Reimplantation with a conventional length electrode following residual hearing loss in four hybrid implant recipients

References

• Adunka O., Kiefer J., Unkelbach M.H., Radeloff A., Gstoettner W. 2005. Evaluating cochlear implant trauma to the scala vestibuli. Clinical Otolaryngology, 30: 121–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BKB-SIN User Manual. Etymotic Available from: http://www.etymotic.com/pdf/bkbsin-user-manual.pdf [accessed 2010 Dec 16].
   Google Scholar
• Cervera-Paz F.J., Linthicum F.H.. 2005. Cochlear wall erosion after cochlear implantation. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 114: 543–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark G.M., Shute S.A., Shepherd R.K., Carter T.D. 1995. Cochlear implantation: osteoneogenesis, electrode-tissue impedance, and residual hearing. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 166: 40–42.
   Google Scholar
• Eshraghi A.A., Van de Water T.R. 2006. Cochlear implantation trauma and noise-induced hearing loss: apoptosis and therapeutic strategies. The Anatomical Record, 288: 473–481.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald M.B., Sagi E., Jackson M., Shapiro W.H., Roland J.T., Waltzman S.B., Svirsky M.A. 2008. Reimplantation of hybrid cochlear implant users with a full-length electrode after loss of residual hearing. Otology and Neurotology, 29: 168–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gani M., Valentini G., Sigrist A., Kos M.I., Boex C. 2007. Implications of deep electrode insertion on cochlear implant fitting. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 8: 69–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz B.J., Hansen M.R., Turner C.W., Oleson J.J., Reiss L.A., Parkinson A.J. 2009. Hybrid 10 clinical trial: preliminary results. Audiology and Neuro-otology, 14 (Suppl 1): 32–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz B.J., Turner C.W. 2003. Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. The Laryngoscope, 113: 1726–1730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz B.J., Turner C. 2004. Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant. Acta Oto-laryngologica, 124: 344–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz B.J., Turner C., Gfeller K.E., Lowder M.W. 2005. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. The Laryngoscope, 115: 796–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller K.E., Olszewski C., Turner C., Gantz B., Oleson J. 2006. Music perception with cochlear implants and residual hearing. Audiology and Neuro-otology, 11 (Suppl 1): 12–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford R.H., Dorman M.F., Shallop J.K., Sydlowski S.A. 2010. Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy. Ear and Hearing, 31: 186–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gstoettner W., Kiefer J., Baumgartner W.D., Pok S., Peters S., Adunka O. 2004. Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation. Acta Oto-laryngologica, 124: 348–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James C., Albegger K., Battmer R., Burdo S., Deggouj N., Deguine O., Dillier N., Gersdorff M., Lasig R., Lenarz T., Rodriguez M.M., Mondain M., Offeciers E., Macias A.R., Ramsden R., Sterkers O., Von Wallenberg E., Weber B., Fraysse B. 2005. Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why. Acta Oto-laryngologica, 125: 481–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawano A., Seldon H.L., Clark G.M., Ramsden R.T., Raine C.H. 1998. Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta Oto-laryngologica, 118: 313–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson P.B., Jin S.H., Carney A.E., Nelson D.A. 2003. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113: 961–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin M.K., Oxenham A.J. 2003. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114: 446–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland P.S., Wright C.G. 2006. Surgical aspects of cochlear implantation: mechanisms of insertional trauma. Advances in Oto-rhino-laryngology, 64: 11–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubinstein J.T., Parkinson W.S., Tyler R.S., Gantz B. 1999. Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. The American Journal of Otology, 20: 445–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Somdas M.A., Li P.M., Whiten D.M., Eddington D.K., Nadol J.B. 2007. Quantitative evaluation of new bone and fibrous tissue in the cochlea following cochlear implantation in the human. Audiology & Neuro-otology, 12: 277–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoendlin H. 1984. Factors inducing retrograde degeneration of the cochlear nerve. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 112: 76–82.
   Google Scholar
• Sugawara M., Corfas G., Liberman M.C. 2005. Influence of supporting cells on neuronal degeneration after hair cell loss. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 6: 136–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton A.R., Raffin M.J. 1978. Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21: 507–518.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner C.W., Gantz B.J., Vidal C., Behrens A., Henry B.A. 2004. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115: 1729–1735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar