The role and position of passive intervertebral motion assessment within clinical reasoning and decision-making in manual physical therapy: a qualitative interview study

References

• Farrell JP, Jensen GM. Manual therapy: a critical assessment of role in the profession of physical therapy. Phys Ther. 1992;72:843–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher C, Latimer J. Pain or resistance: the manual therapists’ dilemma. Aust J Physiother. 1992;38:257–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NVMT (Dutch Association for Manual Therapy). Professional competence profile for the manual therapist [document on the Internet]. Amersfoort: NVMT; 2005 [cited 2009 Jan 31]. Available from: http://www.nvmt.nl/upload/BCP.ENG.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Ravensberg CD, Oostendorp RA, van Berkel LM, Scholten-Peeters GG, Pool JJ, Swinkels RA, et al. Physical therapy and manual physical therapy: differences in patient characteristics. J Man Manip Ther. 2005;13:113–24.
   Google Scholar
• Jull G, Treleaven J, Versace G. Manual examination: is pain provocation a major cue for spinal dysfunction? Aust J Physiother. 1994;40:159–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haneline MT, Cooperstein R, Young M, Birkeland K. Spinal motion palpation: a comparison of studies that assessed intersegmental end feel vs. excursion. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31:616–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hestbœk L, Leboeuf-Yde C. Are chiropractic tests for the lumbo-pelvic spine reliable and valid? A systematic critical literature review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23:258–75.
   Google Scholar
• May S, Littlewood C, Bishop A. Reliability of procedures used in the physical examination of non-specific low back pain. Aust J Physiother. 2006;52:91–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seffinger MA, Najm WI, Mishra SI, Adams A, Dickerson VM, Murphy LS, et al. Reliability of spinal palpation for diagnosis of back and neck pain: a systematic review of the literature. Spine. 2004;29:E413–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stochkendahl MJ, Christensen HW, Hartvigsen J, Vach W, Haas M, Hestbæk L. Manual examination of the spine: a systematic critical literature review of reproducibility. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006;29:475–85.
   Google Scholar
• van Trijffel E, Anderegg Q, Bossuyt PM, Lucas C. Interexaminer reliability of passive assessment of intervertebral motion in the cervical and lumbar spine: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2005;10:256–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott JH, Flynn TW, Fritz JM, Hing WA, Reid D, Whitman JM. Manual physical assessment of spinal segmental motion: Intent and validity. Man Ther. 2009;14:36–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Trijffel E, Oostendorp RA, Lindeboom R, Bossuyt PM, Lucas C. Perceptions and use of passive intervertebral motion assessment of the spine: a survey of Dutch physiotherapists specializing in manual therapy. Man Ther. 2009;14:243–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyis C, Schön D. Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• van der Wees PJ, Hendriks EJ, Veldhuizen RJ. Quality assurance in the Netherlands: from development to implementation and evaluation. Dutch J Phys Ther. 2003;113:3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Colluci E. Focus groups can be fun: the use of activity-oriented questions in focus group discussions. Qual Health Res. 2007;17:1422–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freidson E. Professionalism: the third logic. Oxford: Blackwell; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Jones MA, Jensen G, Edwards I. Clinical reasoning in physiotherapy. In: Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, Christensen N, editors. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier /Butterworth Heinemann; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• CEBM (Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine). Levels of evidence. Oxford: CEBM; 2005 [cited 2009 May 17]. Available from: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o= 1025
   Google Scholar
• Bossuyt PM, Irwig L, Craig J, Glasziou P. Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways. BMJ. 2006;332:1089–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van den Bruel A, Cleemput I, Aertgeerts B, Ramaekers D, Buntinx F. The evaluation of diagnostic tests: evidence on technical and diagnostic accuracy, impact on patient outcome and cost-effectiveness is needed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:1116–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord SJ, Irwig L, Bossuyt PM. Using the principles of randomized controlled trial design to guide test evaluation. Med Decis Making. 2009;29:E1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott JH, McCane B, Herbison P, Moginie G, Chapple C, Hogarty T. Lumbar segmental instability: a criterion-related validity study of manual therapy assessment. BMC Musculoskel Dis. 2005;6:56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Childs JD. Lumbar spine segmental mobility assessment: an examination of validity for determining intervention strategies in patients with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2005;8:1745–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hall TM, Robinson KW, Fujinawa O, Akasaka K, Pyne EA. Intertester reliability and diagnostic validity of the cervical flexion-rotation test. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31:293–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys BK, Delahaye M, Peterson CK. An investigation into the validity of cervical spine motion palpation using subjects with congenital block vertebrae as a ‘gold standard’. BMC Musculoskel Dis. 2004;5:19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogince M, Hall T, Robinson K, Blackmore AM. The diagnostic validity of the cervical flexion-rotation test in C1/2-related cervicogenic headache. Man Ther. 2007;12:256–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moons KG, Biesheuvel CJ, Grobbee DE. Test research versus diagnostic research. Clin Chem. 2004;50:473–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Hertogh WJ, Vaes PH, Vijverman V, de Cordt A, Duquet W. The clinical examination of neck pain patients: the validity of a group of tests. Man Ther. 2007;12:50–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doody C, McAteer M. Clinical reasoning of expert and novice physiotherapists in an outpatient orthopaedic setting. Physiotherapy. 2002;88:258–68.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards I, Jones M, Carr J, Braunack-Mayer A, Jensen GM. Clinical reasoning strategies in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2004;84:312–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen GM, Shepard KF, Hack LM, Gwyer J. Attribute dimensions that distinguish master and novice physical therapy clinicians in orthopaedic settings. Phys Ther. 1992;72:711–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen GM, Gwyer J, Shepard KF, Hack LM. Expert practice in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2000;80:28–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King CA, Bithell C. Expertise in diagnostic reasoning: a comparative study. Int J Ther Rehabil. 1998;5:78–87.
   Google Scholar
• May S, Greasley A, Reeve S, Withers S. Expert therapists use specific clinical reasoning processes in the assessment and management of patients with shoulder pain: a qualitative study. Aust J Physiother. 2008;54:261–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payton OD. Clinical reasoning process in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 1985;65:924–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Jensen GM. Using clinical outcomes to explore the theory of expert practice physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2003; 83:1090–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivett DA, Higgs J. Hypothesis generation in the clinical reasoning behavior of manual therapists. J Phys Ther Educ. 1997;11:40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Kempainen RR, Migeon MB, Wolf FM. Understanding our mistakes: a primer on errors in clinical reasoning. Acad Med. 2003;25:177–81.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen JL. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2217–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrick P, Bond C, Duncan E, Hale L. Clinical reasoning in musculoskeletal practice: students’ conceptualizations. Phys Ther. 2009;89:430–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher CG, Simmonds M, Adams R. Therapists’ conceptualization and characterization of the clinical concept of spinal stiffness. Phys Ther. 1998;78:289–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titchen A, Ersser SJ. The nature of professional craft knowledge. In: Higgs J, Titchen A, editors. Practice knowledge and expertise in the health professions. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Jull G, Zito G, Trott P, Potter H, Shirley D, Richardson C. Inter-examiner reliability to detect painful upper cervical joint dysfunction. Aust J Physiother. 1997;43:125–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fritz JM, Piva SR, Childs JD. Accuracy of the clinical examination to predict radiographic instability of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2005;14:743–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas M, Groupp E, Panzer D, Partna L, Lumsden S, Aickin M. Efficacy of cervical endplay assessment as an indicator for spinal manipulation. Spine. 2003;28:1091–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijbregts PA. Spinal motion palpation: a review of reliability studies. J Man Manip Ther. 2002;10:24–39.
   Google Scholar
• Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DD. Motion palpation: it’s time to accept the evidence. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998;21:568–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiradejnant A, Latimer J, Maher CG, Stepkovitch N. Does the choice of spinal level treated during posteroanterior (PA) mobilisation affect treatment outcome? Physiother Theory Pract. 2002;18:165–74.
   Google Scholar
• Pettman E. A history of manipulative therapy. J Man Manip Ther. 2007;15:165–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sizer PS, Felstehausen V, Sawyer S, Dornier L, Matthews P, Cook C. Eight critical skill sets required for manual therapy competency: a Delphi study and factor analysis of physical therapy educators of manual therapy. J Allied Health. 2007;36:30–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• IFOMT (International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Therapists). Educational Standards in Orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapy. Part A: Educational standards. Auckland: IFOMT; 2008 [cited 2009 Jan 31]. Available from: http://www.ifomt.org/pdf/IFOMT_Education_Standards_and_International_Monitoring_20080611.pdf
   Google Scholar