Advances in the staging of renal cell carcinoma

References

• Northway RO, Ritenour CWM, Marshall FE Renal cell carcinoma: an overview. AUA Update Series 20 (25), 194–200 (2002) .
   Google Scholar
• Jemal A, Thomas A, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer Statistics, 2002. CA Cancer 1 Clinicians 52,23–47 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Flocks RH, Kadesky MC. Malignant neoplasms of the kidney: an analysis of 353 patients followed five years or more. J. Urol 79,196–201 (1958).
   Google Scholar
• •Original renal cell carcinoma staging system proposed by Flocks and Kadesky in 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Robson CJ. Radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J. Urol. 89,37–42 (1963).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.j Urol. 101,297–301 (1969).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••Modifications to the Flocks staging systemsuggested by Robson that maintains its popularity among physicians.
   Google Scholar
• Holland JM. Cancer of the kidney — natural history and staging. Cancer 32, 1030–1042 (1973).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner DG, Colvin RB, Vermillion CD et al Diagnosis and management of renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 28,1165–1177 (1971).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •Demonstrates that renal vein involvement by itself does not significantly alter survival when compared with Ti tumors.
   Google Scholar
• McNichols DVV, Segura JVV, de Weerd JH. Renal cell carcinoma: long-term survival and late recurrence. J. Uml. 126,17-23 (1981).
   Google Scholar
• Vircli JS, Kelly DG. Prognostic value of renal venous involvement in renal carcinoma. Br. J. Uml. 69,481–485 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Guinan P, Saffrin R, Stuhldreher D, Frank W Rubenstein M. Renal cell carcinoma: comparison of the TNM and Robson stage groupings. J. Surgical Oncology 59,186–189 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• •Good comparison between the two widely-used staging systems.
   Google Scholar
• Guinan P, Vogelzang NJ, Fremgen AM et al Renal cell carcinoma: tumor size, stage andsurvival.j Um/. 153,901–903 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Bassil B, Dosoretz DE, Prout GR. Validation of the tumor, nodes and metastasis classification of renal cell carcinoma. J. Uml. 134,450–454 (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Sobin LH, Hermanek P, Huller RVP TNM classification of malignant tumors: a comparison between the new (1987) and the old editions. Cancer61, 2310–2314 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •Compares the two TNM staging systems.
   Google Scholar
• Hermanek P, Schrott KM. Evaluation of the new tumor, nodes and metastases classification of renal cell carcinoma. J. Uml. 144,238–242 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Targonski PV, Frank W Stuhldreher D, Guinan P Value of tumor size in predicting survival from renal cell carcinoma among tumors, nodes and metastasis stage 1 and stage 2 patients. J. Urol. 152,1389-1392 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Schroder FH, Cooper EH, Debruyne FMJ et al. TNM classification of genitourinary tumours 1987 — position of the EORTC genitourinary group. Br. J. Urol 62,502–510 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• •Arguments against the revisions in the 1987 TNM staging system.
   Google Scholar
• Gettman MT, Blute ML, Spotts B, Bryant SC, Zincke H. Pathologic staging of renal cell carcinoma: significance of tumor classification with the 1997 TNM staging system. Cancer91,354–361 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• ••Study showing the efficacy and validity ofthe new 1997 TNM staging system.
   Google Scholar
• Moch H, Gasser T, Amin M et a/. Prognostic utility of the recently recommended histologic classification and revised TNM staging system of renal cell carcinoma: a swiss experience with 588 tumors. Cancer 89, 604–614 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Javidan J, Stricker HJ, Tamboli P et al. Prognostic significance of the 1997 TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma. J. Uml. 162,1277-1281 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• ••Another study demonstrating thesignificance of the 1997 TNM staging system.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui KH, Shvarts O, Smith RB et al. Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria. J. Urol. 163,1090-1095 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Zisman A, Pantuck AJ, Dorey F et al. Improved prognostication of renal cell carcinoma using an integrated staging system. 1 Clin. arca 19,1649–1657 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• •Suggests the inclusion of other parameters such as histological grade and performance status in staging RCC.
   Google Scholar
• Harmer M. 77VMCIassification of Malignant Tumour International Union Against Cancer, Geneva, Switzerland (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Hermanek P, Sobin LH. TAM Classification of Malignant THROWS, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Sobin LH, Wittekind C, International Union Against Cancer ((1CC): TAM Classification of Malignant Tumours, Wiley-Liss Publications, NY, USA, (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Hafez KS, Fergany AF, Novick AC. Nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of tumor size on patient survival, tumor recurrence and TNNI staging. J. Urol. 162,1930-1933 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Polascik TJ, Marshall FE Partial nephrectomy for renal tumors. AUA Update 5eries20(21), 162–168 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Novick AC. Nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Ann. Rev Med. 53, 393–407 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••Latest overview on the role of nephron-sparing stirgery.
   Google Scholar
• Lau WK, Blute ML, Weaver AL, Torres VE, Zincke H. Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs. nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral rebal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney. Mayo Clin. Proc. 75 (12), 1233–1235 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Belldegrun A, Tsui KH, deKernion JB, Smith RB. Efficacy of nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: analysis based on the new 1997 Tumor-Node-Metastasis staging system. J. Clin. arca 9, 2868–2875 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Ghavamian R, Zincke H. Nephron-sparing Surgery. CUIT: Um]. Reports 2,34–39 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• •Reviews the current opinion regarding nephron-sparing stu-gery.
   Google Scholar
• Ghavamian R, Cheville JC, Lohse CM et al. Renal cell carcinoma in the solitary kidney: an analysis of complications and outcome after nephron sparing surgery. J. Urol. 168,454–459 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner SE, Hawkins CA, Blute ML et al. Disease outcome in patients with low stage renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron sparing or radical surgery. J. Urol. 155, 1868–1873 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CT, Katz J, Shi W et al Surgical management of renal tumors 4 cm or less in a contemporary cohort. J. Urol 163,730 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Russo P, Goetzl M, Simmons R et al. Partial nephrectomy: the rationale for expanding the indications. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 9(7), 680–687 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• McClennan BL. Oncologic imaging: staging and follow-up of renal and adrenal carcinoma. Cancer 67,1199–1208 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bechtold RE, Zagoria RJ. Imaging approach to staging of renal cell carcinoma. Urologic Clin. N. Am. 24,507–522 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohan RH. Detection and characterization of renal masses and staging of renal cancers: new considerations in the era of helical computed tomography. Sem Urol. Oncol. 20 (3), 166–173 (2002) .
   Google Scholar
• •Reviews the latest imaging advances in assessing RCC.
   Google Scholar
• Dinney CPN, Awad SA, Gajewski JB et al. Analysis of imaging modalities, staging systems and prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma. Urol. 39,122–129 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zagoria RJ, Bechtold RE, Dyer RB. Staging of renal adenocarcinoma: role of various imaging procedures. Arm j Roentgenol. 164, 363–370 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uzzo RG, Novick AC. Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J. Urol 166,6–18 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui KH, Shvarts O, Barbaric Z et al. Is adrenalectomy a necessary component of radical nephrectomy? UCLA experience with 511 radical nephrectomies. j Urol. 163(2), 437–441 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Moudouni SM, En-Nia I, Patard JJ et al. Real indications for adrenalectomy in renal cell carcinoma. Scand. I Urol. Nephrol. 36(4), 273–277 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Wunderlich H, Schlichter A, Reichelt O et al. Real indications for adrenalectomy in renal cell carcinoma. European Urol. 35(4), 272–276 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Ditonno P, Traficante A, Battaglia M, Grossi FS, Selvaggi FR Role of lymphadenectomy in renal cell carcinoma. Frog. Gun. Biol. Res. 378,169–174 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blom JHIVI, van Poppel H, Marechal JM et al. Radical nephrectomy with and without lymph node dissection: preliminary results of the EORTC randomized Phase III protocol 30881. European Urol. 36(6), 570–575 (1999).
   Google Scholar