Exploring views on current and future cochlear implant service delivery: the perspectives of users, parents and professionals at cochlear implant centres and in the community

References

• Archbold, S., O'Donoghue, G.M. 2007. Ensuring the long-term use of cochlear implants in children: the importance of engaging local resources and expertise. Ear & Hearing, 28(2): 3S–6S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archbold, S., Robinson, K. 1997. A European perspective on pediatric cochlear implantation, rehabilitation services, and their educational implications. American Journal of Otology, 18(6): S75–S78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Archbold, S., Sach, T., O'Neill, C., Lutman, M., Gregory, S. 2008. Outcomes from cochlear implantation for child and family: parental perspectives. Deafness and Education International, 10(3): 120–142.
   Google Scholar
• Athalye, S., Mulla, I., Archbold, S. 2014. The experiences of adults assessed for cochlear implantation who did not proceed. Cochlear Implants International, 15(6): 301–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Backous, D., Watson, S.W., Resquer-Burnham. 2005. Improved cochlear implant care and enhanced center viability using the principles from the Toyota production system. Paper presented at 5th Asia Pacific Symp. on Cochlear Implant and Related Sciences, Hong Kong, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, G.R., Summerfield, A.Q. 2004. Criteria for candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults II: cost-effectiveness analysis. Ear & Hearing, 25(25): 336–360.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, K.J., Fleming, A.M., Todd, K. 2012. Service delivery for children and adults with cochlear implants in the 21st century: telepractice. Cochlear Implant Online. http://cochlearimplantonline.com/site/service-delivery-for-children-and-adults- with-cochlear-implants-in-the-21st-century-telepractice/.
   Google Scholar
• Calman, K.C. 2004. Evolutionary ethics: can values change? Journal of Medical Ethics, 30: 366–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, A.K., Rubin, H.R., Powe, N.R., Mellon, N.K., Francis, H.W., Niparko, J.K. 2000. Cost-utility analysis of the cochlear implant in children. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(7): 850–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, J.B., Leigh, I.W. 2004. Children with cochlear implants: changing parent and deaf community perspectives. Arch Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery, 130(5): 673–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CRIDE report 2013. Accessed online at ndcs.org.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, S.E., Eyles, J. 2006. A review of service delivery at South of England Cochlear Implant Centre 1990–2005. At 8th European Symp. on Pediatric Cochlear Implantation, Venice, Italy, 25–28 Mar 2006.
   Google Scholar
• De Raeve, L., Wouters, A. 2013. Accessibility to cochlear implants in Belgium: state of the art on selection, reimbursement, habilitation, and outcomes in children and adults. Cochlear Implants International, 14(S1): S19–S25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Raeve, L., Baerts, J., Colleye, E., Croux, E. 2012. Changing schools for the deaf: updating the educational settings for our deaf children in the 21st century, a big challenge. Deafness and Educational International. 14, no 1.
   Google Scholar
• English, K. 2008. Counseling issues in the delivery of aural rehabilitation services. Contemporary Issues in Communication Sciences and Disorders, 35, 93–101.
   Google Scholar
• English, K., Kasewurm, G. 2012. Audiology and patient trust. Audiology Today, 24(2): 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, V., Carter, S., Cribb, A., McCaffery, K. 2010. Supporting patient autonomy: the importance of clinician–patient relationships. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(7): 741–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forzley, B., Chen, J., Nedzelski, J., Lin, V., Shipp, D., Godlovitch, G., Hebert, P., Hochman, J. 2013. Bilateral sequential adult cochlear implantation: who should receive priority in the context of a constrained health care system? Laryngoscope, 123(12): 3137–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielides, A., Psarros, C., McCarthy, M. 2014. The role of telepractice in cochlear implantation candidacy and habilitation. Paper presented at Hearing Across the Lifespan Conf. June 5–7, Como.
   Google Scholar
• Geers, A., Moog, J. 1995. Impact of cochlear implants on the educational setting. In: Uziel A., Mondain, M., eds. Cochlear Implants in Children. Basel: Karger.
   Google Scholar
• German guidelines 2012. Guidelines published on behalf of the Board of the German Society for oto-rhino-laryngology. Head and Neck Surgery (http://www.acir.de/ADANO_ci_leitlinie.pdf, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Green, J., Thorogood, N. 2004. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grennes, C., Hickson, L., Laplante-Levesque, A., Davidson, B. 2014a. Patient cantered care: a review for rehabilitative audiologists. International Journal of Audiology, 53: S60–S67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, M., Inadera, H. 2011. Present situation and future perspectives on newborn hearing screening system in Japan. Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi, 66(4): 696–703.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamb, B., Archbold, A. 2013. Adult cochlear implantation: Evidence and experience. Report for the case for a review of provision by The Ear Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J., Raine, C.H. 2013. Quality standards for cochlear implantation in children and young adults. Cochlear Implants International, 14(S2): S13–S20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• , NDCS reportWheeler, A., Archbold, S., 2009. Children with cochlear implants: what do they need and what do they get? http://www.ndcs.org.uk/document.rm?id=4837.
   Google Scholar
• NICE Health Technology Appraisal 2009. Cochlear implants for deafness and in adults. BAA and BCIG-ENT UK (joint report).
   Google Scholar
• Olds, J., Fitzpatrick, E.M., Seguin, C., Moran, L., Whittingham, J., Schramm, D. 2014. Perspectives of young people and their parents in the transition of cochlear implant services: implications for improved service delivery. Cochlear Implants International, 15(1): 2–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parisier, S.C. 2003. Cochlear implants: growing pains. Laryngoscope, 113(9): 1470–1472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piazza, E., Kandathil, C., Carron, J.D. 2009. Parental expectations and outcomes of pediatric cochlear implantation. Journal of Mississippi State Medical Association, 50(10): 331–336.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Punch, R., Hyde, M.B. 2011. Communication, psychosocial, and educational outcomes of children with cochlear implants and challenges remaining for professionals and parents. International Journal of Otolaryngology, 2011(2011): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Raine, C. 2013. Cochlear implants in United Kingdom: Awareness and utilization. Cochlear Implants International, 14(S1): 32–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramos, A., Rodriguez, C., Martinez-Beneyto, P., Perez, D., Gault, A., Falcon, J.C., Boyle, P. 2009. Use of telemedicine in the remote programming of cochlear implants. Acta Otolaryngogica, 129(5): 533–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sach, T.H., Whynes, D.K. 2005. Paediatric cochlear implantation: the views of parents. International Journal of Audiology, (44): 400–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorkin, D.L. 2013. Cochlear implantation in the world's largest medical device market: Utilization and awareness of cochlear implants in the United States. Cochlear Implants International, 14(S1): 4–12.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, M., Brown, J., Freeman, T. 2003. Patient-centered medicine: Transforming the clinical method. Abington, UK: Radcliffe Medical Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turchetti, G., Bellelli, S., Palla, I., Forli, F. 2011. Systematic review of the scientific literature on economic evaluation of cochlear implants in paediatric patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngology Ital, 31(5): 311–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner-Czyz, A.D., Loy, B., Tobey, E.A., Nakonezny, P., Roland, P.S. 2011. Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents who use cochlear implants. International Journal of Pediatrics Otorhinolaryngology, 75(1): 95–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar