Patient‐reported outcome measures in amblyopia and strabismus: a systematic review

REFERENCES

• Birch EE. Amblyopia and binocular vision. Prog Retin Eye Res 2013; 33: 67–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant S, Melmoth DR, Morgan MJ et al. Prehension deficits in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 1139–1148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi DM, Knill DC, Bavelier D. Stereopsis and amblyopia: A mini‐review. Vision Res 2015; 114: 17–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant S, Moseley MJ. Amblyopia and real‐world visuomotor tasks. Strabismus 2011; 19: 119–128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mirabella G, Hay S, Wong AM. Deficits in perception of images of real‐world scenes in patients with a history of amblyopia. Arch Ophthalmol 2011; 129: 176–183.
   Google Scholar
• Lukman H, Kiat JE, Ganesan A et al. Strabismus‐related prejudice in 5‐6‐year‐old children. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94: 1348–1351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olitsky SE, Sudesh S, Graziano A et al. The negative psychosocial impact of strabismus in adults. J AAPOS 1999; 3: 209–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojon‐azzi SM, Mojon DS. Strabismus and employment: the opinion of headhunters. Acta Ophthalmol 2009; 87: 784–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coats DK, Paysse EA, Towler AJ et al. Impact of large angle horizontal strabismus on ability to obtain employment. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 402–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojon‐azzi SM, Potnik W, Mojon DS. Opinions of dating agents about strabismic subjects' ability to find a partner. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92: 765–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlton J, Karnon J, Czoski‐murray C et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of screening programmes for amblyopia and strabismus in children up to the age of 4–5 years: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2008; 12: iii, xi–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konig HH. Cost effectiveness of treatment for amblyopia: an analysis based on a probabilistic Markov model. Br J Ophthalmol 2004; 88: 606–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmucker C, Grosselfinger R, Riemsma R et al. Effectiveness of screening preschool children for amblyopia: a systematic review. BMC Ophthalmol 2009; 9: 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishimoto F, Fujii C, Shira Y et al. Outcome of conventional treatment for adult amblyopia. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2014; 58: 26–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsirlin I, Colpa L, Goltz HC et al. Behavioral training as new treatment for adult amblyopia: a meta‐analysis and systematic review. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 4061–4075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon‐woods M, Awan M, Gottlob I. Why is compliance with occlusion therapy for amblyopia so hard? A qualitative study. Arch Dis Child 2006; 91: 491–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koklanis K, Abel LA, Aroni R. Psychosocial impact of amblyopia and its treatment: a multidisciplinary study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2006; 34: 743–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman PM. Functional benefits of adult strabismus surgery. Am Orthopt J 2010; 60: 43–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kushner BJ. The benefits, risks, and efficacy of strabismus surgery in adults. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91: e102‐109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson EL, Leung H, Webster A et al. Beneficial effect of treatment for strabismus in patients with bilaterally poor vision, who cannot see their strabismus. Strabismus 2013; 21: 33–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hatt SR, Leske DA, Liebermann L et al. Incorporating health‐related quality of life into the assessment of outcome following strabismus surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2016; 164: 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadka J, Mcalinden C, Pesudovs K. Quality assessment of ophthalmic questionnaires: review and recommendations. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90: 720–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arpinelli F, Bamfi F. The FDA guidance for industry on PROs: the point of view of a pharmaceutical company. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4: 85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL et al. Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus‐based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006; 6: 2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010; 10: 22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesudovs K, Burr JM, Harley C et al. The development, assessment, and selection of questionnaires. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 663–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massof RW. The measurement of vision disability. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 516–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer MR, Moll AC, de Vet HC et al. Psychometric properties of vision‐related quality of life questionnaires: a systematic review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2004; 24: 257–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbroeck S, De geest S, Zeyen T et al. Patient‐reported outcomes (PRO's) in glaucoma: a systematic review. Eye 2011; 25: 555–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrillo J, Cano SJ, Mcleod LD et al. Using classical test theory, item response theory, and rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient‐reported outcome measures: A comparison of worked examples. Value Health 2015; 18: 25–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadka J, Mcalinden C, Craig JE et al. Identifying content for the glaucoma‐specific item bank to measure quality‐of‐life parameters. J Glaucoma 2015; 24: 12–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick EK, Pesudovs K, Khadka J et al. Evaluation of item candidates for a diabetic retinopathy quality of life item bank. Qual Life Res 2013; 22: 1851–1858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadka J, Fenwick E, Lamoureux E et al. Methods to develop the eye‐tem bank to measure ophthalmic quality of life. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93: 1485–1494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudtson MD, Klein BE, Klein R et al. Age‐related eye disease, quality of life, and functional activity. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123: 807–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck D, Clarke MP, Powell C et al. Use of the PedsQL in childhood intermittent exotropia: estimates of feasibility, internal consistency reliability and parent–child agreement. Qual Life Res 2012; 21: 727–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatt SR, Leske DA, Holmes JM. Responsiveness of health‐related quality‐of‐life questionnaires in adults undergoing strabismus surgery. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 2322–2328.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James H, Jenkinson E, Harrad R et al. Appearance concerns in ophthalmic patients. Eye 2011; 25: 1039–1044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durnian JM, Owen ME, Marsh IB. The psychosocial aspects of strabismus: correlation between the AS‐20 and DAS59 quality‐of‐life questionnaires. J AAPOS 2009; 13: 477–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis MK, Coyne K, Kennedy‐martin T et al. Vision‐specific instruments for the assessment of health‐related quality of life and visual functioning: a literature review. Pharmacoeconomics 2002; 20: 791–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease‐specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care 1989; 27: S217‐S232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatt SR, Leske DA, Bradley EA et al. Comparison of quality‐of‐life instruments in adults with strabismus. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 148: 558–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leske DA, Hatt SR, Holmes JM. Test‐retest reliability of health‐related quality‐of‐life questionnaires in adults with strabismus. Am J Ophthalmol 2010; 149: 672–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesudovs K, Gothwal VK, Wright T et al. Remediating serious flaws in the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 718–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satterfield D, Keltner JL, Morrison TL. Psychosocial aspects of strabismus study. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111: 1100–1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packwood EA, Cruz OA, Rychwalski PJ et al. The psychosocial effects of amblyopia study. J AAPOS 1999; 3: 15–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdanici ST, Martinescu G, Sandulache CM et al. Socio‐professional Integration for Amblyopic Patients. Revista De Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala 2016; 52: 187–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle A, Norman P, Harrad R et al. Psychosocial and clinical determinants of compliance with occlusion therapy for amblyopic children. Eye 2002; 16: 150–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole SR, Beck RW, Moke PS et al. The Amblyopia Treatment Index. J AAPOS 2001; 5: 250–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felius J, Chandler DL, Holmes JM et al. Evaluating the burden of amblyopia treatment from the parent and child's perspective. J AAPOS 2010; 14: 389–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choong YF, Lukman H, Martin S et al. Childhood amblyopia treatment: psychosocial implications for patients and primary carers. Eye 2004; 18: 369–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrisos S, Clarke MP, Wright CM. The emotional impact of amblyopia treatment in preschool children: randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111: 1550–1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roefs AM, Tjiam AM, Looman CW et al. Comfort of wear and material properties of eye patches for amblyopia treatment and the influence on compliance. Strabismus 2012; 20: 3–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlton J. Developing the draft descriptive system for the child amblyopia treatment questionnaire (CAT‐Qol): a mixed methods study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013; 11: 174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokhary KA, Suttle C, Alotaibi AG et al. Development and validation of the 21‐item children's vision for living scale (CVLS) by Rasch analysis. Clin Exp Optom 2013; 96: 566–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdanici ST, Costin D, Bogdanici CM. Quality of life for amblyopic children and their parents. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 2015; 119: 214–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YY, Chen XH, Chen J et al. Longitudinal impact on quality of life for school‐aged children with amblyopia treatment: perspective from children. Curr Eye Res 2016; 41: 208–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes JM, Strauber S, Quinn GE et al. Further validation of the Amblyopia Treatment Index parental questionnaire. J AAPOS 2008; 12: 581–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes JM, Beck RW, Kraker RT et al. Impact of patching and atropine treatment on the child and family in the amblyopia treatment study. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121: 1625–1632.
   Google Scholar
• Hatt SR, Leske DA, Bradley EA et al. Development of a quality‐of‐life questionnaire for adults with strabismus. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 139–144.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatt SR, Leske DA, Yamada T et al. Development and initial validation of quality‐of‐life questionnaires for intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 163–168.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckeon C, Wick B, Aday LA et al. A case‐comparison of intermittent exotropia and quality of life measurements. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 105–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcbain HB, Mackenzie KA, Au C et al. Factors associated with quality of life and mood in adults with strabismus. Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98: 550–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari M, Balankhe S, Gawade R et al. Comparison of psychosocial and emotional consequences of childhood strabismus on the families from rural and urban India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009; 57: 285–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp GR, Black BC, Coats DK et al. The management of strabismus in adults ‐ III. The effects on disability. J AAPOS 2005; 9: 455–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke JP, Leach CM, Davis H. Psychosocial implications of strabismus surgery in adults. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1997; 34: 159–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson BA, Gunton KB, Lasker JN et al. The psychosocial aspects of strabismus in teenagers and adults and the impact of surgical correction. J AAPOS 2008; 12: 72–76.e71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Yu X, Huang Y et al. The psychosocial effects of strabismus before and after surgical correction in Chinese adolescents and adults. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2012; 49: 170–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha SG, Kim SH. Clinical preoperative and postoperative symptoms of exotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2016; 53: 44–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandercoe TM, Beukes S, Martin F. Adults with strabismus seek surgery for pyschosocial benefits. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 2014; 4: 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson S, Morris M, Gleeson K. The long‐term psychosocial impact of corrective surgery for adults with strabismus. Br J Ophthalmol 2013; 97: 419–422.
   Google Scholar
• Archer SM, Musch DC, Wren PA et al. Social and emotional impact of strabismus surgery on quality of life in children. J AAPOS 2005; 9: 148–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcbain H, Mackenzie K, Hancox J et al. What do patients with strabismus expect post surgery? The development and validation of a questionnaire. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 415–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp GR, Black BC, Coats DK et al. The management of strabismus in adults ‐ II. Patient and provider perspectives on the severity of adult strabismus and on outcome contributors. J AAPOS 2005; 9: 141–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu WY, Sohn EJ, Ahn HB. Differences between patient expectations and actual strabismus surgery experience in adults. Can J Ophthalmol 2015; 50: 61–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin J, He Q, Xiao H. Effect of diplopia on daily life and evaluation of nursing measures following strabismus surgery. Eye Sci 2015; 30: 77–80.
   Google Scholar
• Yu H, Yang X, Ye T et al. Development and evaluation of a Chinese version of the Adult Strabismus Questionnaire (AS‐20). Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2013; 20: 239–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ZH, Bian W, Ren H et al. Development and application of the Chinese version of the adult strabismus quality of life questionnaire (AS‐20): a cross‐sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013; 11: 180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gothwal VK, Bharani S, Kekunnaya R et al. Measuring health‐related quality of life in strabismus: a modification of the Adult Strabismus‐20 (AS‐20) Questionnaire using Rasch analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0127064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali N, Sorensen MS, Sorensen TL et al. Evaluation and validity of the Danish version of the Adult Strabismus Questionnaire AS‐20. Clin Ophthalmol 2016; 10: 65–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leske DA, Holmes JM, Melia BM. Evaluation of the Intermittent Exotropia Questionnaire using Rasch analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015; 133: 461–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leske DA, Hatt SR, Liebermann L et al. Evaluation of the Adult Strabismus‐20 (AS‐20) questionnaire using Rasch analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 2630–2639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Graaf ES, van der Sterre GW, Polling JR et al. Amblyopia & Strabismus Questionnaire: design and initial validation. Strabismus 2004; 12: 181–193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sabri K, Knapp CM, Thompson JR et al. The VF‐14 and psychological impact of amblyopia and strabismus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 4386–4392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felius J, Beauchamp GR, Stager DR Sr et al. The Amblyopia and Strabismus Questionnaire: English translation, validation, and subscales. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143: 305–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ZH, Ren H, Frey R et al. Comparison of the Adult Strabismus Quality of Life Questionnaire (AS‐20) with the Amblyopia and Strabismus Questionnaire (ASQE) among adults with strabismus who seek medical care in China. BMC Ophthalmol 2014; 14: 139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcon GB, Pittino R. The Italian version of the amblyopia and strabismus questionnaire: Translation, validation, and reliability. Strabismus 2014; 22: 100–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vianya‐estopa M, Elliott DB, Barrett BT. An evaluation of the Amblyopia and Strabismus Questionnaire using Rasch analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 2496–2503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO group. WHOQOL Measuring quality of life. Division of mental health and prevention of substance abuse, World Health Organization; 1997. Available from: http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/63482. [Accessed Jan 25, 2017]
   Google Scholar
• Kim US, Park S, Yoo HJ et al. Psychosocial distress of part‐time occlusion in children with intermittent exotropia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013; 251: 315–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uretmen O, Egrilmez S, Kose S et al. Negative social bias against children with strabismus. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003; 81: 138–142.
   Google Scholar
• Goff MJ, Suhr AW, Ward JA et al. Effect of adult strabismus on ratings of official U.S. Army photographs. J AAPOS 2006; 10: 400–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohney BG, Mckenzie JA, Capo JA et al. Mental illness in young adults who had strabismus as children. Pediatrics 2008; 122: 1033–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonge BJ, Lipton GL, Crawford G. Psychological and educational correlates of strabismus in school children. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1984; 18: 71–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatt SR, Leske DA, Kirgis PA et al. The effects of strabismus on quality of life in adults. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 144: 643–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesudovs K. Item banking a generational change in patient reported outcome mearsurement. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: 285–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thissen D, Reeve BB, Bjorner JB et al. Methodological issues for building item banks and computerized adaptive scales. Qual Life Res 2007; 16: 109–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi SW, Reise SP, Pilkonis PA et al. Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full‐length measures of depressive symptoms. Qual Life Res 2010; 19: 125–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpak G, Coskun E, Erbagci I et al. Effects of corrective surgery on social phobia, psychological distress, disease‐related disability and quality of life in adult strabismus patients. Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98: 876–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickmann A, Aliberti S, Rebecchi MT et al. Improved sensory status and quality‐of‐life measures in adult patients after strabismus surgery. J AAPOS 2013; 17: 25–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiike K, Mizuno Y, Hiratsuka Y et al. Quality of life and cost‐utility assessment after strabismus surgery in adults. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2011; 55: 268–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson S, Harrad RA, Morris M et al. The psychosocial benefits of corrective surgery for adults with strabismus. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 883–888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatt SR, Leske DA, Holmes JM. Comparison of quality‐of‐life instruments in childhood intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS 2010; 14: 221–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen G, Mckean‐cowdin R, Varma R et al. General health‐related quality of life in preschool children with strabismus or amblyopia. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 574–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandon AK, Velez FG, Isenberg SJ et al. Binocular inhibition in strabismic patients is associated with diminished quality of life. J AAPOS 2014; 18: 423–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang MY, Velez FG, Demer JL et al. Quality of life in adults with strabismus. Am J Ophthalmol 2015; 159: 539–544.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu CS, Ye L, Jiang LF et al. Impact of strabismus on the quality of life of Chinese Han teenagers. Patient Pref Adher 2016; 10: 1021–1024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai Y, Shao Y, Lin S et al. Vision‐related quality of life and emotional impact in children with strabismus: a prospective study. J Int Med Res 2009; 37: 1108–1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirneiss C, Schmid‐tannwald C, Kernt M et al. The NEI VFQ‐25 vision‐related quality of life and prevalence of eye disease in a working population. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010; 248: 85–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishimoto F, Ohtsuki H. Comparison of VF‐14 scores among different ophthalmic surgical interventions. Acta Med Okayama 2012; 66: 101–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishimoto F, Naito T, Hasebe S et al. Time trade‐off utility analysis for surgical intervention in comitant strabismus, glaucoma, and cataract. Acta Med Okayama 2012; 66: 191–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loudon SE, Passchier J, Chaker L et al. Psychological causes of non‐compliance with electronically monitored occlusion therapy for amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 1499–1503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser SR, Matazinski AM, Sclar DM et al. A randomized trial of atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 268–278.
   Google Scholar
• Rutstein RP, Quinn GE, Lazar EL et al. A randomized trial comparing Bangerter filters and patching for the treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 998–1004.e6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Lu Q, Huang Y et al. Development and evaluation of a patching treatment questionnaire for Chinese amblyopic children. Chin Med J (Engl) 2014; 127: 1261–1265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari G, Sharma AK, Shrestha GS. Parental understanding and psychosocial impact of occlusion therapy on amblyopic children and their parents. J Behav Optom 2012; 23: 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Durnian JM, Owen ME, Baddon AC et al. The psychosocial effects of strabismus: effect of patient demographics on the AS‐20 score. J AAPOS 2010; 14: 469–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancox J, Sharma S, Mackenzie K et al. The effect on quality of life of long‐term botulinum toxin A injections to maintain ocular alignment in adult patients with strabismus. Br J Ophthalmol 2012; 96: 838–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatt SR, Leske DA, Liebermann L et al. Changes in health‐related quality of life 1 year following strabismus surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2012; 153: 614–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatt SR, Leske DA, Liebermann L et al. Comparing outcome criteria performance in adult strabismus surgery. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 1930–1936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasman P, Cheeseman R, Wong V et al. Improvement in patients' quality‐of‐life following strabismus surgery: evaluation of postoperative outcomes using the Adult Strabismus 20 (AS‐20) score. Eye 2013; 27: 1249–1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes JM, Liebermann L, Hatt SR et al. Quantifying diplopia with a questionnaire. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 1492–1496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koc F, Erten Y, Yurdakul NS. Does restoration of binocular vision make any difference in the quality of life in adult strabismus. Br J Ophthalmol 2013; 97: 1425–1430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam D, Khan AA, Bani SAO et al. Gain beyond cosmesis: Demonstration of psychosocial and functional gains following successful strabismus surgery using the adult strabismus questionnaire adult strabismus 20. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014; 62: 799–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatt SR, Leske DA, Liebermann L et al. Successful treatment of diplopia with prism improves health‐related quality of life. Am J Ophthalmol 2014; 157: 1209–1213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatt SR, Leske DA, Liebermann L et al. Depressive symptoms associated with poor health‐related quality of life in adults with strabismus. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 2070–2071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebermann L, Hatt SR, Leske DA et al. Improvement in specific function‐related quality‐of‐life concerns after strabismus surgery in nondiplopic adults. J AAPOS 2014; 18: 105–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim B, Yap GH, Chia A. Functional and psychosocial impact of strabismus on Singaporean children. J AAPOS 2014; 18: 178–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcbain HB, Mackenzie KA, Hancox J et al. Continuing medical education: Does strabismus surgery improve quality and mood, and what factors influence this? Eye 2016; 30: 656–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro GD, Zum bach AG, Faria CM et al. Quality of life of patients with strabismus. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2014; 77: 110–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Zhou J, Luo X et al. Rasch analysis of the Adult Strabismus Quality of Life Questionnaire (AS‐20) among Chinese adult patients with strabismus. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0142188.
   Google Scholar
• Yamada T, Hatt SR, Leske DA et al. Specific health‐related quality of life concerns in children with intermittent exotropia. Strabismus 2012; 20: 145–151.
   Google Scholar
• Hatt SR, Leske DA, Liebermann L et al. Associations between health‐related quality of life and the decision to perform surgery for childhood intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 883–888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim SB, Wong WL, Ho RC et al. Childhood intermittent exotropia from a different angle: does severity affect quality of life? Br J Ophthalmol 2015; 99: 1405–1411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Gao X, Xiao M et al. Effectiveness of strabismus surgery on the health‐related quality of life assessment of children with intermittent exotropia and their parents: a randomized clinical trial. J AAPOS 2015; 19: 298–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill K, Satterfield D, O'hara M. Strabismus surgery on the elderly and the effects on disability. J AAPOS 2010; 14: 196–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon V, Saha J, Tandon R et al. Study of the psychosocial aspects of strabismus. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2002; 39: 203–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Graaf ES, van der Sterre GW, van Kempen‐du saar H et al. Amblyopia and Strabismus Questionnaire (A&SQ): clinical validation in a historic cohort. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007; 245: 1589–1595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Graaf ES, Felius J, van Kempen‐du saar H et al. Construct validation of the Amblyopia and Strabismus Questionnaire (A&SQ) by factor analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009; 247: 1263–1268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian W, Li M, Wang Z et al. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Amblyopia and Strabismus Questionnaire (ASQE). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2015; 13: 81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie A, Colapinto P, Jain S. The psychological impact of strabismus: does the angle really matter? Strabismus 2013; 21: 203–208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cumurcu T, Cumurcu BE, Ozcan O et al. Social phobia and other psychiatric problems in children with strabismus. Can J Ophthalmol 2011; 46: 267–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bez Y, Coskun E, Erol K et al. Adult strabismus and social phobia: a case‐controlled study. J AAPOS 2009; 13: 249–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber AL, Wood JM, Gole GA et al. Effect of amblyopia on self‐esteem in children. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: 1074–1081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson GA, Welch D. Does amblyopia have a functional impact? Findings from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2013; 41: 127–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S, Congdon N, Yam JC et al. Alcohol use and positive screening results for depression and anxiety are highly prevalent among Chinese children with strabismus. Am J Ophthalmol 2014; 157: 894–900.e1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahi JS, Cumberland PM, Peckham CS. Does amblyopia affect educational, health, and social outcomes? Findings from 1958 British birth cohort. BMJ 2006; 332: 820–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel‐yeger B. Evaluation of gross motor abilities and self perception in children with amblyopia. Disabil Rehabil 2008; 30: 243–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp GR, Felius J, Stager DR et al. The utility of strabismus in adults. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2005; 103: 164–172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beauchamp CL, Beauchamp GR, Stager DR et al. The cost utility of strabismus surgery in adults. J AAPOS 2006; 10: 394–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Graaf ES, van Kempen‐du saar H, Looman CW et al. Utility analysis of disability caused by amblyopia and/or strabismus in a population‐based, historic cohort. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010; 248: 1803–1807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Graaf ES, Despriet DDG, Klaver CCW et al. Patient‐reported utilities in bilateral visual impairment from amblyopia and age‐related macular degeneration. BMC Ophthalmol 2016; 16: 56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello PA, Simon JW, Jia YM et al. Acquired esotropia: Subjective and objective outcomes. J AAPOS 2001; 5: 193–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eustis S, Smith DR. Parental understanding of strabismus. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1987; 24: 232–236.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes JM, Leske DA, Kupersmith MJ. New methods for quantifying diplopia. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 2035–2039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escardo‐paton JA, Harrad RA. Duration of conjunctival redness following adult strabismus surgery. J AAPOS 2009; 13: 583–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwood J, Waylen A, Herrick D et al. Common visual defects and peer victimization in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 1177–1181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mruthyunjaya P, Simon JW, Pickering JD et al. Subjective and objective outcomes of strabismus surgery in children. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1996; 33: 167–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman P, Searle A, Harrad R et al. Predicting adherence to eye patching in children with amblyopia: an application of protection motivation theory. Br J Health Psychol 2003; 8: 67–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar