Virtual Patient Simulation Offers an Objective Assessment of CME Activity by Improving Clinical Knowledge and the Levels of Competency of Healthcare Providers

References

• Ryall T, Judd BK, Gordon CJ. Simulation-based assessments in health professional education: a systematic review. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;9:69–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman NB, Durning SJ, Fischer MR, et al. The role for virtual patients in the future of medical education. Acad Med. 2016;91:1217–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kononowicz AA, Woodham LA, Edelbring S, et al. Virtual patient simulations in health professions education: systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:e14676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucero KS, Spyropoulos J, Blevins D, et al. Virtual patient simulation in continuing education: improving the use of guideline-directed care in venous thromboembolism treatment. J Eur CME. 2020;9(1):1836865.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iancu I, Pozniak E, Draznin B. Virtual patient simulation platform challenging traditional CME: identification of gaps in knowledge in the management of type 2 diabetes and hyperlipidemia. J Eur CME. 2021;10:1993430.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Draznin B, Iancu I. Use of a novel virtual patient simulation application to assess providers’ knowledge in management of T2 Diabetes. Diabetes. 2021;70(Suppl. 1):22–LB.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero RM, Gaines JK. The impact of CME on physician performance and patient health outcomes: an updated synthesis of systematic reviews. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2015;35(2):131–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore DE. How physicians learn and how to design learning experiences for them: an approach based on an interpretive review of evidence. In: Hager M, Russell S, Fletcher SW, editors. Continuing education in the health professions: improving healthcare through lifelong learning. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation; 2007. p. 50–55.
   Google Scholar
• Moore DE, Green JS, Gallis HA. Achieving desired results and improved outcomes: integrating planning and assessment throughout learning activities. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009;29(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan S. Educational input and patient outcomes: exploring the gap. J Adv Nurs. 2000;31(2):461–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazmanian PE, Davis DA, Galbraith R. Continuing medical education effect on clinical outcomes. Chest. 2009;135(3 Suppl):49S–55S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, et al. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. J Am Med Assoc. 2006;296(9):1094–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker FW, Mazmanian PE. Commitments, learning contracts, and seminars in hospital-based CME: change in knowledge and behavior. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 1992;12(1):49–63.
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield J, Herbert CP, Maclure M, et al. Commitment to change statements can predict actual change in practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2003;23(2):81–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gordon MJ. A review of the validity and accuracy of self-assessments in health professions training. Acad Med. 1991;66(12):762–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW, Regehr G. “I’ll never play professional football” and other fallacies of self-assessment. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008;28(1):14–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redesigning Continuing Education in the Health Professions. Institute of medicine (US) committee on planning a continuing health professional education institute. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2010 [Cited 2020 Jun 1]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK219802/
   Google Scholar
• Sibley JC, Sackett DL, Neufeld V, et al. A randomized trial of continuing medical education. N Engl J Med. 1982;306(9):511–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis D, O’Brien MA, Freemantle N, et al. Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? J Am Med Assoc. 1999;282(9):867–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazmanian PE, Davis DA. Continuing medical education and the physician as a learner: guide to the evidence. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;288(9):1057–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iancu I, Draznin B. Abstract 9539: treatment of hyperlipidemia: assessment of providers’ competency with edocate® virtual patient simulation application. Circulation. 2021;144(Suppl_1):A9539.
   Google Scholar
• Iancu I, Draznin B. Abstract TP73: use of a novel patient simulation application to assess physicians’ knowledge in the management of atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention. Stroke. 2022;53(Suppl_1):73.
   Google Scholar
• Sperl-Hillen J, O’Connor PJ, Ekstrom HL, et al. Educating resident physicians using virtual case-based simulation improves diabetes management: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Med. 2015;89(12):1664–1673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabai S. COVID-19 impact and virtual medical education. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2020;8(3):140–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chernikova O, Heitzmann N, Stadler M, et al. Simulation-based learning in higher education: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res. 2020;90:499–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuoad SA, El-Sayed W, Marei H. Effect of different teaching/learning approaches using virtual patients on student situational interest and cognitive load: a comparative study. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22:763–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar