Designated as Dangerous: Characteristics of Sex Offenders Subject to Post‐Sentence Orders in Australia

References

• Abracen, J., Looman, J., & Anderson, D. (2000). Alcohol and drug abuse in sexual and nonsexual violent offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 263–274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amenta, A. E. (2005). The assessment of sex offenders for civil commitment proceedings: An analysis of report content. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Newark, NJ: Anderson Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J. V., Stinson, J., Tromp, S., & Messer, G. (2003). Characteristics of individuals petitioned for civil commitment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 185–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birgden, A. (2007). Serious Sex Offenders Monitoring Act 2005 (Vic): A therapeutic jurisprudence analysis. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 14, 78–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, T., & Allnutt, S. (2003). Mental illness among New South Wales prisoners. Matraville, NSW: NSW Corrections Health Service. Retrieved 10 October 2009, from http://www.justicehealth.nsw.gov.au/publications/Mental_Illness_Among_NSW_Prisoners_2003.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cutajar, M., Mullen, P., Ogloff, J. R. P., Thomas, S. D. M., Wells, D. L., & Spataro, J. (2010). Suicide and fatal drug overdose in child sexual abuse victims: A historical cohort study. Medical Journal of Australia, 192, 184–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte Consulting. (2003). Victorian prisoner health study. Melbourne, VIC: Department of Justice. Retrieved 22 September 2009, from http://www.justice.vic.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/justlib/DOJ+Internet/resources/c/0/c04bcc80404a9cd88f55fff5f2791d4a/Victorian_Prisoner_Health_Study_February_2003_Part1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, D. J., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2009). Calling the tune without the music: A psycho‐legal analysis of Australia's post‐sentence legislation. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 42, 179–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducat, L., Thomas, S. D. M., & Blood, W. (2009). Sensationalising sex offenders and sexual recidivism: Impact of the serious sex offender monitoring act 2005 on media reportage. Australian Psychologist, 44, 156–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergusson, D. M., & Mullen, P. E. (1999). Childhood sexual abuse: An evidence‐based perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Glazebrook, S. (2010). Risky business: Predicting recidivism. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 17, 88–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta‐analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D. A., Smallbone, S., Dennison, S., & Knight, R. A. (2009). Specialization and versatility in sexual offenders referred for civil commitment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. L., & Richards, H. J. (2007). Diagnostic and risk profiles among civilly committed sex offenders in Washington State. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 313–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janus, E. S., & Walbek, N. H. (2000). Sex offender commitments in Minnesota: A descriptive study of second generation commitments. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 18, 343–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jespersen, A. F., Lalumiere, M. L., & Seto, M. C. (2009). Sexual abuse history among adult sex offenders and non‐sex offenders: A meta‐analysis. Child Abuse and Neglect, 33, 179–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyzer, P., Pereira, C., & Southwood, S. (2004). Pre‐emptive imprisonment for dangerousness in Queensland under the Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003: The constitutional issues. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 11, 244–253.
   Google Scholar
• Langan, P. A., & Levin, D. J. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994 (Vol. NCJ 193427). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Langevin, R., & Lang, R. A. (1990). Substance abuse among sex offenders. Annals of Sex Research, 3, 397–424.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S. (2004). Sexual predator civil commitment: A comparison of selected and released offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 638–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, W. L. (1996). Assessment, treatment, and theorizing about sex offenders: Developments during the past twenty years and future directions. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 23, 162–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcsherry, B. (2005). Indefinite and preventive detention legislation: From caution to an open door. Criminal Law Journal, 29, 94–110.
   Google Scholar
• Mcsherry, B., Keyzer, P., & Freiberg, A. (2006). Preventive detention for “dangerous” offenders in Australia: A critical analysis and proposals for policy development. Report to the Criminology Research Council. Retrieved from http://www.criminologyresearchcouncil.gov.au/reports/200405‐03.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mercado, C. C., & Ogloff, J. R. (2007). Risk and the preventive detention of sex offenders in Australia and the United States. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30, 49–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H. A., Amenta, A. E., & Conroy, M. A. (2005). Sexually violent predator evaluations: Empirical evidence, strategies for professionals, and research directions. Law and Human Behaviour, 29, 29–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogloff, J. R. P. (2002). Identifying and accommodating the needs of mentally ill people in gaols and prisons. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 9, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ogloff, J. R. P. (2006). Psychopathy/antisocial personality disorder conundrum. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40, 519–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogloff, J. R. P., & Cutajar, M. (2009). The legal and clinical sequelae of child sexual abuse. Paper presented at the Children and the Law Conference: International Approaches to Children and Their Vulnerabilities, Prato, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Ogloff, J. R. P., & Doyle, D. J. (2009). A clarion call: Caution and humility must be the theme when assessing risk for sexual violence under post‐sentence laws. Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand, 2, 59–69.
   Google Scholar
• Ruschena, D. (2003). Determining dangerousness: Whatever happened to the rules of justice? Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 10, 122–140.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, R. (2008). Case commentary: Risk assessment and sentencing of serious sex offenders. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 15, 188–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentencing Advisory Council. (2006). High‐risk offenders: Continued detention and supervision options. Melbourne, VIC: Sentencing Advisory Council.
   Google Scholar
• Short, T., Thomas, S. D. M., Luebbers, S., Ogloff, J. R. P., & Mullen, P. (2010). Utilization of public mental health services in a random community sample. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 475–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, L. M. J. (2000). An examination of the assumptions of specialization, mental disorder, and dangerousness in sex offenders. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 18, 275–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, L. M. J. (2003). Matching legal policies with known offenders. In B. J. Winick & J.Q. La fond (Eds.), Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy (pp. 149–163). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Skeem, J., Golding, S., Cohn, N., & Berge, G. (1998). The logic and reliability of expert opinion on competence to stand trial. Law and Human Behaviour, 22, 519–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallbone, S., & Ransley, J. (2005). Legal and psychological controversies in the preventive incapacitation of sexual offenders. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 28, 299–305.
   Google Scholar
• Smallbone, S. W., & Wortley, R. K. (2004). Onset, persistence, and versatility of offending among adult males convicted of sexual offenses against children. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 6, 285–298.
   Google Scholar
• Snowball, L., & Weatherburn, D. (2006). Indigenous over‐representation in prison: The role of offender characteristics. Sydney, NSW: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, D. H., Mullen, P. E., & Pathé, M. T. (2005). Legislation in Victoria on sexual offenders: Issues for health professionals. The Medical Journal of Australia, 183, 318–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vess, J. (2009). Risk assessment of sexual offenders for extended supervision orders in New Zealand: Basic principles and current practice. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 18, 174–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, L. J., Mackenzie, R., Mullen, P. E., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2005). The problem behaviour model: The development of a stalkers clinic and a threateners clinic. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 23, 387–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M., & Ogloff, J. R. (2006). Victoria's Serious Sex Offenders Monitoring Act 2005: Implications for the accuracy of sex offender risk assessment. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 13, 182–198.
   Google Scholar