Association Between Daily Activities Following Stroke Rehabilitation and Social Role Functioning Upon Return to the Community

REFERENCES

• Elkins JS, Johnston SC. Thirty-year projections for deaths from ischemic stroke in the United States. Stroke. 2003;34:2109–2112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Stroke Network. Canadian leads effort to raise awareness of stroke as a global health epidemic. News release. Available at: http://www.strokeconsortium.ca/000b.docs/2006/PressRelease.World_Stroke_Day.pdf. Accessed November 21,2008.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke P, Marshall V, Black SE, Colantonio A. Well-being after stroke in Canadian seniors: findings from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Stroke. 2002;33:1016–1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Cote R, Durcan L, Carlton J. Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1035–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perenboom RIM, Chorus AMJ. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:577–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P, Cloutier R, Bergeron H, Côte J, St. Michel G. Classification québecoiseProcessus deproduction du handicap. Lac St. Charles, Quebec: RIPPH/SCCIDIH; 1998b.
   Google Scholar
• Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. A patient-centred study of the consequences of stroke. Clin Rehabil. 1998;12:255–264.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ahmed S, et al. Disablement following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21:258–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturm JW, Dewey HM, Donnan GA, Macdonell RAL, McNeil JJ, Thrift AG. Handicap after stroke: how does it relate to disability, perception of recovery, and stroke subtype?: the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke. 2002;33:762–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman-Maeir A, Eliad Y, Kizoni R, Nahaloni I, Kelberman H, Katz N. Evaluation of a long-term community based rehabilitation program for adult stroke survivors. Neurorehabilitation. 2007;22: 295–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley NC, Teasell RW, Bhogal SK, Doherty T, Speechley MR. The efficacy of stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003;10:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, et al. Management of adult stroke rehabilitation care: a clinical practice guideline. Stroke. 2005;36:e100–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker CJ, Gladman JR, Drummond AE. The role of leisure in stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 1997;19:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards LG, Latham NK, Jette DU, Rosenberg L, Smout RJ, Delong G. Characterizing occupational therapy practice in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(Suppl 2):S51–S60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham NK, Jette DU, Coster W, et al. Occupational therapy activities and intervention techniques for clients with stroke in six rehabilitation hospitals. Am I Occup Ther. 2006;60:369–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korner-Bitensky N, Desrosiers J, Rochette A. A national survey of occupational therapists' practices related to participation post-stroke. I Rehabil Med. 2008;40:291–297.
   Google Scholar
• Salter KL, Foley NC, Jutai JW,Teasell RW. Assessment of participation outcomes in randomized controlled trials of stroke rehabilitation interventions. Int I Rehabil Res. 2007;30:339–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sveen U, Bautz-Holter E, Sodring KM, Wyller TB, Laake K. Association between impairments, self-care ability and social activities 1 year after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21:372–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carod-Artal FJ, Gonzalez-Gutierrez IL, Herrero JAE, Horan T, De Seijas EV. Functional recovery and instrumental activities of daily living: follow-up 1-year after treatment in a stroke unit. Brain Inj. 2002;16:207–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann T, McKenna K, Cooke D, Tooth L. Outcomes after stroke: basic and instrumental activities of daily living, community reintegration and generic health status. Austr Occup Ther J. 2003:225–233.
   Google Scholar
• Schepers VP, Visser-Meily AM, Ketelaar M, Lindeman E. Prediction of social activity 1 year poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1472–1476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostir GV, Smith PM, Smith D, Ottenbacher KJ. Functional status and satisfaction with community participation in persons with stroke following medical rehabilitation. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005;17:35–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth EJ, Lovell L. Community skill performance and its association with the ability to perform everyday tasks by stroke survivors one year following rehabilitation discharge. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14:48–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette AM, Haley SM, Kooyoomjian JT. Are the ICF Activity and Participation dimensions distinct? I Rehabil Med. 2003;35:145–149.
   Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J. Muriel Driver Memorial Lecture. Participation and occupation. Can I Occup Ther. 2005;72:195–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cott CA, Wiles R, Devitt R. Continuity, transition and participation: preparing clients for life in the community post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1566–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Demers L, Robichaud L, Vincent C, Belleville S, Ska B. Short-term changes in and predictors of participation of older adults after stroke following acute care or rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:288–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. MONICA Project. Rev ed. Geneva: Cardiovascular Diseases Unit, WHO; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Hebert R, Guilbeault J. Systéme de mesure de l'autonomie fonctionnelle (SMAF). Guide d'utilisation. Rev ed. Sherbrooke, Quebec: Centre d'expertise de l'Institut universitaire de geriatrie de Sherbrooke; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hebert R, Dubuc N. Reliability of the revised functional autonomy measurement system (SMAF) for epidemiological research. Age Ageing. 1995;24:402–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert R, Carrier R, Bilodeau A. The Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF): description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps. Age Ageing. 1988;17:293–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCusker J, Bellavance F, Cardin S, Belzile É. Validity of an Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire among older patients in the Emergency Department. I Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:1023–1030.
   Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Rochette A, Noreau L, et al. Comparison of two functional independence scales with a participation measure in post-stroke rehabilitation. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2003;37:157–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, St-Michel G. Life Habits Measure - Shortened Version (LIFE-H 3.1). Lac St-Charles, Quebec, Canada: CQCIDIH; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Poulin V, Desrosiers J. Participation after stroke: comparing proxies' and patients' perceptions. Rehabil Med. 2008;40:28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Robichaud L, Fougeyrollas P, Rochette A, Viscogliosi C. Validity of the assessment of life habits in older adults. I Rehabil Med. 2004;36:177–182.
   Google Scholar
• Noreau L, Desrosiers J, Robichaud L, Fougeyrollas P, Rochette A, Viscogliosi C. Measuring social participation: reliability of the LIFE-H in older adults with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:346–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Vincent C. The LIFE-H: Assessment of the quality for social participation. Technol Disabil. 2002;14:113–118.
   Google Scholar
• Gowland C, VanHullenaar S, Torresin W, et al. Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment: Development, Validation and Administration Manual. Hamilton, Ontario: Chedoke-McMaster Hospitals and McMaster University; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke. 1993;24:58–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroop J. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. I Exp Psychol. 1935;18:135–141.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss E, Sherman EM, Spreen O. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod CM. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull. 1991;109:163–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesak MD. Neuropsychological Assessment. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Hanes KR, Andrewes DG, Smith DJ, Pantelis C. A brief assessment of executive control dysfunction: discriminantvalidity and homogeneity of planning, set shift, and fluency measures. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1996;11:185–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier L, Hebert R, Colarusso RP, Hammill DD. Motor-Free Visual Perception Test - Vertical. Novato, CA: American Therapy Publication; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Mercier L, Desrosiers J, Hebert R, Rochette A, Dubois M. Normative data for the motor-free visual perception test-vertical. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2001;19:39–50.
   Google Scholar
• Mercier L, Hebert R, Gauthier L. Motor Free Visual Perceptual Test: impact of vertical answer cards position on performance of adults with hemispatial neglect. Occup Then I Res. Fall 1995;15: 223–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. The Boston Naming Test. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson ST, Tompkins CA. Supplemental aphasia tests: freq uency of use and psychometric properties. Aphasiology. 1991;20:91–99.
   Google Scholar
• Thuillard Colombo F, Assal G. Adaptation française du test de denomination de Boston Versions abregees. Rev Eur Psychol Appl. 1992;42:67–71.
   Google Scholar
• Brink TL, Yesavage JA, Lum 0, Heersema PH, Adey M, Rose TL. Screening tests for geriatric depression. Clin Gerontol. 1982;1:37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Yesavage J. Geriatric Depression Scale. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988;24:709–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh JI, Yesavage JA. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontol. 1986;5(1/2):165–173.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell I. Depression. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. 3rd ed. Toronto: Oxford University Press; 2006: 329–393.
   Google Scholar
• Côte R, Battista R, Wolfson C, et al. The Canadian Neurological Scale: validation and reliability assessment. Neurology. 1989;39:638–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales ML, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. I Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–393.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th ed. Toronto: Allyn and Bacon; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Field A. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Gowland C. Predicting sensorimotor recovery following stroke rehabilitation. Physiother Can. 1984;36:313–320.
   Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A. Social participation of older adults in Quebec. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2004;16:406–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Bourbonnais D, Noreau L, Rochette A, Bravo G, Bourget A. Participation after stroke compared to normal aging. I Rehabil Med. 2005;37:353–357.
   Google Scholar
• Rochette A, Desrosiers J, Noreau L. Association between personal and environmental factors and the occurrence of handicap situations following a stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23:559–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levasseur M, Desrosiers J, St-Cyr Tribble D, Levasseur M, Desrosiers J, St-Cyr Tribble D. Do quality of life, participation and environment of older adults differ according to level of activity? Health Qua/Life Outcomes. 2008;6: 30–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond E. La Participation sociale, defi des societes vieillissantes. Quebec : Septembre 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L. Cost-efficiency of longer-stay rehabilitation programmes: can they provide value for money? Brain Inj. 2007;21:1015-1021.
   Google Scholar