Prognostic indicators in paediatric cochlear implant surgery: a systematic literature review

References

• Adunka O, Jewells V, Buchman C 2007. Value of computed tomography in the evaluation of children with cochlear nerve deficiency. Otology & Neurotology, 28(5): 597–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen MC, Nikolopoulos TP, O'Donoghue GM 1998. Speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation. The American Journal of Otology, 19: 742–746.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alonzo TA 2005. Standards for reporting prognostic tumour marker studies. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23(36): 9053–9054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman DG 2001. Systematic reviews in healthcare: systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables. BMJ, 323: 224–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman DG, Lyman GH 1998. Methodological challenges in the evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 52: 289–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language Hearing-Association 2004. Technical report: cochlear implants. ASHA (Supplement), 24.
   Google Scholar
• Archbold S, Lutman M, Marshall D 1995. Categories of auditory performance. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 104(S166): 312–314.
   Google Scholar
• Archbold S, Lutman M, Nikolopolous TP 1998. Categories of auditory performance: inter-user reliability. British Journal of Audiology, 19: 328–331.
   Google Scholar
• Archbold SM, Nikolopoulos TP, Tait M, O'Donohue GM, Lutman ME, Gregory S 2000. Approach to communication, speech perception and intelligibility after paediatric cochlear implantation. British Journal of Audiology, 34: 257–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamiou DE, Worth S, Phelps P, Sirimanna T, Rajput K 2001. Eighth nerve aplasia and hypoplasia in cochlear implant candidates: the clinical perspective. Otology & Neurotology, 22(4): 492–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer PW, Geers AE, Brenner CMA, Moog JS, Smith RJ 2003. The effect of GJB2 allele variants on performance after cochlear implantation. The Laryngoscope, 113(12): 2135–2140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner WD, Pok SM, Egelierler B, Franz P, Gstoettner W, Hamzavi J 2002. The role of age in pediatric cochlear implantation. International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 62: 223–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bent J, Chute P, Parisier S 1999. Cochlear implantation in children with enlarged vestibular aqueducts. The Laryngoscope, 109(7, Part 1): 1019–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeson TR, Pisoni DB, Davis RAO 2005. Development of audiovisual comprehension skills in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants. Ear & Hearing, 26(2): 149–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrettini S, Forli F, Genovese E, Santarelli R, Arslan E, Chilosi AM, Cipiriani P 2008. Cochlear implantation in deaf children with associated disabilities: challenges and outcomes. International Journal of Audiology, 47(4): 199–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brackett D, Zara CV 1998. Communication outcomes related to early implantation. The American Journal of Otology, 19: 453–460.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buchman CA, Copeland BJ, Yu KK, Brown CJ, Carrasco VN, Pillsbury HC 2004. Cochlear implantation in children with congenital ear malformations. The Laryngoscope, 114: 309–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchman CA, Roush PA, Teagle HF, Brown CJ, Zdanski CJ, Grose JH 2006. Auditory neuropathy characteristics in children with cochlear nerve deficiency. Ear and Hearing, 27(4): 399–408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney AE, Moeller MP 1998. Treatment efficacy: hearing loss in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(1): S61–S102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisolm TH, Johnson CE, Danhauer JL, Portz LJP, Abrams HB, Lesner S, McCarthy PA, Newman CW 2007. A systematic review of health-related quality of life and hearing aids: Final report of the academy of audiology task force on the health-related quality of life benefits of amplification in adults, Journal of American Academy of Audiology, 18: 151–183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole DC, Hudak PL 1996. Prognosis of non-specific work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper extremities. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 29: 657–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium Guidelines for the Evaluation and Results of Treatment of Conductive Hearing Loss 1995. Journal of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, 113: 186–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Therapy in Meniere's Disease 1995. Journal of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, 113: 181–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB 1997. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 126(5): 376–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cote M, Ferron P, Bergeron F, Bussieres R 2007. Cochlear reimplantation: causes of failure, outcomes, and audiologic performance. The Laryngoscope, 117(7): 1225–1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosson J, Geers A 2001. Analysis of Narrative ability in children with cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 22(5): 381–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen RD, Buchman CA, Brown CJ, Copeland BJ, Zdanski C, Pillsbury HC, Shores CG 2004. Cochlear implantation for children with GJB2-related deafness. The Laryngoscope, 114: 1415–1419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen RD, Zdanski C, Roush P, Brown C, Teagle H, Pillsbury HC, Buchman C 2006. Cochlear implants in Waardenburg syndrome. The Laryngoscope, 16(7): 1273–1275.
   Google Scholar
• Dettman SJ, d'Costa WA, Dowell RC, Winton EJ, Hill KL, Williams SS 2004a. Cochlear implants for children with significant residual hearing. Archives of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, 130(5): 612–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettman SJ, Fiket H, Dowell RC, Charlton M, Williams SS, Tomov AM, Barker EJ 2004b. Speech perception results for children using cochlear implants who have additional special needs. The Volta Review, 104(4): 361–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettman SJ, Pinder D, Briggs RJ, Dowell RC, Leigh JR 2007. Communication development in children who receive the cochlear implant younger than 12 months: risks versus benefits. Ear & Hearing, 28(2S): 11S–17S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donaldson AI, Heavner KS, Zwolan TA 2004. Measuring progress in children with autistic spectrum disorder who have cochlear implants. Archives of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, 130: 666–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman M, Sharma A, Gilley P, Martin K, Roland P 2007. Central auditory development: evidence of CAEP measurements in children fit with cochlear implants. Journal of Communication Disorders, 40: 284–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowell RC, Dettman SJ, Blamey P, Barker EJ, Clark GM 2002. Speech perception in children using cochlear implants: prediction of long-term outcomes. Cochlear Implants International, 3(1): 1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dyar D 1994. Monitoring progress: the role of a speech and language therapist. In: , McCormick B, Archbold S, Sheppard S (eds.) Cochlear Implants for Young Children. London: Whurr, pp. 237–268.
   Google Scholar
• Eby C, OhioLink ETD 2004. Pediatric cochlear implant outcomes in auditory neuropathy/auditory dysynchrony [2008 April 22]. Available from http://www.ohiolink.edu/etd/view.cgi?acc%5Fnum=iucin1085691784.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards L 2007. Children with cochlear implants and complex needs: a review of outcome research and psychological practice. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12(3): 258–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards LC, Frost R, Witham F 2006. Developmental delay and outcomes in paediatric cochlear implantation: implications for candidacy. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 70: 1593–1600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG 2001a. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in Context. London: BMJ Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Egger M, Dickersin K, Davey-Smith G 2001b. Problems and limitations in conducting systematic reviews. In: , Egger M, Davey-Smith G, Altman D (eds.) Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in Context. London: BMJ Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg LS, Johnson KC, Martinez AS 1995. Clinical Assessment of Speech Perception for Infants and Toddlers. Children's Auditory Research and Evaluation Centre: House Ear Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenman DJ, Ashbough C, Zwolan TA, Arts HA, Tellon SA 2001. Implantation in the Malformed Cochlea. Otology & Neurotology, 22(5): 834–841.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El-Hakim H, Levasseur J, Papsin B, Panesar J, Mount RJ, Stevens D, Harrison RV 2001a. Assessment of vocabulary development in children after cochlear implantation. Archives of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, 127(9): 1053–1059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Hakim H, Papsin B, Mount RJ, Levasseur J, Panesar J, Stevens D, Harrison RV 2001b. Vocabulary acquisition rate after pediatric cochlear implantation and the impact of age at implantation. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 29: 187–194.
   Google Scholar
• El-Kashlan HK, Ashbaugh C, Zwolan T, Telian S 2003. Cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf children with ossified cochleae. Otology & Neurotology, 24: 596–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott L, Katz D 1980. Development of a New Children's Test of Speech Discrimination. St. Louis, MO: Auditec.
   Google Scholar
• Erber NP 1982. Auditory Training. Washington, DC. Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.
   Google Scholar
• Erber NC, Alencewicz C 1976. Audiologic evaluation of deaf children. Journal of Hearing Disorders, 41(2): 56–67.
   Google Scholar
• Fallon J, Irvine D, Shepherd R 2007. Cochlear implants and brain plasticity. Hearing Research, 238(1–2): 110–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein AR 1979. Methodologic problems and standards in case-control research. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 32: 35–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischer MH 1999. Meta-analysis and systematic literature review. In: , Rosenfeld RM, Bluestone CD (eds.) Evidence-based Otitis Media. Hamilton: B.C. Decker Inc., pp. 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Francis HW, Pulsifer MB, Chinnici J, Nutt R, Venick HS, Yeagle JD, Niparko JK 2004. Effects of central nervous system residua on cochlear implant results in children deafened by meningitis. Archives of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, 130: 604–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers AE, Nicholas JS, Sedey AL 2003. Language skills of children with early cochlear implantation. Ear and Hearing, 24(1S): 46S–58S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geers AE, Nicholas JG, Moog JS 2007. Estimating the influence of cochlear implantation on language development in children. Audiological Medicine, 5(4): 262–273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gheysen F, Loots G, Van Waelvelde H. 2007. Motor development of deaf children with and without cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 13(2): 215–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud A, Lee H 2007. Predicting cochlear implant outcome from brain organisation in the deaf. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 25: 381–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon KA, Twitchell KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV 2001. Effect of residual hearing prior to cochlear implantation on speech perception in children. The Journal of Otolaryngology, 30(4): 216–223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gordon KA, Tanaka S, Papsin B 2005. Atypical cortical responses underlie poor speech perception in children using cochlear implants. NeuroReport, 16(18): 2041–2045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grade Working Group. 2004. Education and debate – grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 328: 1490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guedes MC, Weber R, Goffi Gomez MVS, de Brito Neto RV, Peralta CGO, Ferreira Bento R 2007. Influence of evoked compound action potential on speech perception in cochlear implant users. Revista Brasileiro de Otorhinolaringologia, 73(4): 439–445
   Google Scholar
• Haggard P 1999. Foreword in evidence-based otitis media. In: , Rosenfeld Richard M, Bluestone Charles D (eds.) Evidence-based Otitis Media. Hamilton: B.C. Decker Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hammes DM, Novak MA, Rotz LA, Willis M, Edmondson DM, Thomas JF 2002. Early identification and cochlear implantation: critical factors for spoken language development. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 111: 74–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison RV, Gordon KA, Mount RJ 2005. Is there a critical period for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children? Analyses of hearing and speech perception performance after implantation. Developmental Psychobiology, 46: 252–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haskins H 1949. A phonetically balanced test of speech discrimination for children. Master's thesis, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden JA, Cote P, Bombardier C 2006. Evaluation of the quality of prognostis studies in systematic reviews. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144: 427–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heneghan C, Badenoch D 2006. Evidence-based Medicine Toolkit. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hilden J 1990. Speaking of prognosis. Revista Medico-Chirurgicala, 94: 171–176.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holt RF, Kirk KI 2005. Speech and language development in cognitively delayed children with cochlear implants. Ear & Hearing, 26(2): 132–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopfenspirger MT, Levine SC, Rimmel FL 2007. Infectious complications in pediatric cochlear implants. The Laryngoscope, 117(10): 1825–1829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn DL, Davis AO, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT 2005. Development of visual attention skills in pre-lingually deaf children who use cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 26(4): 389–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn DL, Fagan MK, Dillon CM, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT 2007. Visual-motor integrations skills of prelingually deaf children: implications for pediatric cochlear implantation. The Laryngoscope, 117(11): 2017–2025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Incesulu A, Vural M, Erkam U 2003. Children with cochlear implants: parental perspective. Otology & Neurotology, 24(4): 605–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James AL 2004. Cochlear implant surgery at 12 months of age or younger. The Laryngoscope, 114 (12): 2191–2195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger S, Jerger J 1984. Pediatric Speech Intelligibility Test. St. Louis, MO: Auditec.
   Google Scholar
• Kileny PR, Zwolan TA, Ashbaugh C 2001. The influence of age at implantation on performance with a cochlear implantation in children. Otology & Neurotology, 22: 42–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim L-S, Jeong S-W, Huh M-J, Park Y-D 2006. Cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 115(3): 205–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk KI, Miyamoto RT, Ying EA, Perdew MS, Zuganelis MS 2000. Cochlear implantation in young children: effects of age at implantation and communication mode. The Volta Review, 102(4): 127–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk KI, Miyamoto RT, Lento CL, Ying E, O'Neill T, Fears B 2002. Effects of age at implantation in young children. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 111: 69–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kral A, Tillein J, Heid S, Klinke R, Hartmann R 2006. Cochlear implants: cortical plasticity in congenital deprivation. Progress in Brain Research, 157: 400–402.
   Google Scholar
• Lanson BG, Green JE, Roland JT, Lalwani AK, Waltzman S 2007. Cochlear implantation in children with CHARGE syndrome: therapeutic decisions and outcomes. The Laryngoscope, 117(7): 1260–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laupacis A, Wells G, Richardson WS, Tugwell P 1994. User's guide to the medical literature. V. How to use an article about prognosis. The Journal of American Medical Association, 272(3): 234–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Giraud A, Kang H, Kim C, Lee DS 2007. Cortical activity at rest predicts cochlear implantation outcome. Cerebral Cortex, 17(4): 909–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin FR, Niparko JK 2006. Measuring health-related quality of life after pediatric cochlear implantation: a systematic review. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 70(10): 1695–1706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin FR, Wang N, Fink NE, Alexandra L, Eisenberg LS, Tobey EA, Niparko JK, The CDaCI Investigative team 2008. Assessing the use of speech and language measures in relation to parental perceptions of development after early cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 29(2): 208–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loundon N, Rouillo I, Munier N, Marlin S, Garabedian E 2005. Cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations. Otology and Neurotology, 26(4): 668–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luntz M, Teszler CB, Shpak T, Feiglin H, Farah-Sima'an A 2001. Cochlear implantation in healthy and otitis-prone children: a prospective study. The Laryngoscope, 111: 1614–1618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luntz M, Tezler CB, Shpak T 2004. Cochlear implantation in children with otitis media: second stage of a long-term prospective study. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 68: 273–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie J 1921. A defence of the thesis that ‘the opportunities of the general practitioner are essential for the investigation of disease and the progress of medicine. BMJ, 1: 797–804.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Madell JR, Flexer C 2008. Pediatric Audiology: Diagnosis, Technology, and Management. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Manrique M, Cervera-Paz FJ, Huarte A, Perez N, Molina M, Garcia-Tapia R 1999. Cerebral auditory plasticity and cochlear implants. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 49 (Suppl 1): 193–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manrique M, Cervera-Paz J, Huarte A 2004a. Advantages of cochlear implantation in prelingual deaf children before 2 years of age when compared with later implantation. The Laryngoscope, 114: 1462–1469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manrique M, Javier Cervera-Paz F, Huarte A, Molina M 2004b. Prospective long-term auditory results of cochlear implantation in prelinguistically deafened children: the importance of early implantation. Acta Otolaryngologica, 124 (Suppl 552): 55–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe M 2005. Language ability and sequential memory: a study of pediatric cochlear implant users. Psychology master's thesis, University of Cinncinatti.
   Google Scholar
• McConkey Robbins A, Burton D, Osberger MJ, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Kishon-Rabin L 2004. Effect of age at cochlear implantation on auditory skill development in infants and toddlers. Archives of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, 130: 570–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald Connor C, Craig HK, Raudenbush SW, Heavner K, Zwolan TA 2006. The age at which young deaf children receive cochlear implants and their vocabulary and speech production growth: is there an added value for early implantation? Ear & Hearing, 27(6): 628–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinlay RJ, Cotoi C, Wilczynski NL, Hynes RB 2008. Systematic reviews and original articles differ in relevance, novelty, and use in an evidence-based service for physicians: PLUS project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61: 449–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller GL, Knudsen EI 2003. Adaptive plasticity in the auditory thalamus of juvenile barn owls. Journal of Neuroscience, 23: 1059–1065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moog JS, Geers AE 1990. Early Speech Perception Test for Profoundly Hearing-impaired Children. St. Louis, MO: Central Institute for the Deaf.
   Google Scholar
• Mulrow CD, Cook DJ, Davidoff F 1997. Systematic reviews: critical links in the great chain of evidence. Annals of Internal Medicine, 126(5): 389–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylanus EAM, Rotteveel LJC, Leeuw RL 2004. Congenital malformation of the inner ear and pediatric cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 25: 308–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas JG, Geers AE 2003. Personal, social and family adjustment in school-aged children with a cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing, 24(1) Supplement: 695–815.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas JG, Geers AE 2006. Effects of early auditory experience on the spoken language of deaf children at 3 years of age. Ear and Hearing, 27(3): 286–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulos TP, Dyar D 2004. Assessing candidate children for cochlear implantation with the Nottingham Children's Implant Profile (NChIP): the first 200 children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 68: 127–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulos TP, Kiprouli K 2004. Cochlear implant surgery in challenging cases. Cochlear Implants International, 5 (Suppl 1): 56–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nikolopoulos TP, O'Donohue GM, Archbold S 1999. Age at implantation: its importance in pediatric cochlear implantation. The Laryngoscope, 109(4): 595–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulos TP, Lloyd H, O'Donoghue GM 2001. Paediatric cochlear implantation: the parent's perspective. Archives of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 127(4): 363–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulos TP, Gibbin KP, Dyar D 2004. Predicting speech perception outcomes following cochlear implantation using Nottingham children's implant profile (NChIP). International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 68: 137–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulos TP, Archbold SM, O'Donohue GM 2006. Does cause of deafness influence outcome after cochlear implantation in children? Pediatrics, 118(4): 1350–1356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Shannon SI 1998. Effectiveness of instruction in critical appraisal (evidence-based medicine) skills: a critical appraisal. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 158(2): 177–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulos TP, Dyar D, Gibbin KP 2004. Assessing candidate children for cochlear implantation with the Nottingham Children's Implant Profile (NChIP): the first 200 children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 63(2): 127–135.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulos TP, Dyar D, Gibbin KP 2004. Predicting speech perception outcomes following cochlear implantation using Nottingham children's Implant profile (NChIP). International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 68(2): 137–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donohue GM 2008. Politzer Society Meeting, Antalya. Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donohue GM, Nikolopoulos TP 2002. Minimal Access Surgery for Pediatric Cochlear Implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 23(6): 891–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loudon N, Rouillon I, Munier N, Marlin S, Roger G, Garabedian EN 2005. Cochlear Implantation in Children with Internal Ear Malformations. Otology & Neurotology, 26(4): 668–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donohue GM, Nikolopoulos TP, Archbold SM, Tait M 1999. Cochlear Implants in Young Children: the relationship between speech perceptions and speech intelligibility. Ear and Hearing, 20(5): 419–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donoghue GM, Nikolopoulos TO 2002. Minimal access surgery for pediatric cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 23: 891–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donoghue GM, Nikolopoulos TP, Archbold SM, Tait M 1999. Speech perception in children after cochlear implantation. The American Journal of Otology, 19: 762–767.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donohue GM, Nikolopoulos TP, Archbold SM, Tait M 1999. Cochlear implants in young children: the relationship between speech perception and speech intelligibility. Ear & Hearing, 20(5): 419–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill C, O'Donohue GM, Archbold SM, Nikolopoulos TP, Sach TS 2002. Variations in gains in auditory performance from pediatric cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 23(1): 44–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osberger MJ, Fisher L, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Geier L, Barker M 1998. Speech recognition performance of Older children with cochlear implants. The American Journal of Otology, 19: 152–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oxman AD 2004. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 328: 1490–1505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxman AD, Guyatt GH 1991. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44(1): 91–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pantev C, Ross B, Wollbrink A, Knief A 2006. Dynamics of auditory plasticity after cochlear implantation: a longitudinal study. Cerebral Cortex, 16: 31–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel AM, Cahill LD, Ret J, Schmithorst V, Choo D, Holland S 2007. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of hearing-impaired children under sedation before cochlear implantation. Archives of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, 133(7): 877–683.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson A, Shallop J, Driscoll C, Breneman A, Babb J, Stoeckel R, Fabry L 2003. Outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 14(4): 188–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pisoni DB, Cleary M 2003. Measures of working memory span and verbal rehearsal speed in deaf children after cochlear implantation. Ear and Hearing 24(1) Supplement: 106S–120S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisoni DB, Cleary M, Geers AE, Tobey EA 1999. Individual differences in effectiveness of cochlear implants in children who are pre-lingually deaf: new process measure of performance. Volta Review, 101: 111–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulsifer MB, Salorio CF, Niparko JK 2003. Developmental, audiological, and speech perception functioning in children after cochlear implant surgery. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 157: 552–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyman B, Blamey P, Lacey P, Clark G, Dowell R 2000. The development of speech perception in children using cochlear implants: effects of etiologic factors and delayed milestones. American Journal of Otology, 21(1): 57–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quittner AL, Leibach BS, Marciel MS 2004. The impact of cochlear implants on young deaf children: new methods to assess cognitive and behavioural development. Archives of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, 130(5): 547–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajput K, Brown T, Bamiou D-E 2003. Aetiology of hearing loss and other related factors versus language outcome after cochlear implantation in children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 67: 497–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez Inscoe JM, Nikolopoulos TP 2004. Cochlear implantation in children deafened by cytomegalovirus: speech perception and speech intelligibility outcomes. Otology & Neurotology, 25: 479–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson K 1998. Implications of developmental plasticity for the language acquisition of deaf children with cochlear implants. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 46(1–2): 71–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld RM 1999. Evidence-based Otitis Media. Hamilton: B.C. Decker Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld RM, Bluestone CD, (eds.) 1999. Evidence-Based Otitis Media. Hamilton: B.C. Decker Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ross M, Lerman J 1970. A picture identification test for hearing impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 13: 44–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubinstein JT, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ 1999. Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of criteria. The American Journal of Otology, 20: 445–452.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sackett DL, Richardson SR, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB 1997. Evidence-based Medicine; How to Practice and Teach EBM. London: Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson M, Shojania KG, Garrity C, Horsley T, Ocampo M, Moher D 2008. Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61: 531–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schorr EA, Roth FP, Fox NA 2008. A comparison of the speech and language skills of children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 29(4): 195–210.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz KF, Grimes DA 2002. Case-control studies: research in reverse. The Lancet 359(9304): 431–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaheen NJ, Crosby MA, Bozymski EM, Sandler RS 2000. Is there publication bias in the reporting of cancer risk in Barrett's esophagus? Gastroenterology, 119: 333–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin M, Kim S, Park M, Kim C, Oh S 2007. Comparison of cognitive function in deaf children between before and after cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 28(2) Supplement: 225–285.
   Google Scholar
• Sinnathuray AR, Toner JG, Geddis A, Clarke-Lyttle J, Patterson CC, Hughes A 2004a. Auditory perception and speech discrimination after cochlear implantation in patients with connexib 26 (GJB2) gene-related Deafness. Otology & Neurotology, 25: 930–934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnathuray AR, Toner JG, Clarke-Lyttle J, Geddis A, Patterson C, Hughes A 2004b. Connexin 26 (GJB2) gene-related deafness and speech intelligibility after cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 25: 935–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotiriadis A, Makrigiannis A, Stefos T, Paraskevaidis E, Kalantaridou S 2007. Rinolytic defects and recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 109(5): 1146–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart MC 1999. Patient-based outcomes. In: , Rosenfeld RM, Bluestone CD (eds.) Evidence-based Otitis Media. Hamilton: B.C. Decker Inc., pp. 51–72.
   Google Scholar
• Svirsky MA, Teoh S-W, Neuburger H 2004. Development of langage and speech perception in congenitally, profoundly deaf children as a function of age at cochlear implantation. Audiology & Neuro Otology, 9: 224–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svirsky MA, Chin SB, Jester A 2007. The effects of age at implantation on speech intelligibility in pediatric cochlear implant users: clinical outcomes and sensitive periods. Audiological Medicine, 5(4): 293–306.
   Google Scholar
• Tait M, Nikolopoulos TP, Archbold S, O'Donoghue GM 2001. Use of the telephone in prelingually deaf children with a multichannel cochlear implant. Otology & Neurotology, 22(1): 47–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait ME, Nikolopoulos TP, Lutman ME 2007. Age at implantation and development of vocal and auditory preverbal skills in implanted deaf children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 71: 603–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taitelbaum-Swead R, Brownstein Z, Muchnik C, Kishon-Rabin L, Kronenberg J, Megirov L, Frydman M, Hildesheimer M, Avraham K 2006. Connexin-associated deafness and speech perception outcome of cochlear implantation. Archives of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, 132: 495–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellier AL, Cormier-Daire V, Abadie V, Amiel J, Sigaudy S, Bonnet D, de Lonlay-Debeney P, Morrisseau-Durand MP, Hubert P, Michel JL, Jan D, Dollfus JH, Baumann C, Labrune P, Lacombe D, Philip N, LeMerrer M, Briard ML, Munnich A, Lyonnet S 1998. CHARGE syndrome: report of 47 cases and review. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 76: 402–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Cochrane Collaboration 2006. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 4.2.6. [updated 2006 September].
   Google Scholar
• Tobey EA, Geers AE, Brenner C, Altuna D, Gabbert G 2003. Factors associated with development of speech production skills in children implanted by age five. Ear & Hearing, 24(1S): 36S–45S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomblin B, Hebbeler K 2007. Current state of knowledge: outcomes research in children with a mild to severe hearing impairment – approaches and methodological considerations. Ear & Hearing, 28(6): 715–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomblin B, Spencer L, Flock S, Tyler R, Gantz B 1999. A comparison of language achievement in children with cochlear implants and children using hearing aids. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42: 497–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay K, Ross B 2007. Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the brain. Journal of Communication Disorders, 40(4): 305–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Sampson M, Fergusson EC, Horsley T, Moher D 2008. Few systematic reviews exist documenting the extent of bias: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61: 422–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trimble K, Blaser S, James A, Papsin B 2007. Computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging before pediatric cochlear implantation? Developing an investigative strategy. Otology & Neurotology, 28(3): 317–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Lincolnshire Hospitals Knowledge and Information Service 2002. Critical Appraisal Toolkit for Case Control Studies [2007 November 27]. Available from http://.hello.nhs.uk/documents/CAT!-Case_Control_Study.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van den Aardweg MTA, Rovers MM, De Ru JA, Albers FWJ, Schilder AGM 2008. A systematic review of diagnostic criteria for acute mastoiditis in children. Otology & Neurotology, 29: 751–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wermeskerken GKA, Dunnebier EA, Van Olphen AF, Van Zanten BA, Albers FWJ 2007. Audiological performance after cochlear implantation: a 2-year follow-up in children with inner ear malformations. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 127(3): 252–257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieu A, Mondain M, Blanchard K, Sillon M, Reuillard-Artieres F, Tobey E, Uziel A, Piron JP 1998. Influence of communication mode on speech intelligibility and syntactic structure of sentences in profoundly hearing impaired French children implanted between 5 and 9 years of age. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 44: 15–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Lim LL-Y, Levi C, Heller R, Fischer J 2001. A prognostic index for 30-day mortality after stroke. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54: 766–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber BP, Dillo W, Dietrich B, Maneke I, Bertram B, Lenarz T 1998. Pediatric cochlear implantation in cochlear malformations. The American Journal of Otology, 19: 747–753.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Werker J, Tees R 2005. Speech perception as a window for understanding plasticity and commitment in language systems of the brain. Developmental Psychobiology, 46(3): 233–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner L 2007. Issues in human auditory development. Journal of Communication Disorders, 40: 275–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson AS, Brinton JC 2003. Speech Intelligibility Rating of Cochlear Implanted Children: Inter-rater Reliability. Whurr Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Windeler J 2000. Prognosis – What does the clinician associate with this notion? Statistics in Medicine, 19: 435–430.
   Google Scholar
• Wu C, Lee Y, Chen P, Hsu C 2008. Predominance of genetic diagnosis and imaging results as predictors in determining the speech perception performance outcome after cochear implantation in children. Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine, 162(3): 269–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J-L, Lin C-Y, Yang H-M, Lin Y-H 2006. Effect of age at cochlear implantation on open-set word recognition in Mandarin speaking deaf children. International Journal of Pediatric Otolaryngology, 70: 207–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt JC, Altman DG 1995. Commentary: prognostic models: clinically useful or quickly forgotten? BMJ, 311: 1953–1541.
   Google Scholar
• Zwolan TA, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Ashbaugh CJ, Hieber SJ, Kileny PR, Telian SA 1997. Cochlear implantation of children with minimal open-set speech recognition skills. Ear & Hearing, 18(3): 240–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwolan TA, Ashbaugh CM, Alarfaj A, Kileny P, Arts HA, El-Kashlan HK, Telain HA 2004. Pediatric cochlear implant patient performance as a function of age at implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 25: 112–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar