A pragmatic approach to amblyopia diagnosis: evidence into practice

REFERENCES

• Stewart CE, Shah S, Wren S et al. Paediatric eye services: how much of the workload is amblyopia‐related? Strabismus 2016; 24: 109–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch EE. Amblyopia and binocular vision. Prog Retin Eye Res 2013; 33: 67–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pai AS, Rose KA, Leone JF et al. Amblyopia prevalence and risk factors in Australian preschool children. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 138–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckean‐cowdin R, Cotter SA, Tarczy‐hornoch K et al. Prevalence of amblyopia or strabismus in Asian and non‐Hispanic white preschool children: Multi‐Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 2117–2124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attebo K, Mitchell P, Cumming R et al. Prevalence and causes of amblyopia in an adult population. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 154–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett BT, Bradley A, Candy TR. The relationship between anisometropia and amblyopia. Prog Retin Eye Res 2013; 36: 120–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber A, Wood J. Amblyopia: prevalence, natural history, functional effects and treatment. Clin Exp Optom 2005; 88: 365–375.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levi DM, Knill DC, Bavelier D. Stereopsis and amblyopia: a mini‐review. Vision Res 2015; 114: 17–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons K. Old age and the functional consequences of amblyopia. J AAPOS 2008; 12: 429–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber AL, Wood JM, Gole GA et al. The effect of amblyopia on fine motor skills in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 594–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'connor AR, Birch EE, Anderson S et al. The functional significance of stereopsis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 2019–2023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrisos S, Clarke M, Wright C. Visuo‐motor skills in pre‐school children with a unilateral visual acuity deficit. Hawaii: AAPOS, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Grant S, Suttle C, Melmoth DR et al. Age‐ and stereovision‐dependent eye‐hand coordination deficits in children with amblyopia and abnormal binocularity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014; 55: 5687–57015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant S, Moseley MJ. Amblyopia and real‐world visuomotor tasks. Strabismus 2011; 19: 119–128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daw NW. Critical periods and amblyopia. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116: 502–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke M, Wright C, Hrisos S et al. Randomised controlled trial of treatment of unilateral visual impairment detected at preschool vision screening. BMJ 2003; 327: 1251–1254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons K, Preslan M. Natural history of amblyopia untreated owing to lack of compliance. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83: 582–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace DK, Edwards AR, Cotter SA et al. A randomized trial to evaluate 2-hours of daily patching for strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 904–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lempert P. Optic nerve hypoplasia and small eyes in presumed amblyopia. J AAPOS 2000; 4: 258–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lempert P. The axial length/disc area ratio in anisometropic hyperopic amblyopia. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 304–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushner BJ. Functional amblyopia associated with abnormalities of the optic nerve. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102: 683–685.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett BT, Candy TR, Mcgraw PV et al. Probing the causes of visual acuity loss in patients diagnosed with functional amblyopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005; 25: 175–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford G, Kutschke P, Scott WE. Results of amblyopia theapy in eyes with unilateral structural abnormalities. Ophthalmology 1992; 99: 1616–1621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch EE, Holmes JM. The clinical profile of amblyopia in children younger than 3-years of age. J AAPOS 2010; 14: 494–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. The clinical profile of moderate amblyopia in children younger than 7-years. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 281–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ciuffreda K, Levi DM, Selenow A. Amblyopia Basic and Clinical Aspects. Stoneham, Massachusetts: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Mckee SP, Levi DM, Movshon JA. The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia. J Vis 2003; 3: 380–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess RF, Thompson B, Gole GA et al. The amblyopic deficit and its relationship to geniculo‐cortical processing streams. J Neurophysiol 2010; 104: 475–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace D, Chandler D, Beck RW et al. Treatment of bilateral refractive amblyopia in children 3 to <10 years old. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 144: 487–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith EL III, Hung L‐F, Harwerth RS. The degree of image degradation and the depth of amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 3775–3781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith EL III, Hung LF, Arumugam B et al. Observations on the relationship between anisometropia, amblyopia and strabismus. Vision Res 2017; 134: 26–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downie LE, Keller PR. A pragmatic approach to dry eye diagnosis: evidence into practice. Optom Vis Sci 2015; 92: 1189–1197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alharkan DH, Khan AO. False amblyopia prediction in strabismic patients by fixation preference testing correlates with contralateral ocular dominance. J AAPOS 2014; 18: 453–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotter SA, Tarczy‐hornoch K, Song E et al. Fixation preference and visual acuity testing in a population‐based cohort of preschool children with amblyopia risk factors. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 145–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leone JF, Mitchell P, Kifley A et al. Normative visual acuity in infants and preschool‐aged children in Sydney. Acta Ophthalmol 2014; 92: e521–e529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adoh TO, Woodhouse JM, Oduwaiye KA. The Cardiff Test: a new visual acuity test for toddlers and children with intellectual impairment. A preliminary report. Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69: 427–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons K. Visual acuity norms in young children. Surv Ophthalmol 1983; 28: 84–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felius J, Wang Y‐Z, Birch EE. The accuracy of the amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol. J AAPOS 2003; 7: 406–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert L, Schmidt P, Maguire M et al. Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) Group. Threshold visual acuity testing of preschool children using the crowded HOTV and LEA symbols acuity tests. J AAPOS 2003; 7: 396–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Tarczy‐hornoch K, Cotter SA et al. Visual acuity norms in pre‐school children: the Multi‐Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 607–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson V, Maguire M, Orel‐Bixler D et al. Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) Group. Visual acuity results in school‐aged children and adults: lea symbols chart versus Bailey‐Lovie Chart. Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 650–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess RF, Jacobs RJ. A preliminary report of acuity and contour interactions across the amblyope’s visual field. Vision Res 1979; 19: 1403–1408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von noorden G. Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility; Theory and Mangement of Strabismus, 4th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Birch E, Williams C, Drover J et al. Randot Preschool Stereoacuity Test: normative data and validity. J AAPOS 2008; 12: 23–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantz KA, Cotter S, Wick B. Re‐evaluation of the four prism diopter base‐out test. Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69: 777–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch E, Williams C, Hunter J et al. Random dot stereoacuity of preschool children. ALSPAC “Children in Focus” Study Team. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1997; 34: 217–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocco C, Pilotto C, Passone E et al. Presentation and symptom interval in children with central nervous system tumors. A single‐center experience. Childs Nerv Syst 2017; 33: 2109–2116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defoort‐dhellemmes S, Moritz F, Bouacha I et al. Craniopharyngioma: ophthalmological aspects at diagnosis. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2006; 19: 321–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrad RA, Graham CM, Collin JR. Amblyopia and strabismus in congenital ptosis. Eye (Lond) 1988; 2: 625–627.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giangiacomo A, Beck A. Pediatric glaucoma: review of recent literature. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2017; 28: 199–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert SR. Childhood cataracts. In: Hoyt CS, Taylor D (eds). Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 4th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier, 2013. pp. 339–352.
   Google Scholar
• Rahi JS, Dezateux C. Measuring and interpreting the incidence of congenital ocular anomalies: lessons from a national study of congenital cataract in the UK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: 1444–1448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong JR, Tucker MA, Kleinerman RA et al. Retinoblastoma incidence patterns in the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. JAMA Ophthalmol 2014; 132: 478–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrand GD. Imaging the fundus. In: Hoyt CS, Taylor D (eds). Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Elsevier, 2013. pp. 63–67.
   Google Scholar
• Pascual M, Huang J, Maguire MG et al. Vision In Preschoolers (VIP) Study Group. Risk factors for amblyopia in the vision in preschoolers study. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 622–629 e621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarczy‐hornoch K, Varma R, Cotter SA et al. Risk factors for decreased visual acuity in preschool children. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 2262–2273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins S, Sampson GP, Hendicott P et al. Refraction in children: a comparison of two methods of accommodation control. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: 1734–1739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotter S, Varma R, Tarczy‐hornoch K et al. Risk factors associated with childhood strabismus: the multi‐ethnic pediatric eye disease and Baltimore pediatric eye disease studies. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 2251–2261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robaei D, Rose K, Ojaimi E et al. Causes and associations of amblyopia in a population‐based sample of 6‐year‐old Australian children. Arch Ophthalmol 2006; 124: 878–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis TL, Maurer D. Multiple sensitive periods in human visual development: evidence from visually deprived children. Dev Psychobiol 2005; 46: 163–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repka M, Simons K, Kraker R. Laterality of amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 2010; 150: 270–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis TL, Maurer D. Effects of early pattern deprivation on visual development. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 640–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ing MR, Okino LM. Outcome study of stereopsis in relation to duration of misalignment in congenital esotropia. J AAPOS 2002; 6: 3–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang LL, Lambert SR. Reappraisal of occlusion therapy for severe structural abnormalities of the optic disc and macula. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1995; 32: 37–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar