References
- Thompson WG, Longstreth GF, Drossman DA, . Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gut 1999; 45 (Suppl 2) II43–7
- Sonnenberg A, Koch TR. Epidemiology of constipation in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 1989; 32:1–8
- Tytgat GN, Heading RC, Muller-Lissner S, . Contemporary understanding and management of reflux and constipation in the general population and pregnancy: a consensus meeting. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 18:291–301
- Higgins PD, Johanson JF. Epidemiology of constipation in North America: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99:750–9
- Rao SS. Constipation: evaluation and treatment. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2003; 32:659–83
- Koch A, Voderholzer WA, Klauser AG, Muller-Lissner S. Symptoms in chronic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40:902–6
- Prather CM, Ortiz-Camacho CP. Evaluation and treatment of constipation and fecal impaction in adults. Mayo Clin Proc 1998; 73:881–6
- Thomas DR, Forrester L, Gloth MF, . Clinical consensus: the constipation crisis in long-term care. Ann Long-Term Care 2003; 00(Suppl): 3–14
- Schiller LR. Constipation and fecal incontinence in the elderly. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2001; 30:497–515
- Tramonte SM, Brand MB, Mulrow CD, . The treatment of chronic constipation in adults. A systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 1997; 12:15–24
- Muller-Lissner SA, Kamm MA, Scarpignato C, . Myths and misconceptions about chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100:232–42
- The Health Improvement Network (THIN) Database. London: EPIC 2005
- Hammerschmidt T, Zeitler H-P, Gulich M, . A comparison of different strategies to collect standard gamble utilities. Med Decis Making 2004; 24:493–503
- Netten A, Curtis L. Unit costs of health and social care 2005Canterbury: University of Kent, 2005. Personal Social Services Research Unit
- Department of Health. NHS Reference costs 2004/05. Available from http://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidanceArticle/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=4141135&chk=7wrsFg [Last accessed June 2006]
- Drug Tariff. Available from http://www.drugtariff.com [Last accessed June 2006]
- British National Formulary. Available from http://www.bnf.org [Last accessed June 2006]
- Norton C. Constipation in older patients: effects on quality of life. Br J Nurs 2006; 15:188–92
- Johanson JF, Kralstein J. Chronic constipation: a survey of the patient perspective. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 25:599–608
- Department of Health, 2004. Prescription cost analysis England 2004. Available from http://www.dh.gov.uk [Last accessed June 2006]
- Dennison C, Prasad M, Lloyd A, . The health-related quality of life and economic burden of constipation. Pharmacoeconomics 2005; 23:461–76
- Wald A, Scarpignato C, Kamm MA, . Burden of constipation on quality of life: results of a multinational survey. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26:227–36
- Couturier D. Comparative study of Forlax and Transipeg in the treatment of functional constipation in the adult. Ann Gastroenterol Hepatol (Paris) 1996; 32:135–40
- Bouhnik Y, Neut C, Raskine L, . Prospective, randomized, parallel-group trial to evaluate the effects of lactulose and polyethylene glycol-4000 on colonic flora in chronic idiopathic constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 19:889–99
- Bevan G, Hollinghurst S. Cost per quality-adjusted life year and disability-adjusted life years: the need for a new paradigm. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 2003; 3:469–77
- Robberstad B. QALYs vs DALYs vs LYs gained: what are the differences, and what difference do they make for health care priority setting? Norsk Epidemiologi 2005; 15:183–91
- Christie AH, Culbert P, Guest JF. The economic impact of low dose polyethylene glycol 3350 plus electrolytes compared to lactulose in the management of idiopathic constipation in the UK. Pharmacoeconomics 2002; 20:49–60
- Gold MR, Franks P, McCoy KI, . Toward consistency in cost-utility analyses: using national measures to create condition-specific values. Med Care 1998; 36:778–92
- National Institute for Clinical Excellence 2004. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal (reference N0515) 7 May 2004. Available from http://www.nice.org.uk/niceMedia/pdf/TAP_Methods.pdf [Last accessed June 2006]