The relative effectiveness of segment specific level and non-specific level spinal joint mobilization on pain and range of motion: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Allison G, Edmonston S, Kiviniemi K, Lanigan H, Simonsen AV, Walcher S. Influence of standardized mobilization on the posteroanterior stiffness of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. Physiother Res Int. 2001;6:145–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Powers CM, Kulig K, Harrison J, Bergman G. Segmental mobility of the lumbar spine during a posterior to anterior mobilization: assessment using dynamic MRI. Clin Biomech. 2003;18:80–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott JH, McCane B, Herbison P, Moginie G, Chapple C, Hogarty T. Lumbar segmental instability: a criterion-related validity study of manual therapy assessment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005;6:56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys BK, Delahaye M, Peterson CK. An investigation into the validity of cervical spine motion palpation using subjects with congenital block vertebrae as a ‘gold standard’. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004;5:19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulig K, Powers CM, Landel RF, Chen H, Fredericson M, Guillet M, et al. Segmental lumbar mobility in individuals with low back pain: in vivo assessment during manual and self-imposed motion using dynamic MRI. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott JH, Fritz JM, McCane B, Shultz B, Herbison P, Lyons B, et al. Lumbar segmental mobility disorders: comparison of two methods of defining abnormal displacement kinematics in a cohort of patients with non-specific mechanical low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jull G, Treleavan J, Versace G. Manual examination of spinal joints: is pain provocation a major diagnostic cue for dysfunction? Aust J Physiother. 1994;40:159–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jull G, Zito G, Trott P, Potter H, Shirley D. Inter-examiner reliability to detect painful upper cervical joint dysfunction. Aust J Physiother. 1997;43:125–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gross AR, Goldsmith C, Hoving JL, Haines T, Peloso P, Aker P, et al. Conservative management of mechanical neck disorders: a systematic review. J Rheumatol. 2007;34:1083–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluka K, Skyba K, Radhakrishnan R, Lepper B, Wright A. Joint mobilization reduces hyperalgesia associated with chronic muscle and joint inflammation in rats. J Pain. 2006;7:602–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss P, Sluka K, Wright A. The initial effects of knee joint mobilization on osteoarthric hyperalgesia. Man Ther. 2007;12:109–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid A, Brunner F, Wright A, Bachmann LM. Paradigm shift in manual therapy? Evidence for a central nervous system component in the response to passive cervical joint mobilisation. Man Ther. 2008;13:387–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon H, Humphreys BK. Chronic mechanical neck pain in adults treated by manual therapy: a systematic review of change scores in randomized controlled trials of a single session. J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16:E42–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanlayanaphotporn R, Chiradejnant A, Vachalathiti R. Immediate effects of the central posteroanterior mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:622–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegedus E, Slaven E, Goode A, Butler R. The neurophysiological effects of a single session of spinal joint mobilization: does the effect last? J Man Manip Ther. 2011;19:143–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gross A, Miller J, D’Sylva J, Burnie SJ, Goldsmith CH, Graham N, et al. Manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain: a Cochrane Review. Man Ther. 2010;15:315–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlan AD, Pennick V, Bombardier C, van Tulder M. 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine. 2009;34:1929–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings P. Meta-analysis based on standardized effects is unreliable. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:595–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenland S, Schlesselman JJ, Criqui MH. The fallacy of employing standardized regression coefficients and correlations as measures of effect. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;123:203–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland S, Maclure M, Schlesselman JJ, Poole C, Morgenstern H. Standardized regression coefficients: a further critique and review of some alternatives. Epidemiology. 1991;2:387–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdgate A, Asha S, Craig J, Thompson J. Comparison of a verbal numeric rating scale with the visual analogue scale for the measurement of acute pain. Emerg Med. 2003;15:441–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartrick CT, Kovan JP, Shapiro S. The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure? Pain Pract. 2003;3:310–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poole C. Low P-values or narrow confidence intervals: which are more durable? Epidemiology. 2001;12:291–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:1119–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins J, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions The Cochrane Collaboration 2011; No. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Thompson SG, Sharp SJ. Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods. Stat Med. 1999;18:2693–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanrahan S, van Lunen BL, Tamburello M, Walker ML. The Short-term effects of joint mobilizations on acute mechanical low back dysfunction in collegiate athletes. J Athl Train. 2005;40:88–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodsell M, Lee M, Latimer J. Short-term effects of lumbar posteroanterior mobilization in individuals with low-back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23:332–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaver AM, Maher CG, Herbert RD, Latimer J, McAuley JH, Jull G, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing manipulation with mobilization for recent onset neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:1313–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bautmans I, van Arken J, van Mackelenberg M, Mets T. Rehabilitation using manual mobilization for thoracic kyphosis in elderly postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:129–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoving JL, Koes BW, de Vet HC, et al. Manual therapy, physical therapy, or continued care by a general practitioner for patients with neck pain. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:713–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korthals-de Bos IB, Hoving JL, van Tulder MW, van der Windt DA, Assendelft WJ, van Mameren H, et al. Cost effectiveness of physiotherapy, manual therapy, and general practitioner care for neck pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2003;326:911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa LO, Maher CG, Latimer J. Re: Goldby LJ, Moore AP, Doust J, et al. A randomized control trial investigating the efficiency of musculoskeletal physiotherapy on chronic back pain disorder. Spine. 2006;31:1083–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Segura R, Fernandez-de-las-Penas C, Ruiz-Saez M, Lopez-Jimenez C, Rodriguez-Blanco C. Immediate effects on neck pain and active range of motion after a single cervical high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation in subjects presenting with mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006;29:511–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groeneweg R, Kropman H, Leopold H, van Assen L, Mulder J, van Tulder MW, et al. The effectiveness and cost-evaluation of manual therapy and physical therapy in patients with sub-acute and chronic non specific neck pain. Rationale and design of a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanlayanaphotporn R, Chiradejnant A, Vachalathiti R. The immediate effects of mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients presenting with unilateral neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:187–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppieters MW, Stappaerts KH, Wouters LL, Janssens K. The immediate effects of a cervical lateral glide treatment technique in patients with neurogenic cervicobrachial pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33:369–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiradejnant A, Maher CG, Latimer J, Stepkovitch N. Efficacy of ‘therapist-selected’ versus ‘randomly selected’ mobilisation techniques for the treatment of low back pain: a randomised controlled trial. Aust J Physiother. 2003;49:233–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquino RL, Caires PM, Furtado FC, Loureiro AV, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML. Applying joint mobilization at different cervical vertebral levels does not influence immediate pain reduction in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17:95–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schomacher J. The effect of an analgesic mobilization technique when applied at symptomatic or asymptomatic levels of the cervical spine in subjects with neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17:101–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sterling M, Pedler A, Chan C, Puglisi M, Vuvan V, Vicenzino B. Cervical lateral glide increases nociceptive flexion reflex threshold but not pressure or thermal pain thresholds in chronic whiplash associated disorders: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Man Ther. 2010;15:149–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiradejnant A, Latimer J, Maher C, Stepkovitch N. Does the choice of spinal level treated during posteroanterior (PA) mobilisation affect treatment outcome? Physiother Theory Pract. 2002;18:165–74.
   Google Scholar
• Powers CM, Beneck GJ, Kulig K, Landel RF, Fredericson M. Effects of a single session of posterior-to-anterior spinal mobilization and press-up exercise on pain response and lumbar spine extension in people with nonspecific low back pain. Phys Ther. 2008;88:485–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H, Harber P, Kominski GF, Yu F, Adams AH. A randomized trial of chiropractic manipulation and mobilization for patients with neck pain: clinical outcomes from the UCLA neck-pain study. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:1634–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialosky JE, Bishop MD, Price DD, Robinson ME, George SZ. The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model. Man Ther. 2009;14:531–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialosky JE, Bishop MD, Price DD, Robinson ME, Vincent KR, George SZ. A randomized sham-controlled trial of a neurodynamic technique in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39:709–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop M, Beneciuk J, George S. Immediate reduction in temporal sensory summation after thoracic spinal manipulation. Spine J. 2011;11:440–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George S, Bishop M, Bialosky J, Zeppieri G, Robinson M. Immediate effects of spinal manipulation on thermal pain sensitivity: an experimental study. BMC. 2006;7:68.
   Google Scholar
• Bialosky J, Bishop M, Robinson M, Zeppieri G, George S. Spinal manipulative therapy has an immediate effect on thermal pain sensitivity in people with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2006;89:1292–303.
   Google Scholar