Physiotherapy for Upper Extremity Dysfunction Following Stroke

REFERENCES

• Irish Heart Foundation, Council for Stroke. Towards excellence in stroke care in Ireland. Dublin: Eireann Healthcare Publications, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Parker VM, Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R. Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery. Int Rehabil Med. 1986; 8:69–73
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heller A, Wade DT, Wood VA, Sunderland A, Hewer RL, Ward E. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery after the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987;50:714–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeks JG, Lankhorst GJ, Rumping K, Prevo AJ. The longterm outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow up study. Disabil Rehabil 1999; 21:357–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75:852–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyller TB, Sveen U, Sodring KM, Pettersen AM, Bautz- Holter E. Subjective well-being one year after stroke. Clin Rehabil 1997; 11:139–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research in monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince L editor. Behavioural psychology in rehabilitation medicine: clinical applications. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1980:371–440
   Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke 1994; 25:1181 -8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feys HM, de Weert WJ, Selz BE, Cox Steck GA, Spichiger R, Vereeck LE, et al. Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a singleblind, randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Stroke 1998; 29:785–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanton S, Wolf SL. An application of upper extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with sub acute stroke. Phys Ther 1999; 79:847–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra L, Dale P, Crome P. Improving stroke rehabilitation. A controlled study. Stroke 1993; 24:1462–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin JW. Hemiplegic shoulder pain. Phys 77j<?rl986;66:1884 –93
   Google Scholar
• Zorowitz RD, Hughes MB, Idank D, Ikai T, Johnston MV. Shoulder pain and subluxation after stroke: correlation or coincidence? Am J Occup Ther 1996; 50:194–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Larkin PA, Smith MB, Horton MG. Shoulder pain in hemiplegia: statistical relationship with five variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67:514–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashburn A. Physiotherapy in the rehabilitation of stroke: a review. Clin Rehabil 1993; 7:337–45
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Therapy impact on functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation. Physiotherapy 1999;85:377–91
   Google Scholar
• Ernst E. A review of stroke rehabilitation and physiotherapy. Stroke 1990; 21:1081–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobath B. Adult hemiplegia: evaluation and treatment. London: Heinemann, 1978
   Google Scholar
• Brunnstrom S. Movement therapy in hemiplegia: a neurophysi- ological approach. Hagerstown: Harper and Row, 1970
   Google Scholar
• Cotton E, Kinsman R. Conductive education for adult hemiplegia. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone M. Restoration of motor function in the stroke patient: a physiotherapists approach. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1983
   Google Scholar
• Carr JH, Shepherd RB. A motor relearning programme for stroke. London: Heinemann, 1982
   Google Scholar
• Knott M, Voss DE. Proprioceptive neuromuscular stimulation. New York: Harper & Row, 1968
   Google Scholar
• Rood M. Neurophysiological reactions as a basis for physical therapy. Phys Ther Rev 1954; 34:444–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davidson I, Waters K. Physiotherapists working with stroke patients. Physiotherapy 2000; 86:69–80
   Google Scholar
• Carr JH, Mungovan SF, Shepherd RB, Dean CM, Nordholm LA. Physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: basis for Australian physiotherapists choice of treatment. Physiother Theory Pract 1994; 10:201–9
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson LM, Nordholm LA. Physical therapy in stroke rehabilitation: basis for Swedish therapists choice of treatment. Physiother Theory Pract 1992; 8:49–55
   Google Scholar
• Sackley CM, Lincoln NB. Physiotherapy for stroke patients: a survey of current practice. Physiother Theory Pract 1996; 12:87–96
   Google Scholar
• Pomeroy VM, Tallis RC. Physical therapy to improve movement performance and functional ability post stroke. Part 1. Existing evidence. Rev Clin Gerontol 2000; 10:261–90.
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. Stroke 1997; 28:1550–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Wagenaar R, Partridge C. Physiotherapy after stroke: more is better? Physiother Res Int 1996; 1:75–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sunderland A, Tinson DJ, Fletcher D, Langton-Hewer R, Wade DT. Enhanced physical therapy improves arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992; 55:530–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln NB, Parry RH. Randomised, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. Stroke 1999; 30:2242–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry RH, Lincoln NB, Vaas CD. Effect of severity of arm impairment on response to additional physiotherapy early after stroke. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13:187–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999;354:191–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz K-H. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995; 130:59–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation — a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999;36:237–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopp B, Kunkel A, Muhlnickel W, Villringer K, Taub E, Flor H. Plasticity in the motor system related to therapy induced improvement of movement after stroke. Neuroreport 1999; 10:807–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned non-use in chronic stroke and head injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989; 104:125–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Miller NE, Novak TA, Cook EW 3rd, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74:347–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke 1999;30:586–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, Villiringer K, Villiringer A, Taub E, Flor H. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80:624–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single blind randomised clinical trial. Stroke 1999; 30:2369–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dromerick AW, Edward DF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischaemic stroke? Stroke 2000; 31:2984–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly JL, Baker MP, Wolf SL. Procedures for EMG biofeedback training in involved upper extremities of hemiplegic patients. Phys Ther\919\59:1500–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland J, Thomson MA. Efficacy of electromyographic biofeedback compared with conventional physical therapy for upper-extremity function in patients following stroke: a research overview and meta-analysis. Phys Ther 1994; 74:534–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow JL, Lincoln NB, Nouri FM, De Weert W. The effectiveness of EMG biofeedback in the treatment of arm function after stroke. Int Disabil Studies 1989; 11:155–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schleenbaker RE, Mainous AG III. Electro-myographic feedback for neuromuscular re-education in the hemiplegic stroke patient. A meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil\99'i\74:1301–4
   Google Scholar
• Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W, et al. Biofeedback therapy in post stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the randomised controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76:508–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W, et al. Functional electrostimulation in post stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the randomised controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:549–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kralj A, Acimovic R, Stanic U. Enhancement of hemiplegic patient rehabilitation by means of functional electrical stimulation. 1993; 17:107–14
   Google Scholar
• Francisco G, Chae J, Chawla H, Kirshblum S, Zorowitz R, Lewis G, Pang S. Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation for improving the arm function of acute stroke survivors: a randomised pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:570–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafe J, Berthoud F, Bovine T, Dodos L, Davis T, Fried A. Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia. Stroke 1998; 29:975–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonde L, Gip C, Fernaeus SE, Nilsson CG, Viitanen M. Stimulation with low frequency (1.7 Hz) transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (low tens) increases motor function of the post-stroke paretic arm. Scand J Rehabil Med 1998; 30:95–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonde L, Kalimo H, Fernaeus SE, Viitanen M. Low TENS treatment on post-stroke paretic arm: a three-year follow up. Clin Rehabil 2000; 14:14–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood V, Lewith G. The effect of acupuncture on the motor recovery of the upper limb after stroke. Physiotherapy 1997;83:614–9
   Google Scholar
• Wong AM, Su TY, Tang FT, Cheng PT, Liaw MY. Clinical trial of electrical acupuncture on hemiplegic stroke patients. Am J Phys Med 1999; 78:117–22
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney RM. Introduction to special edition on robotics. Technol Dis 1996; 5:121–3
   Google Scholar
• Reinkensmeyer DJ, Dewald JPA, Rymer WZ. Robotic devices for physical rehabilitation of stroke patients: fundamental requirements, target therapeutic techniques and preliminary designs. Technol Dis 1996; 5:205–15
   Google Scholar
• Aisen ML, Krebs HI, Hogan N, McDowell F, Volpe BT. The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol 1997; 54:443–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgar CG, Lum PS, Shor PC, van der Loos HFM. Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: The Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. J Rehab Res Dev 2000; 37:663–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Edelstein OTR L, Diels C, Aisen M. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology 2000; 54:1938–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers MP, deBear PC, Erlandson RF, Kristy K, Geer DM, Nichols A. Patient and staff acceptance of robotic technology in occupational therapy: a pilot study. J Rehab Res Dev 1991; 28:33–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson IH, Murre JMJ. Rehabilitation of brain damage: brain plasticity and principles of guided recovery. Psychol Bull 1999; 125:544–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Miliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic event. Science 1996; 272:1791–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar