Beyond the Norms:

References

• Sattler JAC Assessment of children (3rd Ed.). San Diego, CA: Author; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen C. Research: looking back and ahead after four decades of progress. Am J Occup Ther; 1991; 45, 391–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottenbacher K, Peterson P. Quantitative trends in occupational therapy re-search: Implications for practice and education. Am J Occup Ther. 1985; 39, 240–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerxa EL Research: the key to the development of occupational therapy as an academic discipline. Am J Occup Ther. 1987; 41, 415–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Occupational Therapy Association. Guidelines for occupational therapy services in school systems. Rockville, MD: Author, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Friefeld S, Phillips L, Snider L. Position paper on the role of occupational therapy in paediatrics. Toronto, ON: CAOT Publications de L'ACE; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham-Amundson SJ, Crowe TK. Clinical applications of the stan-dard error of measurement for occupational and physical therapists. Phys Occup Ther Ped. 1993; 12,57–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Washington Administrative Codes (WACs). Rules and Regulations for Programs Providing Services to Children with Handicapping Conditions. Olym-pia, WA: State of Washington; 392:171-173; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers JC. Eleanor Clarke Slagle lectureship-Clinical reasoning: The eth-ics, science and art. Am J Occup Ther. 1983; 37, 601–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber CJ, King-Thomas L. The assessment process. In L. King-Thomas & B. J. Hacker (Eds.), A therapist's guide to pediatric assessment (pp. 3–10). Toron-to, ON: Little, Brown and Co; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn W. Measurement of function: Actions for the future. Am J Occup Ther. 1993; 47, 357–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Missiuna C. Motor skill acquisition in children with developmental coor-dination disorder. Adap Phys Acti Q. 1994; 11(2), 214–235.
   Google Scholar
• Beery KE. Revised administration, scoring, and teaching manual for the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration. Cleveland, OH: Modern Curric-ulum Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt PN, Allen AS, Carrasco RC, Clark F, Schanzenbacher KE. Instru-ments to evaluate component functions of behavior. In P. N. Pratt & A. S. Allen, Occupational therapy for children (2nd Ed.), pp. 168–197, St. Louis, MI: C. V. Mosby; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• King-Thomas L, Hacker BJ. A therapist's guide to pediatric assessment. Toronto, ON: Little, Brown and Co; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Haley SM, Baryza MJ, Lewin JE, Cioffi MI. Sensorimotor dysfunction in children with brain injury: development of a data base for evaluation research. Phys Occup Ther Ped. 1991; 11(3), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Reid D. Occupational therapists' assessment practices with handicapped children in Ontario. Can J Occup Ther. 1987; 54, 181–188.
   Google Scholar
• Crowe TK. Pediatric assessments: a survey of their use by occupational therapists in northwestern school systems. Occup Ther J Res. 1989; 9, 273–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Kaplan BJ, Fellowes S. Gruchy C, Faris P. The efficacy of sen-sory integration treatment compared to tutoring. Phys Occup Ther Ped. 1992; 12, 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver CE. A sensorimotor program for improving writing readiness skills in elementary-age children. Am J Occup Ther. 1980; 44, 111–116.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Category 315.4 Developmental coor-dination disorder. Diagnostic and Statistical Manua (4th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. Occupational therapy guidelines for client-centred practice. Toronto, ON: CAOT Publications L'ACE; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Reisman JE. Development and reliability of the research version of the Minnesota Handwriting Test. Phys Occup Ther Ped. 1993; 12, 41–55.
   Google Scholar
• Bonney MA. Understanding and assessing handwriting difficulty: Perspec-tives from the literature. Aust Occup Ther J. 1992; 39,7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Missiuna CA, Bruni E. Teacher Identification of Children with Movement Skill Problems. Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. Cleveland, OH: The Psychological Corporation; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Bruininks RH. Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency. Minnesota: American Guidance Service; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Schneck CM, Henderson A. Descriptive analysis of the developmental progression of grip position for pencil and crayon control in nondysfunctional children. Am J Occup Ther. 1990; 44, 893–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens J. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Gubbay SS. Clumsy children in normal schools. Med J Austr. 1975; 1, 233–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iloeje SO. Developmental apraxia among Nigerian children in Enugor, Ni-geria. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1987; 29, 502–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston 0, Short H, Crawford J. Poorly coordinated children: a survey of 95 cases. Child Care Health Dev. 1987; 13(6), 361–76.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy JB, Gliner JA. Visual and motor sequencing in normal and clumsy children. Occup Ther J Res. 1988; 8(2), 89–103.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Category 315.40 Developmental coor-dination disorder. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (3rd ed. revised). Washing-ton, DC: Author, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• McHale K, Cermak SA. Fine motor activities in elementary school: Pre-liminary findings and provisional implications for children with fine motor prob-lems. Am J Occup Ther. 1992; 46, 898–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright D, DeMers ST. Comparison of the relationship between two mea-sures of visual-motor coordination and academic achievement. Psychol School. 1982; 19, 473–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson L, Rose P. Henderson SE. Reaction time and movement time in children with developmental coordination disorder. J Child Psychol Psychi. 1992; 33, 895–905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneck CM. Comparison of pencil-grip patterns in first graders with good and poor writing skills. Am J Occup Ther. 1991; 45, 701–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine MD, Oberklaid F, Meltzer L. Developmental output failure: A study of low productivity in school-aged children. Ped. 1981; 67, 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly KJ. Maturation and the ontogeny of motor skills. In K. J. Connol-ly & H. F. R. Prechtl (Eds.), Maturation and development: biological and psycho-logical perspectives (pp. 216–230). London, England: Spastics International Med-ical Publishers; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly KJ. A perspective on motor development. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp. 3–21). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Haines CR, Brown JB, Grantham EB, Rajagopalan VS, Sutcliffe PV. Neu-rodevelopmental screen in the school entrant medical examination as a predictor of coordination and communication difficulties. Arch Dis Child. 1985; 60, 1122–1127.
   Google Scholar
• Roussounis SH, Gaussen TH, Stratton P. A 2 year follow up study of chil-dren with motor coordination problems identified at school entry age. Child Care Health Dev, 1987; 13, 377–91.
   Google Scholar
• Gliner JA. Reviewing qualitative research: Proposed criteria for fairness and rigor. Occup Ther J Res. 1994; 14, 78–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar