Materials for occupational eye protectors

REFERENCES

• Dannenberg AL, Parver LM, Brechner RJ, Khoo L. Penetrating eye injuries in the workplace. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110: 843–848.
   Google Scholar
• May DR, Kuhn FP, Morris RE, Witherspoon CD, Danis RP, Matthews GP, Mann L. The epidemiology of serious eye injuries from the United States Eye Injury Registry. Graef Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000; 238: 153–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macewen CJ. Eye injuries: a prospective study of 5671 cases. Brit J Ophthalmol 1989; 73: 888–905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voon LW, See J, Wong TY. The epidemiology of ocular trauma in Singapore: perspective from the emergency service of a large tertiary hospital. Eye 2001; 15: 75–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasu U, Vasnaik A, Battu RR, Kurian M, George S. Occupational open globe injuries. Indian J Ophthalmol 2001; 49: 43–46.
   Google Scholar
• Veale JH. The incidence of industrial eye injuries in New Zealand and their causes. Aust J Optom 1972; 55: 275–282.
   Google Scholar
• Smith GS, Lincoln AE, Wong TY, Bell NS, Vinger PF, Amoroso PJ, Lombardi DA. Does occupation explain gender and other differences in work‐related eye injury hospitalization rates. J Occup Env Med 2005; 47: 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashby T. Eye protection. Can Fam Physician 1986; 32: 1491–1496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull N. Mandatory use of eye protection prevents eye injuries in the metal industry. Occup Med-Oxford 2007; 57: 605–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts MT. A study into the effectiveness of varying forms of eye protection. J Soc Occup Med 1988; 38: 98–101.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas R, Mcmanus JG, Johnson AMD, Mayer P, Wade C, Holcomb JB. Ocular injury reduction from ocular protection use in current combat operations. J Trauma 2009; 66: S99–S103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong LP, Taouk Y. The role of eye protection in work‐related eye injuries. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol 1995; 23: 101–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sinclair SA, Smith GA, Xiang H. Eyeglass‐related injuries treated in U.S. emergency departments in 2002–2003. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2006; 13: 23–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore WE, Keeney AH. Spectacle lens associated eye injuries in Louisville 1960–1974. J Kentucky Med Assoc 1975; 73: 416–419.
   Google Scholar
• Keeney AH, Fintelmann E, Estlow B. Refractive correction and associated factors in spectacle glass injury. Arch Ophthalmol 1972; 88: 7.
   Google Scholar
• Jain V, Natarajan S, Shome D, Gadgil D. Spectacle‐indiced ocular trauma: an unusual mechanism. Cornea 2007; 26: 109–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand. AS/NZS1337.6 Personal eye protection part 6: prescription eye protectors against low and medium impact. Sydney: Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• New South Wales Government. Occupational Health and Safety Regulation 2001. Sydney: New South Wales Government, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand. AS/NZS 1336 Recommended practices for occupational eye protection. Sydney: Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia. B‐99 Australian standard specification for helmets, handshields, face masks and goggles for protection against harmful radiations in welding and allied operations. Sydney: Standards Australia, 1951.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand. AS/NZS1337.1 Personal eye protection part 1: eye and face protectors for occupational applications. Sydney: Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia. T41 Spectacle lenses. Sydney: Standards Australia, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia. AS 2228.1‐1992 Spectacles—Spectacle lenses. Sydney: Standards Australia, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia. AS 2228.2‐1992 Spectacles—Spectacle frames. Sydney: Standards Australia, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand. AS/NZS ISO 21987:2011 Ophthalmic optics—Mounted spectacle lenses. Sydney: Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hassett RJ, Hanlein SL, Groeller JE. Protective eye shield against small fragments. White Oak, MD: United States Naval Ordnance Laboratory, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN). EN 166 Personal eye‐protection—Specifications. Brussels: Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN), 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt NM. The anatomy and autopsy of an ‘impact resistant lens’. Am J Optom Phys Opt 1974; 51: 982–988.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhri MM, Liangyi C. The catastrophic failure of thermally tempered glass caused by small‐article impact. Nature 1986; 320: 48–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilshaw TR. The Hertzian fracture test. J Phys D App Phys 1971; 229: 1567–1591.
   Google Scholar
• Fields JM, Goldsmith W. Impact resistance of variously mounted ophthalmic lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1983; 60: 725–738.
   Google Scholar
• Dain SJ. Pressure testing of ophthalmic safety materials: the effects on different materials. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988; 65: 585–590.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith W. Projectile impact on glass and polymeric ophthalmic lenses and circular plates. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1974; 51: 25.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski TR, Chase GA. Parameters of chemical strengthening and impact performance of Corning Cose 8361 (White Crown) and Corning Code 8097 (Photogray®) lenses. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1973; 50: 273–282.
   Google Scholar
• Drug Administration Food a. Sec. 801.410 Use of impact‐resistant lenses in eyeglasses and sunglasses. Silver Spring, MD: Food and Drug Administration, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. Z80.3 For Ophthalmics—Non‐prescription Sunglass and Fashion Eyewear Requirements. New York: American National Standards Institute, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand. AS/NZS 1067 Sunglasses and fashion spectacles. Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN). EN 1836 Personal Eye Equipment—Sunglasses and sunglare filters for general use and filters for direct observation of the sun. Brussels: Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN), 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN). EN 174 Personal eye protection—Ski goggles for downhill skiiing. Brussels: Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN), 2001.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. Practice for Occupational and Educational Eye and Face protection. New York, NY: American National Standards Institute, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wigglesworth EC. Personal eye protectors: performance requirements and testing. In: Wigglesworth EC, Cole BL, eds. Vision and Its Protection. Sydney: Australian Optometrical Publishing Company, 1973. p 68–76.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia. AS 1609 Eye protectors for motor cyclists and racing car drivers. Sydney: Standards Australia, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM International. F659‐10 Standard specification for ski and snowboard goggles. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Scaief AL. An alternative to the drop ball test for the measurement of ophthalmic glass fracture resistatnce. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1975; 52: 765–764.
   Google Scholar
• Scaief AL, Wood SA. Static fracture resistance of Schott S‐1005 lenses as a function of thickness. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1978; 55: 58–63.
   Google Scholar
• Diallo ML, Simonet P, Frenette B, Sanschagrin B. Resistance of plastic ophthalmic lenses: The effect of base curve on different materials during static load testing. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78: 518–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckworth WH, Rosenfield AR, Gulati ST, Rieger RA, Hoekstra KE. Basic principles of lens fracture testing. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1978; 55: 751–758.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens GL. Ophthalmic materials for ocular protection. In: Pitts DG, Kleinstein RN, eds. Environmental Vision. Boston: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 1993. p 281–297.
   Google Scholar
• Lamarre DA. Development of criteria and test methods for eye and face protective devices. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety and Division of Physical Sciences and Engineering, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Chou BR, Gupta A, Hovis JK. The effect of multiple anti‐reflective coatings and center thickness on resistance of polycarbonate spectacle lenses to penetration by pointed missiles. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 964–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul A, Lewis A. Safety goggles: are they adequate to prevent eye injuries caued by rotating wire brushes? Emergen Med J 2008; 25: 385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard GC. Safety evaluation tests of personal protective equipment for ordnance operations. China Lake, CA: Naval Weapons Center, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Wigglesworth EC. A ballistic assessment of eye protector lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1971; 10: 785–791.
   Google Scholar
• Rose HW, Stewart GM. Eye protection against small high‐speed missiles. Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1957; 61: 404–410.
   Google Scholar
• Rychwalski PJ, Packwood EA, Cruz OA, Holds JB. Impact resistance of common spectacle and safety lenses to airgun and rimfire projectiles. J Am Assoc Pediat Ophthalmol Strab 2003; 7: 268–273.
   Google Scholar
• Vinger P, Parver L, Alfaro VA, Woods T, Abrams BS. Shatter resistance of spectacle lenses. J Am Med Assoc 1997; 277: 142–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller JW, Kislin B, Tredici TJ, Rahe AJ. Polycarbonate versus CR‐39 lenses: a field study. USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Wigglesworth EC. A comparative assessment of eye protective devices and a proposed system of acceptance testing and grading. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1972; 49: 287–394.
   Google Scholar
• Listman DA. Paintball injuries in children: more than meets the eye. Pediatrics 2004; 113: e15–e19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigglesworth EC. The effect of thermal toughening on the impact resistance of simulated safety lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1971; 10: 992–999.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver AL, Chou BR. A balistic evaluation of the impact resistance of spectacle lens materials. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 822–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis JK. Perspectives on impact resistance and polycarbonate lenses. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1988; 28: 215–218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis JK. A polycarbonate ophthalmic‐prescription lens series. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1978; 55: 543–554.
   Google Scholar
• Wigglesworth EC. The impact resistance of eye protector lens materials. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1971; 48: 245–271.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg I, Chase GA, La marre D. Statistical protocol for impact testing prescription polycarbonate safety lenses. Optical World 1985; 14: 7–8.
   Google Scholar
• La piana FG, Ward TP. The development of eye armor for the American infantryman. Ophthalmol Clin 1999; 12: 421–434.
   Google Scholar
• Lastnick AL, Cleavly BT, Brown JR. Development and fabrication of a polycarbonate eyeshield for the U.S. Army flyer's helmet. Natick, MA: United States Army Natick Laboratories, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlman WG. Mechanical properties of polycarbonate‐polysulphone and polycarbonate‐polyetherimide blends. Natick, MA: United States Army NATICK Research, Development and Engineering Center, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh AJ, Dehmer PG, Yip PW. A preliminary evaluation of diamond‐like carbon coated polycarbonate. Watertown, MA: US Army Materials Technology Laboratory, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Honson VJ, Wong T, Dain SJ. Abrasion resistance of plastics lenses. Clin Exp Optom 1986; 69: 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez urreaga J, Matías MC, Lorenzo V, De la orden MU. Abrasion resistance in the Tumble test of sol–gel hybrid coatings for ophthalmic plastic lenses. Mater Lett 2000; 45: 293–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schottner G, Rose K, Posset U. Scratch and abrasion resistant coatings on plastic lenses—state of the art, current developments and perspectives. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 2003; 27: 71–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samson F. Ophthalmic lens coatings. Surf Coat Technol 1996; 81: 79–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eye Talk Reference Guide. Sydney: Eye Talk Consultants, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Air Wear 1.59. http://www.essilor.com.au/materials_and_treatments/general_information/airwear_159/. Accessed 12 September 2011.
   Google Scholar
• 1.53 Phoenix. http://www.hoyavisioncare.com/asia/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=91&Itemid=102. Accessed 12 September 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Trilogy FAQ. http://www.youngeroptics.com/trilogyfaq.aspx. Accessed 12 September 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Trivex® Lens material. http://www.ppg.com/optical/opticalproducts/opticalmaterials/Pages/Trivex.aspx. Accessed 12 September 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly PM. Lightweight transparent armour systems for combat eyewear. 19th International Symposium of Ballistics. Interlaken: Switzerland, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Dehmer PG, Klusewitz MA. High Performance Visors. Colorado Springs: Army Research Laboratory, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Trilogy lenses. http://www.precision‐optical.co.uk/Resources/Trivex/Trivex.htm. Accessed 12 September 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Keirl A, Payne R. Complete course in dispensing. Part 5—Ophthalmic lens materials. Optician 2008; 14.11.08: 24–30.
   Google Scholar
• SAI Global. Certificate search. http://register.saiglobal.com/default.aspx?stype=power. Accessed 12 September 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Chou BR, Hovis JK. Durability of coated CR‐39 Industrial lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 703–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corzine JC, Greer RB, Bruess RD, Lee GK, Scaief AL. Effects of coatings on the fracture resistance of ophthalmic lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1996; 73: 8–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dain SJ, Hoskin AK, Lee A, Lee J, Reoh RJ. Impact resistance of high index hard resin prescription lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1995; 72: 69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn P, Sansom GF. Identification of transparent materials for safety applications. Aust J Optom 1969; 52: 50–55.
   Google Scholar
• H 911 Transparent Plastic. http://www.homalite.com/cr39.htm. Accessed 12 September 2011.
   Google Scholar
• What is Trivex? http://www.precision‐optical.co.uk/Products/Trivex/Trivex.html. Accessed 12 September 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mcmahon JM, Beckerman S. Testing safety eyewear: how frame and lens design affect lens retention. Optometry 2007; 78: 78–87.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh G, Wilkinson S. Materials and allergens within spectacle frames: a review. Contact Dermatitis 2006; 55: 10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thyssen J, Linneberg A, Menné T, Johansen J. The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population—prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 57: 287–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directive 94/27/EC. Brussels: European Parliament and Council, 1994. p 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Ophthalmic optics—Spectacle frames—Method for the simulation of wear and detection of nickel release from coated metal and combination spectacle frames. ISO/TS 24348. Geneva, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 21 Food and Drugs. Chapter I Food and Drug Administration. Department of Health and Human Services. Subchapter Medical Devices. Part 886 Ophthalmic Devices Subpart F‐ Therapeutic Devices. Silver Springs, MD, 2001.
   Google Scholar