Bibliography
- Abelson MB, Smith L, Chapin M. Ocular allergic disease: mechanisms, disease sub-types, treatment. Ocul Surf 2003;1:127-49
- Majkowska-Wojciechowska B, Pelka J, Korzon L, et al. Prevalence of allergy, patterns of allergic sensitization and allergy risk factors in rural and urban children. Allergy 2007;62:1044-50
- Mah FS, Rosenwasser LJ, Townsend WD, et al. Efficacy and comfort of olopatadine 0.2% versus epinastine 0.05% ophthalmic solution for treating itching and redness induced by conjunctival allergen challenge. Curr Med Res Opin 2007;23:1445-52
- Alcon. Olopatadine hydrochloride solution, 0.2%, package insert. Fort Worth, TX: Alcon Laboratories, Inc. 2004
- Sharif NA, Xu SX, Yanni JM. Olopatadine (AL-4943A): ligand binding and functional studies on a novel, long acting H1-selective histamine antagonist and anti-allergic agent for use in allergic conjunctivitis. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 1996;12:401-7
- Nonaka H, Otaki S, Ohshima E, et al. Unique binding pocket for KW-4679 in the histamine H1 receptor. Eur J Pharmacol 1998;345:111-7
- Kamei C, Sugimoto Y, Nakamura S, Zhong C. Effect of (Z)-11-[3-(dimethylamino) propylidene]-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]oxepin-2-acetic acid hydrochloride on experimental allergic conjunctivitis and rhinitis in rats and guinea pigs. Arzneimittelforschung 1995;45:1005-8
- Yanni JM, Stephens DJ, Miller ST, et al. The in vitro and in vivo ocular pharmacology of olopatadine (AL-4943A), an effective anti-allergic/antihistaminic agent. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 1996;12:389-400
- Ikemura T, Manabe H, Sasaki Y, et al. KW-4679, an antiallergic drug, inhibits the production of inflammatory lipids in human polymorphonuclear leukocytes and guinea pig eosinophils. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1996;110:57-63
- Brockman H, Graff G, Spellman J, Yanni J. A comparison of the effects of olopatadine and ketotifen on model membranes. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl 2000;78:10-5
- Brockman HL, Momsen MM, Knudtson JR, et al. Interactions of olopatadine and selected antihistamines with model and natural membranes. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2003;11:247-68
- Yanni JM, Miller ST, Gamache DA, et al. Comparative effects of topical ocular anti-allergy drugs on human conjunctival mast cells. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1997;79:541-5
- Yanni JM, Weimer LK, Sharif NA, et al. Inhibition of histamine-induced human conjunctival epithelial cell responses by ocular allergy drugs. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:643-7
- Cook EB, Stahl JL, Barney NP, Graziano FM. Olopatadine inhibits TNF-alpha release from human conjunctival mast cells. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2000;84:504-8
- Cook EB, Stahl JL, Barney NP, Graziano FM. Olopatadine inhibits anti-immunoglobulin E-stimulated conjunctival mast cell upregulation of ICAM-1 expression on conjunctival epithelial cells. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2001;87:424-9
- Cook EB, Stahl JL, Sedgwick JB, et al. The promotion of eosinophil degranulation and adhesion to conjunctival epithelial cells by IgE-activated conjunctival mast cells. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2004;92:65-72
- Kaise T, Akamatsu Y, Ohmori K, et al. Effects of olopatadine hydrochloride on the release of thromboxane B2 and histamine from nasal mucosa after antigen-antibody reaction in guinea pigs. Allergol Int 2001;50:337-41
- Miyake K, Horikoshi K, Ikeda Y, et al. Effects of olopatadine hydrochloride on the increase of histamine and peptide-leukotrienes concentrations in nasal lavage fluid following the antigen-antibody reaction in actively sensitized guinea pigs. Jpn J Pharmacol 2001;85:453-6
- Kaise T, Ohmori K, Sakakura Y, Ukai K. The effect of KW-4679, an antiallergic drug, on experimental allergic rhinitis in guinea pigs: effects on nasal blockage. Jpn J Pharmacol 1995;69:435-8
- Abelson MB, Chambers WA, Smith LM. Conjunctival allergen challenge. A clinical approach to studying allergic conjunctivitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:84-8
- Abelson MB, Spitalny L. Combined analysis of two studies using the conjunctival allergen challenge model to evaluate olopatadine hydrochloride, a new ophthalmic antiallergic agent with dual activity. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;125:797-804
- Abelson MB. Evaluation of olopatadine, a new ophthalmic antiallergic agent with dual activity, using the conjunctival allergen challenge model. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1998;81:211-8
- Abelson MB, Pratt S, Mussoline JE, Townsend D. One-visit, randomized, placebo-controlled, conjunctival allergen challenge study of scanning and imaging technology for objective quantification of eyelid swelling in the allergic reaction with contralateral use of olopatadine and artificial tears. Clin Ther 2003;25:2070-84
- Abelson MB, Spangler D, Giovanoni A, Gomes P. Chemosis is an important diagnostic tool for evaluating new ophthalmic anti-allergic agents using the conjunctival allergen challenge model. American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, November 7 – 12, 1997, Poster #62
- Leonardi A, Abelson MB. Double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study of the mast cell-stabilizing effects of treatment with olopatadine in the conjunctival allergen challenge model in humans. Clin Ther 2003;25:2539-52
- Butrus S, Greiner JV, Discepola M, Finegold I. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and comfort of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution in the human conjunctival allergen challenge model. Clin Ther 2000;22:1462-72
- Abelson MB, Greiner JV. Comparative efficacy of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic suspension using the conjunctival allergen challenge model. Curr Med Res Opin 2004;20:1953-8
- Katelaris CH, Ciprandi G, Missotten L, et al. A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and cromolyn sodium 2% ophthalmic solution in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Clin Ther 2002;24:1561-75
- Ciprandi G, Turner D, Gross RD. Double-masked, randomized, parallel-group study comparing olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution with cromolyn sodium 2% and levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic preparations in children with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Curr Ther Res 2004;65:186-99
- Aguilar AJ. Comparative study of clinical efficacy and tolerance in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis management with 0.1% olopatadine hydrochloride versus 0.05% ketotifen fumarate. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl 2000;230:52-5
- Artal MN, Luna JD, Discepola M. A forced choice comfort study of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% versus ketotifen fumarate 0.05%. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl 2000;230:64-5
- Berdy GJ, Spangler DL, Bensch G, et al. A comparison of the relative efficacy and clinical performance of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and ketotifen fumarate 0.025% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival antigen challenge model. Clin Ther 2000;22:826-33
- Leonardi A, Zafirakis P. Efficacy and comfort of olopatadine versus ketotifen ophthalmic solutions: a double-masked, environmental study of patient preference. Curr Med Res Opin 2004;20:1167-73
- Spangler DL, Bensch G, Berdy GJ. Evaluation of the efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and azelastine hydrochloride 0.05% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model. Clin Ther 2001;23:1272-80
- Finegold I, Granet DB, D'Arienzo PA, Epstein AB. Efficacy and response with olopatadine versus epinastine in ocular allergic symptoms: a post hoc analysis of data from a conjunctival allergen challenge study. Clin Ther 2006;28:1630-8
- Lanier BQ, Finegold I, D'Arienzo P, et al. Clinical efficacy of olopatadine vs epinastine ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model. Curr Med Res Opin 2004;20:1227-33
- Berdy GJ, Stoppel JO, Epstein AB. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and loteprednol etabonate 0.2% ophthalmic suspension in the conjunctival allergen challenge model. Clin Ther 2002;24:918-29
- Deschenes J, Discepola M, Abelson M. Comparative evaluation of olopatadine ophthalmic solution (0.1%) versus ketorolac ophthalmic solution (0.5%) using the provocative antigen challenge model. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl 1999;38:47-52
- Alcon. Patanol® package insert. Fort Worth, Texas: Alcon Laboratories, Inc. 2003
- Brodsky M. Allergic conjunctivitis and contact lenses: experience with olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% therapy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl 2000;230:56-9
- Brodsky M, Berger WE, Butrus S, et al. Evaluation of comfort using olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers compared to placebo using the conjunctival allergen-challenge model. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:113-6
- du Toit R, Situ P, Simpson T, Fonn D. The effects of six months of contact lens wear on the tear film, ocular surfaces, and symptoms of presbyopes. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:455-62
- Dogru M, Ozmen A, Erturk H, et al. Changes in tear function and the ocular surface after topical olopatadine treatment for allergic conjunctivitis: an open-label study. Clin Ther 2002;24:1309-21
- Mah FS, O'Brien T, Kim T. Evaluation of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% in an allergic conjunctivitis patient population with dry eye. In: Western Society of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology 2007 Scientific Session , January 14 – 18, 2007, Wailea Maui, HI.
- Krokhmal L, Gomes P, Welch D, Abelson MB. The incidence of dry eye with topical anti-allergic therapies. In: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, May 6 – 10, 2007, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Poster #2300
- Abelson MB, Welch DL. An evaluation of onset and duration of action of patanol (olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%) compared to Claritin (loratadine 10 mg) tablets in acute allergic conjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl 2000;230:60-3
- Gupta G, Ousler GW, Pollard SD, Abelson MB. The comparative drying effects between Claritin® and Zyrtec® in normal adults. In: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, May 4 – 10, 2002, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
- Torkildsen G, Abelson MB. Comparison of topical and systemic anti-allergy treatments relative to ocular dryness. In: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, April 30 – May 4, 2006, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Poster #4976
- Abelson MB, Lanier RQ. The added benefit of local Patanol therapy when combined with systemic Claritin for the inhibition of ocular itching in the conjunctival antigen challenge model. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl 1999;228:53-6
- Spangler DL, Abelson MB, Ober A, Gotnes PJ. Randomized, double-masked comparison of olopatadine ophthalmic solution, mometasone furoate monohydrate nasal spray, and fexofenadine hydrochloride tablets using the conjunctival and nasal allergen challenge models. Clin Ther 2003;25:2245-67
- Berger W, Abelson MB, Gomes PJ, et al. Effects of adjuvant therapy with 0.1% olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution on quality of life in patients with allergic rhinitis using systemic or nasal therapy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2005;95:361-71
- Vogelson CT, Abelson MB, Pasquine T, et al. Preclinical and clinical antiallergic effect of olopatadine 0.2% solution 24 hours after topical ocular administration. Allergy Asthma Proc 2004;25:69-75
- Abelson MB, Gomes PJ, Pasquine T, et al. Efficacy of olopatadine ophthalmic solution 0.2% in reducing signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis. Allergy Asthma Proc 2007;28:427-33
- Abelson MB, Gomes PJ, Welch DL, et al. Olopatadine reduces ocular signs and symptoms associated with allergic conjunctivitis 16 hours after instillation. In: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, May 4 – 9, 2003, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
- Greiner JV, Spindel GP, Gomes PJ, et al. Olopatadine is effective for the prevention and treatment of the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis. In: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, May 4 – 9, 2003, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
- Abelson MB, Gomes PJ, Vogelson CT, et al. Clinical efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.2% compared with placebo in patients with allergic conjunctivitis or rhinoconjunctivitis: a randomized, double-masked environmental study. Clin Ther 2004;26:1237-48
- Abelson MB, Gomes PJ, Vogelson CT, et al. Effects of a new formulation of olopatadine ophthalmic solution on nasal symptoms relative to placebo in two studies involving subjects with allergic conjunctivitis or rhinoconjunctivitis. Curr Med Res Opin 2005;21:683-91
- Abelson MB, Raizman MB, Granet DB, O'Brien TP. Ocular allergy: Treatment goals & therapeutic evaluation. In: Eastern Allergy Conference, May 10 – 13, 2007, Palm Beach, FL.
- Lichtenstein SJ, Pasquine TA, Edwards MR, et al. Safety and tolerability of olopatadine 0.2% in children and adolescents. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2007;23:366-71
- Claxton AJ, Cramer J, Pierce C. A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin Ther 2001;23:1296-310
- Guest JF, Davie AM, Ruiz FJ, Greener MJ. Switching asthma patients to a once-daily inhaled steroid improves compliance and reduces healthcare costs. Prim Care Respir J 2005;14:88-98
- Schenker H, Maloney S, Liss C, et al. Patient preference, efficacy, and compliance with timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution versus timolol maleate ophthalmic solution in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ther 1999;21:138-47