![ISPOR Europe 2024 – May 5-8. Register now.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112342/JournalAd-ISPOR-2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- Walter G, Rey JM, Soh N, et al. Publishing ethics in child and adolescent psychiatry: Essentials for authors and readers. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2008;17:149-63
- Walter G, Bloch S. Publishing ethics in psychiatry. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 2001;35:28-35
- Garfield E, Welljams-Dorof A. The impact of fraudulent research on the scientific literature. JAMA 1990;263:1424-6
- Sprague RL. The voice of experience. Sci Eng Ethics 1998;4:33-44
- NIMH report. Investigation of alleged scientific misconduct on grants MH-32206 and MH-37449. Final report and summary. April 28, 1987
- Budd JM, Sievert ME, Schultz TR. Phenomena of retraction: reasons for retraction and citations to the publications. JAMA 1998;280:296-7
- Budd JM, Sievert ME, Schultz TR, et al. Effects of article retraction on citation and practice in medicine. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1999;87:437-43
- Redman BK, Yarandi HN, Merz JF. Empirical developments in retraction. J Med Ethics 2008;34:807-9
- Whitely WP, Rennie D, Hafner AW. The scientific community’s response to evidence of fraudulent publication: the Robert Slutsky case. JAMA 1994;272:170-3
- Wysocki T, Fuqua RW. The consequences of a fraudulent scientist on his innocent coinvestigators. JAMA 1990;264:3145
- Garfield E, Welljams-Dorof A. The consequences of a fraudulent scientist on his innocent coinvestigators. JAMA 1990;264:3146
- Kochan CA, Budd JM. The persistence of fraud in the literature: the Darsee case. J Am Soc Inform Sci 1992;43:488-93
- Aman MG. Recent studies in psychopharmacology in mental retardation. In: Bray NW, ed. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation. Elsevier. 1997;21:113-46
- Aman MG, Teehan CJ, White AJ, et al. Haloperidol treatment with chronically medicated residents: dose effects on clinical behavior and reinforcement contingencies. Am J Ment Retard 1989;93:452-60
- Whitaker A, Rao U. Neuroleptics in pediatric psychiatry. Psychiatric Clin N Am 1992;15:243-76
- Neale AV, Northrup J, Dailey R, et al. Correction and use of biomedical literature affected by scientific misconduct. Sci Eng Ethics 2007;13:5-24
- Bornmann L, Nast I, Daniel H-D. Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication. Scientometrics 2008;77:415-32
- Anon/Editorial. The science of retraction. Nature Neurosci 2002;5:1249
- Martinson BC, Anderson MS, de Vries R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 2005;435:737-8
- Atlas MC. Retraction policies of high-impact biomedical journals. J Med Libr Assoc 2004;92:242-50
- Couzin J. … And how the problems eluded peer reviewers and editors. Science 2006;311:23-4
- Campanario JM. Fraud: retracted articles are still being cited [Correspondence]. Nature 2000;408:288
- Gabehart ME. An analysis of citations to retracted articles in the scientific literature [thesis]. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 2005
- Sox HC, Rennie D. Research misconduct, retraction and cleansing the medical literature: Lessons from the Poehlman case. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:609-13
- NIH guide for grants and contracts, 2009. Available at: grants.nih.gov/grants/guide [Last accessed 24 November 2009]
- Council of Science Editors. CSE’s white paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications, 2009. Available at: www.councilscienceeditors.org /editorial_policies/white_paper.cfm [Last accessed 11 November 2009]