Critical assessment of diabetic xerosis

Bibliography

• Romano G, Moretti G, Di Benedetto A, Skin lesions in diabetes mellitus: prevalence and clinical correlations. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1998;30:101-6
   Google Scholar
• Yosipovitch G, Hodak E, Vardi P, The prevalence of cutaneous manifestations in IDDM patients and their association with diabetes risk factors and microvascular complications. Diabetes Care 1998;21:506-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrits EG, Lutgers HL, Kleefstra N, Skin autofluorescence: a tool to identify type 2 diabetic patients at risk for developing microvascular complications. Diabetes Care 2008;31:517-21
   Google Scholar
• Uhoda E, Debatisse B, Paquet P, The so-called dry skin of the diabetic patient. Rev Med Liege 2005;60:560-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seite S, Khemis A, Rougier A, Ortonne JP. Importance of treatment of skin xerosis in diabetes. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2011;25:607-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leveque JL, Francois G, Sojic N, Giron F. A new technique to in vivo study the corenocyte features at the surface of the skin. Skin Res Technol 2008;14:468-71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon HS, Baik SH, Oh CH. Quantitative measurement of desquamation and skin elasticity in diabetic patients. Skin Res Technol 2002;8:250-4
   Google Scholar
• Sakai S, Kikuchi K, Satoh J, Functional properties of the stratum corneum in patients with diabetes mellitus: similarities to senile xerosis. Br J Dermatol 2005;153:319-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirao T, Denda M, Takahashi M. Identification of immature cornified envelopes in the barrier-impaired epidermis by characterization of their hydrophobicity and antigenicities of the components. Exp Dermatol 2001;10:35-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierard-Franchimont C, Pierard GE. Beyond a glimpse at seasonal dry skin: a review. Exogenous Dermatol 2002;1:3-6
   Google Scholar
• Serup J. EEMCO guidance for the assessment of dry skin (xerosis) and ichthyosis: clinical scoring systems. Skin Res Technol 1995;1:109-14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pierard GE. EEMCO guidance for the assessment of dry skin (xerosis) and ichthyosis: evaluation by stratum corneum strippings. Skin Res Technol 1996;2:3-11
   Google Scholar
• Pierard-Franchimont C, Petit L, Pierard GE. Skin surface patterns of xerotic legs: the flexural and accretive types. Int J Cosmet Sci 2001;23:121-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quatresooz P, Pierard GE. The visioscan-driven ULEV and SELS methods. In: Barel AO, Paye M, Maibach HI, editors. Handbook of cosmetic science and technology. 3rd edition. Publ. Informa Healthcare; New York, USA; 2009. p. 283-90
   Google Scholar
• Pierard-Franchimont C, Henry F, Pierard GE. The SACD method and the XLRS squamometry tests revisited. Int J Cosmet Sci 2000;22:437-46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takahashi M, Black D, Hughes B, Marks R. Exploration of a quantitative dansyl chloride technique for measurement of the rate of desquamation. Clin Exp Dermatol 1986;12:246-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierard-Franchimont C, Pierard GE. Cyanoacrylate skin surface strippings for visualising the stratum corneum structure and dynamics. In: Agache P, Humbert P, editors. Measuring the skin. Non invasive investigations, physiology, normal constants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Paye M, Simion A, Pierard GE. Dansyl chloride labelling of stratum corneum: its rapid extraction from skin predict skin irritation due to surfactants and cleansing products. Contact Dermat 1994;30:91-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumowski-Sunek D, Saurat JH. Systemic reaction during a dansyl chloride test. Dermatology 1992;185:73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhoda E, Pierard-Franchimont C, Debatisse B, Repair kinetics of stratum corneum under repeated insults. Exogenous Dermatol 2004;3:7-11
   Google Scholar
• Berardesca E. EEMCO guidance for the assessment of stratum corneum hydration: electrical methods. Skin Res Technol 1997;3:126-32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischer TW, Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P. Assessment of “dry skin”: current bioengineering methods and tests designs. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 2001;14:183-95
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee CM, Maibach HI. Bioengeneering analysis of water hydration: an overview. Exogenous Dermatol 2002;1:269-75
   Google Scholar
• Leveque JL, Xhauflaire-Uhoda E, Pieard GE. Skin capacitance imaging, a new technique for investigating skin surface properties. Eur J Dermatol 2006;16:500-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xhauflaire-Uhoda E, Pierard GE, Quatresooz P. The skin landscape following nonoptical capacitance imaging. Am J Clin Dermatol 2010;11:89-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazin R, Laquieze S, Rosillo A, Leveque JL. Photoaging of the chest analyzed by capacitance imaging. Skin Res Technol 2008;14:23-9
   Google Scholar
• German GK, Engl WC, Pashkovski E, Heterogeneous drying stresses in stratum corneum. Biophys J 2012;102:2424-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xhauflaire-Uhoda E, Mayeux G, Quatresooz P, Facing up to the imperceptible perspiration. Modulation influences by diabetic neuropathy, physical exercise and antiperspirant. Skin Res Technol 2011;17:487-93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noel F, Pierard-Franchimont C, Pierard GE, Quatresooz P. Sweaty skin, background and assessments. Int J Dermatol 2012;51:647-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrofsky JS, Lee S, Patterson C, Sweat production during global heating and during isometric exercise in people with diabetes. Med Sci Monit 2005;11:CR515-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provitera V, Nolano M, Caporaso G, Evaluation of sudomotor function in diabetes using the dynamic sweat test. Neurology 2010;74:50-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierard GE; the EEMCO group. EEMCO guidance for the efficacy assessment of antiperspirants and deodorants. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 2003;16:324-42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Draelos ZD, Yatskayer M, Raab S, Oresajo C. An evaluation of the effect of a topical product containing C-xyloside and blueberry extract on the appearance of type II diabetic skin. J Cosmet Dermatol 2009;8:147-51
   Google Scholar
• Loden M. The clinical benefit of moisturizers. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2005;19:672-88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi VY, Tran K, Lio PA. A comparison of physicochemical properties of a selection of modern moisturizers: hydrophilic index and pH. J Drugs Dermatol 2012;11:633-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham HT, Exelbert L, Segal-Owens A, A prospective, randomized, controlled double-blind study of a moisturizer for xerosis of the feet in patients with diabetes. Ost Wound Manag 2002;48:30-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pavicic T, Korting HC. Xerosis and callus formation as a key to the diabetic foot syndrome: dermatologic view of the problem and its management. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2006;4:935-41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quatresooz P, Pierard-Franchimont C, Szepetiuk G, Fungal chitin-glucan scaffold for managing diabetic xerosis of the feet in menopausal women. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2009;10:2221-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seite S, Khemis A, Rougier A, Importance of treatment of skin xerosis in diabetes. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2011;25:607-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierard GE, Seite S, Hermanns-Le T, The skin landscape in diabetes mellitus. Focus on dermocosmetic management. Dermatol Ther; In press
   Google Scholar
• Garrigue E, Martini J, Cousty-Pech F, Evaluation of the moisturizer Pedimed® in the foot care of diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab 2011;37:330-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar