Third and fourth degree perineal tears

References

• Sultan AH, Stanton SL. Preserving the pelvic floor and perineum during childbirth – elective caesarean section? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 731–4.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk NM. Obstetricians’ personal choice and mode of delivery. Lancet 1996; 347: 544.
   Google Scholar
• Sultan AH. Anal incontinence after childbirth. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 320–4.
   Google Scholar
• Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI.. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 1994; 308: 887–91.
   Google Scholar
• Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Dekker GA, Deville W, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM. Third degree obstetric perineal tears: risk factors and the preventive role of mediolateral episiotomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 563–6.
   Google Scholar
• Zetterström J, Lopez A, Anzen B, Norman M, Holmström B, Mellgren A. Anal sphincter tears at vaginal delivery: risk factors and clinical outcome of primary repair. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 21–8.
   Google Scholar
• Klein MC, Janssen PA, MacWilliam L, Kaczorowski J, Johnson B. Determinants of vaginal-perineal integrity and pelvic floor functioning in childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 403–10.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh CJ, Mooney EF, Upton GJ, Motson RW Incidence of third-degree perineal tears in labour and outcome after primary repair. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 218–21.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelsson E, Ladfors L, Wennerholm UB, Gareberg B, Nyberg K, Hagberg H. Anal sphincter tears: prospective study of obstetric risk factors. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 107: 926–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bek KM, Laurberg S. Intervention during labor: risk factors associated with complete tear of the anal sphincter. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1992; 71: 520–4.
   Google Scholar
• Labrecque M, Baillargeon L, Dallaire M, Tremblay A, Pi- nault JJ, Gingras S. Association between median episiot- omy and severe perineal lacerations in primiparous women. Can Med Assoc J 1997; 156: 797–802.
   Google Scholar
• Thacker SB, Banta DH. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature 1860–1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1983; 38: 322–38.
   Google Scholar
• Woolley RJ. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: a review of the English-language literature since 1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1995; 50: 806–35.
   Google Scholar
• Klein MC, Gauthier RJ, Robbins JM, Kaczorowsky J, Jorgensen SH, Franco E et al. Relationship of episiotomy to perineal trauma and morbidity, sexual dysfunction and pelvic floor relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 591–8.
   Google Scholar
• Walker MPR, Farine D, Rolbin SH, Ritchie JWK. Epidural anesthesia, episiotomy and obstetric laceration. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 668–71.
   Google Scholar
• Wenderlein JM, Merkle E. Beschwerden infolge Episiotomie. Studie an 413 Frauen mit komplikationsloser Spontangeburt. [Complaints caused by episiotomy. Study of 413 women with spontaneous complication-free labor.] (in German with English abstract.) Geburtshilfe Frauen- heilkd 1983; 43: 625–8.
   Google Scholar
• Haadem K, Ohrlander S, Lingman G. Long-term ailments due to anal sphincter rupture caused by delivery- a hidden problem. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1988; 27: 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Pirhonen JP, Grenman SE, Haadem K, Gudmundsson S, Lindqvist P, Siihola S et al. Frequency of anal sphincter rupture at delivery in Sweden and Finland – result of difference in manual help to the baby’s head. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77: 974–7.
   Google Scholar
• Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1905–11.
   Google Scholar
• Payne TN, Carey JC, Rayburn WF. Prior third- or fourth- degree perineal tears and recurrence risks. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999; 64: 55–7.
   Google Scholar