1,313
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue Article

Phenomenology and physiotherapy: meaning in research and practice

&
Pages 398-408 | Published online: 12 Nov 2013

References

  • McWilliam CL. The theoretical basis of phenomenology. In: , Bourgeault I, Dingwall R, de Vries R, editors. SAGE handbook of qualitative methods in health research. London: Sage; 2010. p. 229–48.
  • Shepard KF, Jensen G, Schmoll BJ, Hack L, Gwyer J. Alternative approaches to research in physical therapy — positivism and phenomenology. Phys Ther. 1993;73:88–97.
  • Higgs J, Horsefall D, Grace S. Writing qualitative research on practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2009.
  • Moustakas C. Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1994.
  • Edward IA, Richardson B. Clinical reasoning and population health: decision making for an emerging paradigm of health care. Physiother Theor Pract. 2008;24:183–93.
  • Nichols D, Gibson B. The body and physiotherapy. Physiother Theor Pract. 2010;26:497–509.
  • Shaw JA, Connelly DM, Zecevic A. Pragmatism in practice: mixed methods research for physiotherapy. Physiother Theor Pract. 2010;26:510–8.
  • van Manen M. Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, Ont.: Althouse Press; 1990.
  • Dowling M. From Husserl to van Manen: a review of different phenomenological approaches. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;44:131–42.
  • Ajjawi R, Higgs J. Using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate how experienced practitioners learn to communicate clinical reasoning. Qual Rep. 2008;12:612–38.
  • Crotty M. Phenomenology and nursing research. Chicago, IL: Churchill-Livingston; 1996.
  • Denzin N, Lincoln Y. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Vol. 4. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2011.
  • Caelli K. Engaging with phenomenology: is it more of a challenge than it needs to be? Qual Health Res. 2001;11:273–81.
  • Holloway I, Todres LS. The status of method: flexibility, consistency, and coherence. Qual Res. 2003;3:345–57.
  • Paley J. Phenomenology as rhetoric. Nurs Inq. 2005;12:106–16.
  • Lawler J. Phenomenologies as research methodologies for nursing: from philosophy to researching practice. Nurs Inq. 1998;5:104–11.
  • Darbyshire P, Diekelmann J, Diekelmann N. Reading Heidegger and interpretive phenomenology: a response to the work of Michael Crotty. Nurs Inq. 2001;6:17–25.
  • Small R. A hundred years of phenomenology: perspectives on a philosophical tradition. London: Ashgate; 2001.
  • Schutz A, Luckmann T. The structures of the lifeworld. Vol. 1. Chicago, IL: Northwestern University Press; 1973.
  • Crotty M. The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage; 2003.
  • Merlerau-Ponty M. The phenomenology of perception. New York: Routledge; 1958.
  • Wilding C, Whiteford G. Phenomenological research: an exploration of conceptual, theoretical, and practical issues. OTJR. 2005;25:98–107.
  • Sartre J. The transcendence of the ego. New York: Hill and Wang; 1960.
  • Hediegger M. Being and time. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 1996.
  • Seifert J. Back to the things themselves: a phenomenological foundation for classical realism. New York: Routledge; 1997.
  • Flynn T. Existentialism: a brief insight. New York: Sterling; 2006.
  • Lopez KA, Willis DG. Descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology: their contributions to nursing knowledge. Qual Health Res. 2004;14:726–735.
  • Giorgi A. The phenomenological movement and research in the human sciences. Nurs Sci Q. 2005;18:75–82.
  • Therkleson T. Ginger compress therapy for older adults with osteoarthritis. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66: 2225–33.
  • Primozic D. On Merleau-Ponty. New York: Wadsworth/Thomson; 2001.
  • Moran D. Introduction to phenomenology. New York: Psychology Press; 2000.
  • Mackey S. Phenomenological nursing research: methodological insights derived from Heidegger’s interpretive phenomenology. Int J Nurs Stud. 2005;42:179–86.
  • Hoy D. Heidegger and the hermeneutic turn. In: , Guignon J, ed, editor. The Cambridge companion to Heidegger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993, 170–194.
  • Rorty R. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1979.
  • Derrida J. Of grammatology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1974.
  • Johnson M. Heidegger and meaning: implications for phenomenological research. Nurs Philos. 2000;1:134–46.
  • Papadimitriou C, Stone DA. Addressing existential disruption in traumatic spinal cord injury: a new approach to human temporality in inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:2121–33.
  • Waldenfels B. The central role of the body in Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology. J Br Soc Phenom. 2008;39:76–88.
  • Dastur F. The question of the other in French phenomenology. Cont Philos Rev. 2011;44:165–78.
  • Ricoeur P. The conflict of interpretation. London: Athlone Press; 1989.
  • Nicholls DA, Gibson BE. The body and physiotherapy. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010;26:497–509.
  • Oien AM, Raheim M, Iversen S, Steihaug S. Self-perception as embodied knowledge — changing process for patients with chronic pain. Adv Physiother. 2009;11:121–9.
  • Bullington J. Embodiment and chronic pain: Implications for rehabilitation practice. Health Care Anal. 2009;17:100–9.
  • Thomas S. Through the lens of Merleau-Ponty: advancing the phenomenological approach to nursing research. Nurs Philos. 2005;6:63–76.
  • Embree L. Notes on the specification of ‘meaning’ in Schutz. Hum Stud. 1991;14:207–18.
  • Peritore P. Problems in Alfred Schutz’s phenomenological methodology. Am Polit Sci Rev. 1975;69:132–40.
  • Berger PL, Luckmann T. The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Double Day; 1966.
  • Brown PR. The phenomenology of trust: a Schutzian analysis of the social construction of knowledge by gynecology patients. Health Risk Soc. 2009;11:391–407.
  • Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Method. 2006;5:1–11.
  • van Manen M. Phenomenology of practice. Phenom Pract. 2007;1:11–30.
  • van Manen M. Phenomenological pedagogy and the question of meaning. In: , Vandenburg D, ed, editor. Phenomenology and educational discourse. Durban: Heinneman Higher and Further Education; 1996. p. 39–64.
  • van Manen M. Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curric Inq. 1977;6:205–28.
  • van Manen M. Writing qualitatively, or the demands of writing. Qual Health Res. 2006;16:713–22.
  • van Manen M. Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London: Althouse Press; 1990.
  • Barkway P. Michael Crotty and nursing phenomenology: criticism or critique? Nurs Inq. 2001;8:191–5.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.