Effects of the Direction of Turning on the Timed Up & Go Test with Stroke Subjects

REFERENCES

• Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, Dickson H, Frommelt P, Omar Z, et al. ICF core sets for stroke. I Rehabil Med. 2004;44(Suppl):135–141.
   Google Scholar
• Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR). Clinical Guideline Number 16: Post-stroke rehabilitation. 1995. (Publication No 95–0062). Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=hstat6.chapter.27305. Accessed June 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews AW, Bohannon R. Distribution of muscle strength impairments following stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14:79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Gayton D. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can. 1989;41 (6):304–310.
   Google Scholar
• Dite W, Temple VA. Development of a clinical measure of turning for older adults. Am Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81:857–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias S, Nayak USL, Isaacs B. Balance in elderly patients: the "Get-up and Go Test." Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;67: 387–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinetti ME, Williams TF, Mayewski R. Fall risk index for elderly based on the number of chronic disabilities. Am J Med. 1986;80:429–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming RG, Klineberg RJ. Fall frequency and characteristics and the risk of hip fractures. I Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42:774–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackintosh SF, Hill K, Dodd KJ, Goldie P, Culham E. Falls and injury prevention should be part of every stroke rehabilitation plan. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:441–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramnemark A, Nyberg L, Lorentzon R, Olssoni T, Gustafon Y. Hemiosteoporosis after severe stroke, independent of changes in body composition and weight. Stroke. 1999;30:755–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thigpen M, Light KE, Creel GL, Flynn SM. Turning difficulty characteristics of adults aged 65 years or older. Phys Ther. 2000;80:1174–1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The Timed "Up 61 Go": A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. I Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:142–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, Foley NC, Bitensky J, Bayley M. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:315–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plata AE, Prentice SD, Robinson C, Neufeld J. Visual control of locomotion: strategies for changing direction and for going over obstacles. I Exp Psycho/ Hum Percept Perform. 1991;17:603–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flansbjer U, Holmback AM, Downham D, Patten C, Lexell J. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. Rehabil Med. 2005;37:75–82.
   Google Scholar
• Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW. The timed up & go test: Its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1641–1647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leroux A, Pinet H, Nadeau S. Task-oriented intervention in chronic stroke: changes in clinical and laboratory measures of balance and mobility. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85(10):820–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Physical activity trends - United States, 1990-1998. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50:166–169.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MR Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen WGM, Bussmann HBJ, Stam HJ. Determinants of the sit-to-stand movement: a review. Phys Ther. 2002;82(9):866–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn M, Van Vliet P, Mockett SR Reliability of measures obtained with the Modified Ashworth Scale in the lower extremities of people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2002;82:25–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW. Referencevalues for extremity muscle strength obtained by hand-held dynamometry from adults aged 20 to 79 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:26–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flansbjer U, Downham D, Lexell J. Knee muscle strength, gait performance, and perceived participation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:974–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews AW, Thomas MW, Bohannon RW. Normative values for isometric muscle force measurements obtained with hand-held dynamometers. Phys Ther. 1996;76:248–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olney SJ, Richards C. Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I: Characteristics. Gait Posture. 1996;4(2):136–148.
   Google Scholar
• Yardley L, Beyer N, Hauer K, Kempen G, Piot-Ziegler C, Todd C. Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Age Ageing. 2005;34:614–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zecevic AA, Salmoni AW, Speechley M, Vandervoot AA. Defining a fall and reasons for falling: comparisons among the views of seniors, health care providers, and the research literature. Gerontologist. 2006;46:367–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira-Salmela LF, Nadeau S, McBride I, Olney SJ. Effects of muscle strengthening and physical conditioning training on temporal, kinematic and kinetic variables during gait in chronic stroke survivors. Rehabil Med. 2001;33:53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Tyson SF. Hemiplegic gait symmetry and walking aids. Physiother Theory Pract. 1994;10:153–159.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp SA, Brouwer BJ. Isokinetic strength training of the hemiparetic knee: effects on function and spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78: 123–126.
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman D, Ashburn A, Stack E. Fall events among people with stroke living in the community: circumstances of falls and characteristics of fallers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:165–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellstrom K, Lindmark B, Wahlberg B, Fugl-Meyer AR. Self-efficacy in relation to impairments and activities of daily living disability in elderly patients with stroke: a prospective investigation. I Rehabil Med. 2003;35: 202–207.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen E, Sunnerhagen KS, Kreuter M. Fear of falling, balance, and gait velocity in patients with stroke. Physiother Theory Pract. 2005;21: 113–120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol. 1982;37:122–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman SM, Munoz B, West SB, Rubin GS, Fried LP. Falls and fear of falling: Which comes first? A longitudinal prediction model suggests strategies for primary and secondary prevention. I Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50: 1329–1335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maki BE. Gait changes in older adults: predictors of falls or indicators of fear. I Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:313–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva EB, Teixeira-Salmela L, Faria CDCM, Reis DA, Nadeau S, Saliba VA. Number of trials of functional performance tests in subjects with hemiparesis after stroke: reliability and comparisons. Proceedings of the XVII Semana de Iniciação Cientifica da UFMG, 2008, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeau S, Arsenault AB, Gravel D, Bourbonnais D. Analysis of the clinical factors determining natural and maximal gait speeds in adults with a stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;78:123–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar