavení cigánskych komunít na (východnom) Slovensku [the Truthful Picture of the Life and Standing of Gypsy Communities in (Eastern) Slovakia]. Košice: ELFA.
- Svoboda, Ivo. 2016. “Možnosti postihu trestných činů z nenávisti s podporou platných judikátů a jejich interpretace ve vyšetřování a kriminalistice [Possibilities of Criminal Investigation and Legal Sanction of Hate Crimes Supported by Settled Case Law].” Policajná teória a prax (1): 82–96.
- Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2021. “Legal Pluralism across the Global South: Colonial Origins and Contemporary Consequences.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 53 (2): 168–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2021.1942606
- Temperman, Jeroen. 2011. “Freedom of Expression and Religious Sensitivities in Pluralist Societies: Facing the Challenge of Extreme Speech.” Brigham Young University Law Review 2011 (3): 729–756.
- Uhrík, Milan. 2018. “Mazurek na politickom súde, policajné razie a vražda novinára. Slovensko, kam speješ?! [Mazurek on a Political Trial, Police Raids, and Murder of a Journalist. Slovakia, Where Are You Heading?!].” Ľudová strana Naše Slovensko. https://web.archive.org/web/20191023023848/http://www.naseslovensko.net/cinnost/reportaze-z-akcii/mazurek-na-politickom-sude-policajne-razie-a-vrazda-novinara-slovensko-kam-spejes/.
- Virchow, Fabian. 2017. “Post-Fascist Right-Wing Social Movements.” In The History of Social Movements in Global Perspective: A Survey, edited by Stefan Berger and Holger Nehring, 619–646. Palgrave Studies in the History of Social Movements. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
- Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Weinstein, James, and Ivan Hare. 2009. “General Introduction: Free Speech, Democracy, and the Suppression of Extreme Speech past and Present.” In Extreme Speech and Democracy, edited by Ivan Hare and James Weinstein, 1–8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Wilson, Richard Ashby. 2016. “Expert Evidence on Trial: Social Researchers in the International Criminal Courtroom.” American Ethnologist 43 (4): 730–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12387
- Zákon č. 382/2004 Z.z. o znalcoch, tlmočníkoch a prekladateľoch [Act No. 382/2004 Coll. on Expert Witnesses, Translators and Interpreters]. 2019. http://www.zakonypreludi.sk/zz/2004-382.
- Žitňanská, Lucia. 2016. “Majú extrémisti právo na extrémizmus? [Do Extremists Have the Right to Extremism?]” Denník N. https://dennikn.sk/595241/ucinnejsie-proti-extremizmu/.
Cases cited
- 2To/10/2018. 2019. Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic.
- 2To/13/2018. 2019. Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic.
- 3Sž/79/2005. 2006. Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic.
- 4T/36/2017. 2018. Specialised Criminal Court of the Slovak Republic.
- 4Tdo/49/2012. 2013. Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic.
- 4Volpp/1/2017. 2019. Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic.
- Irving v. Penguin Books Limited, Deborah E. Lipstadt. 2000. High Court of Justice, UK.
- PL. ÚS 5/2017. 2019. Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic.