Surrendering to the Process: Innovation in Developing CPD for General Practice

References

• Allen LM, Palermo C, Armstrong E, et al. Categorising the broad impacts of continuing professional development: a scoping review. Med Educ. 2019;53:1087–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero RM, Gaines JK. The impact of CME on physician performance and patient health outcomes: an updated synthesis of systematic reviews. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2015;35(2):131–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogue RJ, 2013. Epistemological Foundations of Educational Design Research. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education Las Vegas, NV, USA, 1915–1922.
   Google Scholar
• Wittich CM, Chutka DS, Mauck KF, et al. Perspective: a practical approach to defining professional practice gaps for continuing medical education. Acad Med. 2012;87(5):582–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmboe ES, Sherbino J, Long DM, et al. The role of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):676–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaravel B, Hearn JH, Jahangiri L, et al. A systematic review and taxonomy of tools for evaluating evidence-based medicine teaching in medical education. Syst Rev. 2020;9(1). DOI:10.1186/s13643-020-01311-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis N, Davis D, Bloch R. Continuing medical education: AMEE Education Guide No 35. Med Teach. 2008;30:652–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore DE, Chappell K, Sherman L, et al. A conceptual framework for planning and assessing learning in continuing education activities designed for clinicians in one profession and/or clinical teams. Med Teach. 2018;40(9):904–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore DE, Green JS, Gallis HA. Achieving desired results and improved outcomes: integrating planning and assessment throughout learning activities. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009;29:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani S, McMahon GT, Armstrong EG. Continuing professional development to foster behaviour change: from principles to practice in health professions education. Med Teach. 2019;41(9):1045–1052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regehr G. It’s NOT rocket science: rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Med Educ. 2010;44:31–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead CR, Hodges BD, Austin Z. Captive on a carousel: discourses of ‘new’ in medical education 1910–2010. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2012;18(4):755–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta GJJ, van Braak M. Beyond the Medical Model: thinking differently about Medical Education and Medical Education Research. Teach Learn Med. 2020;32(4):449–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson T, Shattuck J. Design-based research: a decade of progress in education research? Educ Researcher. 2012;41(1):16–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmans DHJM, Tigelaar D. Building bridges between theory and practice in medical education using a design-based research approach: AMEE Guide No. 60. Med Teach. 2012;34(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Könings KD, Mordang S, Smeenk F, et al. Learner involvement in the co-creation of teaching and learning: AMEE Guide No. 138. Med Teach. 2021;43(8):924–936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen E, Torfing J. Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration Soc. 2011;43(8):842–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löffler C, Altiner A, Blumenthal S, et al. Challenges and opportunities for general practice specific CME in Europe – a narrative review of seven countries. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray S, Lazure P, Schroter S, et al. International challenges without borders: a descriptive study of family physicians’ educational needs in the field of diabetes. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12(1):1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thepwongsa I, Kirby C, Schattner P, et al. Type 2 diabetes continuing medical education for general practitioners: what works? A systematic review. Diabetic Med. 2014;31(12):1488–1497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster F, Krueger P, MacDonald H, et al. A scoping review of medical education research in family medicine. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15(1):1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:1–7. doi:10.1136/bmj.h1258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374(2018):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers PJ, Petrosino A, Huebner TA, et al. Program theory evaluation: practice, promise, and problems. New Directions Eval. 2000;2000(87):5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkmann S, Kvale S. Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg M, Forslund K, Wahlberg AC, et al. To surrender in dependence of another: the relationship with the ambulance clinicians as experienced by patients. Scand J Caring Sci. 2014;28(3):544–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead CR, Austin Z, Hodges BD. Flower power: the armoured expert in the CanMEDS competency framework? Adv Health Sci Educ. 2011;16(5):681–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358(9280):483–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar