Quantifying Quality: A Review and Scale Proposal

References

• Cockson A: Stereology, histopathology and the technologist. J Histotechnol 9:9–12, 1986
   Google Scholar
• Adams EJ, Green JA, Clark AH, Youngston JH: Comparison of different scoring systems for immunohistochemical stain-ing. J Clin Pathol 52:75–77, 1999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buesa RJ: Mineral oil: the best xylene substitute for tissue processing yet? J Histotechnol 23:143–149, 2000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jong Jde, Nap M, Merz WE, Leunissen JE, Eiger W: Direct gold-silver method for HCG binding to specific tissue struc-ture. j Histotechnol 15:275–281, 1992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goss G, Petras RE, Perkins A, Miller M: Effects of refixation and reprocessing on the quality of slides prepared from par-affin embedded tissues. j Histotechnol 15:43–47, 1992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbuhl MF, Mendelsohn G: A simple technique for the use of radioimmunoassay antisera in immunohistochemical proce-dures. J Histotechnol 9:17–19, 1986
   Google Scholar
• Miura M, Endoh M, Nomoto Y, Sakai H. Rapid immunoflu-orescence staining by microwave incubation in patients with IgA nephropathy. J Histotechnol 13:175–179, 1990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu K-Y: Comparison of the effects of fixatives on the de-tection of lymphoid surface markers in paraffin embedded tissues. J Histotechnol 12:15–18, 1989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dankner WM, Spector SA: Detection of human cytomegalo-virus by immunogold and silver enhancement. J Histotechnol 12:9–13, 1989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bella JL, Gosälvez J: C-banding with specific fluorescent DNA-ligands: a new approach to constitutive heterochromatin heterogeneity. Biotech & Histochem 66:44–52, 1991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brundrett MC, Kendrick B, Peterson CA: Efficient lipid stain-ing in plant material with Sudan Red 7B or Fluoral Yellow 088 in polyethylene glycol-glycerol. Biotech Histochem 66: 111–116, 1991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoon V, Thung SN, Choi H-SH, Unger P: Immunohistochem-ical evaluation of intermediate filaments in testicular sex-cord stromal tumors and non-neoplastic testes. J Histotechnol 17: 119–123, 1994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saby JA, Sigler RE, Stever K: Comparison of fixatives for histologic evaluation of the canine eye. J Histotechnol 14: 251–255, 1991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias JM, Cartun RA, England DM, Hayes S, Hogenson CM, Hyder DM, Leong AS-Y, Maliniak RM, Martin AW: Inter-laboratory comparison of estrogen receptor analysis in paraf-fin sections by a monoclonal antibody to Estrophilin (H222). J Histotechnol 16:57–63, 1993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll B, Jelveh Z: Antigen recovery for vimentin immuno-staining by reducing agents for two cases of spindle cell tu-mors. J Histotechnol 21:45–48, 1998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warmington AR, Wilkinson JM, Riley CB: Evaluation of ethanol-based fixatives as a solution for formalin in diagnostic clinical laboratories. J Histotechnol 23:299–308, 2000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemire TD, Duffy JC: Microwave irradiated canine and feline tissues. j Histotechnol 23:123–131, 2000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand NH, Church RJ: Superheating using pressure cooking: its use and application in unmasking antigens embedded in methyl metacrylate. J Histotechnol 21:231–236, 1998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo-rong S, Au S, Soriano R, Zhao J-X, Sweet WL: Non-biotin amplification (NBA) kit prevents nonspecific back-ground staining of endogenous biotin induced by heat induced epitope retrieval (HIER) procedure. J Histotechnol 23:327–331, 2000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornbeck C, Emmanual J, Bloebaum RD: A comparative study of three paraffin media for preparing large decalcified bone sections. J Histotechnol 9:227–229, 1986
   Google Scholar
• Moll UM, Fromowitz FB: Immunoperoxidase staining for Leu 14 antigen identifies thymic B lymphocyte follicular hyper-plasia in myasthenia gravis. J Histotechnol 10:43–45, 1987
   Google Scholar
• Christensen L, Strange L: Universal immunoperoxiclase stain-ing protocol to optimize the use of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. J Histotechnol 10:11–15, 1987
   Google Scholar
• Slattery AF, England DM: Estrogen and progesterone receptor proteins in zinc sulfate, formalin fixed breast carcinoma: ad-vantages of a supersensitive streptavidin technique. J Histo-technol 16:51–56, 1993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutilier L, Stratis M, Bailey D, McGirr D, Wahid S: A com-parison of simple two steps immunoalkaline phosphatase tech-nique with the peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) and avidin biotin complex (ABC) technique. j Histotechnol 12:279–282, 1989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuovo GJ, Margiotta M; Gellery F, Forde A: A comparison of sub genomic DNA probes for detection and typing of human papilloma virus by in situ hybridization. J Histotechnol 18: 105–110, 1995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecke D van: Sequential immunohistochemical double-staining using Envision polymer technology. J Histotechnol 24:107–111, 2001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovic O: Sensitive immunocytochemical method for iden-tification of estrogen receptor positive subpopulations of breast cancer cells. j Histotechnol 14:19–25, 1991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtrasburg S, Gal R, Pras M: Crush and smear technique for rapid detection and semiquantitation of amyloid deposition: Biotech & Histochetn 66:203–207, 1991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromley CM, Palechek PL, Benda JA: Preservation of strogen receptor in paraffin sections. J Histotechnol 17:115–118, 1994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montone KT, Tomaszewski JE: In situ hybridization protocol for overall preservation of mRNA in fixed tissues with a poly d(T) oligonucleotide probe. J Histotechnol 16:315–322, 1993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank JD, McKelvey TW, Kraynak AR, Hertzog PR, Storer RD: Detection of apoptosis, p53, and Bax protein expression in various tissues of neonatal and adult rats after exposure to gamma irradiation or aflatoxin B1 j Histotechnol 23:11–19, 2000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson NE, Gu J, Ianuzzo CD: Detection of myosin heavy chain in skeletal muscles using monoclonal antibodies on for-malin fixed, paraffin embedded tissue sections. J Histotechnol 21:19–24, 1998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendricks JB, Stephen CA, Wilkinson EJ, Szekeres G: Estro-gen receptor specific (ER1D5) epitope stability in paraffin sections. J Histotechnol 19:23–25, 1996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd JM, Cerezo L: A comparison of stainable iron in thick bone marrow aspirate smears and decalcified biopsy speci-mens. Lab Medicine 19:493–496, 1988
   Google Scholar
• Sharma HM, Kauffman EM, McGaughy VR: Improved im7 munoperoxidase staining using microwave slide drying. Lab Med 21:658–659, 1990
   Google Scholar
• Hsi ED: A practical approach for evaluating new antibodies in the clinical immunohistochemistry laboratory. J Histotechnol 24:275–281, 2001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrosyan K, Tarnayo R, Joseph D: Sensitivity of a novel biotin-free detection reagent (Powervision +TM) for immuno-histochemistry. J Histotechnol 25:247–250, 2002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarris M, Scolyer R, Konopka M, Thompson J, Harper CO, Lee CS: NM23 cytoplasmic expression is reduced in primary cutaneous melanomas with cerebral metastases. J Histotech-nol 25:169–170, 2002
   Google Scholar
• Genty CE: Technical standardization of prognostic factors in breast cancer. ASCP Fall 2001 Teleconference Series Program 2099, 12 Oct. /2001; pp 17
   Google Scholar
• Elias JM: A Phoenix arisen-estrogen receptor immunohisto-chemistry. J Histotechnol 20:7–10, 1997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DakoCytomation: DAKO Herceptest. A manual for interpretation. DakoCytonzation, Carpinteria CA, DAKO, 1999, pp 21
   Google Scholar
• National Public Radio Network: NASA sniffing scale WLRN South Florida 13 MAR/04 (9:30 AM)
   Google Scholar
• Andre GG, Wenger JB, Rebolloso D, Arrington JB, Mehm WJ: Evaluation of clearing and infiltration mixtures (CIMs) as xylene substitutes for tissue processing. J Histotechnol 17: 137–142, 1994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg SR: The comparative histologic application of Phorwite fabric brighteners. J Histotechnol 12:43–45, 1989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAP: Immunohistochemistry Survey MK-B 2001: kit instructions, Marc, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Wynnchuk M: Minimizing artifacts in tissue processing: Part 1. Importance of softening agents. J Histotechnol 15:321–323, 1992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynnchuk M: Evaluation of xylene substitutes for paraffin tissue processing. J Histotechnol 17:143–149, 1994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele A, Uckan D, Chamizo W, Ferre P, Thomas B, Edwards T, Steele P, Koutsonikolis A, Good RA: An optimized immu-nohistochemical protocol for both manual and automated staining of formalin fixed, paraffin embedded human placenta for demonstration and analyses of FAS, FAS-L, and BCL-2. J Histotechnol 21:285–293, 1998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandavilli SR, Cartun RW, Ricci Jr A, Tsongalis GJ: Immu-nohistochemical evaluation of genetic and epigenetic factors in primary breast cancers. J Histotechnol 20:27–30, 1997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teter KP, Holloway DC, Sandusky GE: Assessment of PCNA (19A2) and Ki-67 (MIB1) cell proliferation markers in for-malin fixed tissues. J Histotechnol 18:99–104, 1995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkeholm L, Grant CA, Magnusson A, Mier E: Xylene-free method for histological preparation: a multicentre evaluation. Lab Invest 81:1213–1221, 2001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sompuram SR, McMahon D, Vani K, Ramamthan H, Bogen S: A novel microscope slide adhesive for poorly adherent tissue sections J Histotechnol 26:117–123, 2003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallidis C, Volpe V, Ostör A, Lopata A, Gordon Baker HW: Fixation and staining of testicular tissue. J Histotechnol 17: 111–114, 1994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond MEH: HercepTest techniques and procedures. ASCP Fall 2000 Tleconferences Series, Program No 2082 (10/29/2000) pp 12
   Google Scholar
• Murphy TM: The effects of a crowded workplace on morale and productivity. J Histotechnol 24:9–15, 2001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villanueva AR: Experimental studies in demineralization and its effects on cytology and staining of bone marrow cells. J Histotechnol 9:155–161, 1986
   Google Scholar
• Luna LG: The quality control dilemma in histotechnology: a possible answer. Histo-Logic 21:245–250, 1991
   Google Scholar
• Buesa RJ: Phosphotungstic acid eliminates uranyl nitrate as a sensitizer before the silver impregnation of Helicobacter py-lori. J Histotechnol 24:113–116, 2001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias JM, Heimam A, Cain T, Margiotta M, Gallery F, Gomes A: Estrogen receptor localization in paraffin sections by en-zyme digestion, repeated applications of primary antibody, and imidazole. J Histotechnol 13:29–33, 1990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyn JA, Whitaker BP, Hladik CL, Robinson RJ, Joie JB, Stigliano WW, Carson FL: Zinc isopropyl alcoholic un-buffered formalin as postfixative for routine surgical pathol-ogy specimens. J Histotechnol 17:105–109, 1994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consumers Union: Consumers Report Buying guide for 2005. Consumers Union, Yonkers, NY, 2004, pp 360
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald G, Dillman P, Shirley I: Evaluation of six histo-logical fixatives using image analysis to measure reaction product concentration. J Histotechnol 18:119–125, 1995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendricks JB: Quantitative histology by laser scanning cy-tometry. J Histotechnol 24:59–62, 2001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald G: Carbohydrate retention in routinely processed paraffin sections: comparative study of stat fix, neutral buff-ered formalin, and Gendre fluid. J Histotechnol 15:123-126, 992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James JD, Hauer-Jensen M: Effects of fixative and fixation time for quantitative computerized image analysis of immu-nohistochemical staining. J Histotechnol 22:109–111, 1999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dardik A, Henry EJ, Ballermann BJ: Gelatin increases adher-ence of polyurethane vascular grafts to glass slides. J Histo-technol 21:245–247, 1998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarris M, Lee CS: Increased expression of nm23 protein in colorectal adenocarcinoma. J Histotechnol 23:133–137, 2000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan-Rong S, Cote RJ, Taylor CR: Standardization and fur-ther development of antigen retrieval immunohistochemistry: strategies and future goals. J Histotechnol 22:179–192, 1999
   Google Scholar
• Larsen PA, Bartlett LM, Bozzo PD: Quality improvement monitors for histologic surgical preparations. J Histotechnol 27:141–144, 2004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman GE, Elfont EA: The taming of immunohistochemistry: the new era of quality control. Biotech & Histochem 66: 194–199, 1991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottifora H: Quality assurance issues in immunohistochemistry. J Histotechnol 22:169–175, 1999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar