Bibliography
- Miller A. Simplified pleading, meaningful days in court, and trials on the merits: reflections on the deformation of federal procedure. NY Univ Law Rev 2013;88:286-372
- Barnes & Noble Comments to Federal Trade Commission and U.S. Department of Justice Concerning Patent Litigation. 2013. Available from: http://www.ftc.gov/os/comments/pae/pae-0012.pdf
- Statt N. ReadWrite [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://readwrite.com/2013/04/29/weaponizing-the-patent-system-a-tiny-eyewear-startup-faces-financial-extinction#awesm=∼ojBIBL5Eq4VmHy
- Pénin J. Strategic uses of patents in markets for technology: a story of fabless firms, brokers and trolls. J Econ Behav Organ 2012;84(2):633-41
- Risch M. Wired [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/03/stop-blaming-the-trolls-or-we-wont-be-able-to-fix-the-patent-system/
- Merges RP. The trouble with trolls: innovation, rent-seeking, and patent law reform. Berkeley Tech Law J 2009;24(4):1583-614
- Fischer T, Henkel J. Patent trolls on markets for technology – an empirical analysis of NPEs' patent acquisitions. Res Policy 2012;41(9):1519-33
- Risch M. Patent troll myths. Seton Hall Law Rev 2012;42:457-99
- Scott Morton F, Shapiro C. Strategic Patent Acquisitions. 2013. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2288911
- Cotropia CA, Kesan JP, Schwartz DL. Patent Assertion Entities (PAEs) Under the Microscope: an Empirical Investigation of Patent Holders as Litigants. 2013. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2346381
- Intellectual property: assessing factors that affect patent infringement litigation could help improve patent quality. In: Office GA, editor. General Accounting Office, USA; 2013
- Tucker C. Patent Trolls and Technology Diffusion. 2012. 2013. [ 37 p]. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2136955
- Khan Z. Trolls and Other Patent Inventions: Economic History and the Patent Controversy in the Twenty-First Century. 2013. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2344853
- Lamoreaux NR, Sokoloff KL, Dhanoos S. Patent alchemy: the market for technology in US history. Bus Hist Rev 2013;87(1):3-38
- Hagiu A, Yoffie DB. The new patent intermediaries: platforms, defensive aggregators, and super-aggregators. J Econ Perspect 2013;27(1):45-65
- Pohlmann T, Opitz M. Typology of the patent troll business. R&D Manag 2013;43(2):103-20
- Bessen JE, Meurer MJ. The direct costs from NPE disputes. Cornell Law Rev 2014;99; forthcoming
- Schwartz DL, Kesan JP. Analyzing the role of non-practicing entities in the patent system. Cornell Law Rev 2014;99; forthcoming
- Morton FS, Shapiro C. Strategic Patent Acquisitions. 2013. [ 30 p]. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2288911
- Lemley MA, Shapiro C. Patent holdup and royalty stacking. Tex Law Rev 2007;85:1991-2049
- Reitzig M, Henkel J, Heath C. On sharks, trolls, and their patent prey—unrealistic damage awards and firms' strategies of “being infringed”. Res Policy 2007;36(1):134-54
- Golden JM. ‘Patent Trolls’ and patent remedies. Tex Law Rev 2007;85:51
- Green JR, Scotchmer S. On the division of profit in sequential innovation. Rand J Econ 1995;26(1):20-33
- Risch M. Patent portfolios as securities. Duke Law J 2013;63:89-154
- Elhauge E. Do patent holdup and royalty stacking lead to systematically excessive royalties? J Competition Law Econ 2008;4(3):535-70
- Sakakibara M. An empirical analysis of pricing in patent licensing contracts. Ind Corp Change 2010;19(3):927-45
- Lu JJ. The myths and facts of patent troll and excessive payment: have non-practicing entities (NPEs) been overcompensated? Bus Econ 2012;47(4):16